Milo and PPB have really ruined the alt right. It's devolved into a bunch of faggots posting "hehe" and other bullshit. A shame, really.
Joseph Bailey
DAILY REMINDER THAT DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN OUTED AS A GLOBALIST SHILL FROM PICKING THIS FAGGOT
YOUR (You)S CANT SAVE YOU NOW ITS OVER SOON HE WILL BE SAYINF TPP IS GOOD FOR AMERICA
ABORT ABORT THE GOD-EMPEROR IS DEAD
Ian Lopez
straya!
Chase Murphy
...
Joshua Rodriguez
I would follow Sheriff Clarke to hell and back.
Dylan Wright
Business man can't into science, more at 11
Alexander Campbell
The people who watch this trash are not going to see the light. I saw a woman praise Don lemon for "not backing down" on Twitter
Brody King
Awoo indeed.
Hunter Powell
I don´t know that that´s why global warming was created as a concept but it is undeniable that American jobs and industry suffer for it to the delight of china, Vietnam Mexico etc.
Owen Murphy
When does it start
Connor Smith
4 pm
Julian Carter
The RNC is going to start today and I already noticed a significant increase in shilling activity all across Sup Forums. We need to tough, we need to smart. It's true, folks. All things considered this should be an interesting week.
Parker Perez
>you can never vote for Trump
Cameron Watson
True statement, false motive.
Isaiah Russell
Sup Forums WILL DEFEND THIS >b...buh... buh the vp doesn't matter riiiiighttt? >hhh...hhe needed to get th-the hardcore conservatives on board... >i...if you care that his vp is in the establishment, y-you are better off with Bernie sanders y...you redditor! LOW ENERGY
Adrian Young
*We need to be tough
Cooper Cook
I love you trumpgen. When we make america great again, can we improve family life too? I want to be a grandfather wen I grow up, teaching my grandkids things my kids didnt want them to know, if they dont already know it.
Blake Price
Mike Pence:
Pro Life Pro Military Pro Border Wall Pro Balanced Budget Pro Business Pro Free Trade Pro Fair tax Voted No to '08 Auto Bailout Voted No to Wall Street Bailout Voted to terminate Home Affordable Mortg. Program Voted yes to define Marriage as one man, one woman Voted yes to ban same sex marriage Voted yes to protect the pledge of allegiance Voted to repeal Obamacare reporting requirements for small business Voted yes on military border patrols to battle drugs and terror Voted to guarantee parent's right to educate their children Voted yes to allow drilling on the continental shelf Voted to bar the EPA from regulating greenhouse gasses Voted no to enforcing C02 global warming pollution Voted yes for permitting new refineries Voted against raising the CAFE Standards Voted yes to drilling in the ANWR Voted to bar greenhouse gasses from the Clean Air Act Voted no on Cash for Clunkers Voted to reduce marriage tax Voted to restrict US funding of the UN Voted no on Senate pay raise Voted to require ID to vote Voted against suing gun manufactures and sellers for gun misuse Voted for national concealed carry Voted to ban gun registration Voted to defund Obamacare Voted twice to repeal Obamacare Voted to end birth right citizenship (anchor babies) Voted to declare English as the official language Against Internet tax Rejects the Fairness Doctrine and Net Neutrality Member of the TEA Party movement Committed to unbreakable US- Israel bond Rated by the NTU as being a "Taxpayer's Friend" Rated by the CTJ as being opposed to progressive taxation Rated by the AFL-CIO as being anti-union Rated A by the NRA for pro gun position Rated by AAI as being anti-Arab and anti-Palestine Rated by the Christian Coalition as being of Pro Family Values Rated by the NEA as being anti-public education Rated by the NAACP as being anti Affirmative Action
Ian Bailey
Like 4pm I think. Most people are at work or in lecture right now
Justin Gutierrez
Trump and Hillary tied in Connecticut.
Does that mean Trump is gonna change his campaign plans? I mean, maybe CT is in play?
Michael Myers
Isn't Don Lemon, the CNN journalist that got squeezed into a lemonade by based Sheriff David Clarke the same Don Lemon that got BTFO so hard by based Omarosa that he had to cut the transmission complete with the "hand through the neck" gesture to prevent further damage?
Pic related
Also, when do anything at all happen in the RNC. Working the whole week but can watch stuff via mobile.
Brody Sanchez
...
Justin Turner
It's been like this ever since Pence was tapped.
Posts like and are fine examples of CTR trying to earn their shekels.
Angel Sullivan
Never say never. You might not be able to run for president, but you might one day be able to vote for him.
Landon Martinez
CT was always in play. All states are in play.
