This is how the average Russian dressed during the Imperial era...

This is how the average Russian dressed during the Imperial era. Vladimir Lenin changed that by destroying Russian culture. Today he is revered, worshiped, declared a national hero, has hundreds of monuments dedicated to him and called "Father of all the Rus" by people he called subhuman, the Russians.

youtube.com/watch?v=emNUP3EMu98

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/thread/81949709/#81949709
twitter.com/AnonBabble

is this what you think there in america or you are just trolling?

The average Russian during the Imperial Era was a malnourished peasant.

archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/thread/81949709/#81949709

Hmm...

You are confusing the Imperial era with the Soviet era. Very understandable

t. Kulak Kulakovich

You lying weasel

fuck off

muh russian empire

muh czar

muh czar muhfugga

I remember when the Anastasia movie implied Russians went commie due dark magic

>This is how the average Russian dressed during the Imperial era.
No, it is a rich person's dress exactly before the Imperial era.
>Vladimir Lenin changed that by destroying Russian culture.
No, he died before Russian culture was actually damaged. It happened during collectivisation. Only peasants kept that culture and "attacking" their economy and way of life was Stalin's doing. Not like I defend Lenin.
>
Oh, it is trolling.

>muh great holy rus we lost

Make a better bait next time.

This fashion was literally banned by Peter I, the first Russian emperor.

This is how native Russians used to dres in the early 20th century. This is probably a city family.

These Pomor men have their working clothes on.

Czars were the enemies of Russians in last 300 years.

The bolsheviks liberated women from muslim misogynist opression and gave to all soviet women freedom and equality. That's just one of the many achievements of the Great Socialist Revolution.

Naturally, yes. Lenin, Stalin & co. Are praised and beloved as long as the people remember all the good things they gave to us, no matter how reactonary bigots whine online.

Peasants who escaped to Poland from Romanov opression then they were relocated by Ekaterine II to Siberia. You see they look less rich.

Kulaks----->Gulag

the last romanov was a massive useless faggot, he deserve his fate

>guy frees people from serfdom
>American thinks the freed people should hate him because the oppressors used to wear nice clothes

Mutt IQ is showing.

>liberals unironically like Nicolas II and probably think Yeltsin was great too

>the average Russian

lolno

Serfdom ended in Imperial Russia during the 19th century. Not every country is Indonesia where they have serfdom in the present day.

You know America is a "pay to play" country because you notice that whenever there is a conflict or civil war in a foreign land, they will always side with the filthy rich minority.

kill yourself right now

those are Old Believers right?

serfdom was actually abolished in 1861

Serfdom was abolished but the living conditions of the ex-serfs deteriorated instead of ameliorating because the terms were so skewed towards the previous landowners.

In effect they were still serfs. Their freedom was just a technicality in law. They had no choice but to keep doing the same work or starve and they were not getting anything in return.

This was one of the causes of the revolution.

Yep.

True about rights. People couldn't even leave their region without permission. But you forget Stolypin's reforms tha made hard-working people rich. To 1916 80+% of the land belonged to peasants. Temporary govt. abolished that. Basically the reason for the Civil War. And WWI ofc.

>The serfs of private estates received less land than they needed to survive, which led to civil unrest. The redemption tax was so high that the serfs had to sell all the grain they produced to pay the tax, which left nothing for their survival. Landowners also suffered because many of them were deeply in debt, and the forced selling of their land left them struggling to maintain their lavish lifestyle. In many cases, the newly freed serfs were forced to "rent" their land from wealthy landowners. Furthermore, when the peasants had to work for the same landowners to pay their "labor payments", they often neglected their own fields.[13]:p. 126 Over the next few years, the yields from the peasants' crops remained low, and soon famine struck a large portion of Russia.[13]:p. 127 With little food, and finding themselves in a similar condition as when they were serfs, many peasants started to voice their disdain for the new social system. On one occasion, on 12 April 1861, a local leader murdered a large number of uprising peasants in the village of Bezdna.[14] When the incident was over, the official report counted 70 peasants dead and another 100 wounded. After further investigation, and trial of some members of the uprising, five peasants were found guilty of "agitation" and not uprising.[14] That said, several different instances did take the form of an uprising.[14]

>On one occasion, on 12 April 1861, a local leader murdered a large number of uprising peasants in the village of Bezdna.[14] When the incident was over, the official report counted 70 peasants dead and another 100 wounded. After further investigation, and trial of some members of the uprising, five peasants were found guilty of "agitation" and not uprising.[14]

Gee I wonder why they revolted.

>>how reactonary bigots whine online.
>commie is blind to the orgies of soviet officials
>somehow thinks "reactionary" is actually a valid slur or indicative of any objective criticism