3DCG

3DCG
LOLI

Attached: 1575614842738m.jpg (791x1024, 68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

My tablet has tons. I'm on my phone right now bored. Help.

Not sure if this qualifies.

Attached: 1575620541251m.jpg (1024x640, 48K)

Bump for !unny

Come on. BORED. At a friend's house.

Anyone also wanna trade lolis?

Wickr: helloworld69420

Attached: 1575586666410.png (811x553, 349K)

I could use some.

That's fucking child porn right there you degenarte fuck
No wonder why the fbi is patroling this shithole of a board

more of this?

Child porn involves a child you imbecile

Truth

Attached: ff99b24666fa9f54d4ca023f1d905dd6.jpg (600x800, 63K)

Very nice

More please

Did you just... put a grown woman's face on a kid's body? Can't tell if sneaky genius or still FBI's target audience.

MODS fucking MODS MODS MODS GIT HERE FUCK Fuck you this post is not spam

Graphic art is art

Attached: 1516059497016.jpg (1061x1500, 255K)

Attached: pregposer00.webm (800x600, 589K)

CRINGE! these are OLD! post shit people actually want to see not these stale ass niggas

What an enormous faggot

VERY nice

Mods please!! I'm a giant faggot who cries at lolis

Attached: 2919082 - 4ere4nik Lily_Castellanos Source_Filmmaker The_Evil_Within_2.png (1080x1920, 1.65M)

What are you doing there?

This isn’t illegal child pornography or child sexual exploitation material because no children are being exploited in its production but it’s definitely child pornography as it is a pornographic depiction of children

offensive art is rape

>isn't child pornography
>is definitely child pornography
you seem confused

It isn’t ILLEGAL child porn. It is however child porn

Child porn is illegal. If it's legal, it's not child porn.

Attached: 71636381_p0.png (1920x1080, 1.6M)

no painting, drawing, tattoo or sculpture can ever be child porn

all child porn was outlawed in 1980 due to unscrupulous parents embezzling all compensation paid to child actors

Attached: Tattoo.jpg (460x525, 126K)

No, you’re just retarded. Illegality is not a defining aspect of child porn. There was a point in time in every western nation when porn made with real children was legal, was that not child porn because it was legal? Do you know what lolicon is called in the legal system? “Simulated child pornography”
If it is pornography, and it depicts children, in what way is it not child pornography?

Attached: 1575559032486.webm (1920x1080, 514K)

Attached: 1575558097957.webm (720x540, 454K)

Attached: image.jpg (1152x2048, 405K)

What is pornography?

>was that not child porn because it was legal?
Child porn used to be legal. Now it is not. But since this is not child porn, it is legal.

Attached: 71414635_p0.png (1518x1080, 1.65M)

fucking pedos

Attached: 621631ff6c4a0da11b8c28738b9dceec.jpg (848x1200, 849K)

Right, so you concede that legality is not relevant and therefore, that this is child pornography.

>a simulated rape is a rape
>a simulated murder is a murder
Can I get a government subsidy for growing corn in Farming Simulator Current Year?

Attached: 1834177 - Life_is_Strange Max_Caulfield source_filmmaker.png (1280x720, 939K)

I concede that the legal status of child porn has changed over time.

Attached: eed411b7beed6715f1006a1ecf5874f40e3db504a4c51939c1a23eec67051808.jpg (1920x1080, 960K)

Strawman. I not only did not say that this involves child molestation, I said the opposite. What is being simulated is not child porn, this *is* child porn. What is being simulated is sexual activity involving children.

Simulated child pornography means that pornographic acts were done to a minor you dumb tard. Anyone could force a kid to act like they're choking on a dick, and that's simulated CP

I need more of this.

Fucking idiot. Follow that "logic" and put to jail every BF/cod player

More

By your logic, diaper roleplay porn would be illegal. You completely missed the point. It's not about someone pretending like a child, but an actual child is required to be involved for it to be CP.

>What is being simulated is not child porn, this *is* child porn.
If it were child porn, it would be illegal.

Attached: 331359_-_3D_Lily_Castellanos_Source_Filmmaker_The_Evil_Within_honorboundnoobsfm.png (1920x1080, 1.84M)

Attached: OxLaa.webm (1280x720, 1.44M)

Which means that you concede the irrelevance of legality in determining whether or not this is child porn, correct.
Here look at this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
Are they incorrect to consistently refer to this as “virtual child pornography”? Perhaps you should have been there to correct the court, in your infinite wisdom, that this is not child porn at all.
Wrong
Nobody’s trying to put anybody in jail. Again, this is L E G A L. Try harder

Heres one of my favs

Attached: 1539201244928.webm (800x518, 1.48M)

>virtual
>simulated
>other synonyms for "not actually"
Why should I correct the court when it agrees with me?

