Xray requests. Bored, so I'll xray your pictures - I don't do shit fakeray or shoop...

Xray requests. Bored, so I'll xray your pictures - I don't do shit fakeray or shoop, just use Gimp to bring out what's there.

Guidance - thick fabrics, swimming costumes, where there is a bra or where the fabric is not in contact with the skin will almost certainly not work. Skin-coloured fabric is also tricky as Gimp can't highlight the skin under as it's the same colour. Small, shitty pictures or pictures that have already been digitally processed will also probably not work. Don't forget it takes a few minutes to download and manipulate each picture, plus there's the retarded Captcha to deal with.

I'm not brilliant, just OK and I do have a bad attitude and will rip you a second asshole if you don't follow the guidelines above and post impossible stuff.

What you got?

Attached: 1565183341679.jpg (500x667, 73K)

Anything?

Attached: E94CE90F-DD05-4CEB-8CEC-B403E31E98E9.jpg (582x728, 76K)

>Anything?
No. Fabric is way too thick, plus it's textured and I think she has a bra on

If we could see her bra that would be cool. If you don’t want to I understand.

Attached: _1342.jpg (799x1643, 266K)

Hmmm. I wonder what sort of feminine undergarment those two black straps could be part of?

Sorry - wrong image

(You)
(cont)
It's a really shitty image (look at the jpeg artifacts in the screen cap) plus it's already been digitally processed, as you can see by the spiky frequency curve

Attached: Capture.jpg (1449x966, 168K)

Attached: 22.jpg (1500x2666, 864K)

I just wanna see her body and her belly button but okay.

Attached: 39356460_1082647768576472_5310735952086302720_n.jpg (1080x1350, 220K)

No chance

Anything here?

Attached: sam (9).jpg (405x531, 38K)

why

Attached: sam(15).jpg (395x887, 72K)

plz

Attached: 25025716_682090061984693_4945714167727259648_n.jpg (735x735, 94K)

What is she wearing? What did I say?

And, in case you don't have two functioning synapses to rub together, swimming costume fabric is chosen so it doesn't go transparent when wet. Which means it will block all light. Which means you're a fucking idiot with reading comprehension issues

Attached: 12144105_1636037779988905_1349957778_n.jpg (837x837, 113K)

>why
Because I said so. Now fuck off

Doubtful, but I'll give it a go

Fabric is pretty thick so I think all you'll get is the outline of the nipples. I'll do this second, so hang on in there

can you x-ray this?

Attached: 20160808_183619999.jpg (888x787, 42K)

Appreciate you OP

Show me those sexy fucking lungs

Thanks OP. Figured it would be questionable but I wanted to try anyway. Have a few more of her that might work better but not sure

Attached: 24838782_1981431982130868_426562055756054528_n.jpg (924x924, 154K)

Nope. Image is really blurry when you zoom in and there's no details to bring out (apart from the stain)

Up next

Attached: Capture.jpg (1196x1026, 148K)

Another with thick fabric

Attached: 30604540_440402463083091_7618062034982141952_n.jpg (1080x720, 214K)

Is it possible to remove the blood on this?

Attached: Screenshot_20180216-190126_compress12.jpg (1080x1920, 267K)

As I thought

Attached: 1575566660673.jpg (735x735, 155K)

Thanks for giving it a go. Unfortunately none of her pics are that High Res

Attached: 1470889485800.jpg (720x960, 76K)

Attached: 85399C56-AB3A-497A-8AD6-9E4C8A3E90AC.jpg (1077x906, 197K)

Thanks for trying man

Any chance with this?

Attached: BDA4F794-8DCC-4B51-9A8D-442AF7D9775B.jpg (1080x1080, 236K)

Ironically the text will fuck with the overall effect and I won't be able to get rid of it easily. The shirt is pretty thick too, but I'll give it a punt

Can i see her panties?

Attached: 1918630_419071186787_7032939_n.jpg (540x720, 165K)

Is it possible to see through the shorts of girl closest to camera?

Attached: 1574437955199.jpg (640x960, 74K)

Nope - virtually nothing to work with

Attached: Capture.jpg (1350x1023, 225K)

Clearly see the bra top in this one

Won't be any better than the first

>Is it possible to remove the blood on this?
No. It's opaque

On this now

Its okay thanks man

Oof too bad

Attached: 10455690_10204273388609574_5059392148566616195_n-1.jpg (607x720, 94K)

Anything?

Attached: 14269016_191907014562386_124280294_n.jpg (1080x1349, 140K)

All I'm really doing is altering the tint of the fabric - it's pretty light-proof

Attached: 1575567200499.jpg (1077x906, 254K)

>Any chance with this?
The folds will fuck the result a bit, bit I'll give it a shot

This one should be easy op

Attached: FB_IMG_1575567853425.jpg (1080x1080, 68K)

or here

Attached: 27581985_756580041219817_7876264538125893632_n.jpg (1080x1350, 81K)

Or this one

Attached: 24327458_1964745487113123_6131267334905528320_n.jpg (1080x1350, 104K)

Nope. And it had already been processed so there were chunks of the spectrum missing

Attached: 1575567219618.jpg (1080x1080, 272K)

>Can i see her panties?
Possibly, but I can't be arsed showing underwear

Can you do this one

Attached: Screenshot_2017-01-23-02-51-51-1.png (791x1403, 845K)

>Is it possible to see through the shorts of girl closest to camera?
No, you fucking idiot. I'm using Gimp, not the fucking Hogwarts Sorting Hat

Attached: cc.jpg (540x720, 49K)

You need to brush up on your HP lore if you think that's how the sorting hat works...

