False flag in Saudi Arabia

Believe it or not, the Saudi government itself is most likely behind the attacks in Madinah, Al-Qatif, and Jeddah.

The attacks were clearly intended to cause very small amounts of damage in an empty and localized area. Two of the three attacks had no casualties at all, and the one in Madinah was in the middle of a parking lot with empty cars, where the casualties seemed unintended.

A rundown of the details:

- Madinah: The attack in Madinah took place in the middle of a parking lot full of empty cars (picture of the small area of damage: imgur.com/OFJXH6e). The explosion didn't damage more than a few of the surrounding vehicles, and the windows were not even blown out of many the vehicles right next to source of the explosion (see the windows of the SUV: imgur.com/Zos3sqc). This was clearly a small detonation meant more to aggravate public opinion than to cause widespread damage and destruction as a suicide bomber would normally seek to achieve.

- Al-Qatif: The attack in Al-Qatif had no casualties, and took place on an empty side street. It barely damaged even the building next to it, much less the nearby vehicles (imgur.com/3p5Z3UJ). Again, clearly a small detonation intended more for effect than actual damage.

- The attack in Jeddah is interesting. The "suicide bomber" blew himself up in an empty parking lot across the street from the US consulate, and no one was killed or harmed seriously (bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36700635). Only one vehicle was damaged (seen here: imgur.com/YiKeuQK).

All three attacks took place in areas that were empty or almost empty. The casualties (people hurt or killed) seem only incidental and not intentional, as the attacks seemed intended for empty areas. And all three attacks could have easily been done via vehicles rigged to detonate or a bag placed on the ground with explosives in them.

Other urls found in this thread:

state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/07/259358.htm).
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Now, if you are not willing to believe that the Saudi government was behind it, then at least know that they seem to be now moving to use these events to justify sending troops into Syria to work WITH the US efforts to help bring Syria under Bashar's control, under the guise of - as Salman put it: "striking with an iron fist."

The Saudi Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir and US Secretary of State John Kerry met in a sudden and unscheduled meeting on July 5th to discuss Saudi's offer to send troops into Syria (state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/07/259358.htm).

"The two discussed the need to combat and defeat Daesh, including in Syria, where the Kingdom has offered to commit troops to the counter-Daesh campaign."

Department of State spokesperson John Kirby said "The U.S. looks at the Saudi suggestion very seriously."

BUMP.

BUMP

Pfftfftt this is such bullshit.

All you need to do is get Trump elected, and him and Putin initiates Operation: The White Stallion, and bomb every single location of ISIS. They already know where ISIS is, isis is not a real threat.

Indeed

Bump again.

I don't get it. Why are the wahabit fundamentalists from House Saud now supporting a secular alawit who is ally to the shia mullahs? What is the suspected motive? Makes no sense.

Oil pipeline and market share.
Gotta jew fast...

What are the chances that the House of Saud likes money and the US, more than religion?

ok, but they really hate Iran, because it is a fight for regional dominance. For humans, dominance is most important. Saud wants to contain Iran by all means.

>Why are the wahabit fundamentalists from House Saud now supporting a secular alawit who is ally to the shia mullahs?
Where did you read that in the text? As far as I know, the Saudis are supporting the FSA.

because most terrorists are Sunnis

>FSA.
No such thing. A lot of Al Jihad al kill infidels freedom fighters groups though

Op stated the claim in his second post, first sentence.

> A lot of Al Jihad al kill infidels freedom fighters groups though
I know. That's why the Saudis are supporting them.

They get dominance by buying up all the old US military gear, and leaveing Israel alone.

Iran might still get attacked.

Thanks. I'd say it is in Saudi interests to primarily defeat ISIS since they're much more of an immediate threat to the royal family. Don't forget that the Islamic rebels are fighting ISIS as well.

>They get dominance by buying up all the old US military gear
Well, they do not even succeed in Jemen, a pisspoor country almost no arms. I don't think, war is a viable path for Saud.

To be fair amerifats failed to beat Taliban for 15 years with all their high-tech shit.

To be fair, though, this wasn't due to the Taliban being great fighters or anything. The U.S. could easily have glassed every Taliban hideout and there would've been no one left to fight. The humanitarian cost, however, would've put the American leaders in the Hague for a century.