Attached: lolibooru 125450 clitoral_hood looking_away photorealistic pointing_at_self sarah_(the_last_of_us) s (1078x1920, 1.57M)

Attached: crib1.webm (800x600, 1.95M)

DDLG, Diaper porn, Age difference, loli and midget porn aren't CP
CP is constantly being hunted down, while these aren't

What they're referring to as virtual, is the written aspect of it and how it could be perceived as. A lot of people might not know the difference between a greentext and a real CSA when written in plain text.

Attached: sarah_11.webm (1280x720, 693K)

What is being simulated is not child porn, this *is* child porn. What is being simulated is sexual activity involving children.

Post older futa on loli

Exactly, simulating cp with children. Not depicting, but involving. A person can depict an involvement which is not CP.

I hope she isn't too lonely. Any more of her?

>simulating cp
No, simulating sexual activity. Your post is incoherent.

>News headline: A 50 yr old man fucked a 10 year old
>>News company is arrested for depicting CP
Man...

This argument reminds me of that dumb Spongebob meme.
"so lolis are children"
"yep"
"and you're posting porn of them"
"yep"
"and porn involving children is child porn"
"makes sense to me"
"so loli is drawn child porn"
"no wtf iT's ArT iDiOt"

See, I'm not the guy still arguing, I know you know he's right and you're either just trying to troll or pretend otherwise. I just don't get why you all refuse to just admit you're pedophiles.

>Zamboni Simulator isn't a simulated zamboni, it simulates *driving* a zamboni.

Attached: skyrim86434.jpg (1680x1050, 198K)

>"so lolis are children"
But lolis aren't real. Children are real. So how are lolis children?

kek, this is the best one yet to prove that loli is not CP
freedom of speech is still freedom of speech regardless of how detailed it may be

Attached: haagpeepic.jpg (350x467, 29K)

>I just don't get why you all refuse to just admit you're pedophiles.
It’s a defense mechanism. In their minds pedophile = evil person, and they = good people, so they convince themselves they aren’t pedophiles because otherwise they would hate themselves

They don’t refuse to accept they’re pedos they’re just annoyed people are saying this is cp when there are no actual children involved in the making of it.
So there’s no abuse. There’s no harm to anyone, it’s just images which do not have any affiliation with any real people.

What does the term “real loli” mean?

Attached: 693.jpg (500x456, 59K)

YOU PEDOS MAKE ME SICK !!!

JAV

I'm a simulated pedophile.

Attached: 154496_3D_Sarah_The_Last_of_Us.jpg (1100x1940, 154K)

>They don’t refuse to accept they’re pedos
No they do.
>So there’s no abuse. There’s no harm to anyone
Abuse and harm do not determine something as child porn, only that it be a pornographic depiction of children.

I feel like these posts are very connected. Why do you have such a strict definition of "child porn" other than just "porn depicting children"?

Attached: __FuckYou.webm (374x214, 225K)

Bump for MILF on loli!

Have sex incels

Attached: Have sex.jpg (870x500, 191K)

That's a bonus.

Attached: 2.jpg (2200x1598, 508K)

Something other than loli. Would you EVER confuse pic related with a real child?

Attached: LS_23.jpg (1280x1792, 543K)

Legal reasons tbhq

>child porn
A requirement for something to be child porn is to involve real children. It doesn't matter if it's a drawing, a statue, a picture, a movie or whatever, if it involves real children in its making then it's CP otherwise it's not.

Except in Canada, Australia and the UK to name but 3

She's one potato looking bitch.

>Something other than loli.
Hahahahaha

Prove you’re not some paranoid normie

If this is kiddie porn, Is this rape?

Customs restrictions are not limited to porn. Public obscenity laws is not specifically for porn or loli. If they can watch teen porn then it's definitely legal to watch loli or anything else, otherwise everyone watching teen porn or doing DDLG roleplay would've been arrested which is not the case

If you are in those places, it's illegal for you to be in most threads on Sup Forums.

Attached: 72942253_p7.jpg (3840x2160, 777K)

You're being needlessly reductive and obtuse for someone who masturbates to art of toddlers getting fucked

They’re
Looking
For
Attention

Starve
The
Cunts

for it to child porn, it would have to have children. It does not have any children, therefore it its not child porn.

>A requirement for something to be child porn is to involve real children
Incorrect. It only requires that it depict children
Q: Is this pornography?
A: Yes
Q: Does it depict children?
A: Yes
Therefore, it is a pornographic depiction of children, or put more simply, child pornography

no pubic bone

>it would have to have children
This does have children, fictional children

The law does not agree with this definition.

Attached: 71364184_p4.jpg (2560x1440, 738K)

Completely wrong

You are mistaken, see