Answer : no
Would these statpadders have scored as much if they had played in a league where people can defend
Other urls found in this thread:
yes
CR7 played in the EPL
He said a league where people can defend.
What's the league then? Bayernsliga? Serie A?
>mfw there's literally no league where people can defend
This.
Championship
yesterday I say a youtube with all of messi's 600 goals and was shocked how few of them where tap in, like maybe 20 out of 600, it was quite revealing
m.youtube.com
poonaldo is a very different story lmao
i doubt that either of them could do it on a cold rainy night at tondela
well obviously; messi is the better player
...
skewered data. Arsenal were fucking shit when Messi put hattricks past them. Ronaldo was up against a much more defensively solid side.
Fact is both would struggle in Serie A and Messi would struggle in PL
>Destroying top teams on a regular basis is not enough
>Messi and Ronaldo also have to prove themselves against Stoke and WBA
lmao poonaldofags BTFO FOREVER
I mean, if they could bring with them their billion pound super teams, probably. But neither would be scoring anywhere near 50+ a season playing for someone like Man Utd or Chelsea in their current states.
This is why i take stats of this era with a pinch of salt. I mean even shitters like Cavan are scoring 50 a season, and there's like 10 forwards who hit 30 goals before March.
messi played tougher city's than donaldo
>Messi destroyed champions league
le need 600 chances to score man
meanwhile in real life 2018:
Ronaldo: 12 goals in 8 games
Missi: 4 goals in 7 games
lmfao he should just retire already.
This, leaguefags are the worst.
And both did nothing in World Cups.
City were West Ham tier when Penaldo played against them.