Why do the democrats want to ban guns?

Why do the democrats want to ban guns?

Attached: 1562821172366.jpg (1273x873, 186K)

they don't

Because they kill people, dumbass

they are tired of being shot over SJW'ing when they shouldn't be.

they do

What a retarded argument. Are we also going to ban alcohol, cigarettes and fast food such those "kill people" far more than guns do?

Will we? No. Should we? Absolutely.

>Guns
>Alcohol
>Cigarettes
>Fast food
>Cars (in the city)
>All opiates/opiate derivatives

Ban them all

Based on the stats and other crazy shit that gun owners do, it's obvious that the US isn't responsible enough to have arms freely.

Other countries have similar guns per capita and don't have the level of violence that we do. So the best thing to do is to get rid of them until people around her smarten up.

citation

Why do republicans only have soft support for guns. There only opinion is all the gun control we have now is fine, but only a little more plaese

We should ban those things because niggers and stupid people have no self control? Yeah I don't fucking think so bud. What we should do instead is bring back public hangings and sentence people who commit gun crimes to death, which will obviously never happen because the democrats don't want their slaves to be punished no matter what they do.

Now a cute AOC faces thread

Attached: aoc1.jpg (1640x976, 88K)

They will be banned sooner or later, so the sooner the better.

mimimimimimimim guns....my precious guns - nasty dems takin my guuuuns...
- any 'murican rep

Attached: 1463770706745.jpg (1920x1280, 1.03M)

because banning something makes it go away forever 4head

That they want guns banned? How about the fact that multiple blue states have already banned "assault" weapons at the state level.

It's to help curve disadents among the ruled. Citizens should not be able to defend themselves that's what the state is for.

>They will be banned sooner or later
According to who, fags like yourself? Go live in fucking Mexico if you love gun bans so much. Btw how's gun control working for them over there?

why not just prevent people with a history of domestic violence from owning guns?

Good question, but I have a better idea. How about we make demestic violence a felony? I find it interesting how the fucking democrats don't want to do that though. Instead they want "red flag laws" that they can expand more and more to take guns away from anybody they want.

When you ban alcohol, people make their own alcohol, which is even less safe and people become blind from methanol poisoning.
When you ban guns, people make their own guns, which don't work as you can see in the nazi from Germany, a few days ago. His guns malfuncitoned more often than not.

Stop being such a scared little pussy, guns do far more damage to society than good. You just want to make sure every pathetic little white faggot who gets bullied like you did will have access to powerful assault weapons and an endless supply of ammunition.

fear of the unknown.

because 40% of police are domestic abusers

I think it has more to do with protecting those in power than any left/right divide user

No, when you ban guns you just take them away from law abiding citizens. Criminals will continue to own guns no matter what retarded laws we have.

>Stop being such a scared little pussy
And there it is. Thanks for letting me know you're underaged and not qualified to talk about this issue. You can fuck out this thread now kiddo.

... you idiot. Oh my god. You lack any understanding of these things. It IS ALREADY illegal. The problem is, just because something is illegal, doesn’t mean people won’t do it. Hence why banning things won’t work, classic example is alcohol prohibition. Look how that worked out. Weed (in some places) heroin, cocaine, all illegal. Very easily accessed. News flash: those who commit murder don’t give a fuck about gun laws, why do you think banning something will be the cure all?

This is the most pathetic and ignorant argument I’ve seen here

Attached: akSCIN0.png (631x502, 186K)

Attached: aoc-charlie.jpg (789x460, 44K)

Well, if you dont know how to safely play with your toys then they should be taken away...

so niggers can steal more TVs because of slavery or whatnot

THESE ARE RACISTS

Oh it most definitely is about that. But my main point is that the democrats are just using DV as an excuse to go on gun grabs. Next they will say anyone with a restraining order get their guns taken, so on and so on. If the democrats REALLY cared about DV they would make the punishment for that crime a lot harsher. Anyone who takes the left won't use their red flags laws to enact a defacto gun ban is fucking delusional.

Firearms are not toys

>Why do the democrats want to ban guns?

They don't want to "ban guns".
I'm sure they would permit the US Army to use a whole lot of guns, therefore it's not a "ban".

Words matter.

>found the actual nazi

Attached: 307497F4-8152-49C5-A9FC-7524AD4134BE.jpg (600x778, 121K)

The only people who claim guns are "toys" are leftists

okay so what if i said we should ban:

>racist speech
>sexist speech
>homophobic speech
>Anime

replace Trump with Putin, and AOC with Trump, this would be 100% accurate

So you can't fight back effectively

>anime
>Miyazaki was right
are you implying anime was a mistake?

user, if we ever want our kids to be safe, we need to get rid of all war. Getting rid of guns would be a good first step, though.

Attached: 1570760093368.jpg (717x765, 369K)

are we still posting this meme? in 2019

get with the times grandpa

Attached: leo2.png (493x453, 443K)

> stop making fun of my retarded hero

calm down, balding cuck soyboy

Attached: 1561477153150.gif (500x338, 688K)

Back in the 90s, Congress passed the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, also known as the Lautenberg Amendment. The problem is that the law only bans attackers who are or have been married, have children with, or live or used to live with their victims from purchasing or owning a firearm.
Currently, only 27 states have passed laws expanding on these federal protections

Also what is the gunshow loophole?

