American churches should be “arming some of the parishioners” or hiring “professional security”...

>American churches should be “arming some of the parishioners” or hiring “professional security”, Republican Ken Paxton told Fox News in an interview hours after the shootings at Sutherland Springs First Baptist Church. “It’s going to happen again.”
archive.fo/lVm29

based yanks
our churches here would just let them walk in and shoot everybody

Thats just sad, man

thats the price of freedom :^)

Don't forget that only mosques get shot up in this country.

I look forward to the day one of the 'professional security' guys shoots the place up and they decide it's time to start arming the priests

Then what, armed guards in front of every walmart?

>Warrior priests

will they shoot the sharters?

The shooter was only stopped when a neighbor nearby ran and grabbed his rifle. It ended up stopping him at 26 otherwise the death toll could have been much higher.
IF some parishoners or the pastor were armed (or a security guard) was armed, the deaths would have been lower still, maybe even as low as 1 (the shooter himself). Seems straightforward and common sense. Simple concealed handgun before leaving for a Sunday service. Easy, practical, saves lives. Many many children were killed and it would fucking suck if this mistake were repeated again.

Or do you think victims should sit around getting shot at while they wait for police to arrive? Hell maybe while they are waiting for the police they can order a pizza too, so they can enjoy a nice snack while they wait to get rescued.

I agree
we need to arm children so people would stop shooting them

I think the point is why are 26 people being shot at in the first place. Even then, would religious people support taking guns into a church?

Can always count on the good ol USA to provide a good laugh

>be American
>be unarmed
>get shot by mass shooter

>be American
>get a gun for self defense
>get shot by cops for having a gun in their presense

>lol let's give even more people guns, how could that go wrong?
Why don't we just make everyone a cop while w're at it

Alright but why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon? Do they genuinely reason that their *desire* to own a lethal assault weapon equipped with armour-piercing rounds overrides the right of their compatriots to feel safe in public spaces?

or just abolish all gun free zones. all major shootings happen where people cant defend themselves. in a place where guns are so prevalent its downright dangerous to have a designated area where the good guys are disarmed. the only other option is to completely disarm the population which is nothing short of a pipe dream

stop baiting faggot

>american considers that bait

ah yes, Paddock would never have killed as many people if only the concert-goers carried along sniper rifles with them

Clearly we need to reconstitute the Templar order to defend churches, because we're a third world country now.

I-Isolated incident!

Children? Nah. Their parents, teachers and supervisors? YES.

I don't own a gun myself, the fact remains the only way to stop a shooter is with:
1-Another gun
2-Wait for shooter to tire himself out.

Which one do you think is better?

Cops are corrupt and retarded on average.

>doesnt trust cops
>thinks the average citizen is any better

if you think rights depending on people's needs isn't bait you need to get help

But aren't they turned on your fellow countrymen? What legitimate reason is there to own a murder tool?

Then you just go on some roof and shoot people from a distance

Las Vegas shooter had the advantage of high ground.

1-Gun control would not have stopped him.
2-Neither would more gun ownership since of course, he was so far away and in the cover of darkness. The victims had no choice but to adopt the "Euro plan" used by Breivik's victims and wait for police forces to arrive, therby causing the worst mass shooting in American history.

And you want that.....repeated? Because every gun free zone means more and more victims. Full stop.

>if you think rights depending on people's needs isn't bait you need to get help

to be fair, you can shoot at the average citizen without getting a dozen armoured cars and a helicopter on your ass

Power corrupts, cops have power. When citizens are all armed, nobody has power over anyone else.

To protect people. Do you think the entire British law enforcement and military should be disarmed? Better give up your nukes too btw

are you twelve years old?

>Las Vegas shooter
why did he kill all those people again

yes but they carry toilet paper instead of guns

"Assault weapons" clue is in the name, assault is not a nice word.

>better give up your nukes
funny thing is there is a not-insignificant amount of people in the UK who want this.

...

We still don't know.

money problems apparently
idiots blame it on mental illness when this man was 100% conscious of his horrible decisions

mentally well people don't go on killing sprees, dumbass

For the rush of power.

"Assault weapon" is a meaningless buzzword. Have fun with your memes, they do nothing to stop shootings.

Then let them, and let them disarm their entire military and everyone else too. Let them practice what they fucking preach before they bitch at America

if you think crimes are only committed by insane people then youre a real fucking idiot
he consciously sent his girlfriend away to another country and destroyed his computer's hard drive before the shooting began, picked an advantageous area for him to begin the massacre that he must have planned in advance, and had his own cameras watching the hallway for any security that mightve responded to his shooting
these are the actions of a sane man

ah yes, the expected brainlet retort
yes guns would not have helped the concert goers. that does nothing to fix the other shootings such as the church shooting or the orlando nightclub one.
there are destined to be shootings in america as long as there are guns. there will always be guns because guns nearly outnumber humans in america. even if massive initiatives were to happen today such as buybacks and bans there would be guns 100 years from now just because of how widespread they are. Having areas where guns are not allowed is doing nothing but painting targets on everyone in the location. And this is all in the name of making people feel safe when in reality its doing the exact opposite

you can already do that. what does that have to do with gun free zones

>mongrel argues they need more guns to stop the guns
hey tard...why not have guns only in the hands of responsible people?

>Ameriblubbers

like who? our police which you also always complain and whine about?

If those are functionally the same what's the problem with banning the top one