Are AR-15s more dangerous than handguns?

Are AR-15s more dangerous than handguns?

Attached: 447DE21A-60C4-46ED-8C53-72EA8D233BC4.jpg (493x758, 105K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/École_Polytechnique_massacre
youtube.com/watch?v=o_H17moBp2o
usconcealedcarry.com/blog/revolver-vs-semi-auto-whats-the-difference/
youtube.com/watch?v=sFY1vHxip4g
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The majority of gun crimes are committed with a handgun. No fucking gang banger gives enough of a fuck to know how to operate a rifle and also doesn't want a gun he can't conceal in his clothes

In terms of lethality due to being shot by one? Yes.
In terms of crime statistics? No.

Jesus Christ, if you were going to put all those upgrades on an ar, you should just get something else like a comparable HK or Scar

Pretty much this.

If you are aiming to kill one person, you use a handgun.
If you're aiming to kill a ton of people, you use a semiauto rifle.

Sure, whatever fits your narrative
Fucking faggot

>semiautomatic
You a cuck?

An AR in the hands of a trained professional is far less dangerous than a glock in the hands of a nigger.

So bigger is automatically the same as more lethal? What about one .45 semi-auto pistol and a bag of hollow-point magazines?

>Hollow-point magazines
I lold

Imagine not recommending a fully automatic to slaughter a group of people

Literally nobody said that. There's a reason why the military uses 5.56 and not .45 you retard. Try again. You clearly don't know much about fire arms if you don't know what the 5.56 does to human flesh and internals.

Fmj would be better for a big group imo, more chance to hit more people through collateral. Hollow point and rip would knock 1 person per bullet, altho with the rip or hollow point persay the chance of the person dying would be more likely. Fmj will get more tho

These

You know what he meant, shut the fuck up.

Lol gunfags get upset so easily, sadly it's innocent people who pay the price.

Your definition of “innocent people” are the ones who are not armed at the time of a mass shooting. You might be right in saying that but I see that your motive for saying that is wrong. All of us have a right to arm ourselves because of evil, and your anti-gun bias is showing

bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081

Majority of deaths are by handgun, suicide being a large part.

Sitting here looking at my Glock 17 on the desk. Just takes a few stupid moments for tragedy to happen.

Wrong... that’s all about distance and comfort to shoot repeatedly and weight of ammo carried. Lots of service men carry handguns 9mm, .40 and .45 for close quarters. It’s really a stupid question that OP asked because I’m very scared of an AR at 250 yards.. Not so much the handgun.. both are pretty god dam lethal at 10 yards. Like I said it’s a dumb comparison.

Unless it's a revolver most handguns are semiauto as well.

Yeah because the people who are armed are the ones killing the innocent people...duh.

hell no. a guns ability to become dangerous is based more than anything else on its capacity to be concealed by someone

Revolvers are semi-automatic retard

Not wrong at all. The 5.56 is extremely more lethal than a .45 for multiple reasons. I'm not gonna go into detail, but you apparently seem to think a .45 just blows massive holes in people and you're sadly mistaken.

If you're going to shoot someone, 5.56 does more damage than any handgun round, period.
Look up dr's reports on people shot with 5.56 vs any other typical bullet type.

True, but 30 round magazines aren't standard for them, unless you're using like a .22. That's the real kicker.

About 8% of all murders are committed using long guns of any sort. Handguns are the firearms of choice in crime.

30 year ago today the École Polytechnique massacre happened.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/École_Polytechnique_massacre

youtube.com/watch?v=o_H17moBp2o

Implying most people can afford a HK.
Nigga it took me until I was 29 before I completed my Metal Gear Solid gun collection. That shit cost me as much as a house

So what about the military police who shot and killed the terrorist today in Florida? They were armed

Your logic isn’t adding up and you’re making an ass out of yourself

Did you even read what I wrote at all? You just repeated my point.

thats a pistol

>military police
>were armed
Gee I fucking wonder why

It was a fucking Saudi pilot too... Taliban has clearly infiltrated their ranks.

What are you smoking? Can I have some of that?

>Literal bunch of dumbasses weighing in on shit they know nothing about.
Guns arent dangerous, people are. No a single gun was used in the attack on the Oklahoma Federal building.

Wow, sorry to trigger you faggot. I reinforced your point with statistics. With as many spergs as inhabit this board details help.

Bzzt wrong
usconcealedcarry.com/blog/revolver-vs-semi-auto-whats-the-difference/

I can see you are getting more and more upset so I am going to stop trying to reason with you, it's almost Christmas and I'd feel bad if you went out and killed a bunch of kids because you don't know how to chill otherwise.

Rifles are much more stable to fire. Handgun rounds can go all over the place if you're not trained and if you're having an adrenaline rush. They are both deadly at close range and the round's velocity won't make much a difference. That's why if you're looking at it from a mass shooting perspective, it really doesn't matter. It's someone with a gun against a bunch of unarmed targets close.

All semi-autos are east to operate if you're not a complete retard. if a hoodrat can rack a Hi-point then they can pull the charging handle on an AR or AK.

HERE

Attached: 20OKLAHOMAweb02-articleLarge.jpg (600x480, 109K)

Guns are like spiders, it's the little ones you should worry about. That being said in a gunfight a rifle is a more dangerous tool.

Imagine being this autistic that you null and void and entire conversation about bullet caliber just to tell everyone involved that they don't know shit. Clearly the mind of a genius at work.
EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP

The Lord is speaking.

cool but your comment is irrelevant and nobody here is talking about the Oklahoma federal building

>are one type of firearm more dangerous than another
Its not even about caliber.

>gang banger
I believe you mean.
Nigger?

