Is it true that women don't understand what a "nation" or a "tribe" is? That they don't know what loyalty is...

Is it true that women don't understand what a "nation" or a "tribe" is? That they don't know what loyalty is. It bothered me for a while, but let see some examples of it:

>French women fucked Germans during German occupation of France
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html
>Austrian and German women had no problem spreading their legs for Russians
pic related
>Women invite blacks and arabs to their nations
Don't even need to source that one
>Our polish women changed from patriotic and german/russian despising soldiers to coalburning cunts.

Why are women leftist, socialist and pro-progressive? What the fuck is wrong with them. They just invite rape.

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3692181/Wear-headscarf-raped-Sick-messages-threatening-sex-attacks-women-posted-Swedish-town-stickers-demanding-democracy-replaced-Islam.html#ixzz4EfxkPoJW
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Nothing is wrong, it is their nature.

Men are supposed to be strong enough to control them like any other animal he owns.

>Is it true that women don't understand what a "nation" or a "tribe" is? That they don't know what loyalty is.

Yes. They even have an ANTI loyalty mode built in.

Why do women ruin everything, Sup Forums?

>women who resist invaders/conquerors/occupiers are killed
>those who submit breed and pass their genes on
Evolution, plain and simple

loyalty and honor are a male concept

expect and show neither to women for a happier life

loyalty and belief in blood ties are for beta cuckolds

Women don't understand those things because they never had to worry about it throughout the entire course of evolution. They just let the men fight each other and fuck whoever wins. Really we can't even blame them for it. It was actually men who made the mistake of giving them the right to vote and pretending they are equal, which should never have happened.

Women are gene-gatherers. They are wired to increase genetic diversity. That means they will spread their legs for anything with a different genetic makeup than their own tribe. Prevents inbreeding.

>Mehmet has no idea how this functions
>Buys into leftist inbreeding meme

On topic. Women were never responsible for fending off outsiders. Thus they only have the most vague concept of is especially as they themselves are part of the resources whom are fought over in many conflicts rather than part of the fighting groups.

This changes once they have children, at least when the father is around. As suddenly they have a vested interested, their children and are too old to be of any interest to possible conquerors.

The world is fucked up.

Men and women don't trust each other any more. Russians and Europeans don't trust each other (even Europeans don't trust each other).

What the fuck.

Women understand what the human race is and are loyal to it.

The fact that Sup Forums considers everyone who doesn't buy into Nazi propaganda disloyal is not women's problem, it's yours.

Different tribe is one thing, breeding with niggers is breeding with another species

women need a strong man to protect their child and themselves

if Nazis are in power you'd best believe they'll want to get with Nazis. If communists are in power, ditto. Islamists the same.

Not very hard to understand whatsoever.

Women fuck dogs...

>current year
>not having a religious court to force your womynz in their place

Seriously goyim?

That is a commonly observed behaviour in many species. For example young male lions, elephants and apes are expelled from the tribe to prevent inbreeding. It is simply unhealthy to fuck around too long with your cousins or siblings. Pakistan and England prove this point.

Men's survival strategy is team-work and ganging up on your enemies.
Female's survival strategy is spreading their legs.

penis envy

The demise of western women's sexual behaviour obviously correlates with the destruction of the catholic church. In other words there is no moral instituion to keep women in check.

No, men's survival strategy is killing everyone who disagrees.
Women's survival strategy is finding a peaceful compromise.
Women are more mature in every way, but men are more logic and action oriented.
This is why women have to make decisions and men have to enforce these decisions.
This is why Jewish culture, for example, has survived for so long.

And it's behaviour not occuring in a whole bunch of other species, selectively picking out a few who for the most part do not align with humans especially where the effort required in raising children is concerned to push your point is idiotic.

Human women NEED the father to stay around for the children and their own survival. Up untill welfare being introduced relatively recently any other outcome would've lead to their and their childrens untimely demise.

The inbreeding angle itself doesn't work, as you only need a population of a few thousand to effectively prevent it. Thus the whole "we have to do this to prevent inbreeding" and the other leftist arguments are hollow to begin with. Especially since mudslimes and nogs tend to be INCREDIBLE inbred.

Btw the animals you chose as an example do not engage in this to prevent inbreeding, most of the young males are expelled from the group by older males, but to keep the younger males from challenging their position. The males of these species tend to have little to no issue with banging their own daughters if they manage to hold onto the reigns long enough to do so.

