DAILY REMINDER HILLARY CLINTON SEND AND RECIEVED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION VIA PRIVATE EMAIL TO HER CRONIES FROM THE...

DAILY REMINDER HILLARY CLINTON SEND AND RECIEVED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION VIA PRIVATE EMAIL TO HER CRONIES FROM THE CLINTON FOUNDATION

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/mJ0YEchTwEc
youtu.be/4amgOoCE5gY
youtu.be/fZkK2_6H9MM
thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/flashback-trump-defends-gays-clintons-2000/
youtu.be/bC1Mc6-RDyQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm still voting for her.
There was no criminal intent and she didn't even know she was breaking law. She clearly has no time nor patience to worry about trivial things like some meagre emails on some random server, that is the assistants job, she has actual cities to fulfill that keep this country running unlike trump and his storm weenies. Whatever you think she did is nothing to all the hate trump had been spreading.

We need someone with her experience in the white house, we also should have a woman in the white house by now so this is too long overdue to just let the opportunity slip by.

I'm guessing you don't care at all about Clinton's plan on declaring war with Russia for the lulz.

You don't need intent to break the law

She's not going to do that, Jesus you idiots jump all over the dumbest things. Besides Russia would lose.
The difference is that emails can't kill people, it's not even close to the same thing.

this is just another shil

shilldog

>If it doesn't agree with my narrative is a shill
Maybe you should wake up kid, the real world is still out there.

And not picking up the phone can't kill people either.

She sent classified Intel to a charity organisation?

You think trump would have done better?
You have no idea what kind of mental fortitude a situation like that demands, you would have done much worse. She did what she could.

Are you saying no other president had a plan to invade your cold war enemy?

Those are very different things. Past criminal prosecutions about intentionally distributing intel. Clinton put it on a private server who didn't know about the security risks. No one did until it was reported and suddenly everyone's a security expert.

Giving out classified info to people that aren't cleared for it is a treasonous act. That is why Snowden is to be put in jail and why she should too.

youtu.be/mJ0YEchTwEc

I believe trump would have given them the security they asked for the first time they asked for it

You came to the wrong neighborhood motherfucker.

Hindsight is 20/20. First you want her to just hand out security clearance like candy, then you bitch when she doesn't use enough security on her server. You are all autistic.

but the negligence can still kill, you fucking retarded mouth breather

>You think trump would have done better?
he would have never sent troops there, so yes.

>You are all autistic
Rather be autistic than MentallyHill

Delete your account, stupid frog poster.

Delete your life.

When you email Lybian militia men and tell them to attack the US embassy because the ambassador knows you've been selling guns to them, that kills people.

Also why else do you think Obongo plans on moving an invasion force to Poland to 'deter' Russia?

What are you going on about? She doesn't need to hand out security clearance is she read her own damn classified emails instead of pawning it off on her staff. And you were the one saying that she did the best she could. I gave you an example where she could have done better.

She did leak SAPs to the Muslim Brotherhood, but if they prosecuted her on that there'd be pandemonium.

All you've done is muddy the issue with irrelevant facts. Trump is still a racist bigot and we need a woman with experience in the white house to push America back on track. All that other shit comes second, if it even mastered to begin with. You morons can't see the forest with all these damn trees in the way can you.

Ignoring your obvious failures in making your post coherent:

>giving gov't officials security in a violent city in a failed state where they shouldn't officially be anyway is handing out security "like candy"

Not even of a wew. A - fuck you stupid shill- is the only appropriate response

Show me one racist quote from trump with a source. And don't say that calling illegals criminals is racist because it isn't. They broke the law. Also her "experience" has gotten us into war with Iraq (something trump was always against) and she called it an economic opertunity for America
youtu.be/4amgOoCE5gY

You can't just redefine racism to fit your narrative. Fuck off faggot.
We would have never left the war if not for her and Obama.

Also, you say that I use irrelevant facts, but I haven't seen a single documented fact from you. I've given video testimonies. Here is another video. This one is hillary saying she is against gay marriage

youtu.be/fZkK2_6H9MM

Ooooyyyy veeeey
DELETE THIS

rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm
noun
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races

I didn't redefine anything. He classified criminals as criminals. And you still didn't give me an example. Was the illegal mexicans the only example you had? That is pathetic

wow i hate hilary now

Doesn't matter and I don't care. A tech illiterate criminal is still a better decision than Trump and the right wing.

Stay BTFO for the 12th consecutive year, trumpets.

This guy knows what is really going on

>attack on consulate starts
>Hillary calls meeting 6 hours later
>7 out of the 9 talking points discussed reference the YouTube video coverup story
YOU HAVE NO IDEA THE MENTAL FORTITIUDE

You have conceded the fact that Hillary is worse, but you still want to vote for her? Why?

Can't read? I just said that she is still a better option than the far right and Trump. That is not conceding anything. I am literally telling you that voting for someone as terrible as Hillary is STILL better than voting for the far right.

Tell that to the armed forces members/civies that went to Levenworth or were kicked out over 'negligent' handling of classified info. Or the current ones. Certainly they'll trust a commander-in-chief who 'didn't know' how to practice basic infosec/compusec with top secret info. It'd be like hiring a fire chief that kept 'accidentally' setting fires.

Can you not read? I was asking why voting for the right is so much worse? She was for the war, trump isnt. She was against gay marriage, trump wasn't (source - thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/flashback-trump-defends-gays-clintons-2000/ ).
The Republicans are voting for this man. They are changing. But hillary is just a horrible human being

>Republikeks are changing
0/10

Are you retarded enough to think that Hillary or anyone else actually wants to do that? Just because she doesn't want to warm to a country that illegally invaded and occupied another country, and that is massively deceitful and corrupt besides that, doesn't mean that she wants to start WW3

You alt right kiddies are so poor at arguing. All you can do is post memes that are massive strawmen

How is calling out the fact that intent isn't required to break the law a strawman?

Republicans voted for McCain, Romney and the Bushes. They were all once Republican idols and now they are publicly shunned by the majority of Republicans. I call that a change.

Clinton lacked criminal intent. All she did was delete emails, which is a normal thing for people to do. With regards to the mishandling of classified information, nobody has ever been convicted under that law because it has a very uncertain constitutionality, and it wouldn't hold under scrutiny, especially in a case as weak as this. The FBI director was only being completely rational in not caving into pressure and recommending charges, because the case against her is so weak

She deleted emails that were illegal for her to have in the first place
Deleting government information improperly is also illegal.
General Petraeus mishandled classified info without criminal intent and was convicted. He lost his security clearance.

youtu.be/bC1Mc6-RDyQ

Intent isn't required. She broke the law.

>Intent isn't required.

It is actually necessary in most countries, including the united states. The intent AND action are required to convict someone for a crime

Just so you guys know, I was the one who made the first Hilary post and like all but 2 of the others. I'm just bored on my phone in my hotel room, you guys are great. Never change pole. :^)

Oh yea and vote trump.

In the US negligence is a legal definition of intent. That is what they used against Petraeus.

2/10 shitpost, leaf

Intent is rarely ever used as a factor to indict in a case with this much evidence against the accused.

>she had the classified emails
>she gave individuals without security clearance access to them

Whether or not she intended to break security laws is irrelevant, since she intended to set up the private account and intended to give access to uncleared individuals. If these had been accidents, then intent would come into play. However, you can't accidentally call an IT team to set ul 4 private servers in your bathroom

Thanks for doing that. I needed to vent. Good night