4D Chess
Cooper Williams
But he's objectively correct. >Still getting behind ""Muh science"" when education has been dismantled by the left for decades
They can praise all they want, the narrative fell into pieces in that block. They can't undo that, they can make people unsee that, based Sheriff Clarke put it all out there, no words barred and police and law enforcement and their families all over America watched that.
Blue states will become red, red states will become redder, Trump is guaranteeing not only the presidency but, if played correctly, he could get a constitutional majority (2/3) in congress (a man can dream).
Jordan Collins
I WILL SEND A CRUZ MISSILE INTO CLEVELAND DONALD
FREE
THE
DELEGATES
DONALD
Asher Howard
Next Kek himself will incarnate
Gabriel Thomas
Nice screencap, where are the dates on those polls, oh right they're old as fuck. Once again being intellectually dishonest as is necessary to shill for Hillary, since she's such a garbage candidate.
Nicholas Brown
So shills clock in at around 9?
Jonathan Cook
>Not wanting a Establishment Cuck for Trump to bully for the next 8 years
Then why were we always laughing about the idea of a Jeb VP?
Jacob Peterson
Yep. Expect the convention times to be fucked too.
Nathaniel Williams
>hey let's move all our industry to china so they can continue to blow the shit into the air we would actually blow into the air >climate change avoided! yay!
Colton Edwards
>Voted to declare English as the official language
Thomas Sanchez
I HATE FUCKING BABY BOOMERS
THEY CREATED THIS SJW SHIT THAT IS DESTROYING THE WORLD TODAY
FUCK THIS C.UCKOLD PUSSY BITCH AND THE REST OF HIS GENERATION
Anthony Allen
Anybody have the infographic where hillary calls people kike, nigger, and retard with the sources?
Jose Wright
Someone called?
Colton Myers
>Trump will never run >Trump will never release his financials >Trump will never breach 15% >Trump will never win New Hampshire >Trump will never breach 25% >Trump will never win SC >Trump will never breach 35% >Trump will never breach 50% >Trump will never reach 1237 >Trump will never recover after Wisconsin >Trump will never win unbound delegates >Trump will never recover after Colorado >Donald, hand over the delegates... >Trump will never be the nominee >Trump will never predict BREXIT >Trump will never pivot to the GE >Trump will never unify the majority of the GOP >Trump will never beat Clinton in swing states ------------------ You are here ------------------ >Trump will never get 270 >Trump will never be POTUS >Trump will never build the wall >Trump will never block risky or illegal shitskins >Trump will never deport said illegals >Trump will never win a second term >Trump will never bring back manufacturing jobs >Trump will never abolish Common Core >Trump will never renegotiate our trade deals >Trump will never MAGA >Trump will never MEGA >Trump will never colonize Mars >Trump will never colonize the Milky Way >Trump will never deport xeno scum
Ryan Stewart
I can't wait to add a Trump to my collection.
Joseph Harris
I expect there to be a large group working overtime as well.
Zachary Green
Nice of you to bring that up, it gives me the chance to post to take the fangs out of one of Trump's most controversial points with a series of posts I prepared about that (and other) Trump statements about global warming.
It will be long by twitter standards and even by Sup Forums standards but you guys are intelligent and can handle a longish read every now and then.
What Trump says:
> the concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive
What some articles and his detractors says Trump said:
> Trump has called climate change a hoax, claiming that China created the myth in order to surpass the U.S. economically.
Saying the ***concept of*** (emphasis 1) ***global warming*** (emphasis 2) is a tool to benefits the Chinese in detriment of the U.S. Is not calling "climate change" a hoax.
This started as a short text that nobody probably will read and became a full blown essay about the subject. I apologise for that and I'll post anyway, it is a small dose red pill and may help people to understand better the objections a part of the right leaning individuals and organisations have with regards to the whole climate change debate.
The summary is: THE CLIMATE CHANGE DEBATE WAS COOPTED BY THE LEFT AND BY THE GLOBALISTS IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION ON A GLOBAL SCALE, BENEFITING CHINA AND HURTING THE U.S., EUROPE AND OTHER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES.
This post will be divided in parts so, before resorting to the leftists and globalists tactic to dismiss my point without analysing the whole reasoning try to read it.
(continues)
Jordan Scott
All states...well let's not get overhype.
Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, Maryland, Delaware, DC, Vermont, Rhode Island, MA, WA, OR, NJ CA, New Mexico are some states that Trump can never win right?
Ryan Rogers
We won't know if Trump beat Clinton in swing states until november. Not shilling, just saying that's technically when we'll know.
