Sup Forums's thoughts on the Constitution?

What do you guys think of the Constitution?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_Thirty-three_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Canada
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.A.V._v._City_of_St._Paul
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

good piece of literature 10/10 would recommend to a friend

9/10 could be better to protect individual rights and federalism.

nice trips

it only works when everyone is on the same page and contributes

not everyone does

in fact it seems like there is an overly vocal segment of the population that seems to want to destroy it one piece at a time

hurling excrement like the primates they are

Outdated

0/10 doesn't protect jack shit you still have free speech zones, gun limits, shit even nsa stores all of your interest use and you need to damn near take a prostate exam to get on airplane.Then you get your jewish ruling class abusing the constitution to have unlimited campaign financing, push degeneracy on our youth and proliferate open border babies.

I'll take the British-Canadian constitution every single day hands down for section 33 alone. Jewish marxist judges shouldn't be able to overrule the elected reps like in America.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_Thirty-three_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

A codified consitution with special protections is retarded; something only needs a 2/3rds majority to be completley legitimate in law.

Where as a constitution of convention is far fucking superior; we have a head of state that wouldn't give assent to a bill unless it followed the establish conventions and liberties of these Isles.

> it allows Parliament or provincial legislatures to override certain portions of the Charter
How is this a good thing? This is scary.

And then you have this clause
>. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
> reasonable limits
>demonstrably justified
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

Canada has hate speech laws that go against the freedom of speech
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Canada

In the US, people burned a cross on a black family's lawn. A city tried to make this kind of freedom of expression illegal, and the Supreme Court unanimously said it was unconstitutional, citing the first amendment. This wasn't a century ago either. This was in 1992.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.A.V._v._City_of_St._Paul

Who has better free speech laws?

>How is this a good thing? This is scary.
The Governer general (the Monarch herself here) has absolute power of veto only to be exercised to uphold the established conventions.

She's essentially an Autocrat bred to uphold the consitution of the Nation.

It needs modern nationalist revision, under Trump of course.

magna carta on steroids

"we the people" implies you have to preserve who the people are

Constitution only works under Nationalism

Pretty good, wish we had parts of it.

>modern nationalist revision
+1
Birthright citizenship needs to be abolished.

What does Sup Forums think about universal service? Universal suffrage should require universal duty. The Founding Generation essentially had such a concept in the form of militias. Every man of a certain age was required to serve. I see no reason why a modern incarnation would be "anti-American" or "anti-liberty" when the Founding Generation had no problem with such an idea.

Largely irrelevant at this point in history.

Pretty based until they amended it several times

Quality. Writers knew what they were doing. Wish there was a bit more about how much power the gov can have and money in politics, it'd fix a lot

all rights need to be handed over to the government. they already handle all foreign affairs and ensure trade happens. the police become federalized and elminates the need for personal defense

We don't have organized state militias anymore. Under the Dick Act of 1903, all males between 17 and 45 are part of their respective state militia.

same

Wat

iktf.

Obsolete, needs to be rewritten

This. Start with erasing the 14th

It's too late for that. We're too used to the one we have. Even if we wrote a new one, it would pretty much be same as the one we have now

shouldent give rights to non whites and non christians.

founding fathers were naive SJWs for not banning Islam from the start.

now muslims will abuse the 1st and 2nd to remove the 1st and 2nd

> Wish there was a bit more about how much power the gov can have and money in politics, it'd fix a lot

Lol they literally threw together a few English consitutional documents, sprinkled wit with some lockean rhetoric and called it a consitution; it wasn't original and buy and large they had no idea what they were doing; they were disagreeing on the interpretation as early as the late 1780's.

The Founding Fathers did the best they could with what they knew. As far as rewriting it, this may be a door we don't want to open.

It's meaningless.

>all men are created equal