I don't see how this could be argued against

I don't see how this could be argued against.

thank you
it's not 'ONLY black lives matter', it's 'black lives matter TOO'

Really made me think.

Nice proxy faggot.

Reminder to sage shill threads.

>Black Lives Matter
Ahahahahahahahahahaha

The problem with the slogan "Black Lives Matter" is the dichotomy it proposes.

Chanting "Black Lives Matter" implies that their opponents think black lives DON'T matter. This is a mischaracterization. The basis upon which I don't give a fuck isn't that I think their lives are inherently worthless; it's that you won't get any pity from me if you commit a violent crime, resist arrest, and subsequently get shot.

>7 billion humans
>most spend their entire lives doing nothing of significance
>all lives matter
They really don't

The problem is that in reality almost nothing BLM argues for is actually true.

They're worth less than fecal matter.

That's because you're ignorant of the facts, niggers get shot because they come into contact with the police more and usually resist arrest, if they behaved like Jews or east Asians then there wouldn't be a blacklivesmatter organisation because they wouldn't get in trouble with the law in the first place. FYI more white people are killed by the police than blacks/niggers

>what is systematic poverty and insufficient funding of impoverished areas
also
>these people are a different species because they fucked up, kill them like animals if you want

It's a standard firefighting procedure to hose neighbor buildings wet with water if the building next to them is on fire so that the fire cannot spread on them. Also, if that burning building is supposed to represent black people, then it's more likely that their fellow black people (or better yet, the residents of that building) set the fire by themselves.

Let it burn, idgaf about it

Fixed.

I love how democrats are completely unable to make arguments using plain facts, they instead constantly need to make metaphorical arguments that don't actually parallel at all what they're talking about.

I'm not going to help put out your house fire when you're the one who set it, double nigger.

>they come into contact with police more

the obvious counterargument here is that POLICE approach them more, not the other way around, which makes your point moot

The pic equates being black to a house that is burning down.

The problem IS blacks.

Maybe they should say 'too', because the way they act certainly doesn't suggest it.

>mfw read this

Tell the nigger to stop setting his fucking house on fire

>not posting the finished comic
desu weeb desu senpai, cuck fag

all that cartoon needs is a black person lighting the house on fire

I was talking about the semantic implications of the slogan.

Literally nothing in your post has anything to with what I said.

blacks kill more than twice as many whites every year than vice versa

it would follow if your premise were correct. it's not

sage

>you won't get any pity from me if you commit a violent crime, resist arrest, and subsequently get shot.

Huh, certainly provokes some ideas...

Well, yeah, what's the point pouring water on a house already engulfed in flames? Better water the house that is still untouched, so it won't catch fire

... Yes? That's usually how it works.
Unless you meant "non-violent".

Oh.... That explains what Germany is doing with Greek economy

Gtfo shill cuck

Because you are suggesting that only the black house is on fire, that there are no problems that all people face.

American cops manage to shoot a few hundred blacks, whilst 4000 more are shot by other blacks.

It's like wasting water on one house when a massive 10 000 hectare forest fire is directly behind you causing the property damage.

>Nigger sets his own house on fire
>Normal human being protects other houses from catching fire
>Waits for emergency services to come handle the situation
>Burning house will probably collapse at any moment, leaving it a lost cause

Clear bias.

YRYL thread?

nigger

Black lives have negative value

Not only does it paint the opposition as stupid and bigoted as others pointed out, it also ignores the fact that blacks are more than 10 times more likely to die from gang violence ( some 2000 a year vs. like 12), or the gigantic abortion rate among blacks. (Not to mention whites are more likely to get shot by police when adjusted for population and violent crime rate) They only believe black lives matter when white people take them.

>I don't see how this could be argued against.
Its misrepresenting the opposing side in the argument.

You don't get a pass for violent crime if you grew up in a bad neighborhood. Sorry. Having a sucky childhood doesn't mean you get to threaten people with guns and attack the police with impunity.

And in no way did I say anything resembling "these people are a different species...kill them like animals." I wrote an entire sentence scoffing at the idea that black lives are inherently worthless.

Rather, it should simply not be surprising when individuals who commit violent crime and resist arrest are shot.

What do you expect the police to do in such a situation? Why are you making excuses for criminals who violated the rights of others, endangered society, and then tried to fight with those who would bring them to justice? Don't commit violent crimes, don't resist arrest, and the police will treat you well.

>Being poor makes you a bad person

If you are poor is because you are stupid to start with

>gambling is a crime in the home of the """"""free""""""

there's maybe 10-15 countries in the world where online poker is illegal and the US is one of them purely because the rich jews who own your casinos pay off politicians to keep it that way

should be a national outrage desu

It can. Because the comic does not give us any detail about the circumstances of whether the fire is too severe to extinguish at the source.

There is a great deal of calculation and circumstance taken into consideration when firefighters determine whether one should extinguish a fire or attempt to contain it.

Agreed, dirty toothpaste

Not necessarily.

In Darwinian fashion, with no memes regarding ethics in the mix, you might find yourself at an advantage taking a risk on welfare than working your ass off in the hope of paying for some other poorfag's bills.

In the end, socialism is still capitalism. It still involves self-interest, it's just a matter of the capitalist refusing to consider violent force as a risk factor.

Memes.

>"American families work hard to earn $4,250 a month. Obama is spending $18,972 a month on each illegal immigrant child."
>Numbers are valid, the comparison is questionable
>Mostly false

Seriously, is this not verifiable proof of not just bias, but liberals in general moving the goalposts? How is that NOT a valid comparison? In what way does the federal government spending four and a half times an average American family's monthly income on each illegal immigrant child make sense, or seem fair?

When a plane goes down, they tell you to put the oxygen mask on yourself before you help the person next to you, even if it's a kid. Maybe one day people will learn that that shit applies to other things, too.

>bluepilled comment old as fuck posted every day
>B8 text
>1 post by this id
>not using sage

Well meme'd, faggots.

>Admits it's a hatefact
>"Pants on fire!"
No bias here.

underrated

It's more like there is a big pile of garbage on fire next to your house, and so you protect your house instead of the garbage pile.

>correct but niggers
>but niggers
>niggers

At this point, the strength of politifact is clearly on its evidence, nothing else. Giving Trump a pants on fire for that claim is nonsense, even ty their standards. It's almost like they're desperate.