Why is northern italy cheaper for a tourist than southern austria?

Why is northern italy cheaper for a tourist than southern austria?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=huLCqpOpnPQ
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t
amazon.com/Race-John-R-Baker/dp/0936396040
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974
jstor.org/stable/4145377
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019188699190057I
sciencemag.org/content/319/5864/813.abstract
sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160606103654.htm
reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/i765g/do_the_principles_of_hybrid_vigor_andor/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Economic state of the relative countries. Northern Italy is the better destination

All the gypsies make it about even.

northern italy is just the other side of the same mountain

because nobody outside the germanosphere actually visits Austria for tourism except for Vienna and maybe Innsbruck. If you check youtube, there's dozens of user made videos about my end of the world and north Italy, but none about Klagenfurt or even Graz. I was pretty shocked that the world hasn't discovered those two places yet desu.

>why is Slovenia cheaper than bpth?

how much cheaper are we talking?

And Germans are the main source of tourists in Italy, plus Northern Italy is not that interesting compared to the rest of the country

>Northern Italy is not that interesting compared to the rest of the country


what's interesting then? Beaches? Why don't you go to Croatia then?

>Why don't you go to Croatia then?
we do

>>what's interesting then?
we WUZ Roman ruins, islands, beaches, sea

>one twentieth of australians went to italy in 2015
what?

>WUZ Roman ruins
no german go there desu, you all go to the cheapest northern italy beaches eg Riccione, Iesolo. Your grills are desperate for BIC.

Austria and Italy are completely the same! Just this ""tiny"" mountain divides the two!

1/4 Austrians did. Proximity makes sense but wtf

bunch of wogs

The same reason Switzerland is so fucking expensive.

why is USA so cheap?

Same reason Mexico is.

We believe in free markets and free trade for everyone, Switzerland are racist, reclusive mountain dwellers.

We welcome all of our brothers to come visit. Stay a while, we are very hospitable

Legal slave labor.

>, Switzerland are racist, reclusive mountain dwellers.
yes they are

what is this picture saying?

...

create security

KEK
Shekelschaf

t. mongrel orc
t. ürke
Fucking integrationist shithole. Nothing worse than integration of immigrants. it’s a common mistake on this board to think that Switzerland works. Switzerland used to be German-dominated state with French minority and literally oppressed Ticino Italians that knew their place before the 1960s. It was a proper Germanic state. The average native Swiss is not rich. Banks, few individuals (many of whom are not native) and corporations are. Switzerland is everincreasingly socialist diverse shithole. nu/pol/ thinking Switzerland is good is part of the problem and a clear LARP. Full of Portuniggers, Albos, Serbroaches, Greeks and Itwlians. Naturalized several nogs and gooks by voting as early as 1980s. Could have been homogenous, but no. Now some fucking subhuman naturalized tamil (descent of toilet cleaners with australoid blood) lectures the native races about possible African infiltration while wearing the SVP badge.

youtube.com/watch?v=huLCqpOpnPQ

The only good option - kicking out Ticino(or better yet cleansing it from Italians) and repatriating non-Germans/Northern descendant French. Secession of the German regions is a good option too

why do you speak lowly of italians?

They keep coming to our lands, be it non-PIGS Europe or CANZUK

wont that improve your lands?

>Southern/Southeastern European immigrants flee their homelands for economic reasons
>must improve
All economic migrants are usually genetically inferior trash, that seeks to leech from the AVERAGE higher set of living standard built by genetically dissimilar people. Not us, never will be

Steve Jobs is far from “subhuman sandnigger mongrel”, but even one person like him having citizenship desecrates the sacred institute of Nation for the rest of the Natives

if italians are bad then how come they are able to engineer cutting edge technology such as ferrari engines back in the day?

I didn’t say they are incapable of achieving stuff. I’m saying that Southern Europe is racially different to the rest of Europe, and therefore doesn’t belong to Upper Alpine Europe/CANZUK.

>inb4 muh potential, iq, capability, muh voting patterns
It's not about that. Not at all. Race and ethnicity matters and the only thing that matters. Objectivity in matters like this is for people without roots. It's a spiritual matter, not one you can tally up on a spreadsheet.
Suppose some "Children of Man" type disease hit Såizburg Land and no one here could have children so everyone adopted babies from Japan instead.

They'd speak with local accents, eat local food and behave in a few ways like Såizburg people (though in many ways they would not owing to racial differences in behaviour).

Would you consider them the same people as the Austrians of today?

Fuck I wouldn't want the yellow bastards there even if they were superior to us in every way, because they are *not* us and never will be.

sounds kinda gay desu. not having the freedom to live where you want so you can preserve ancients genomes? sounds like a shitty trade off

ancient*

You don’t have that freedom though. You know why genetics are not much seen around Western high school, or you don’t see “popular genetic science” on TV?

Because those objectively show MENAs, negroes, mestizos, castizos and Jews to be literal genetic trash.

