My professor shared this in our intellectual leftist whatsapp group

My professor shared this in our intellectual leftist whatsapp group

Is pol/ irredimably BTFO?

>checks flag
>not white

Sounds like even this faggot is willing to

MAKE

>argentinian """"""intellectual""""""

You see, he doesn't realize everyone on the right is also unified under one belief. We all hate shitskin Argentinians

>Implying that the left doesn't have it's own ideologies
>Implying that the left wing is cohesive at all

The "genius in the art of persuasion" exists...

It keeps all the ideologues on the left in line because

>my gibbmedats

The left thinks that lying to its own supporters is effective in the long run.

>mfw

Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line-Karl Marx

>leftist """""""""intellectual"""""""""

WAIT

HOL UP

SO YOU BE SAYIN

WE WUZ POLITCALLY DIVERSE AN SHIEEET

>argentina- "intellectual" lefists

Will you be defaulting on all your debts again? Worse than Greece, you slimy fucks just say "we're not paying anything"

>hambrientinians intellectuals

>We wuv "Evita" n ' sheit....

>leftist intellectual
Might as well have said "unicorn" instead

A poor porto faget who literally changed his name, made some shit films and reviewed films for a living which any smuck with a dvd player can do and also died in poverty is Argentina's prized example of left intellectism.

So basically the left are indeed nothing more than highly manipulated drones susceptible to group think. Where as the right can think for themselves. ok.

>Leftist intellectual

>My (((((((professor)))))) shared this in our intellectual leftist whatsapp group

So basically what he's saying is diversity is bad?

>Equality and justice for all
Wow that's really fucking specific and not something nearly every group on the political spectrum has in their mission statement.

>But my definition of equality and justice is better than yours!
That's about as narrow minded as believing the left can't be just as fragmented as the right.

No right winger wants equality

>Leftist Intellectuals
>There are no subcategories to the broad group that is "leftists"

So Centre-left, Social Democrats, Socialists, Marxists and Hard-core Communists all have the same social political ideals? Is that seriously what this guy is suggesting?

One post by this ID

>Socialism
>Communism
>Libertarian Socialism
>Democratic Socialism
>Liberals
>Democrats
>AnarchoCommunism

Just to name a few.

They are just degrees of the same thing

Right wing ideologies can't be quantified, they work on entirely different paradigms, as Chomsky notes

>Degrees of the same thing
In what sense? You say that "leftists" are united in the pursuit of equality, yet equality itself is an arbitrary term which not everyone agrees on. To what degree of equality? To what end should you pursue that equality?

Just look at how the right wing is eating itself over the police shootings. Libertarians hate the police, while Conservatives love it.

Most of them do.

It's just that not all believe that equality is about dem programs.

Again it's about how you define equality and how exactly you would go about achieving when no one is quite literally equal.

The bongs should have finished the job

You're avoiding my answer I see, to be suspected.

It is true, the Republican Party has prided itself for having a broad coalition of views, however it is worth noting that those views are not all equal in number, For instance, there are far less An-Caps - as your quote points out - than Christians.

How about what is currently occuring in the Democrat party? Bernie Sanders and his supporters with considerable momentum are attempting to drag the party left, clashing with more traditionally centrist Democrats. Clinton risks losing votes to Stein if she not give concessions, and if she does, then risks losing votes to even Trump.

Your political view is too narrow and simplified.

>Getting Democrats to agree on a course of action was like herding cats, while the Republicans didn’t seem to have this problem. ~ Bill Clinton

>I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat. ~ Will Rogers

The left is a coalition of minority groups and economic and social liberals.

I don't even know where to begin

thanks OP am now mentally hill

>right can be anything as long as he's not left wing
Retarded argument

The left is currently eating itself precisely because they don't really agree on anything except that they hate republicans.

This """"""""intellectual"""""""" is a retarded monkey.

Why is Jaoa Cesar Monteiro, a long-dead Portuguese filmmaker, discussing American politics as though he's actually American?

It's retarded as fuck, the average leftard is so fanatical to the way he can't even agree on anything with another leftist...

In France we used to joke on the leftist saying that two leftist form a political party but three leftist form a split...

We on the right have much more ease to unify ourselves, we only need to shout slogans against the leftards and shitskins while you need to make enough leftard feel like your aganda is radical enough.

>The left wing is cohesive

The Left is anything but egalitarian. That's why they're separated into Feminists, LBGT, BLM, Black Panther Party, Occupy Wall Street, Occupy San Diego, Occupy Etcetera, Anonymous, La Raza, Nation of Islam, Refugees Welcome, Green Party, this shit goes on and on. The Left is nothing but special interests, there is no Left-Wing egalitarian movement anywhere, because equality is not Left-Wing.

