Where is the line between cinema and porn ?
When does a film stop being cinema and become pornography ?
I remember a lot of people ( mostly americans) getting really triggered over the sex scenes in La Vie d' Adéle, saying it went too far and made the rest of the movie irrelevant.
Other urls found in this thread:
xvideos.com
twitter.com
who is this semon demen
If you ejaculate while watching it it's not a film. I think the difference in intent is clear.
Her rubbing her pussy goes over the pornography line easily.
source
Clearly porn
What film
Pornography has no definition. Anything that contemporary considers smut is called so. In a 100 years every DP scene will be considered art.
She seems to have some sort of modesty thing over her pussy though
>When does a film stop being cinema and become pornography ?
As defined in US obscenity laws the key word is "prurient interests."
Which is to say "is there any artistic merit to this, or is it just there to be sleazy."
>a white dude
No thanks
what tv show and/or pornography is this?
Depends on the culture
If that was American i'd say its porn
If it was from mainland Europe i'd say its some artsy type movie
If her tits are that big its absolutely porn, cinema only features small breasted women. Its a simple and clear distinction really.
It's a movie
It must involve a black man to be considered pornography.
80 iq post
In 100 years a simple kiss on tv might be considered indecent, don't try to predict the future
Everything is fucking
Nigger. Fight me.
this is a dumb answer. many would ejaculate at emma stone in lalaland or any other regular "film"
and it's called....?
>golden shower on the right
Oh mama
In the OP's scene it's a flashback of some student's life in the sex industry. Out of context you could just say it's porn though.
Erect male penis. As soon as it shows up, it's a porno.
First of all if its for a Film Festival they can get away with twice as much nudity and sex than your typical American R rated film.
Then on top of that your movie is French. Like come on dude, have you seen Blue is the Warmest Color? Im sure theyre gonna be the first ones to show actual penetration.
Can we please get sauce on OP's webm before the thread goes 404
In context too. It is clearly unnecessarily graphic
Don't be so pretentious
5 days has been added to your BLACKED subscription. Thanks for #BlackingTheRecord!
>In context too. It is clearly unnecessarily graphic
no penis is shows
vagina is hidden, it's very not that explicit
the piss and spit are what triggers you
Is it La Vie d' Adéle, the movie mentioned in the OP?
for real the answer is acting and overall production aspects but mainly acting.
You can tell this webm is acting - the crying, the makeup, lighting etc.
real porn is either too gaudy (cheesy; bad acting because the focus is sex) or it's like porn gone wrong (efukt; legit crying etc. Even when someone is a good actor, you can tell when they're being legit. it's subtle and to do with reading expressions and nuance of collective behaviour ie/ something autists struggle with)
yeah the brackets in this post are fucked but I shan't be editing it.
There really isn't a line, and pornography can have artistic merit.
Are you confessing to this?
Is that hannah hilton?
Yeah, is there some sort of rule that states these things must be shown? No, I'm sure with some creativity they could have implied these events without showing them.
>he never saw the sex scenes of Blue is the Warmest Color
No they aren't the same movie
What fuck is wrong with you OP!
Give us sauce already!
no. just pointing out how strange it is to make your comment on Sup Forums of all places
Context is the answer, but I don't think there's a discernible line exactly.
those are some sexy semicolons
The only people to ever jerk off to Lalaland are Hollywood faggots and their ilk.
No, that's the french name for blue is the warmest colour.
>the piss and spit are what triggers you
Well yeah. And the pussy rubbing as someone pointed out. In fact I consider the entire scene unnecessary. There are other ways to show this. This is for entertainment purposes only
>what is an example
found the aspie
Obviously it depends on the intentions of the project itself.
The context IS the key to establishing if its prurient or not. Of course it ultimately comes down to the judges decision.
I can't think of any actual trial for indecency in a long fucking time though. Not since the Tipper-sticker became a thing with music.
Her spitting on his palm is probably the hottest thing about this
>This is for entertainment purposes only
So is the movie faggot
Gotcha. Sounds like I've gotta check that movie out.
Joanna Kulig
Elles
So all of Sapphic Erotica and Viv Thomas is art.
I agree.
Top lad
thank you
Are you retarded?
>calls someone a nigger
>proceeds to resort to violence like a nigger
2/10 really who is the nigger?
I think sex is always a distraction but it can't destroy a good story.
I still think the worst part of 9 songs is not the sex. That made sense. It was the other mediocre parts that were boring.
Such low ratings.
Meh
>34
throw it in le garbage
mah nigga
>the girl isn't Japanese
garbage
Any more pisskino?
did she really let herself get peed on? wtf
A pornographic film is meant for sexual pleasure. A cinematic film with lots of sex is a visual pleasure. Please watch "Caligula", nothing will ever be the same. I saw it when I was 12, now I'm a male prostitute.
I thought there was an unspoken agreement that we wouldnt spoonfed them the source ?
I don't think there is a clear line. Every person, country and culture has it's own rules. I can list countless porn films that have better stories and sometimes acting that some Hollywood crap they shovel today. In the same way I can list creative projects that are just an excuse to show off naked women on screen. I think the goal is to project children and those who do not wish to see this kind of art from seeing it and give an avenue to those who do.
Sex can enhance and climax a story (no pun intended)
Tell me Blue is the Warmest would be as good without the sex scenes
Watch more European cinema, we're quite relaxed about nudity here
Some people aren't faggots.
Those tits are fucking amazing.
She looks so horny
This is definitely in porno category, I think it depends on how graphic the sex is
That being said making sex graphic like this is something edgy euro filmmakers like to do
You're such a faggot, that pun should have been intended
>mfw massive piss fetish
le nonymoose is legun!!11!11
See
cinema and porn are not mutually exclusive
>Tell me Blue is the Warmest would be as good without the sex scenes
it would be as good as it is with the sex scenes
that is not good at all, but there would be even less reasons to watch it without porn
there's no line
Well i guess Schindler's List isn't a film after all.
I never got piss fetishes
My gf wanted me to piss on her, not only was it weird and forced me to change sheets afterwards, it's fucking HARD to piss with a boner
you are an stupid edgy kid,Sup Forums is for dscussing tv related things not to be the edgy champion autist of your supossed secret club.
Probably a plastic bladder taped to his torso with a tube going down to his dick. They use them in japanese porn, they hide them with the censoring
Keked
and again
look at those jugs
do it after you cum then
fucking sneaky slants
It's hard to explain fetishes, lad. I'd like nothing more than to have a line of sluts borderline drown me in piss, but feet fetishes gross me out. Makes no fucking sense to me, but there it is.
that's why you piss on her in the bathtub
Porn is when they show benis in bagina for real.
There is no line between cinema and porn as a film can contain pornographic content just fine.
I have autism
Peeing right after cumming hurts my weewee
My ex wanted me to piss inside her while fucking.
It wouldn't come out though and i was scared that forcing it too hard to make me shit myself.
or it is another thing entirely
xvideos.com
This. Flaccid is ok.
I really fucking want to do this. You lucky bastard.