Back before civilization if your tribe lost to an enemy tribe then the women had sex with the conquerors so they could survive. The winners of the battle had proven themselves to be superior mates anyway. Natural instinct

>Men are more logical
>Women try to find peaceful compromise and collectivist "nobody is upset" solutions which are impossible and grind progress aswell as decision finding processes to a complete halt.
>Women are somehow more mature
>Women should make decisions

None of this computes in any kind of way. Women are themselves for the most part barely above the level of children because men tend to prefer neoteny features which has lead to various physical changes and is unlikely to have left them without change to mental faculties. Women are collectivist, they have a desperate need for resource hoarding to secure their own and their childrends future, they also are extremly reluctant to cause offense as ostracization meant death for them and their children as they're incapable of supporting themselves much less their children.

Women mostly were in charge of raising children, tending to in group relationships, keeping the peace inside the group. They were never in charge of dealing with outsiders, aquiring resources (altough they will demand this happen) nor protecting the group at large.

>Women were never responsible for fending off outsiders
says the country that got BTFO by our partisan women, go prep the bull

The Albanian bull for your wife, isn't that your job? Hey how's Kosovo, Albanian I guess.

Exactly, which shows that they have too much freedom

...

wow, you suck at this germany, is there an aussie here to show this cuck how it works?

>women are genetically predisposed hurr durr
Holy shit, this virgin-tier autism. Well men are genetically predisposed to fuck any woman they meet and then bail, so do you execute your evolutionary imperative?
There's a bit more to humans than just plain instincts, you know, stuff like culture, education, abstract thinking n shit.

>virgin-tier autism

Fairly sure aussies have no interest in showing others how to prep your bull.

That is probably the worst 2 buttons meme I've seen in all my life.
Also, you're not refuting the central point of my argument.

DELET THIS!

Isn't adapting and surviving so your genes can carry on, by any means necessary, the most logical thing to do? Isn't ensuring that only the strong men's children's genes get to carry on the most logical thing? Isn't killing everything that moves, and getting yourself killed not a very logical thing to do?

sorry russbro but is right
women tend to listen to their emotions because the culture around them says their emotions matter, that's why liberals are mostly faggots, that is not gays but men who overestimate the value of their emotions, except it's ok for women to be faggots and when men are being faggots they get called faggots, the only solution is to raise a generation of women who know their emotions don't mean shit in the face of reason like generation upon generation of men were raised, liberals are saying masculinity is toxic but it's actually femininity, raise your daughter as you would raise your son and she'll have the values of a man including patriotism loyalty and that other shit

he is not the only veteran reporting this, others reported how German women welcomed Allis barebreasted.
Also, Germans had to make up rape stories out of shame, like after WW1 with the Rhineland bastards.

even though I hate german scum, this is really depressing.

this is a reminder to keep your kurwas in check.
I once read about a Bavarian soldier who had an affair with a "Volksdeutsche" girl in occupied Poland, as soon as the Soviets arrived she no longer could speak German anymore. The German saw, while marching into a prison camp, how that girl already had a Soviet boyfriend...

extremely bad, keep trying

Nation is a very recent concept anyway. But that's beside the point. Women are pragmatic. They're for a man because of his status. You can't defend her? She'll shack up with a brute who can. Evolution has selected women to be like that. It's what's best for their genes given how inferior women are in the battlefield and how frequently men make war.

>The German saw, while marching into a prison camp, how that girl already had a Soviet boyfriend...
Jesus fucking christ.

it's everyone for themselves
a storm's a brewin

>this is a reminder to keep your kurwas in check.
>I once read about a Bavarian soldier who had an affair with a "Volksdeutsche" girl in occupied Poland, **as soon as the Soviets arrived she no longer could speak German anymore. The**
>**German saw, while marching into a prison camp, how that girl already had a Soviet boyfriend...**

They're really all whores

sadly with watermark, but she certainly does not regret being "raped"

of course europeans don't trust each other, europeans killed each other for centuries until they realized they could kill other races

Do you people ever stop for a moment to consider if your ideas actually reflect reality? Or are you so caught up with how Stacy got with Tyrone that you see everything as related to that thing?

If the reason why most women supported refugees was because they want to get fucked by a pack of Africans, don't you think all the propaganda would show big ripped Africans coming over on boats? Why does it instead show dirty, crying children? Because the (((pro-immigrant organisations))) are appealing to women's maternal instincts, not their libido. That is what is causing this. Not all this cuck bullshit you're all fucking obsessed with, but women's maternal instinct which has no other outlet because they're all on the fucking pill constantly and have no children of their own. Women never see the reality, all the young nigger men, because it never appears on the mainstream media. Women get their information from the TV news and Facebook, not Sup Forums and Youtube.