Naw this ain't real in fact the opposite is more likely. Take for example the Spanish Civil War, although the right-wing forces had many ideologies, Carlism, Fascism, Conservativism, Monarchism, etc. In the end like more right-wing forces do they accepted the authority of the dominant ideology, Fascism/Falangism. The left-wing force on the other hand spent most of the time fighting among themselves as they refuse to accept authority of anyone but themselves. This lead to the split of the Left-wing forces along Soviet and Anarchist lines and ultimately lead to their downfall and the success of the right. Better yet think of how many Bernbots aren't going to vote for Hillary cause they didn't get their way vs how many miscellaneuous republican aren't going to vote for trump because they didn't get their way...

he obviously doesnt know many leftists

>genius in the art of persuasion

Your professor just posted a meme instead of being able to use his own communication skills to make a point

So that shows he is garbage

The left was never united, why do you think they are so many lefty parties in Argentina?

Try again.

>Left wing is cohesive
>Left wing is filled with various splinter SJW groups that cannibalize each other when they aren't attacking themselves.

Just genderfluid my party up senpai.

>nigs
>spics
(US only, here its Maori and Islanders. Who in turn have divisions and are often actually right wing)

also
>fags
>feminists
>environmentalists
>muslims

Seems like the left has divisions also. Granted they will work together for a common cause, but so will the right. As we type the right is more appealing to moderates. Immigration and economy are more important to the typical moderate than checking privilege and promoting transsexualism.

Whiter than you

There's a reason the Republican party is the party of "no."
Right-wing ideology is just a narrow-minded cultural perspective. What fiction is the one "true" one? There are right-wing groups all over the world and the only thing they have in common is they believe they're right and everyone else is wrong. Sort of hard to rally around "we all can't stand each other."

Left-wing movements have always been notorious for factionalism and schisms over doctrine and dogma.

Right-wing movements are typically less systematized by nature, and are typically brought together by nothing more than common interests, which counter intuitively makes them more cooperative and agreeable since they perceive a common enemy in the Left.

pretty embarrassing flop there man

The right want equal opportunities

The left want equal results

>left wing is cohesive
>literally eating each other over who is more of a victim

That's fucking hysterical. The american left is a collection of a thousand different special interest groups, most of whom have nothing in common with one another. I'm not a conservative either btw.

Nice try 'white' guy.

Diversity is our strength.

We abolished slavery in 1812 Ahmed

We abolished your navy in 1982 Daquan

Yeah. So when leftists finally reveal their power level and take over and move from socialism to communism, they always end up killing each other. I mean literally gunning each other down and assassinating each other.

I think it was the other way around Muhammad

Whats wrong with a little diversity?

>leftist intellectual

WUZ

LIBERALS BTFO BY EMPEROR CLINTON

Sorry that we never bothered sinking your bath toys Tyrone

>Can you imagine what kind of genius in the art of persuasion would be required to appeal to all of them at the same time, and then go on to appeal to moderates and win a national election?

Who indeed?

Nah. After the sinking of the Belgrano the Argentinian navy pussied and hid for the rest of the war. That's why the Brits didn't sink another Argie ship.
All the British vessels which were put out of combat weren't sank or damaged by actual Argentinian vessels. They were sank or damaged by the French provided Exocets.

Falklands War was quite retarded desu, senpai. Just as retarded as if we declared war on the US over the Philippines.

The numbers represent how many people died in the sinking.

>the left wing is cohesive
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA remember when Omar shot up those gays and the left collapsed in on itself figuring out who to support or whether just to push the gun agenda? Holy fuck that's so wrong it hurts my sides

It was retarded.

But it doesn't change the fact that what he said was wrong. Our Air Force rekt their Navy, despite they having satellite intelligence from the USA. Our pilots would fly at dangerous almost sea level to avoid radar detection and strike with Exocets in daring sweeps.

It was pretty heroic.
A pointless war, but a pretty gentlemany affair. Both sides fought honourably.

Your navy literally ran to port after the Belgrano sank. Britain didn't have the luxury, they were thousands of miles from home.

So he's saying the left are all sheep, and the right are free thinkers. OK, I agree with that.

commies btfo desu

You're actually pretty cool for a nigger. Sorry about what I said earlier. It was a good, fun war for both of us.

