Is there anything wrong with women serving in the armed forces and in combat IF they're segregated into all female...

Is there anything wrong with women serving in the armed forces and in combat IF they're segregated into all female units?

Cost efficiency of filtering women for service are higher than that for men.

We are not in total war, we are not desperate for more personnel.

It hurts the feelings of inbred conservashits and some might consider that wrong. Not me though.

When I was in the army, we fucked the females... Some dumbasses fell in love and would fight over them... If they're bull dukes it might be alright, but females who suck cock will fuck up a unit...

What if fitness and entrance standards would be tailored to a more achievable level for women? This would result in poorer soldiers than their male counterparts, of course, but wouldn't water down the effectiveness of said male units and would allow for greater tactical flexibility altogether.

Women out the militery

They are pathetic hokes in uniform.

>having entire units of substandard troops
Why?

If they want to help just put them in support/office roles

Fuck yes. A female only unit would operate at unacceptably low efficiency and would be worthless on an operational or strategic scale.

Only if their units serve as a "Whore Corps".

It's 2016. We should have segregated wars for women to fight in already.

Pls no. Us supply folks need proficient people to keep shit working and rolling forward even when we're undermanned due to doctrine. The entire battlegroup depends on us getting our work done.

Why bother, when men make better soldiers, readily sacrifice themselves for their brothers in arms and men are simply faster stronger etc.?

If you have to conscript women, youve already lost the battle.

Even fascist shitholes like Israel only use female soldiers for propaganda.

Why even bother?

It's been proven that women are physically and mentally inferior in the realm of warfare to men.

Under what circumstance (outside of desperation) would any country want to field an inferior force comprised solely of women?

That would be a complete waste of resources.

Because then they'll keep bitching and moaning. Besides even substandard troops can be of some use. In any case anyone equipped with military equipment and the training to use it is going to be able to pose something of a threat.

They would all get jealous of whoever had the biggest breasts and send them out on suicide missions.
As long as you're ok with petty shit like that reducing the efficiency of your military then no, there is nothing wrong in that case.

What about the soviet women serving on the eastern front?

What about the squads in the rear lines waiting to machine gun any deserters?

>what about total war and desperate measures
If I recall correctly, they were mostly crewmen, pilots and snipers.

Women infantry should be last line of defence.

OP asked about serving in the army, serving doesn't mean infantry roles

Yes and no, it really depends on what they are doing.

If they are running logistics that is fine, field hospital staff is fine too, intel and comms would be fitting. They may even be fairly capable drone operators...

However front line roles would be problematic, and they MUST always be kept away from the men.

Imagine the infighting in the film platoon and multiply that by every woman in the company.

The saying "bro's before hoes" may be true and in the minds of every soldier but they'll find a way to excuse any sexual interest from "hoe" tier.

...

A jihadi killed by a woman does not go to paradise, so I say bring all the women you can