Josiah Jenkins
The crux of the discussion is the "anthropomorphic" (man made) cause of climate change. Some clarifications:
> climate is not weather. Weather is local and have a short cycle, climate is global and have a long cycle > there are plenty of studies and a clear explanation linking certain gases to the greenhouse effect and a potential global climate change
Now, and here are the points of debate:
> 1. is the planet going to a process of climate change? > 2. if so, is it natural and part of a natural cycle or is it man made? > 3. also, if so is it detrimental or beneficial? > 4. assuming it is predominantly man made, is it possible to reverse it? > 5. also, if so, at what cost?
Point 1 is more or less uncontroversial. People that don't understand the whole problem and argue on "gut feeling" tend to argue against this point to base their objection to what I'll argue about later. That's is a mistake because data points to the reality of climate change and arguing against it is pointless.
Point 2 is arguable but, just like point 1 there is a very good collection of data that points that man made greenhouse emission is a powerful contributor to the current global climate change pattern.
Point 3: this is the point ideology takes over science. "Scientific consensus" (an oxymoron, science should never be an appeal to authority, it should always stand on its own merits) not only states categorically that climate change is predominantly man made but also for years it predicts its catastrophic consequences on short and long term unless it is reversed.
That brings us to point 4: assuming all the previous points to be as the "scientific consensus" says, is it reversible? If so, how and (point 5) at what cost?
(continues)
Wyatt Cox
>>/cfg/
Charles Jackson
Here comes the big problem, the one brought up (as succinctly as a 140 characters can fit) by Trump and by many in the "climate change skeptic” camp (something today so vilified by the media and by the left it is compared to flat earth proponents):
*** the main solution proposed by the left is to force (through government regulation) the reduction of emission of greenhouse gases by the industry. ***
They propose two main ways to achieve that:
> 1. To put a hard limit in the amount of greenhouses can be emitted, with hefty punishment for non compliance
> 2. To create the concept of "carbon credits", where the amount of greenhouse gases one can emit is allocated by the government, and companies that emit less than its share can sell its surplus to entities that want to emit more than its share.
This causes an obvious problem: there is no incentive to apply these measures at a national level, companies would simply move to other countries without the restrictions.
To solve that for many years countries (spearheaded by the left) meet trying to agree on a common framework to reduce emissions globally and at the same time. These talks (look up Kyoto protocol) happened on *** the Bill Clinton administration *** and the agreed upon measures are very damaging for U.S. industry, to the direct benefit of China.
> The Protocol is based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities: it puts the obligation to reduce current emissions on developed countries on the basis that they are historically responsible for the current levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol
In short: developed countries (US, Canada, Europe, Australia) must reduce emissions while underdeveloped countries (like China, India, Brazil) gets a pass.
Kayden White
CT may seem like a lost cause, but outside of the liberal trash zones of the cities, it's pretty damn red. >if Kek blesses this post, Trump wins, and we hang Dan Malloy with Hillary's entrails.
Wyatt Long
It is clearly detrimental to the U.S. (and to Europe) and it clearly benefits China even if the later economy (and consequently industrial output and emissions) will reach and maybe surpass the former in the next decades.
Even conceding all the 4 points enumerated above (it's happening, it's man made, it's detrimental and it can be reversed) the solution proposed by the left and so detrimental to the national interests of the U.S. that no national politician in its right mind would consider supporting and implementing.
So, why does the left tries to push it with all their influence (monetary, political and mediatic)?
The answer, my friends, is because the whole proposal is an attempt to implement wealth redistribution, at a global level, from the richer countries to the poorer ones.
By allocating carbon credits not In the proportion of current industrial output but based on the fact that "on the basis that they [the developed countries] are historically responsible for the current levels of greenhouse gases" the left creates the perfect mechanism to force richer countries, if they want to keep at their current levels of productivity, to buy these "carbon credits" from poorer countries.
WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION. At a global level. From the developed countries and productive countries to the underdeveloped ones.
With China counting as underdeveloped.
Trump 140 characters can explain his objection to it at length, even these 7000 or so cannot fully. But, and that’s where people underestimate him, he have closed deals in most countries in the world and is certainly well versed in the art of spotting a bad deal.
I hope it helped you guys to understand well how the proposed remedy to "global warming" is a ploy to benefit China and other underdeveloped countries in detriment to the interest of the United States and other developed and productive ones.
Hunter Turner
That's in regards to polling.
Bentley Martinez
Some people just can't see the forest for the trees. >Oh boy howdy 1 hair is out of place, I #shill4hill now
William Cooper
To summarize. Even if one concede the existence of the problem (and I'm not even touching that here) the solution proposed by the leftists is socialism at a global scale, including (forced) redistribution of wealth and a the implementation of a supranational authority.
