Why did it flop?

why did it flop?

>shitty title (what the fuck is a cloud atlas)
>3 hours
>is it a sci-fi? a period drama? what the fuck is it about? how do we market this?
>based on a book that isn't YA shit
>yellowface

for the same reason every PTA movie is a flop

which is....

Because the Wachowski trannies lost their talent when that dominatrix forced them to cut off their balls and turn into women.

It was too much for idiots like this to digest. If it ain't whitewashed capeshit then it's shit.

I liked it.

too cerebro (I don't mean smart, I just mean a really really dense plot)

>cerebro

Because its the worst song played on the ugliest guitar

Cloud Atlas would have been more successful if you didn't have to have read the book to understand the movie.

The book was structured with each story within the last. The movie was just randomly cut together, which was pretty hard to follow.

Erm.. Have you watched it?

>comparing this shit with films by PTA

You best be joking, you idiot

>too cerebro
>cerebro
What? Are you fucking retarded?

>It was too much for idiots like this (You) to digest.

Hey I liked it too. I was giving real reasons based off experience and knowledge of the movie biz why plebs didn't see it.

I never found it hard to follow. The 6 stories are pretty simple and very distinct, and the thematic similarities are quite obvious.

i'm not comparing it, i'm just saying that big movies like these that are not action movies are faded to flop, it is just how it is

Because it was a fucking clusterfuck of a movie. Nothing in this worked. The Wachovsky ""sisters"" are fucking hacks. Nothing they touched since Matrix Reloded was good and even that one already contains absolutely idiotic stuff and elements.

>inb4 Speedracer
That was an overrated piece of colorful trash, at best

Only overrated by contrarians on this site. It has low reviews for a reason.

You literally compared them, you dipshit. Literally.

>i'm not comparing it
But you did.

Only contrarians don't like it, one of those movies that come along every oncein a great while that's actually better in the second watch

The average film goer is not smart enough to comprehend or appreciate what this film is.

donnie darko for europoo teens

no you fucking twat, i'm not comparing them in quality terms, i'm just saying every fucking movie that is 3 hours long and it is not an action movie WILL flop, I WILL not make the money back, PTA movies are great but all of them are comercial flops, cloud atlas tried to be a epic drama with too many threads for your average movie goer handle and it flopped
fuck off retard

>Only contrarians don't like it
In what world are you living in, faggot? Nobody I know likes this movie. And it fucking flopped. Are you high on glue?

I only read the book and it gave me brief and fleeting feels

>with too many threads for your average movie goer handle and it flopped
You forgot to add that it was also totally retarded shit that didn't work as a movie.

Spotted the pseud. Most movies are better on the second viewing. Plebs disagree with this.

>movie with strong libertarian themes
>all of the actors are socialists
why does hollywood do this?

Is this real?

You are not going to the cinema often, are you

pretentious as fuck, 6/10 at best

Am I alone in liking this then?

I mean, it wasn't perfect, and the message is a little happy-clappy simplistic for my taste generally. But it's got a great cast, and its an interesting idea.

I enjoyed that the movie at least had a vision and idea, and wasn't just paint-by-numbers blockboster. I didn't find it hard to follow, and I thought the different plots and genres element was fun.

Like I said, not perfect, but an A for effort, and an above average movie.

I went into it not knowing anything about the movie (friends dragged me along) and was very confused until around half way though, I was expecting some time travel or some shit because the only two actors I recognized as being in two different stories were halle berry and tom hanks
watched it a second time on cable and enjoyed it quite a bit

too many parallel plots to keep track of, for the casual cinema viewer.

It's a forgettable movie. I watched it near when it came out and I don't remember the plot being hard or anything. But literally I don't remember a thing about that movie. It's just bland non-story of a movie.

yeah but its from back when the movie came out so I would hope he at least realized its a piece of trash haha

I unironically think it is a masterpiece

Is the book any good?

libshit has never ever sold well lol

probably because liberals dont have jobs

i mean seriously
>in the post apocalyptic future the hyper advanced race are all brown
>white people are the ooga booga tribesmen

>with a forced gay romance cutin every 5 minutes

perfect answer. this project was a sinking ship before it even began

Because tracking the same people you don't care about around through their different incarnations in vignettes you mostly didn't care about is full of fail.

Wachowski faggits pulled that shit in the matrix sequels where Zion was a city of negros performing sex rituals.

not to mention
>having a big racist white guy call a mexican a wetback who gets EPIC revenge 5 minutes later!

no idea why a white person would watch such a hateful movie

reminder that nigs will inherit the earth

Tom Hanks was the only good actor in the movie and thats because he wasnt pushing the WE WUZ KANGZ agenda

Even though he had a pale white ghost talking to him telling him to fuck the 'hazelnut' monkey

WE

>mfw that dumb rumour about one of the Wachowskis becoming a woman was true
>mfw they're both trannies now

Well I'm guessing it flopped in New Zealand since Moriori look absolutely nothing like black people

>not including agent smith as the mean nurse and Adam Ewin as Highlander

except i don't think the same person played the same character -- the character jumped around between actors