>butthurt poster tags all people smarter than himself
It's a badge of honor to be tagged and bring you the booty pain

Great argument youve got there, you raging cock addict.

>found the mentally unstable liberal who sits in his mom’s basement fantasizing about murder

The original question wasn't. But the topic afterwards was. You clearly didn't read anything. Jesus Christ are you that fucking vain? I honestly can't believe how difficult it is for 90% of Sup Forums users to follow a conversation accurately

>informing people that on inanimate object cant possibly be more dangerous than another
Do you understand OP is a limpwristed faggot that doesnt know how to ask a question?

I didn't give any arguments, mong.

youtube.com/watch?v=sFY1vHxip4g

Attached: hanna-three.jpg (750x428, 33K)

My sincerest apologies. Im trying to help everyone from the frustration of some fudd tier faggotry over here and you try to stop me from spreading truth?

Top kek, now if youd stop posting, it would be the greatest post youve made soo far

Haha no
Im not gonna lug around some bulky rifle in a varmint round when i can just get something better and smaller

You did a shit job at it. Maybe next time just make a point and leave it at that instead of telling everyone their fucking idiots without reading anything.

Reminder that 223 and 5.56 are for fags and only real men use 308 or 30-06

:^)

Okay, so whats your position on the OP? Lets hear it /k/ommando

Attached: 1571773854207.webm (640x360, 310K)

More lethal yes but more dangerous no. Considering all firearm crime is usually committed with Pistols.

I believe gangbanger is the better umbrella term since it can include nigs, spics, and wypipo.

Go on. Im confident you can add more to that. Im not op btw

You are literally the dumbest person I've encountered today. Congrats.

>Gangbanger
Isnt that a pornographic term?

Top kek. I knew it, fag. I fucking knew you didnt have shit.

Depends on the distance to the target and shooter position.

A gangbang is sex but gangbanger is a pretty old term for someone in a street gang.

What about someone in a neighborhood gang?

I've already said multiple points you're just too stupid to realize it. I was the second post here. Now because I don't want to repeat myself for your dumb ass I suddenly don't have shit? What a fucking moron you must be.

do you think they just jump out and bite people you retard?

Same thing?

Not really. Street gangs are named after streets ex 18th street gang.
Neighborhood gangs are not

You can't possibly be this stupid lmao .

Inherently, yes a rifle caliber will absolutely provide more damage.

Ok so ?
Youre telling us that an ar 15 is more lethal than an any caliber pistol?

Attached: 1573012310127.jpg (470x470, 70K)

Are ypu implying the only two types of gang are prison and street?

Yes? This is basic firearms knowledge.

Those are different sets and crews within a larger gang. Street gang and Gangbanger apply to all that. Organized crime that is not the mafia (which tries to paint a more dignified portrait of itself, one which is often believed by the public.)

Gangs are gangs. The only person dividing them up into categories is you. Lmao. Name me one gang that functions exclusively in prisons.

guns don't shoot themselves! no gun is "more lethal"! they don't get up and just savage someone on their own you stupid JAPPER WHORE

it comes down to the operator of the firearm everytime.

Depending on caliber of said AR style rifle yes. A 500 Magnum is not as powerful as a .50 Beowulf 458 Socom based on barrel length and inherent load strength.

Depends on the caliber and skill of the shooter I'd imagine.

So if a 556 is fired from 5 yards it is more lethal than a 357 for example at the same distance? Kek
Did you test that on some ballistics gel? Did you major in physics? If a hot fmj round travels and passes through a person, and taking all its energy with it youre telling me thats more lethal than an expanding round stopping in the persons body after opening up a wound channel 5 times the diamiater of the bullet and dumping all of its energy onto their body?

Attached: 1494303538042.jpg (2000x3000, 808K)

Op specified ar 15 not ar 10

Not them but that is how some of them started. Gangs formed in prisons for racial protection, which then started making connections on the streets once some members got out. Or the gangs which take their orders from leaders who are in prison. It does start getting into splitting hairs though since some prison gangs have a specific name but a clear link to one on the street.

Thats my argument, but the gal I responded to suggested otherwise. So I was getting clairifcation

Duckgun is still a better weapon for schools ngl

Operator proficiency is unaccounted for when it comes to predetermined strength of caliber and or efficiency of exothermic reaction due to barrel length of said small arm.

No no, youre right. I was just trying to understand your perspective. Where did you study gangs and for how long?

Again, common knowledge. You can literally go look up studies for yourself and see the difference.

And in answer to your question, yes. You clearly don't know enough about firearms because all you do is spew out an anger fueled rant instead of any actual logical argument.

Go to bed little triggered boy.

Oh shut the fuck up. You clearly aren't someone who studies gangs if you're sitting here talking about them on Sup Forums you absolute retard.

Is that what you say to everyone who challenges your points? Tell them if they don't have a degree in a subject they can't talk about it? What a fucking moron.

some nigger just here to argue. yawn. go back to picking cotton.

OP didn't specify load strength. A hot and heavy load of 5.56 will still provide more foot lbs. of energy at 500 meters than a .500 magnum at said distance. Merely because of barrel length and the grain of bullet carried over powder provided.

See

You play too many videos games dude.

Top kek.
No one is angry with you. I just dont want you to go about life misinformed.
You should study more about wound channels, trauma to the CNS and how the human body reaponds to the energy of a projectile and how much energy the projectile losses when its completely stopped by mass.

There are multiple people here explaining exactly what I just said. Not my fault you get fucking furious when you're wrong instead of taking the opportunity as a learning experience.

A 5.56 wil crush a .357 from the same distance.

I just said youre right. Idk what you mean. Im just curious as to where you learned soo much about criminal organisations. Are you a minority? Did you grow up in a gang infested community?