Why Trump will lose

And the West will continue its century long decline...

Other urls found in this thread:

amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Yep, unfortunately if you even talk about this issue, you'll be called a neckbeard and told to go back to even on Sup Forums

19th was a mistake

...

...

What the fuck is this pic even saying?

And people say Hispanics are based.

Women vote to marry the state and to import rapists.

amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/

Please don't make this about race. Minorities are easy to control if you aren't being sabotaged by herdthinking, cowardly women. We will never be able to deal with minorities or foreign aggressors while women are at the wheel.

>No sample size listed

Nu/pol/...

...

...

The lead presidential candidates had among men/women expressed in percentage points

Nixon +14 means that Nixon received 14 percentage points more votes than McGovern. So , for example Nixon - 56%, McGovern - 42%

>Bush +9
>Bush +11

He may win, but his hands will be tied and his legacy compromised by women. See for example Bush; through a fluke we managed to beat them and elect a warrior, he fucked up our enemies - then 8 years later they elect Obama and begin an era of apologizing and thanking our enemies. China and Islam do not have this schizophrenic foreign policy.

which is why you can't be blunt anymore.

For republicans to win over women, they have to appeal to emotion.

Sadly the media is superior at this and are the cementers of leftist preaching that draws women in.

Ty ty

You cannot win over women's emotions because their emotions are different than ours. When a woman caveman is wandering her territory alone and encounters a strange man, she is liable to attempt to seduce him to avoid being killed by him. When a man caveman encounters a strange man, he either chases the man off, engages with him on even terms, runs for backup, or dies trying. Women are instinctively conflict averse, as a survival instinct.

>According to the article, 17 percent of men would vote for AfD while only 2 percent of women would do so.

.. with the power vested in them.. by DEMOCRACY

That's a load of bullshit user. If you're basing it off chimps, the females slut around to avoid infanticide by neighboring males, not to prevent males from killing her.

Non-western women don't go around clamoring for open boarders, this is exclusively a sickness of white women or westernized women who associate with them. Scratch that, it's a sickness found in the west via a post-boomer generation, since I've seen plenty of men who go to such lengths as to deny the horrors exposed to the world in favor of their leftist ideology.

To but it bluntly, the suicidal leftist ideology of today, the stuff that spreads based on emotion and appeal to virtue, is an ideology of children.

We're leftists as teens but grow out of it upon maturing. Women are children, they don't mature and cling to it's buzzwords. Then, then there are the man children, the neckbearded antifa faggots.

>That's a load of bullshit user. If you're basing it off chimps, the females slut around to avoid infanticide by neighboring males, not to prevent males from killing her.
What's the difference? Either way slutting around isn't a great defense.

>Non-western women don't go around clamoring for open boarders
Because 1. the wealth is in the west, so it's only non-western men moving to the west
2. they don't live in democracies

Just compare non-western democracies (India, most of Africa, most of Latin America) to non-western autocracies (China, Gulf States, Russia) to see the deleterious effects women have on society.

>Women are children, they don't mature and cling to it's buzzwords. Then, then there are the man children, the neckbearded antifa faggots.
True. Many many men base their society around serving a woman, and adopt her views to please her.

>What's the difference

You're attempting to claim that women vote left because of some instinct where they need to fuck violent rapist foreigners so they don't get killed by them.

That's not how it works

My point is that leftist thinking appeals to children, yours is that women are in a perpetual state of wanting foreigners to come in and rape them.

It's not that they necessarily want foreigners to come and rape them, although they probably do want to be competed over.

It's that when a foreigner comes there, they don't respond by expelling him, because that isn't their role in society. Which is why they vote for parties that tolerate and reward immigrants - not because they want immigrants, but because they don't want to start a conflict with immigrants.

If you ever wonder why the West retreated from Africa and Asia and Latin America, it's because women are incapable of stomaching protracted conflict. These are wars that could easily have been won if strengthening our countries instead of paying attention to our women was the goal.

Exactly.

Nah, it's because of leftist thought.
I've had plenty of arguements with leftist to left moderate women, they all commonly believe that islam is innocent that the magic of feminism will westernize them.

The way they talk of these people is that of a pet, a cultural curiosity that will one day westernize and be like them, but oh so interesting for being brown and oppressed. Women love to help and nurture, of course, and such an easy way to prove you're a good person is an offer they can not refuse.

They don't see the threat because of a multitude of indoctrinated ideas that have been applied to both sexes. Including a hatred of "old white men" that they associate with control over their lives and all sorts of other evils.

in essence, children don't like to keep up with the news, they prefer fantasy.

the broplem of leftists is they would rather profit off their own countrymen than foreigners.

Which isn't such a problem, since I don't believe in collectivism - except that it opens the gates for foreigners to destroy your country.

Of course the reverse is true of rightism; empower your country sufficient enough to destroy foreigners, and it can also destroy you.

It's all a bit of a conundrum but I think it's safe to say women should never have been allowed to vote.

...

>women are more likely to vote against my personal beliefs and I'm incapable of coming into terms with that.

I think it's important that in the next election, all men hold down a woman and physically prevent her from voting, so that we can remove them from all levels of government and military.

Woman care more about the physical attractiveness of candidates. They don't care if he's Hannibal Lecter.

t. /r/theredpill

t. reddit eggspert

>No sample size
Also polls have been nothing short of worthless for a few years now, especially with libtard rags polling their own readership for sampling.

>Also polls have been nothing short of worthless for a few years now

No, they haven't. The gender gap is real and I don't understand why the fuck anyone would doubt that women vote differently.

Women are parasitic scum and thus they vote for parasites like liberal parties.

Universal sufferage was a mistake.

It all comes full circle.
Hillary will probably win and make the country culturally sensitive.
We will start brainwashing our young with pro-islam ideologies.
Islam finds nooks and cracks in our political system and forces certain cities to be havens for islam and shariah law.
It slowly takes over due to cucked men and feminists.
Women again are viewed as second class citizens.
Mars takes a back seat and has to wait 400+ years till whites take over the world again

71 + 46 doesn't equal 100%

Nice graph tard

...

Is this the famous Australian shitposting?