You can all be fucking stupid and obsessive sometimes. It's the worst thing about this website.

>women tend to listen to their emotions because the culture around them says

>why would I need maths I want to be journalist
This is why we get so many shit tier click bait articles that totally misrepresent scientific publications.

Fucking hell this thread.
Sup Forums has got to be slowly depressing all of us
Not good

Female evolution promoted a few things that beget treason:

1. Maintaining genetic fitness means being attracted to the strong/successful and not the weak/failures
2. Outgroups are attractive because they represent genetic diversity and prevent inbreeeding
3. Ostracized women are dead women; they are unable to care for themselves
4. Women in conquered groups are mostly raped, but not killed

Women have no biological imperative to maintain loyalty. They are, in a sense, born sociopaths. Their loyalty is to whatever group or man is strong, able to defeat other men or groups of men, and has the resources to provide for her children. Women are a spoil of war, they are a prize. Women innately understand this on an instinctual level - they have nothing to fear from abdullah becoming head imam of the caliphate of europe; because they will still get fucked, have children, and have the resources to survive.

Men, on the other hand, are brutally and savagely murdered, even if they are just boys, when an outgroup wins against the ingroup.

Women win, even if they're conquered. Men only win if they're the conquerors. As such, men have biologically developed loyalty, trust, brotherhood, honor, and so forth; these improve the effective performance of the ingroup so that the ingroup does not lose to the outgroup.

I'll say that again:
Women don't give a flying fuck about the country or nation being defeated. They welcome conflict between men with open arms because the winners are proving their genetic fitness. They are born traitors. This is why monogamy was so strongly promoted in european culture, why women did not have the right to vote. Until this fundamental error is corrected, european nations will continue to destroy themselves at the behest of women.

science has spoken

Tell me why we haven't exterminated the American govenrnment?
a single nigger with a european in the homeland is enough cause for extermination.

every single supporter of ww2 in america should be executed, along with their successors.

the white man everywhere thinks the laws of nature no longer count as he developed into a higher state of consciousness, where everything will be better if he surrenders all principles which made him strong.

It's just amazing. Boys dream of doing things, girls dream of attaching themselves to a man who does things.

I find the whole thing where girls plan their dream wedding to be vile, too. I don't even know how to describe why I hate it. It's like, instead of making something happen, they just sort of waste their lives in their imagination, getting so fucking invested in something that has literally NOT FUCKING HAPPENED that it controls them.

There are a lot of levels of delusion, you could dream about being an astronaut, and even though you might not succeed, at least it's about skill and knowledge, but this wedding obsession has absolutely no serviceable potential to improve their life at all.

It's junk food for the brain.

the racial traitor hanged.

What can we do to reverse that?

A leftist Serbian! As rare as a neonazi Swede.

how can you even believe in fantasy leftist ideals when you're living in reality in serbia?

strong eat weak are eaten, truths.

((men))

take away their right to vote

easier said than done

>take away their right to vote
Fuck you I work and pay taxes and I don't want my life oppressed by a bunch of shits who hate me and want to make my life shit.

Get back in the kitchen whore

Tits or gtfo

Gb2/b/ nigger.

Critically underrated post, Sup Forums needs to learn this to understand where modern feminism and all of its effects come from

>not in the kitchen cooking dinner for her husband
>probably not with child

You have literally 0 value. End your life.

This. Women are the closest thing to human like animals we have, they have to regarded as such.

This.

Aside from le ebin genetic diverstiy maymay, which is total bollocks.

>believing that bullshit
:^)

Okay, clarify this for me, are you

1. A troll

2. An actual housewife

3. My values are wrong because they aren't your values

>.Ostracized women are dead women; they are unable to care for themselves
Why does Sup Forums believe this when history proves this is not true? Why do you guys love to make shit up?

Women ruin everything because they have privilege but no responsibility. Bring break back a woman's responsibility and watch as they start acting like adults again. Granted giving them responsibility is pretty much equivalent to dismantling the welfare state, which would be called sexist and since most men are cucks it wouldn't happen.

I am working, taxpaying citizen of the female persuasion, quite satisfied with myself and my accomplishments in life, laughing at retards like you.

