Twitter Totalitarianism

>theguardian.com/culture/2016/jul/18/leslie-jones-racist-tweets-ghostbusters

She-boon crying that she's been hurled with abuse on twitter after the much anticipated failure of the Ghostbuster's sequel, sadly not so much financially.

>theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/20/milo-yiannopoulos-nero-permanently-banned-twitter

Milo has been banned for supposedly 'evoking' his followers to go and attack aforementioned she-boon, this time permanently.

When will this blatant, racist attack on white men be exposed as such? If a black person we're to have been blamed for such a thing, twitter wouldnt even so much as lift a finger to warn, let alone ban them because of one fundamental feature they seem to lack any understanding towards - freedom of speech.

Oh the irony of advocating yourselves as a bastion of freedom of conversation and yet you've become the Thought Police of the internet.

Other urls found in this thread:

support.twitter.com/articles/18311
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It is a private service after all

So what tweet or tweets got him banned?

You'd be surprised that he tweeted nothing towards it actually. He didn't urge anyone to do jack shit. It was something along the lines of why is leslie jones getting so upset over tweets, just block people and stop being a pussy.

support.twitter.com/articles/18311
>Abusive Behavior
>We believe in freedom of expression and in speaking truth to power, but that means little as an underlying philosophy if voices are silenced because people are afraid to speak up. In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs, we do not tolerate behavior that crosses the line into abuse, including behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.
>Any accounts and related accounts engaging in the activities specified below may be temporarily locked and/or subject to permanent suspension.
>Violent threats (direct or indirect): You may not make threats of violence or promote violence, including threatening or promoting terrorism.
>Harassment: You may not incite or engage in the targeted abuse or harassment of others. Some of the factors that we may consider when evaluating abusive behavior include:
>if a primary purpose of the reported account is to harass or send abusive messages to others;
>if the reported behavior is one-sided or includes threats;
>if the reported account is inciting others to harass another account; and
>if the reported account is sending harassing messages to an account from multiple accounts.
>Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease. We also do not allow accounts whose primary purpose is inciting harm towards others on the basis of these categories.


>break site's rules
>get banned
WAAHHH FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! Milo is usually in the fucking wrong for acting like an edgy 14 year old, this is just him reaping the consequences of his actions.

Please don't click the Guardians clickbait.
Thanks.

Don't really care. Twitter is dying (IPO went from $41 to $18) and they want to keep their current userbase, which 28% of is black people. So of course they'll do things that cater to black interests like support BLM and other shit. It's business.

Sup Forums then
>private property is inviolable. no business should be forced to associate with people they don't want. muh niggers, muh white communities, muh ethnonationalism. government enforced association is tyranny

Sup Forums now
>twitter shouldn't ban anybody form their private property. muh rights, muh feelings, muh freeze peach. private agents enforcing their property rights is tyranny

I can't stand Milo but what he did wasn't against the guidelines. He didn't "attack" or tell anyone else to, he just made some comments about how you should block trolls and move on.

So just making statements that someone else feels are offensive to them is enough for a ban? Okay then Inquisitor.

The entire newspaper is one batshit lefty fuckfest, I still don't know why they're making news.

>If a black person we're to have been blamed for such a thing, twitter wouldnt even so much as lift a finger to warn, let alone ban them because of one fundamental feature they seem to lack any understanding towards - freedom of speech.

literally, the first person banned by the feminist frequency led group of twitter uber mods was a black man that regularly made fun of the creator of feminist frequency

How the fuck do you even know that was a black man and not some 17 year old troll from suburban Britain?

he's a well known author of multiple novels

...

Do you expect me to know what your constitution is or what ?

>not memorizing a constitution of a country not relevant to you
What are you, casul?

Well, you based it off of ours, so yes.

> freedom of speech.
Does not mean that a private and for profit company is obligated to host views which may damage its revenue and/or reputation, under ANY reasonable interpretation.

>using the term she boon
>accusing others of racism

You are literally worse than feminists at this point.

Grow up.