Because genetics prove that Hitler was wrong.

Wrong about accepting 1/4 and 1/8 Jews into the German citizenship. As it turns out, the purer the better. The more homogenous and cleaner your gene pool, the better you health, longevity, looks and intelligence. But it still doesn’t really matter, because in the end of the day lack of ingroup loyalty (aka not being racist, ingaging in racemixing) is a sign of objectively genetically inferior individual that fails the evolutionary group strategy.

Homogenous racially pure eugenic society breeds superior genetics collective,which in it’s turn breeds high amount of genetically superior individuals. Which guarantees things like lack of crime, beauty, health and freedom.

>>Homogenous racially pure eugenic society breeds superior genetics collective,which in it’s turn breeds high amount of genetically superior individuals

that's just plain wrong from a scientific perspective. Not only is it wrong, but the opposite is in fact true since cross-breeds exhibit heterosis

why does Slovenia claim to be an alpine country when their tallest "mountain" isn't even 3000m high?

>Heterosis is expressed in sapiens

Just some popular genetics a wog mind (maybe?) can comprehend
This 22% ancestry is the cause of multiple negative health effects due to genetic incompatibility. Indeed, consistent with Haldane’s rule, unmixed Blacks from Africa and White Americans do not have the same rate of birth problems that hybrid American Blacks have: “In 2005, the mortality rate for black infants was 4.4 times higher than that of white infants… African women who come to the United States and have babies experience the same low rate of infant deaths as white American mothers.”
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t (docs.google)

“Indiscriminate interbreeding between distinct forms, whether ‘species’ or markedly different races, is not generally beneficial. The defect may show in a change in the sex-ratio of the offspring, probably caused by the early abortion of members of one sex, generally the male in the case of mammals.”
amazon.com/Race-John-R-Baker/dp/0936396040

LTA4H, or “leukotriene A4 hydrolase” is found on chromosome 17. An allele of this gene increases the risk of heart attack (the #1 cause of death in America) in Blacks by more than 250%, but only 16% in Whites. The 30% of Whites with this allele have counteracting genes, while the 6% of Black Americans who obtained it through race mixing do not.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974

The average rate of success for mixed race couples is around half that of same race couples, 0.127 compared to 0.213.
jstor.org/stable/4145377

There is evidence that the more similar the two people are, the happier their marriage tends to be.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019188699190057I

A study in Iceland showed that 3rd cousin marriages are the most fertile and successful. Suggesting that mating within one's ethnic/racial group would be more beneficial than outside of one's ethnic/racial group.
sciencemag.org/content/319/5864/813.abstract

>why does Slovenia claim to be an alpine country when their tallest "mountain" isn't even 3000m high?
because their country is small and 1/3 of their area is alpine and 1/3 of their population lives in the alps

It does just the opposite, mixed race baboon. Whites are less genetically diverse because natural selection eliminated all the useless genes. There may be less variety, but the traits selected for are better. "genetically stronger" in evolutionist speak means "more diversity (of traits)" which in biology speak means "more mutations" which in human speak means "more degenerate".

The only way to avoid inbreeding and decay is to keep Mediterraneans, Balkanites and non-whites out. According to this, Europeans should be the ones migrating to untermenschen countries and not the other way around, because it's the only way to fix their inbred source population.

"Genetic rescue is designed to move gene variants from an outbred population to an inbred population," says Harris. "Our results suggest managers must ensure that this movement only goes one way; otherwise harmful mutations from the inbred population may lower the fitness of the outbred group."

sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160606103654.htm

Any non-white immigration is a genocidal genetic charity at expense of the native population

reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/i765g/do_the_principles_of_hybrid_vigor_andor/

>. There may be less variety, but the traits selected for are better. "genetically stronger" in evolutionist speak means "more diversity (of traits)" which in biology speak means "more mutations" which in human speak means "more degenerate

but now you are contradicting what you previously said. Before you said that it may be that italians have high IQ and mostly positive traits but your primary desire to keep a genetically homogenous population.

what a joke

>that italians have high IQ and mostly positive traits
Italian people are not a single entity and their genetics are absolute trash comparing to Celtic-Germanic Europeans, and more importantly a fucking danger for developed and reinforced immune system they have
>tfw too stupid for actual science
Melbourne Greek restaurant cleaner feels

>and more importantly a fucking danger for developed and reinforced immune system they have

>tfw to intelligent for diseases

Yet again, ethnically pure peoples exhibit genetic superiority when put in their native habitat. While being in Swiss Army, I’ve witnessed myself how German Swiss outperform and feel more well within mountain regions than those with ancestry in Portugal, Albania and Serbia. Most serious geneticists and eugenicists (some of them being from Italy) highly imply that even mixing outside of regions in Italy is not a good fuckind idea.

KEK. I haven't seen this one.

,

because shitaly sucks

why?