what is this thread: DISCUSS THE AVOIDANCE OF THE CLINTON CASE BY LORETTA LYNCH AS SHE DISMISSES EVERY REPUBLICAN IN AMERICA, she cannot answer if she condones lying under the oath, manslaughter, or breaches of security, she cannot answer if she has any information, she cannot answer whether she has any opinions on any topics, she cannot contribute anything; she can however very easily preach that BLACK LIVES MATTER and that the guns need to be restricted and that cops shoot niggers in the streets! democrats bring up random bullshit that doesn't matter, republicans try to question lynch on important topics relating to the clinton case, watch in awe as no progress is made over six hours!
because a barbell won't get dropped on her throat for answering it.
John Young
2nd ammendment exists for a reason.
Joshua Carter
So did the dems get cleansed for derailing the hearing?
William Gray
was ms paint :c
Ryder Martin
DOES SHE KNOW ANYTHING? WHO THE FUCK KNOWS THIS SHIT IF NOT HER?! FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Charles Reed
kek she's only grilling Lynch because she's pissed at the DOJ
Hunter Rogers
SHE DOESNT KNOW IF CLINTON'S ATTORNEYS HAD CLEARANCE
WHY WAS SHE ALLOWED TO MAKE THE DECISION TO INDICT OR NOT
GROSS NEGLIGENCE ON ATTORNEY GENERAL'S PART
someone webm/youtube this moment please
Jace Sullivan
When is somebody gonna just ask her "What information DO you have?"
Jonathan Gutierrez
Remember the 5 Ds of Department of Justice Oversight, lads: 1) Dodge 2) Duck 3) Dip 4) Dive 5) Dodge
Caleb Hernandez
4 (FOUR) REPUBLICANS IN A ROW
IT'S OVER
Isaiah Wilson
gross negligence from the FBI gross negligence from the AG
Juan Gomez
Walked out in protest I think
Adrian Rivera
GOWDY is gonna miss his plane!! He's still there. We have hope.
Jackson Morales
I support this shop.
Carson Collins
i don't have that information to hand
Juan Hall
Holy fuck!! The slide is real. All the dems left THE MOMENT OBAMA'S SPEECH STARTED!!
Nathan Taylor
S T O N E W A L L T >O >N E W >A L L
Nathan Anderson
...
Dominic Ramirez
They could not make any further characterizations and therefore had to defer until a more qualified committee could come to a more appropriate decision.
Connor Reyes
democrats are LOW ENERGY
big strong republicans are filing in despite the impossible odds, dedicated to support this lynch
Connor Clark
>perfect alibi HERE WE GO
Julian Cruz
kek
Benjamin Robinson
>no "Democrat"
Ian Smith
Its so bad, its good.
10/10
John Taylor
That nigger that talked about dindu shit is just seething about people talking about relevant shit. All other dems left it seems.
Noah Ortiz
kek'd hard
Michael Morales
But did they mean to be negligent?
Andrew Peterson
>Sir do you know why I've pulled you over today? >I'm sorry, I don't have that information to hand
Jack Murphy
>no difference >except where I decided to not look at the case at all
Christopher Morales
Can you tell me how she confirms the meeting was planned? I can't tell from what shes saying how it was planned
Jose Evans
74 TIMES LYNCH HAS REFUSED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS
Charles Russell
SEVENTY FOUR
Aiden Ward
74 TIMES
ABSOLUTE MADMAN
Tyler Miller
it becomes apparent she doesn't know her fucking case, or willingly won't disclose any information damaging Hillary. How is this normal?
Jordan Nelson
>74 times HOLY FUCK
WHITE MAN GOING IN RACE WAR SOON(TM)
Dylan Kelly
LYNCH IS ABOUT AS USEFUL AS A POOPY FLAVORED LOLIPOP
LYNCH COULDN'T HIT WATER IF SHE FELL OUT OF A BOAT
Matthew Cruz
In some cultures they only eat vomit
Parker Thompson
TROTT TROTTING THE LYNCH
Jason Brooks
74 GET
Daniel Wright
74 times! 74! seventy four!
Jordan Morales
74 TIMES >74 TIMES 74 TIMES >74 TIMES 74 TIMES >74 TIMES 74 TIMES >74 TIMES
>call her out for not answering questions >she stonewalls and rambles on about nigger lives
Wyatt Taylor
HOLY SHIT LOOK AT HER FACE
SHE'S SNARLING BETWEEN WORDS
BITCH IS SO FUCKING PISSED
Tyler Sanchez
What does he mean by this?
Eli Jenkins
JUST GOT HERE HOW LONG HAS THIS GONE ON FOR??
Adam Adams
Why have they not gotten her to support their reasoning for creating a distinction between the statute code wording ;"Gross negligence" and their claims of what they found;"Extreme carelessness."
This is the crux of the matter... there is in reality absolutely no difference between what those two phrases describe
the words you employ requires you to substantiate your reasoning how you claim you discovered a substantive difference when their actual definitions contain no difference whatsoever.
That is the most important question.
Jaxson Cook
>She and other niggers, kikes and spics need removing... That would still leave Hillary Clinton...