He doesn't even understand his own constitution. So his expectation is kind of moot.

you can't be this stupid to believe this

He's not black, he is white. Manly Tears is probably who you are referring to, who is a British manlet who hates SmegmaKing.

He is funny as fuck though, dindu nuffin.

Kill yourself faggot.

#ConfuseWhitePeopleParty is trending right now. Totally fine to stereotype and be racist towards Whites on Twitter.

Totally fine as long as you follow twitter's rules, nigger.

Milo did nothing wrong.

Twitter is obviously targeting him due to his political beliefs.

SAD!

b8 harder, he broke no rule, unlike Leslie Jones, kek

Fuck off , no one gives a shit about Milo the nigger fucking faggot

What egregious injustice that someone can't mobilize a far right group to viciously berate someone for the race she was born into.

Seriously, all memes aside and disregarding being fed up with PC culture, what sort of fucking person starts calling someone like her a dirty nigger, spamming her with monkey pics etc?
It's surely a pathology

>What egregious injustice that someone can't mobilize a far right group to viciously berate someone for the race she was born into.

Except, that didn't happen.

Okay.

Now answer the next part

Yes it did, fuck off.

He didn't do that. She got trolled by Sup Forums kiddies and got triggered. Fuck off nigger lover

hitting me where it hurts, in my love of niggers.

Its a private business. They have no obligation to Milo whatsoever. They don't have to prove anyhting to ban him except that they don't want him posting on thier, which is proved by his being banned.

The alternative is FORCING people to host content, to their financial or reputational detriment in pursuit of some form of illusory equality of access.

And you know who makes arguments like that user?

Are you a pig fucking SJW liberal? Or do you actually respect the concept of private property?

How retarded do you think people are? Everyone knows exactly what he did, and your god emperor Trump just lost his reddit fanbase.

>Seriously, all memes aside and disregarding being fed up with PC culture, what sort of fucking person starts calling someone like her a dirty nigger, spamming her with monkey pics etc?

Answer this part? I don't know, nor care. It isn't really relevant to anything at hand, since Milo didn't actually do any of that racist stuff. The guy is not that dumb.

leaf pls

Sup Forums, Sup Forums and Sup Forums were spamming her for hours before Milo tweeted her a few times. None of his tweets had anything to do with race either.

He simply became a scapegoat for the whole ordeal because he was the most "famous" person partaking into it. It was guilt by association. Aside from the fact that he got banned for something he didn't do the hypocrisy of twitter banning him for something Leslie was doing is ridiculous.

posting on their platform*

You aren't entitled to a twitter account.

Now fuck off and die liberal scum

I agree that they have that right. I'm just mad about the hypocrisy and selective policing of their terms. And the hypocrisy of liberals that have gone out of their way to crucify a baker that wouldn't bake a cake for some gays, despite running a private business.

The left is simply not interested in justice, and will break every principle by any means to get their ends.

Milo is a Jewish homosexual who advocates interracial relationships through his worship of thick black cocks.

He shouldn't be allowed to have twitter in the first place.

Protip: There is nothing wrong with totalitarianism. Fascism is the only way to defeat the liberal kike socialist globalist judaic lizard men

>partaking into it

Oops, so he was partaking into it.

>deflection
boring

If a private company fosters a large amount of discussion maybe we need to protect our freedom of speech there as well, and change the laws regarding that.

He partook into mocking her, which is not against any rules. And his tweets were not racist either, not that it should matter.

Even twitter wasn't dumb enough to claim that was why they banned him. Come on leaf, basic reading comprehension.

This. We should still shit on Twitter/not use it for not supporting free speech, but it's ultimately up to them.

I love it when low-IQ conservashits try to bullshit their way out of something and think they're so smart and that no one can see through their shit.

Listen. You are everything that's wrong with this board. You think a significant political issue is some faggot getting banned on Twitter.

Seriously, get a fucking grip. I bet you care about Gamergate and Disney movies too

Sup Forums will ignore this
>Sup Forums will ignore this
Sup Forums will ignore this
>Sup Forums will ignore this
Sup Forums will ignore this
>Sup Forums will ignore this

I've been posting this same image for 3 days and not one person on Sup Forums has actually done it. Lots of 'sounds like a good idea' comments but no actual action.