>This one should be easy op
You fuck off and do it then. I love people who can't do this telling me how easy it should be

>Anything?
Unlikely - the white looks pretty saturated

Also unlikely, but I'll have a go after the white top

Thanks user. If these two are way easier you can just go for one of them instead
Again, not sure how easy any are though

Second from left?

Attached: 21151432_1856703761011521_2668266397776607384_n.jpg (960x720, 71K)

There wasn't a lot of detail in the white to work with

Up next

Attached: 1575567734965.jpg (1080x1349, 265K)

Do this one

Attached: 3BAC27DD-D0BA-4037-AB05-1E83DB2F91DF.jpg (631x1024, 42K)

Nope.

Attached: 1575567564161.jpg (607x720, 113K)

>Can you do this one
I've already tried this one in another thread (or one extremely similar), and no. The colour fucks with Gimp

Can't be arsed

Nope

>Second from left?
Idiot

>Do this one
Up next

Captcha is being a complete cunt - I'm having to solve about 9 per upload or reply

Can you do this one

Attached: 20191205_120039.jpg (1440x1786, 1.12M)

Why would that one not work? Sorry new to this.

The image had already been processed and it was full of jpeg artifacts

Attached: 1575568443825.jpg (631x1024, 75K)

>Can you do this one
Nope. That fabric would stop small-calibre bullets, never mind light

Hmm?

Attached: 1AF5C740-09C0-48D1-8D1D-6CFDEF0533B0.jpg (510x907, 162K)

Or maybe?

Attached: 1C0AE05C-3BD5-4EC9-8B91-82D2620A0EAA.jpg (742x738, 80K)

because you can do only easy tasks?

Because the image is tiny. look at the small spectrum and how jagged the image gets as I zoom in to work - any detail id compromised and the colour spectrum available to tweak the levels of is small. But I'll do a bit more.

Had this been a decent image then something good could have come out of it

Attached: Capture.jpg (1448x1040, 200K)

Attached: 1575568310021.jpg (960x720, 134K)

Attached: 20191205_181036.jpg (897x1195, 553K)

>Hmm?
Red too saturated

>Or maybe?
Doubtful, but up next.

>because you can do only easy tasks?
Yes, absolutely. You'd better fuck off and take your request for free work to an expert

How about this one OP

Attached: E0A2528B-8305-4B14-99D6-F9288AC92D19.jpg (1242x1226, 266K)

How about this

Attached: Screenshot_20191205-121150_Instagram.jpg (1374x1388, 663K)

Or maybe this one

Attached: 2E0535BA-988A-4711-9197-C0DCD6C03230.jpg (1242x1529, 398K)

?

Attached: s.jpg (612x612, 49K)

Image had already been processed

Up next - when fucking captcha lets me

Attached: 1575569289554.jpg (742x738, 98K)

Kinda see through already but can it be cleaned up???

Attached: 142B58CE-1811-473F-97D4-2AF4F13D337B.jpg (750x1334, 655K)

Probably too processed, but worth a try

Attached: received_1296260530534112.jpg (736x540, 23K)

im also interested in this one

The universe blows up and shit

The girl on the right at all?

Attached: C4E5D4A9-2786-48C7-8C28-99E6FAFAEFD9.jpg (720x960, 181K)

I thought this might turn out better, but again it had already been subject to some processing

Attached: 1575569486442.jpg (897x1195, 840K)

You’d be a legend

Attached: 9E02F2A6-76B2-43E7-A36F-31FC0D85D0D3.jpg (1242x1553, 1.18M)

Attached: 27709776_10215838236855235_7834636147893713909_o.jpg (1080x720, 87K)

>How about this one OP
That lace-type pattern is different colours and transmissibility, so there's no real point as I won't be able to get rid of it

Image is pretty poor

>Or maybe this one
Better, but ribbed. Up next

Would love to see my aunts big ass titties please help me out

Forgot pic

Attached: AA88B531-B604-4FF2-AAFD-45FFA695A28A.jpg (960x640, 118K)

There's this one too

Attached: 20191205_182252.jpg (905x1244, 638K)

you cant xray this jazz

>Catalog
looks awesome bro

Attached: Screenshot_20191019-214143~3.png (701x1204, 1.44M)

Fabric turned out to be too thick for a good result

Attached: 1575569650196.jpg (1242x1529, 494K)

Try?

Attached: Screenshot_20191203-112633_Gallery.jpg (1080x1920, 676K)

Bigger image would have been better - full of jpeg artifacts

Attached: 1575569695302.jpg (612x612, 84K)

expert at xraying? how degenerate you must be to learn this skill

Attached: 1575569757656.jpg (750x1334, 737K)

hummm this one any better?

Attached: s2.jpg (720x960, 79K)

Attached: 70085318_107482093834236_8238723504378478389_n.jpg (1080x1080, 144K)