Politicalcompass

Any other "Liberty or Death" here?

...

SPOOKS

1776 or Liberty or Death are the only acceptable options


The US constitution is a work of art formed out of sound political theory, and not enough people these days have even looked at it.

Liberty or death my friend.

Here

tax this dick bitch

Kill the (((other))) people

Heritage

WELL SPOOK'D, MY PROPERTY.

>Bottom Right
>Not "Not an Argument"
Dropped fampai

I should buy a Che shirt.

Average citizen here

Nobody ever likes you and its very hard to win/lose/have an argument
Bernie had great judicial system reforms
Trump will help the american worker with anti h1b visa pressure on businesses
Hillary is the only candidate that really understands womens issues
And a return to christian family values would ultimately be great foe the moral fabric of our country. Thanks ted cruz

Has a modern liberal really even considered throwing a molotov ?

Right on the line between 420 and tax this dick bitch usually but it varies sometimes

Liberty or death/You can have my guns when you peel my fingers off the grip fuckin statists

"This molotov will inspire change" was "Liberty or Death" in "1776"

Perhaps in their mind, but they wouldn't have the balls to do it in real life.

>Not 1776
Classic Liberalism FTW

Anyone more than two squares off dead center is a total retard or underage.

Test is bad to begin with. I consider myself a national socialist and land right on the e in "Citizen".

Modern liberals are Bernouts, red/green parts of average citizen, Che shirts and the weed ones.

The molotov one would be literal Marxists/anarcho-communists

You can't be a national socialist and land right in the middle, that would make you a centrist you goomba.

A nat soc calling is caking is retards stop the presses and get a load of this guy

DEATH TO SARACENS

You stand for nothing, so you'll fall for anything

...

I disagree with the Cuck category. Yes, that area in the spectrum is filled with neocon cucks, but thsts basically saying that theyre nationalists... just for the wrong country.

Just yr average lefty.

1776, save us George

...

nice

Heritage!

"The individual is foolish, but the species is wise."

Incorrect.

"A person can be smart, but people are dumb and stupid, panicky animals."

I'm near the middle

What do I do?

Also I should probably try to move over to the right

but I'm not sure exactly what right and left mean in this circumstance.

What are some of the right's ideals? Small government, less regulations?

purplefag and AR-15 will always ALWAYS be my one and only raifu

Millennial neets will disapprove

Molotoves until the end, my friend

Left: zero private property (communism)
right:all private property (capitalism)

up: big gov (authoritariansim/statism)
down: small gov/no gov (libertarianism/anarchism)

ENTP masterrace here

Well personally I think there should be a balance between private and public property.

Also authoritarianism has its uses, but that also means it has its MISuses, so you can't have too much or too little.

I do support the USA's 1st and 2nd amendments, but the 2nd really should specify that an average citizen be able to purchase and operate equipment that could reasonbly challenge the military or police.
It's a bit of a shame that rotary grenade launchers, mortars, MANPADs, and the like are not civilian legal.

Myers-briggs is horseshit on par with astrology.
Poor retestability - people shift categories after only a few days
The objects placed on different axes are not opposites - Feeling is not the opposite of Sensing, Introversion is not the opposite of Extroversion
A 1% preference is in the same as a 50% preference, so being in a given category doesn't really predict much

Might as well rename it the Myers-Briggs Weekly Horoscope.

So you'd be what, heritage? God loves both me and the Constitution? You did specifically cite the Constitution, after all. Also,

>rotary grenade launchers, mortars, MANPADs
I wsih, /k/ommando. I wouldn't be using molotovs then

t. caveman

Waiter, I'll take a molotov.

I didn't know there was any of my niggas here

>"This molotov will inspire social change"

You say nigger like one of them. Who you trying to fool, spook.

...

Anyone else not really give a fuck about economics and only social issues?

I'd rather live in an all white/socially conservative communist country than a free market capitalist cucked one

I think in Poland the communists are very right wing socially

>not liking rap music
This nigga don't know shit

>111111111111111111
why, user

"Tax this Dick bitch" here.

>Introversion is not the opposite of Extroversion

I am INTP and I'm near the mmiddle

God loves me and the constitution :))))

I'm ENTP-A master debater but this

Then you would be Right Libertarian. In OP's pic a NatSoc would land between Kill the (((Other))) people and Filthy Commies boxes.

...

I'd say that pretty accurate for me. INTP here.

I do have sympathies with the following characteristics from time to time:
Libertarian
Anarchist
Fascist
Economic Equality

...

Perfection

INTJ
Different days get me "tax this dick bitches, ""money," and "1776."

...

...

>women's issues

Why are these oddly true

>Nazi cap
>farther right than Monarch
You do realize that monarchy is about as far right as you can get? It should be to the far end.

daily reminder that if your not on red or at least green you deserve to be purged

*tips night vision goggles*

GOMMIE :-DDD

Monarchy is a system, authoritarian and right leaning in nature, but it's neither neccessarily extremely rightist nor extremely authoritarian.

But yes, swapping the two hats would be a good idea considering that NatSocs can hardly be considered significantly right leaning.

>Vietnam
Well, at least it ain't me.

Modern monarchies in Britain and the Netherlands aren't that far right but I was thinking of the extreme social differences in the past (King Louis XIV, Edwardian England, etc.)

funny thing is, Max Stirner was purple as hell, but most of his philosophical followers were super-green (i.e. Peter Kropotkin, Emma Goldman)

Modern monarchies aren't really monarchies to begin with. The monarch has hardly any real power in them - it's more of a "let's keep the tradition going" thing.

And what you're talking about is specifically absolute monarchy. Off the charts in authoritarian aspect and usually far right.

That's not a Nazi cap you fucking dingbat, it's a Pinochet hat

And most purples hate his ideas

Same thing with Rousseau. He was definitely purple but influenced the Socialists.

Stirner does not believe in property rights so no, he is not "purple as hell"

Seems accurate

>tfw

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

YES.

I bet I could kill you with my dick

>tfw don't smoke but really want to smoke cigars and pipes

>Left
>Liberal
>Netherlands

Makes sense.

1776

feels good being a freedom loving patriot.

colors do not apply

nice