Sup Forums is basically a bunch of edgy teenagers who were happy to troll the black woman, but are not happy to turn it back onto SONY and completely Jew Twitter in the process.

Basically by the time Sony denied it, all the SJWs would have picked up on it and done most of the work for us. They would be boycotting the GB film too.

Welp. I tried.

Twitter can ban whoever they want. They shouldn't lie about their rules and who they will apply them to though.

Lol, why didn't you just say you're a woman. I would have wasted as much time on you. I'm sorry the concept of "principles"is beyond your comprehension.

Suicide is highly recommended for you.

I can understand the outrage. But the principle in operation here is self interest. Forcing anyone to violate theirs is worse than banning a self hating faggot from a discourse of retardation...

Do you even listen to yourself?

You are basically saying that peoples right to private property end where your feelings begin.

Get fucked you commie shitbag.

Listen. You are everything that's wrong with this board. You think that your emotions and political bias gives you a right to forsake logic and truth as along as the outcome agrees with you.

Seriously, get a fucking grip. I bet you care about gay marriage and woman's suffrage too.

Milo should consider lengthy and highly publicized legal action for discrimination

everytime twatter does something like this they further erode their crumbling base. If they dont change they'll go extinct soon enough. They dont even make money, they are losing tons of it every month- only kept afloat by investors

> Forcing anyone to violate theirs
Come on now, twitter didn't do this out of any sort of principle. They did it for political reasons, and are completely ignoring the same infractions from people that lean left.

Why did twitter say they banned him?

See your posts in this thread. You're the one who's shaking with anger and impotent frustration.

celebrating the killing of cops and calling for more is permitted on twitter as well.

White faggots rank lower in the oppression Olympics than millionaire nigger gorillas

Harassment and previous offenses kek

What's wrong with calling a black woman a filthy nigger on twitter? She can just block it if she doesn't want to see it.

I don't get it.

I thought Sup Forums liked totalitarians.

Hitler, Pinochet, Putin, Erdogan, Trump...

What happened?

It's funny because the woman does the exact same thing that she accused him of doing to her. She only ran to Twitter to ban him because he has such a huge fan base.

Stating facts doesn't make angry. Rationalizing lapses of logic would, but everyone is different and perhaps it does not have that effect on you. Hmmm, but then why are you projecting?

You should understand the economic cost of violating political 'principles' held by the masses. That is if you are smart enough to hide your powerlevel.

Isn't that the shittiest thing about the SJW crowd? That political opinions are ipso facto sufficient reason to fuck with someones livelihood?

Sure seems that way to me.

And if I am right, forcing someone to host something anyone could identify as hate speech, no matter how tenuous the link actually is, has major implications for the success of a platform such as twitter.

Honestly, I fucking hate twitter, and have so far resisted even pirating the film in question, depsite request from the gf.

But anyone's right to host the types of content they wish to seems sacrosanct to me.

I mean sheeeeiiiiit, I feel the same way about Anglin and his daily stormer, but would happily get into it with anyone calling for him to be shut down.

Basically raiding in twitter terms. Inciting harassment.

That mass media is controlled by a handful of private companies that can ban people for their opinions effectively erodes all the meaning behind the freedom of speech.

Innate rights are more than legalese that you get a lawyer to dance around, its about respect and deference.

I don't think there was any economic cost to not banning Milo. If anything, they guy drives plenty of traffic towards twitter.

I mean, these are the people who let ISIS recruit radicals and openly celebrate death Europeans after a terrorist attack.

Good idea. You could do this yourself ya know.

I've done it. Tweeting from one account doesn't exactly get any attention though.

Not when there were thousands of tweets attacking Leslie in the first place.

>My plan is so clever and none of those stinky SJWs will be able to see through it (unlike every other time they saw through one of these paper-thin ruses) because they're all dumb! Otherwise they'd think like me!

>Also Sup Forums is a sekret so none of them will ever find the post on a forum open to all users! I'll even make an easily saved and reproduced image to post repeatedly on the forums open to any user! They'll never know!