Is there something more disastrous for a football club than having an American majority shareholder?
>Completely ignorant about the sport
>American
>Only cares about profits to buy some new ranch
Is there something more disastrous for a football club than having an American majority shareholder?
>Completely ignorant about the sport
>American
>Only cares about profits to buy some new ranch
Other urls found in this thread:
bleacherreport.com
twitter.com
all English clubs are run that way
why does only Arsenal suck?
Because Kroenke is a notorious shit owner in the States
Swansea have American owners too unfortunately
>all English clubs are run that way
Arsenal and Liverpool are the only top-6 clubs with an American owner
Manchester United?
(((Glazerstein's))) own Man Yooo
based owner milking customers for their hard earned pounds
capitalism wins again
Italian owners
So the three top-6 clubs that are currently garbage (Man United, Liverpool, and Arsenal) changed to American ownership in the past decade. Really makes you think
>Swansea are 1% owned by Mindy Kaling, the Indian girl from the American office.
this
The guy took a team from anaheim to saint louis to suck money from them for 15 years and moved back to LA to suck more money from them
he even got retards in his inner circle to help pay for his new stadium
having shareholders as a football club.
europeans try to discredit americans when it is basically the same thing
One Jurgen Klopp please
>Is there something more disastrous for a football club than having an American majority shareholder?
Liverpool do fine.
>Completely ignorant about the sport
Arsenal are run sustainably with a strong community footprint. They play decent football, sometimes. The reality is they cannot compete financially with the oil and gas republics.
Kroenke was not the owner when they moved to St. Louis, retard.
Spurs are the only one with a british owner.
he was the advisor to georgia , had stakes in the team and eventually bought the team pick related
he initiated talks with STL , pushed for it in the board meetings and got the women owner to go for it , after her death he bought the remaining stakes he needed to become majority owner
the point is he moved the team , he admits it and all people involved when talking about the move point to him first and foremost
I don't know how much stan is paying you to be a idiot but you can also watch the nfl doc about both the raiders and rams moving which also details stan's greedyness to get out of LA for STL(in a more controlled environment [nfl network])
He's a straight white American. Of course he doesn't give a shit about soccer.
Liverpool's current American owners (from New England, also own the Red Sox) saved them from bankruptcy, although to be fair that was caused by previous American owners (from Texas, the same morons who ruined the Rangers).
commies BTFO
next time be sure to put more sponsors on your ugly ass jerseys
He cares about profits, until it affects his pocket he will not bother
Why would you care about winning when the bottom line is all that matters?
He's a business man, not a fan
move arsenal to the us tbqh
Kroenke would move them to LA tomorrow if he thought he could get away with it
>gives the most smug, annoying sports city in america what they deserve
>singlehandedly destroys arsenal
thank you based kroenke
>Is there something more disastrous for a football club than having an American majority shareholder?
Having an English manager
>you now remember bob bradley
FSG are great.
Um no sweetie, United and Liverpool are both quite good.
just fix my shit up
>Southerners ruin something because they're morons
>Northeasterners have to come in to fix it
Who’s worse an American or Arab owner?
That's what you get for selling to an american that just wants profits instead of an arab who just wants to showoff.
American. Arabs throw money at around and hire the best managers possible, see PSG and Man City, while slightly second-rate in Europe they dominate their domestic leagues. Arsenal, for example, is like a rudderless ship under Kroenke, while maintaining the most expensive tickets in the Premiership, usually with a full stadium of 60k, and being virtually the only side to make a net profit on transfers their backroom staff is woeful, and while making improvements in scouting in Mislintat, are clueless in man-management, tactics, and training. It's at the point where I can predict Arsenal's lineups before they are announced and predict where mistakes will happen which lead to conceding goals.
t. from London, was a season ticket holder from 1998-2011.
>was wondering for quite some time why Arsenal tickets are so expensive
>turns out that the owner is american
Holly shit, americans are fucking cancer, always overcharging the "customer" and shitting on the teams history.
Just waiting for Arsenal to be relocated to Birmingham due to lower taxes and become the "Birmingham Muzzies™"
>you know remember the Boston owners of Liverpool they tried to apply the baseball moneyball theory to soccer which resulted in the 20 million pound transfer of Stewart Downing
Truly inspiring
He uses profits from Arsenal to keep his perro caca teams in the US afloat, as they haemorrhage money. He rejected a billion pound offer last year from the second largest shareholder who called for a huge overhaul.
>tried to apply the baseball moneyball theory to soccer
Can you elaborate on the plan?
They used some complicated maths that was really effective in a stat based sport, like baseball, and tried to apply it to soccer, which is the sport with the worst correlation between stats and success.
They deduced that Downing was a really good player because he created a lot of chances at Aston Villa and thought he would be worth 20 million
faggots complain about oil sugar daddies but at least those put money in the club, amerifat owners are parasites
bleacherreport.com
This really highlights how dumb it was
>Carrol
>Adam
they used STATS and MATH from baseball, it didnt fucking work.
In baseball it is a huge squad game, built mainly on duels between the pitcher and the batter. Using maths and stats scouts figured out that by using a a left handed pitcher against batter Y he'd strike out, but for batter X they'd need to use a right handed switch up.
Essentially it broke the sport down into tiny little fragments that could be solved. Maximising teams strengths and opponent weakness.
>out fielder Z is really good at fielding against right handed batsmen
>only ever field him against teams with predominately right handed hitters
Simplified but extreme specialisation.
Yeah, but after a couple of years they realised it was retarded and threw it away. Now Liverpool is the best club in England at transfers (except City and their just throw money at them tactic).
It was a learning experience la
>Curry'd
fuck soccer
he can do whatever he wants. i don't care.
Calm down Cletus
>being owned by Russian gangsters and dune coon oil niggers is better
liberal detected
owner just gotta pay the bills who gives a fuck
Why don't people blame fans. Everyone identifies the problem, it's about profits. If you run a business, you're not going to give a fuck what people think if you still give them money. It's like that horrible green and gold thing United fans did. They still gave them their money.
>he still is a United customer
>doesn't support based F.C. United of Manchester
just cuz the cardinals fucked your favourite team up doesn't mean st.louis deserved that shit
That's exactly what people should do. It's noble what they did, they didn't like it so they started something themselves. Instead of that loser DT, always saying he can't stop watching, something needs to change. Yet he keeps spending money.
Yup.
AFC Wimbledon and FCUM are the good guys
That's hilarious considering he spent nearly 1 billion of his own money just to build the Rams a new stadium. Brits cucked again m8
>United and Liverpool are both quite good
Man United have finished 7th, 4th, 5th, 6th in the past 4 seasons. Liverpool have done even worse overall
At least they're care about the club & tried to make Liverpool better.
That's the important point.
Can Arsenal fans here give me a rundown about "Hill Wood & Kroenke Vs Dein & Usmanov" thing?
Apparently Kronke is less evil than Usmanov, so Hill Wood sold arsenal to Kronke even though Hill Wood himself hate Kronke.
>shareholders on a football club