That's depressing.

Happy and content until you can't get alphas to give you the time of day and have to settle for /r9k/

>he really believes this happens
>he has no idea who he's talking to
kek

>and thus the white race died because women wanted that promotion instead of a family

>he has no idea who he's talking to

Thats the whole point of an anonymous imageboard you thick cunt, jesus christ.

>used up whore thinks she's too good to have to settle for anything because she's a successful businesswoman

You shouldn't be working or paying taxes. You should be in the home.

The fuck are you talking about? You realize there are two relevant parties in the aspect of rape or the scenarios you are bringing up? The man is involved? So how exactly does your argument somehow place the blame only on women somehow?

And why exactly are the rapists themselves exempt for betrayal of their nation by breeding with the enemy and giving them number for the next generation?

>>French women fucked Germans during German occupation of France
Who the fuck cares. Russian women fucked nazis, i had an aryan classmate with SS great granda-pa. Not a crime.
Fucking frogs and hollanders let germans fuck their women while they clean their german boots downstairs in 1943, then when it's safe they beat those very women.

That's true, there is absolutely no loyalty between women and no real friendship. Very selfish, jealous and love to talk bad about people and "friends".
Source: i am one of them

It's literally beneficial for them to be like that in order to carry on their genetic lineage.

>Other people did a bad thing
>This means that I don't have to make any effort to be good
Sort of like how genocide is acceptable if anybody on the planet is doing it.

>None of this computes in any kind of way. Women are themselves for the most part barely above the level of children because men tend to prefer neoteny features which has lead to various physical changes and is unlikely to have left them without change to mental faculties. Women are collectivist, they have a desperate need for resource hoarding to secure their own and their childrends future, they also are extremly reluctant to cause offense as ostracization meant death for them and their children as they're incapable of supporting themselves much less their children.
>Women mostly were in charge of raising children, tending to in group relationships, keeping the peace inside the group. They were never in charge of dealing with outsiders, aquiring resources (altough they will demand this happen) nor protecting the group at large.
This.

That's not how it works. If you breed with the enemies' women then the offspring won't have the conquered nations ideals and culture, you are planting the seeds of your own culture. The muslims here love English girls but don't think their children will be any less muslim.

I don't get if you're with or against me in this one, since what I've said had no implications of justifying anyone's actions.

Oh, you mean like how all Brazilians LOVE Portugal?

Don't be stupid - unless you stay there and teach the kid, they will grow in a broken country that hates yours.

>That they don't know what loyalty is.
except they do. Women are overwhelmingly supportive of the status quo. a century ago that was traditionalism. the same suffragettes that first fought for women to vote were the strongest voting block against immigration. the status quo today is just kike progressivism

This, if an invading force actually sticks to itself they end up being assimilated by the conquered population, see Rome with Greece, the Normans with England, as the native population slowly takes back control of the administration.

>Thats the whole point of an anonymous imageboard
Thinking your delusional fantasies are true?

A promotion can grant you enough financial means for a family though.

Being in the home doesn't grant me a livable income.

Just because one party is wrong does not mean that everybody has to be wrong. Willfully allowing yourself to be raped by foreign invaders is among the most stupid, shortsighted, and disloyal things you can do. Any woman who would condone such behavior is fundamentally useless to any nation.

exactly

'Wear a headscarf or be raped': Sick messages threatening sex attacks on women are posted in Swedish town with stickers demanding democracy is replaced with Islam

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3692181/Wear-headscarf-raped-Sick-messages-threatening-sex-attacks-women-posted-Swedish-town-stickers-demanding-democracy-replaced-Islam.html#ixzz4EfxkPoJW

Yes, I agree with you. My point, though, is to show OP's reprimand on women alone makes no sense - someone had to rape them and these are just as disloyal to their nations.

>if
That's the big question, user. If you rape a woman and lose the war, you gave the enemy a free soldier.

You're only acting on hindsight bias. The entire story is about women willfully being impregnated by the invaders. Trying to pretend that it's somehow any other person's fault for such women to be impregnated is absurd. As though to say that it's the fault of gravity if you jump off a cliff and die.

>inb4 shitposters claim "hurr you can live off your husband's money"
Fuck no a livable income is mine and mine only. It's my own money to use and manage and save and dispose of as I see fit. I don't want to live off someone else's money and risk a no to something I want, that's objectively worse than having my own money so whatever I want I can get no annoying obstacles in the way.