You have 1.7 billion seconds to name a movie without people in it.
You have 1.7 billion seconds to name a movie without people in it
Other urls found in this thread:
every nature documentary ever made?
>human narrators
Try again.
wallace and gromit
Everything by Kubrick and Refn (outside of Bronson, The Killers, Paths of Glory and Doctor Strangelove)
March of the Penguins
BNSF
At Sea
RR
Morgan Freeman Narrator
Amitabh Bachchan Narrator
Gösta Ekman Narrator
Fiorello Narrator
Sofie Gråbol Narrator
Zootopia now fuck off
The Lion King.
Boyz in da Hood
Menace 2 Society
every chinese movie ever
Fantasia.
Antz
>documentaries are movies.
hello Autism.
Slumdog Millionaire
...
...
Fuck.
Well, I said the Lion King too.
All the characters are voiced by people.
There are no people in the film though, which is what OP is asking for.
that piercing would get her stoned in her home country
Empire (andy warhol)
Deseret
Ten Skies
There's an 8 hour film about paint drying.
Someone made it to piss off the BBC as they have to watch a film to give it an age rating before release.
>piercing is illegal in Bangladesh
actual state of Sup Forumsfags knowledge about the world
Ia your next step saying that it was filmed/animated/written by people also?
Very clever unfunny fucking faggot
>documentary films aren't actually films
hello retarded as fuck plebbitor
i'm certain there's some verse in the qur'an that says something like "a woman must never be vain or indulge in acts that further her own vanity"
they don't need much reason other than that
>Bangladesh
>Muslim
fucking hell Sup Forums is ignorant
Stop trolling
???
uhh
uhh
jackie chan
what are some films about a once proud nation devolving into a caliphate?
>Bangladesh is the country with the 4th largest population of Muslims in the world
>The population of Bangladesh is 86.3% Muslim
>Muslims only live in deserts
Is this the Muslim woman who won the bake-off competition and then presented the Queen this piece of shit shit cake for her 90th birthday?
Any animated film ever made? They're cartoons not people.
Empire (Andy Warhol, 1964)
You have 2 seconds to name a movie not made by people.
Lemon (1969)
...
>Milo and Otis
I might be wrong. Haven't seen in years.
Those nature documentaries, that are made by putting cameras on the collars of cats or dogs.
DUDE PEOPLE DREW THAT
DUDE PEOPLE OPERATED THE CAMERAS
DUDE VOICE ACTORS
DUDE A PERSON WROTE THE SCRIPT
DUDE PEOPLE BUILT THE SOUND EQUIPMENT LMAO
no OP no animals or bugs have had the capabilities to create their own movie. What is the point of this thread?
...
>implying people didn't build those collars and attach them
If you really want to trigger people and make leftists realize their mental gymnastics, the bottom pic should be a white born in Africa or something.
...
That's a terrible suggestion.
March of the Penguins.
>I'm British
OK
>and Bangladeshi
? Pick one. And/or move to Bangladesh.
one of the dumbest images I've ever seen in my entire life
So are all you fags that cry about Sup Forums boogiemen this dumb, or are you playing some kind of meta
Narrated by a Mr. Morgan Freeman
IT'S TIME FOR JACK TO LET HER RIP
China or Japan would work better as examples.
Except it isn't, and fully encapsulates the ridiculous belief that foreigners born in European countries can be considered members of that race and citizenry. "British" is a race. "German" is a race. "Swedish" is a race. These are peoples whose ethnic makeup has not changed AT ALL in the last 2000 years, until half a decade ago during the post-war immigration boom when all of Europe opened the floodgates to the third world under the flimsy pretext that mixing all races of the world together would end prejudice.
You must be an American mongrel with no sense of racial identity and no awareness/care for ancestry and heritage or worse, a nigger, to think that picture is anything but completely on the money.
half a century ago*
>"British" is a race
It is still a bit baffling, and I support monoculturalism, but for the United Kingdom it sort of makes sense: "Bangladeshi" doesn't mean the nationality, but rather the ethnicity (although there is dispute whether it is "Bangla" or "Bangladeshi").
It's like saying "I'm British and Gypsy", or "I'm British and Welsh".
In the context of a "union of peoples" like the UK, it is understandable and compatible that different British peoples live under the same nation.
In France or Hungary it would be more out of place, since they are one nation and one people, and they try to integrate and assimilate and convert fully their immigrants.
>"Bangladeshi" doesn't mean the nationality, but rather the ethnicity
LMAO what? It was known as east Pakistan 40 years ago idiot. You SJW millennials are literally retarded and have zero understanding of history lmao what a surprise
>France
>they try to integrate and assimilate and convert fully their immigrants
What did he mean by this?