Because Middle Eastern Muslims, Nation of Islam Black Muslims/Black Power Organizations, Feminists, LGBTIQ, Non-Zionist Jews, Environmentalist, Communists, Democratic Socialists, La Raza, Liberal Globalists, Unions, and the unwashed masses of average minorities that don't fall into any of the above groups are all 100% unified with one another and have no fundamental disagreements.

Literally who?
>that hook nose

Don't worry Sayid, I can handle the banter
Cheers m8

Well, he's clearly wrong (or more likely lying) about what the left hopes to achieve, but I think he is correct that the right is not cohesive. That's why the left has successfully managed the long march through the institutions and managed to put people in terror of agreeing with them. They have no true ideaological opposition.

That said, the actual left that exists, while far larger than any rightwing leadership, is managing a bunch of disparate groups of useful idiots. Literally every leftwing group hates all the other groups and are only united by handouts and fear of nonconformance (depending on group). Blacks hate hispanics and vice versa, muslims have nothing in common with feminists at the end of the day (other than burning all western thought), etc.

Everyone needs to calm down because the exact opposite it true. Anyone trying to justify why it's ok for the left to be cohesive, but the right to be some sort of "splitering faction" needs to stop trying to justify something that's entirely not true. It is the left that is a mangled group of interests which are not aligned with each other. A barely cohesive group that is only united by it's hatred for white people, in fact. Low income blacks, illegal immigrants, high income white gays, atheists, union blue collar workers, globalist free traders, trannys, musilms, native americans. What do these people have in common except their hatred for straight white males? This is literally the only issue that they've all been taught to focus on equally. Meanwhile their whites are taught to display their white guilt so as to appease the minorities.

he's right in the sense that the reason Republicans havent won an election by a massive margin in decades is because they became conservative idealogues that cannot appeal to the center.

But that's what trump is. he is the anti-Goldwater.

>leftist intellectual

>leftist intellectual

>nazis
>NATIONAL
>SOCIALISTS

>RIGHT WING
professor where, the university of dumb fucking niggers?

I would add that even the sentence

>the only thing they all have in common is the fact that they are not leftists

does not prove an impossibility for a Republican president. A motley group of people who unite against leftist ideologies is nonetheless united group of people. I assume most would have no issues compromising the extraneous details if all are at least sure of what they do not want to give power to.

No, the right is more coherent than he gives it credit for. Every genuine rightist ideology is anti-egalitarian, anti-globalist, and in favor of some sort of heirarchy. Neocons come from the left, and libertarians/ancaps can fall into either the left (C4SS) or right (Mises Institute). The right is way more diverse than the left, but it wouldn't be hard to see all strands of the right come together against leftism, like the alt-right proves

Volvé a la UBA bobo

You fucking leftists, it's not about equality, it's about fairness and justice, not everyone deserves to be treated equally, a black person who acts like a criminal does not deserve being equally treated to a normal human being

He's a kike, isn't he? Or a commie brainwashed by kikes.

fascism isnt a winged form of government or politics. leftist are the fascists in the modern age

>left is cohesive
>BLM vs LGBTQQAHSYDTF happened just a few days ago
Was this supposed to be a joke?

Exactly.

The right is diverse, and agrees on the important points. They have a cohesive ideology with minor disagreements on disagreement.

The left is scattered. They don't agree on anything. On methodology, on ideology, or anything, but they sometimes align in anger, stupidity, and vague ideals of unity. That's about it.

The right is far more cohesive, it's just that fewer people come to those ideals and leftism is inclusive and easy.

simply put:
chaos vs. order
>left vs. right

BUILD WALL... but you can do it from our side :3

Anyone that thinks the left is unified has never seen their protests. Watch anything from the Battle of Seattle to the Occupy shit, there's little unifying them besides a distaste for the "establishment." A lack of cohesion and infighting is why any of these "movements" have all failed spectacularly, to say nothing of the old school ideologues that killed each other on a regular basis during their revolutions in the pre-modern era.

>disagreements on disagreement

Fuck me I'm distracted, disagreements on implementation.

>in Canada, 26% of the total population figures are "mixed origin"
>so we'll call half mestizo and half mulatto

In Canada, "Mixed Origin" means half English/Scottish/Irish/German/etc and half French

Jesus fucking Christ Argentina

The problem with the pussy mentality of leftists is that they think that peace, love and submission is the answer to everything, but then you end up having a society full of religious extremists, feminists, homosexuals, drug addicts, criminals, among other degenerates...

My professor shared this in our intellectual nazi whatsapp group

Is reddit irredeemably BTFO?

Ask him why anarchists and marxists are best buddies then

>the democrats are a left wing party
topkek

But I thought diversity was a good thing