how can you consider yourself redpilled and be nationalist?
are you aware that being in war is x100 times worse than being in detroit or in paris no go zones and get beaten and robbed?
your feet get ill, you are yelled at, you cant sleep, you eat bread, water tastes like dust, your ears get irreversible damage, you are forced to walk miles with a bag, etc
all while your general/captain/king/president are in their house fucking a hooker while your wife cleans the floor
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
going to war = being cucked
at home sleeping cozy = redpilled
Nationalism to me means armed security officers keeping hordes of brown people from the place I live.
Calm your tetas, you're scaring the children here.
what about who fought in the falklands/malvines?
they were forced to live in the mud getting bombed by harriers
and if they misbeheaved they would be humillated in the floor at -10ºc
isnt that the biggest form of cuckoldry?
I swear you fucking Dagos are retarded.
The US has been at war for most of the last century, yet Detroit is still the measure of a terrible city.
Nationalism doesn't equal imperialism.
On the contrary, imperialism ultimately destroys nations.
I don't know where you got this idea but it's wrong.
You mean those mestizos the UK kindly disposed from us for free? why is nationalism = war in your books? that's just stupid, some people just want to be left alone.
so you are ok with the argentine people being killed as long as they are mestizos?
Of course, is this a serious question?
>at home sleeping cozy = redpilled
t. a lazy sevillano
...
Where do you think those come from ? the dumbo ears are a guarani indio trait (paraguay)
Google Di Maria, another example of the guarani dumbo ears.
Irish nationalism means not going to war. It's in our constitution.
European union means being dragged into a European military, war, niggers and eventually civil war when France and Germany become Islamic.
/thread.
I don't want war, I just don't want to be invaded by subhumans
War is a means to an end.
Detroit and No-go zones are not.
>not going to war
But you can defend yourself if attacked and invaded right?
I think Switzerlands model for this (and almost anything else) is the best. Don't invade or get involved in anyone else's shit but the moment anyone wants to fuck with you you've got a big well trained standing army and every citizen has military training and is waiting behind every door with a gun
Nationalism means protecting your country and people by force if nescesary. It does not mean one has to start a war against anyone else
>you've got a big well trained standing army and every citizen has military training and is waiting behind every door with a gun
Is this true?
How is Switzerland so peaceful compared to america if everybody has guns?
Switzerland blows it's tunnels and bridges and roads. That's how they defend themselves.
We defend ourselves by being a grassy island with no resources in the Atlantic. No one has any need to invade.
...
No south Americans or blacks.
The hell are you on about.
Nationalism != war.
Hilary is more likely to start global conflicts than her nationalist counterpart.
>implying being nationalist means you're pro-war
it's the opposite since war is almost always the worst thing for your country and it's shitheads putting the issues of other countries before their own that start them now adays
What the fuck does being a nationalist have to do with wars.
Imperialists and globalists are the biggest warmongers of today
all nationalist nations have been immediately involved in wars
HAHAHAH fucking plebians without major phobias that disqualify you from being in the military
>you eat bread
Holy shit that's awful.
War isn't in the self interest of a 'nationalist' state. If you love your country so much you'll stand by and protect it but won't bother invading anyone else.
All nations have been involved in wars, no matter if they are nationalist or not. The USSR was involved in wars, African tribesmen are constantly involved in wars.
The only reason why war is not as prevalent as before is nuclear deterrence, not a lack of nationalism
nationalist Spain didn't go into any wars.
As long as you can toast it and smother it in butter who the fuck cares. War it is!!
I mean IMMEDIATELY involved in wars.
They willingly got into wars because it was their policy to make their nation great again.
nationalist spain was in war from the first day of its existance
>en.wikipedia.org
that was a war to establish the state.
Nationalism would keep the US out of wars. Currently the US is at risk of getting into wars across the globe because it guarantees the security of almost the entire globe. Trump is much less likely to go to war than Hillary, and if he does, it will be for American interests and not the interests of Germany or Saudi Arabia.
>south Americans
Shouldn't you be cooking something merely made of potatoes or something?
>I mean IMMEDIATELY involved in wars.
any example? Even ultraationalist movements such as fascism and national socialism took 15/20 years before they went to war.
>Spanish civil war
Republican Spain was just as guilty in the war as the nationalists were
people just want something to fight for. Thats why yurofags join the islamic state or retarded shit like that, because they want that feeling of having a cause instead of the relentless void of sitting home watching anime and porn. People here hate mudslimes (and for a good reason), so they want war against them to fulfill that biological need of fighting for what you want/believe.
>15/20 years to get into war with the whole fucking world
>not fast
The thing is with a nationalist government doing diplomacy they don't back down, they don't "show weakness" and they don't cede. This way it's easy to eventually go to war or risk losing support of your people
What made you think nationalism == war?
I dont really mind being drafted in a nationalist fueld war t b h.
At least I could say I did something important in my life besides post on an online veitnamese pogo stick club
Nationalism today is just a reactionnary movement, nobody want to conquer the world, we just don't want Africa and Middle East filth flooding us, destroying our safety and way of life.
I don't wish for war but if it is needed we would have no other choices.
>equates war and nationalism
What are you doing lad?
You are a vagina, go back to plebbit.
you cunts invading the falklands in a few years? we've got a shiny new aircraft carrier i wouldnt mind a shot of