Would these statpadders have scored as much if they had played in a league where people can defend

Answer : no

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=JmbZpvFNan0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

yes

CR7 played in the EPL

He said a league where people can defend.

What's the league then? Bayernsliga? Serie A?

>mfw there's literally no league where people can defend

This.

Championship

yesterday I say a youtube with all of messi's 600 goals and was shocked how few of them where tap in, like maybe 20 out of 600, it was quite revealing
m.youtube.com/watch?v=JmbZpvFNan0

poonaldo is a very different story lmao

i doubt that either of them could do it on a cold rainy night at tondela

well obviously; messi is the better player

...

skewered data. Arsenal were fucking shit when Messi put hattricks past them. Ronaldo was up against a much more defensively solid side.

Fact is both would struggle in Serie A and Messi would struggle in PL

>Destroying top teams on a regular basis is not enough
>Messi and Ronaldo also have to prove themselves against Stoke and WBA

lmao poonaldofags BTFO FOREVER

I mean, if they could bring with them their billion pound super teams, probably. But neither would be scoring anywhere near 50+ a season playing for someone like Man Utd or Chelsea in their current states.

This is why i take stats of this era with a pinch of salt. I mean even shitters like Cavan are scoring 50 a season, and there's like 10 forwards who hit 30 goals before March.

messi played tougher city's than donaldo

>Messi destroyed champions league

le need 600 chances to score man

meanwhile in real life 2018:
Ronaldo: 12 goals in 8 games
Missi: 4 goals in 7 games
lmfao he should just retire already.

This, leaguefags are the worst.

And both did nothing in World Cups.

City were West Ham tier when Penaldo played against them.