I'll start
ITT: Decaying cores of dynasty era franchises
>dynasty
>dynasty
>reddithawks
>dynasty
3cupsin5yearsequalsdynasty
>dynasty
at least three consecutive championships is a dynasty
>dynasty
you have to win back-to-back to even have an argument of being a dynasty
>ytsanyd
Salary cap prevented this
>0 (zero) back to back cups
>dynasty
>blackhawks
>dynasty
'no'
OP isn't wrong about the core decaying though
their playoff chances are basically fucked this year
>3 cups
>not even consecutive
>dynasty
It's more like shared dynastic rule with the Kangz and Shitsburp
if anything, the pens are at least a “dynasty” this decade because two out three of their cups are consecutive
but they’re not a dynasty either.
>decaying
The dynasty is just being started. They'll Win the next ten from next season
they will be this year desu the only team in modern salary cap era to 3peat, tears from haters will be delicious
...
2009 patriots
>it's only a dynasty if my team does it
for me bare minimum to qualify as a dynasty is 3/4{obviously implies back to back at some point} winning the majority of years while winning at least 4. I guess technically you can win 4/7 or 5/9 and not go back to back