Down from 1/2 at the turn of the 20th century
nytimes.com
Down from 1/2 at the turn of the 20th century
nytimes.com
Sad!
in other words, water is wet?
And only 1/20 have naturally blonde hair
Kill them all, hazel eyes are the only true eye color
Blondes are stupid shits
>by mid century a person's education and not ethnicity become the primary factor in selecting a spouse
How is that a bad thing? Did you even read the article?
Its because Catholics breed fast
good
brown eyes are cute
Completely disagree.
That being said, most white people where I live (Carolinas) still have blue eyes, probably because of lack of impact from Italians and Poles.
Most poles have blue eyes
>Carolinas
Having .2% African ancestry isn't going to affect your features.
Having 42% Italian will.
>Recessive genes die out of time
woah
>die out
That's not how genes work
They still exist, but because they're recessive, don't show up physically as often.
Genes can always be expressed even generations down the line.
bullshit. poles are relatively swarthy
I can’t tell if you’re making a joke or serious, but natural blonde hair is definitely way more prevalent here than blue eyes.
I’m actually surprised there was a time when half the people in the US had blue eyes.
Look it up if you don't believe me
latinas love my blue eyes. i'm going to be the first in my family to racemix :D
>poles are relatively swarthy
le 56% face.jpg
1/6 more than you mohamed
le 56% faic
Well, I mean it’s bad because blue eyes are getting pushed out of the gene pool because they’re recessive and not because we don’t think they look good. I would take blue eyes over brown eyes any day, but it’s still way down the list of things I would prioritize when looking to marry someone.
>1/6 of Americans have blue eyes
>that's rare
>54000000 people is rare
My gosh you people are sensationalist believing retards sometimes.
Fuck you.