What are some good films about the universe being a hologram?

What are some good films about the universe being a hologram?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=16WIlRJxnrY
youtube.com/watch?v=ijFm6DxNVyI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Believing unsubstantiated shit because you can't deal with the fact that once you die, you cease to exist.

any youtube video about this?

If the universe is always expanding then whats on the other side of it?

>doesn't understand cosmology or entropy

Much smarter people than you believe it's true

>>once you die, you cease to exist.

Prove this or you're just as retarded

You think that's the first time you've posted that?

I have a surprise for you user

[spolier] it isn't [/spoiler]

...

Yeah they also believe in shit like Communism and Socialism. Even smart people get things wrong. Musk is no different.

People forget how many ideas Einstein had wrong and wouldn't let go for decades over sheer ego.

he second guessed himself early on when he was right, so he doubled down on wrong ideas for the rest of his scientific career.

Inventors will start 50 projects and maybe 1 comes to fruition. Look at how many pie in sky projects Google took on. They spun off, sold or closed most of them.

Intelligence isn't perfect because you can memorize and replicate at a better, more efficient pace than others. Does it usually preclude you from making lesser mistakes? yes. It doesn't stop you from drawing wrong conclusions.

Why are you so against this idea? It's beautiful

...

That's not how escape velocity works

More proof

>believe in shit like Communism and Socialism.
But user, that's where we're currently heading

I'm agnostic towards the idea, in that way that I acknowledge possibility that universe could have at another point in time or space, another sapient intelligence. It doesn't mean I believe they visited earth, especially without proof.

>The universe being a hologram has literally ANYTHING to do with afterlife beliefs

...

I don't know

ask Jem

funnier than it should be.

youtube.com/watch?v=16WIlRJxnrY

...

this x100

Overbye then moves from Witten and Higgs to Maldacena. We get two sentences on Maldacena's 1997
“theory” that
>Nature is some kind of hologram, and that
information about what happens inside a volume of three-dimensional space, for example, is encoded in quantum equations on its two-dimensional boundary, the way a 3-D image is encoded on the face of your bank card.

That isn't a physical theory, as any real physicist would realize. It is just proof that famous physicists
don't know what dimensions are anymore.
As in my recent paper on superfluids, where we saw top physicists putting the superfluid into a 2D surface to explain gravity problems, we see (many of the same) physicists here proposing existence in 2D. Unfortunately, that is physically impossible, by definition. You cannot encode anything in 2D, since if you remove the third dimension all your objects and encodings disappear. A surface is only a mathematical abstraction, and it exists only in abstract geometry. No planes exist in the real world, and the face of your bank card is not a 2D surface. It is a very thin 3D “surface,” and they know that. So why are they trying to pass this slop by us?

Don't even need to watch to know these people are on drugs

But what if the 2D universe is itself a hologram of a 1D universe?

How has Einstein been thrown under the bus? Overbye tells us that, too.

>In Dr. Maldacena’s holographic universe, considered to be the last word on quantum gravity, the dimensions of
space-time do not seem to matter. “We’ve known for years that space-time is not fundamental,” Dr. Polchinski
said. “General relativity is not fundamental.” He went on, “space-time is emergent. Gravity is emergent. Maybe
sometimes it doesn’t always emerge.”

The new physics, ladies and gentlemen! Where physicists who don't know what a dimension is
produce a theory that is “the last word on quantum gravity.” In this “quantum gravity” they don't have
to worry themselves with unification anymore, since gravity is “emergent.” You don't have to unify
something that is emergent, do you? You can just define it away, replacing it with a “deterministic”
soup can label. And does that mean Quantum Mechanics is fundamental? No, not really. If QM gets
in the way, it can be called “emergent” as well, and the theorists can just pull whatever they like out of
the vacuum as they need it. They have been doing that for decades and no one has called them on it, so
why bother about dimensions, fundamentals, unification, or even consistent math? Just say it in the
New York Times and it becomes physics.

Gravity is real. Take a step off a tall building and tell me it isn't

Observer effect. You're trying to argue semantics about something that goes across established boundaries of ideas since from a human point of view, the spotlight effect in terms of how we view things is impossible with our current technology to figure out if life is moving through time and space like a 4d worm or spotlight effect in terms of contiguous reality. Perception in how you view in idea or come to define it could be as amalgam in terms of rhetoric as blurring of lines between old classical ideas about cosmology of the universe without any basis to understand it beyond mathematical proofs. Language of the universe type shit.

...

ok, then watch this one at least
youtube.com/watch?v=ijFm6DxNVyI

These threads are harmful to the welfare of mankind. Please don't make threads like these.

why would the light from the sun just stop at the center?

...

It's a small sun, around 15% the diameter of the earth.

OH MY GOD THE MOON IS MADE OF POTATO?!?!?!

yum

So no films have been made about this shit?

World on a Wire, kind of.

yes but that doesn't really answer my question

a giant glowing ball high in the sky hundreds of miles in diameter would still be visible 5000 miles away on a flat earth

I can deal with it, but the universe does seem to have some peculiar attributes. Where does it all come from? What's the purpose of life? These questions are way too interesting to be dismissed with a simple "dude you just die lmao".

It depends on the intensity of the light source.

>What is Lunar eclipse
>What is solar eclipse
Pick two

I think anime is way too interesting to be dismissed as just something originating from the minds of japs

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module

Dark City.

>having only one dimension of time

I agree but the answers people are coming up with don't make sense and often exclude a lot of exculpatory information as the user above pointing out credit card example.