Angel Collins
You should write that in then
Let's not lower our guard to such early polling
Jaxon Perry
He's a cuck. He and that whole network are known for cutting people off when the truth starts coming out. They also do it and act like they're being "civil" or more mature like with Clarke. Also, "That has nothing to do with these last two shootings." Trying to discredit someone for legitimate questions is another tactic.
Somewhere in one of these, censored and uncensored.
Jace Wilson
Dude just stop you're embarrassing yourself Climate Change has already been scientifically proven the debate is over Climate change is real
Jayden Garcia
...
Jayden Allen
>Brit Hume up next to attack Trump for winning I fucking love the butthhurt of these old neocons who realize their status is completely irrelevant and Trump has taken back the party for the working class.
Dominic Garcia
He's about to bring in millions of fundraising dollars and eliminate half of Trump's opposition. I'm sorry that your meme VP pick had zero practical application.
Caleb Lewis
>I don´t know that that´s why global warming was created as a concept
And now you know, read and the rest of the series of posts. Long read, eye opening
Camden Nelson
>trump will never get 270 >trump will never be potus Aren't these the same thng?
Xavier Moore
>the debate is over What's embarrassing is your lack of understanding of the scientific method.
Jayden Bennett
Nevada State Gaming Commission deems Trump to UNTRUSTWORTHY to be granted a gaming license, so who are the idiots that think he should be trusted running the country, take off your tin foil hats and come into the real world, before its to late and you elect this buffoon.
Jason Cook
Lemon: [Brings up a study] "This study proves my point." Sheriff: "Actually, it proves the opposite." Lemon: "Well it was a small study...and it was discredited."
Parker Powell
I feel bad for Americans. . Its like voting for the lesser of the two evil.... hard decision to make.. all the best.
Connor Wood
>Voted to end birth right citizenship (anchor babies) >Voted to declare English as the official language
He's perfect
Robert White
You must not have read because the point that " Climate Change has already been scientifically proven" is conceded, I don't argue against that. Quite the contrary, I support it in that reasoning.
Re-read it and we discuss it.
Jaxon King
Excited af right now. Got everything set up for the convention. TV for coverage, laptop for protests, and phone for trumpgen aw yasss.
Luke Walker
@81587441
Not reading the article it is clear that you're either functionally illiterate or a troll.
Benjamin Nguyen
Good posts, as a building tycoon Trump would be very aware of carbon credits, electricity usage and the science used to justify an assortment of environmental regulations
Juan Nguyen
It's anthropogenic, not anthropomorphic. The first one means it originates from man, and the second means it resembles man. I just thought I'd tell you, to avoid any future embarrassment.
Justin Jenkins
...
Thomas Bailey
>MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH MUH WHO ELSE IS #TeamLowEnergy HERE?
WHO ELSE HERE SUPPORTS TPP? WHO ELSE HERE SUPPORTS GLOBALISM? HMMmmmMmmmmMmmmm? WHO ELSE HERE SUPPORTS ISRAEL? HOW ABOUT THE JEWS? YOU SUPPORT THAT?
THEN THE TRUMP/PENCE TICKET IS FOR YOU! [Jewing intensifies]
Joseph Robinson
It astounds me seeing some people I went to school with (in the Bible belt no less), who are now regular working guys with families, yet they literally think Clinton is truly the better choice just because she has some experience. They completely disregard everything that makes her pure evil ... disregard that she wants more immigrants and could care less about the violence going on. How can there be this much delusion?? I literally cannot fathom this. Honestly the email lying is plenty enough for me that I wouldn't have anything to do with her.
Aaron Brown
Brit Hume looks like a basset hound. That cuck apparently fucked Megyn Kelly though so good for him
Matthew Hill
So when does the party start?
Brody Stewart
someone recommend me something to watch until the rnc starts >leaf
Daniel Nguyen
cool, got it a mod or janny actually deleted my post yesterday when I said that she said that shit
David Hill
It's like voting for the supreme evil versus the ultimate good. Every single thing Trump wants is beneficial to the country, the exact opposite is the case with Hillary.
Hunter Powell
...
Dominic Williams
Med student here. There are folks in my class who are smart as hell when it comes to the books but they actually think Hillary is honest and trustworthy. Pretty incredible.
Cameron Hall
>because she has some experience Even Bernie has said that through her years in power she showed mostly bad judgement.
James Allen
>Hillary shills trying this hard to fit in
Connor Young
This. But because it's a fact climate change exists, people assume that it's man made because people don't understand how the climate could change otherwise, when there are plenty of models provided to explain it with the Sun, which affects daily climate also.
Kayden Torres
you know what doesnt have room for skepticism? SCIENCE!