>muh slipery slope argument

Attached: 0mKXcg1.gif (640x360, 1.14M)

Attached: 5A0DBE82-4A3B-4CFD-A76D-A1AB78CFD549.jpg (770x415, 42K)

>based russian shill
I knew it! this whole tread is just a bunch of spook bots! You have to go back.

here pham

Attached: bj blowjob.jpg (684x1024, 99K)

Attached: aoc-glowingeyes.jpg (452x413, 196K)

At least the authoritarians in this thread are ideologically consistent. They aren't hiding behind an appeal to fear, they are unabashed when it comes to what they want to ban. I am happy w3 have free speech so we can all bear witness their insanity. They want to ban that too though so it's easier to hide behind lies.

> if you don't believe what i believe you are a russian bot

calm down, balding cuck soyboy

Attached: 1560900773147.gif (241x313, 65K)

Stupidity.

Weak people attempting to satiate a desire to control things that scare them.

Career criminals in politics that know it'll be easier to get away with shit if they're the only ones with guns.

There's plenty of reason they won't admit to.

Attached: 623.jpg (500x348, 149K)

If you don't believe what I believe I am a soy boy, is that right you fucking Russian bot?

It's like I said already, it's very simple. Make domestic violence a felony and then these people won't be allowed to have guns anymore. Any reason the "law and order" democrat party is against this? Why do we need more bullshit laws that their voter block ignore anyway?

Obvious Russian bot is obvious.

o mae wa...
MOU SHINDEIRU

The only ones that use them as toys are right wingers....

you like consuming soy and you are balding. your childish beliefs are unrelated to this.

Then you should stop pouting like little children every time someone tries to regulate them...

>implying i'm vegan
>be me
>lives in northwest texas
>hunt on a regular basis
>kekkles
KEK

Wrong again, you wanna go for strike three?

>shoots you in the face
You're out...

If you are too retarded to figure this out on your own I can explain it for you...its called sarcasm

Where do you live... they're highly regulated.

Serious question, have you ever purchased a firearm, applied for a concealed weapon permit, or applied for an NFA item?

Wasnt wrong the first time to begin with retard....

So? Why does it affect you when people use them as toys? That would be as opposed to using them as weapons. Also what you said is objectively false. You've heard of socialist gun clubs. Hyperbole helps no one dawg.

but user, im not shilling for trump

>WAHH NOT LETTING ME SHOUT NIGGER IS LITERALLY 1984

>REQUIRING A LICENCE TO OWN AND OPERATE A CAR IS INFRINGING MUH RIGHTS

I wouldnt say "highly"... as long as fucktards are still running around shooting civilians in every fucking state there is something wrong with the regulations

Control, votes, aaaaand power.

Toys sarcastically retard...jesus you guys are fucktarded!

>NIGGER
>you can't criticize china either, you gook

Dude, balding? I'm fucking bald as a cue...like the President. Although I am not combing over little remnants of hair to look otherwise like our fearless leader...

Also edamame is delicious...though I never liked soy milk, if that soy boy thing is supposed to be some kind of insult...it reads very high on the lameometer

Ok, I'll bite.

How would you change things to prevent sick people from getting their hands on firearms or any weapon for that matter. (Cars, tools, knives, explosives, guns, etc.)

>>you can't criticize china either, you gook
where? Im in america and south park has been doing that the past 2 weeks

shouting slurs is not the same as calling political opponents whinnie the pooh

In August, the new zealand PM bans semi and automatic weapons. In Oct she announces Immigration from african and middle east countries to increase by 50 per cent.
see how it works yet ?

Obviously never purchased a gun before. Has no idea the hoops you have to jump through.

Ok good you bit! Here's how I would do it.....

Obviously you dont know how to buy a gun, there are no hoops or jumping involved...

GUNSHOW
U
N
S
H
O
W

LOOPHOLE
O
O
P
H
O
L
E

Intellectually disingenuous. Faggot confirmed.

Except they don’t

I dont know what that word means

People with guns kill other people. And some people are crazy as fuck.

When was the last time someone got a hold of a pack of cigarettes and killed their classmates with them the next day at school?

I chose to drink and be slowly killed by it. But I whould be against if someone beat me to death with a bottle of whiskey.

Gunshow loophole? How many shooters got their guns this way? FYI most retailers at gunshows do background check. It only takes a few seconds. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

btfo stupid nigger
>NIGGER

I would start gun reform by banning anyone that posts this stupid Ocasio photo repeatedly with the bullshit "ban guns" question from EVER owning a firearm, crossbow, bow and arrow or sword or tool of any kind with the exception of maybe a knife or rope to kill himself...also, a lifetime supply of condoms or a vasectomy...

Why does this bother you so? Gun show loopholes should be fixed..it wouldn't affect you at all...

i'm surprised some idiot hasn't shot up a gunshow yet. don't be getting any ideas now, user...

As the saying goes, it takes one to know one...

So you want people to have no defence agains shooters? You would rather be a blubering bitch begging for your life before getting gunned down rather than standing a chamce at ending thar human garbage?

why can’t the left meme?

It's a weak argument that's why it bothers me. I'm giving you am opportunity to voice your opinion and offer sold advice on how to change things without the REEEEE that would actually help the situation and your coming up short. Do better.

It's because that's the only way that they can turn the U.S. populace into slaves. We are already well on our way to an Orwellian police state. So long as we are armed, we can rebel. That is exactly why the founding fathers put the second amendment into ink.

Get rid of (((them)))

Because everyone is fucking armed lmfao, see how that works. Shooters target soft targets.

it’s not even well done, look at that shitty masking