I think our lack of understanding about 13 dimensions of the universe, dark matter and how to view the universe with human senses tends to make people think it's all on same lateral plane, as if the universe is 2-d flat.

The common person does not understand the way universe is netted together so to speak so it allows for easy confusion and our own cursory examinations have to be flawed.

You could ask a simple question like, what happens if you left the earth and just went up, what happens to you? Most people don't realize the graviton bend of the universe so to speak.

I don't know if I'm explaining this right but hope you get idea

considering you can go blind from staring into the sun for too long I think it's safe to say that its light is intense enough to be seen from quite far away

...

Flat earthers scare me.

I think you are way too much of a faggot not to be dismissed as just someone who sucks cocks.

We often fear what we do not understand.

No, I'm more worried that these individuals are voting and driving, without understanding basic math and science.

Pattern not found: the matrix

Not one mention of the Matrix

I honestly don't know if these images are just for trolling purposes or not

>I'm more worried that these individuals are voting
8 MORE YEARS

Its a stupid people on tv thread

thats every thread, but this one is extra special with stupid

>hologram universe
>not a terrifying prospect

youre all under the presumption that whoever is operating the hologram universe is kind and benevolent. could be a sadistic elder god for all we know.

Trump doesn't bother me at all, being a carnival barker has it's own party purposes, and throw in a dash of Houdini and you can weather just about anything it appears. From making up shit that nebulously attacks democrats, intelligence community, fisa system and leaves you relatively unmarked while controlling the media narrative. I would say masterclass showman.

Fucking Christ. Someone has this saved unironically on their computer. That is the joke here, right?

>universe is a hologram
>still can't reject the holocaust

You're completely ignoring the implications of having a 2D waifu. You need to be silenced.

Why would anyone need to be behind it? It could just be a natural phenomenon

>universe being a hologram

I would love to see the cinematic adaptation of that image

Fuck the matrix, this is about the entire universe not some misconstrued computer simulation of jew york.

>implying it works

That image is very clearly a joke.

This makes my brain hurt with how retarded it is. The fact that people believe this shit astounds me. Truly.

Put a gun to your head and pull the trigger

There, proved

Yet you can't begin to explain why it doesn't work. Remove the parallel ""orbits"" of the sun and moon and this model is spotless.

>What's the purpose of life?
This honesly is not a scientific question also. This is TELEVISION AND FILM you autists.

here is the board you are looking for:

>Juptier has moon made of potato
Holy fuck someone alert the irish

At some point in your bloodlines history, being so paranoid and skeptical must have had a biological purpose but believing nothing that you can't see directly with your senses has to weigh on you.

>once you die, you cease to exist.
No you don't.
You will be reborn, that's a mathematical fact

I get it, the deeper we go the more counter-intuitive it gets for our monkey brains. At the very least I'm hoping that physicists will have some sort of breakthrough in the near future because it feels like they've lost direction with all the competing theories.

>sucking cocks
>bad

>Asks for purpose of life
>Sends him to Sup Forums

I'VE BEEN BLIND TO THE TRUTH FOR ALL THESE YEARS!

>You will be reborn

Wait WHAT? I was told I was gonna live in eternal bliss in heaven at the feet of our Lord surrounded by all my dead relatives. What the FUCK is this shit I now hear about for the first time??

user..just because you can't destroy doesn't mean it doesn't change form.. that is basic science.

Human matter ceases to exist in current form and changes back to starstuff we're made up of.

That doesn't guarantee rebirth.

Also Entropy. we got leaks user, in universe.

user, that's called the process of elimination. Start off with what's obviously wrong. Get a feel of what not to do.

Kiddo, I got banned from your reddit for asking basic science questions that show how absolutely autistic your flat earth beliefs are. It isn't even a theory.

It hurts my head that you don't see how fucking stupid it sounds when you apply basic 8th grade earth science to it.

>Going there in the first place
smfh tbqh

I said go to Sup Forums more to screech about the flat earth. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

/x/ kiddies are everywhere. They believed a photo with a toy alien was real for years.

Are you legitimately autistic?

I went there to argue with them. To see if they could formulate a real defense for their beliefs. Then I was banned. Kek.

What are you calling me autistic for exactly? That I don't believe in some stupid shit like the earth being flat?

he thinks you can't tell that image was meant as a joke and taking it seriously even though they're probably at least 1 user that isn't trolling in this thread about it.

it's clearly a joke, user. you may be legit autistic

That the pic is quite clearly a satire to laugh at flat earthers, and you're unable to see it

Nice try brainlet. I bet you don't even understand classical mechanics, nevermind adS/CFT.

I know it is a joke, I am also very aware that someone in here takes all this autism seriously and probably has that saved unironically to discredit that the dinosaurs even happened. I once had a flat earther tell me that dinosaurs were fake. Anything is possible really. Like a beautiful autism of possibilities.

>This honesly is not a scientific question
How so?
>all life we know of strives for survival and reproduction at all costs, increasing in complexity over time
doesn't this imply a purpose to you? if you look at it rationally, living things are trying way too hard to stay alive.

>unable to see it
Again, I get it. Fucking Christ this thread needs to be pruned.

Explain what information is

>Fucking Christ. Someone has this saved unironically on their computer. That is the joke here, right?

supposed to convey then.

>living things are trying way too hard to stay alive.
Literally wut?

>How so?
because it's a philosophical question. to put it disgustingly simply, science tells us how the world works, but it does not tell us how to live in the world