Reunification when?

Reunification when?

Other urls found in this thread:

wuhstry.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/william-the-conquerors-england-and-its-relations-with-the-papacy/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigand
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's not gonna happen at the eclesiastical level for a very long time.
The best we can hope for is grassroots movement at the laity level to bring about unity in practice, if not in name.
There's already good ground being made in the second area in the Americas. I can't speak for the rest of the world.

What are the main disagreements?

fun fact, we had an orthodox king at that point

Never. Devoted Christians see each other as heretics. Orthodoxy believe that worshipping a living person is not a great idea, Latins believe that worshipping icons is not very Christian either.

Name?

Nothing of essence.
It's just a cultural divide. Romans vs L*tins.

harald hardrada

the poorthodox church has been the cuckold of the muslim world for too long

It's Greek Romans vs Latin "we wuz more Roman than u because use Latin even though our empire collapsed" right?

lots of small things that would just be considered cultural differences and differing emphases in modern times. There were some big ones like the filioque, hesychasm, and Augustine, which today do not pose a problem for reunification. The main thing is the Pope and his authority.

>2017
>believing that Catholics worship the pope or that Catholics do not use icons

that's interesting, I would have never thought that about him
this

differences in practice (orthodoxs have better ones) and in authority (everyone knows the Pope is the Bishop in Vatican, except orthodoxs, they want each Bishop to rule their own ground)

>Latins believe that worshipping icons is not very Christian either.
latins worship the virgin mary which might as well count as worshipping an icon.

>veneration = worship
(THIS IS WHAT PROTESTANTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN)

Not exactly.
It's pretty complicated. It's mainly that the Popes wanted to be like emperors.

>except orthodoxs, they want each Bishop to rule their own ground

You mean they want pope to influence Vatican only?

pr*testants are subhuman, I am an atheist christian

he's a pretty interesting person
spent most of his life as a mercenary in russia and greece, refused papal authority, invaded denmark and england and had two wives

They treat him like he is more important or something. Regular members of the church have no voice, etc.

Yeah, it was the point when the Western Church went down. Just like our Raskol.

How amazing would the world have been if Northern Europe went Orthodox instead of Protestant.

His life was awesome.

>I don't want my culture to exist
We'd conquer England and you'll be nevr born.

Burn every Church to be honest.

For all you know you wouldn't even be a country if there was no separation of the churches.

I'm not acountry.

HAHA GUM ON BENIS :DDDDDDDD

>
>
>

Christianity is pretty much dead. Even those in the west who still call themselves Christian are liberal and progressive as fuck abandoning all traditions and principles.

oh please, as if people in the past were principled. Stories of lying, deceipt, theivery and sluttery have existed in Christian Europe for millenia. It's always happened. Now people are aware of it more than before.
Also, traditions are only useful insofar they preserve Christian dogma. Cultures have always changed, and it makes perfect sense that it is in a state of disequilbrium right now as it catches up to the fastest technological change humanity has ever seen.
About Christianity being dead: it's still the biggest religion, and growing in future power centers in East Asia. Don't discount the possibility of a cybercatholic empire. Stranger things have happened.

that's pretty neat

The original Orthodox Church had five biships who were the most powerful on Earth(Mediterranean)

Rome was one of the five, and it began hireing armies to conquer lands from the other 4, bowing to barbarians who destroyed and annexed the old Western empire
The other four archbishop of the pentarch then fell to Islam's armies because the west was busy fighting it's self
Eastern Orthodox Church. It found its fullest expression in the laws of Emperor Justinian I of the Byzantine Empire. In the model, the Christian church is governed by the heads (patriarchs) of the five major episcopal sees of the Roman Empire: Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem

Don't give a shit about the church outside of the west. It was a rallying figure for European civilization but no longer. There wasn't open faggotry, democracy, legal abortion, and wide spread drug use even legal in some countries, and legal prostitution. Not to mention the encouragement and defense of mass Muslim immigration. The pope himself is defending faggots, atheists, and licking refugee feet.

already happened at the council of florence. but the turks invaded constantinople and ruined it.

the pope always had primal leadership within the universal church.

>Don't give a shit about the church outside of the west
> not knowing faggotry and legal prostitution is an ancient traditional European practice
> Pope not calling for exterminitaion and forced conversion of faggots and atheists means he's defending them
Please stop reading Church Militant propaganda, heretic.

>Orthodoxy believe that worshipping a living person is not a great idea

What?

>Latins believe that worshipping icons is not very Christian either.

Firstly, Eastern Orthodox don't worship icons
Secondly, Eastern Catholics and to a lesser degree Latin Catholics also venerate icons

More than anything else the extent of the Pope's authority. The sparksnotes version is that for Catholics he's more the CEO, to Orthodox he should be more the head of the board

Fun fact: The conversion of Sweden was never completed, so people still thought Adam&Eve were only born after Rangarök killed all the relevant old gods. In rural Sweden there are signs of people drawing curse runes as late as the 19th century.

>Burgundy
>actually doesn't include Burgundy
heh

Never, Orthodox are heretics who have strayed from the light of God

>

The Anglo-Saxons weren't Catholics

Didn't they follow Rome and love the Pope?

Not necessarily, bear in mind you're talking about a time long before the schism where "Catholic" had a different meaning.
William's attempt to gain Papal backing from Alexander II rested on the claim that the English church was too independent and had to be brought back in line with Rome.
wuhstry.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/william-the-conquerors-england-and-its-relations-with-the-papacy/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigand