I guess this debate is finally over forever, right Sup Forums?

I guess this debate is finally over forever, right Sup Forums?

Attached: 14740567327778.jpg (990x627, 84K)

Has been for about 8 years, gary

It was over years ago when Pep nonced his halal side over and over again

Mourinho is still better

yes pepo caca will never win the CL with porto or a weaker team

only literal idiots and casuals have still been questioning the fact that Pep is far superior

Mourinho's philosophy is ten years behind. Pep innovates while Mou stagnates.

He can't even win it with a stacked Chelsea/Real Madrid/Man U team FFS.

It was never there to begin with

Poop is still a meme, but he at least doesn't get exposed this easily

what debate

Not true. Also, Pep makes their teams play fun and beautiful. Man Ud is a fucking snore fest.

???
They both lost 2-1 at home

Where does De Boer fit in this equation?

Attached: mouyes.jpg (655x659, 137K)

Attached: 1481471786484.jpg (250x242, 14K)

>playing bad with literally who's
Vs
>playing bad with a billion dollar team
Vs
>playing great with a billion dollar team

You decide how they rank.

Pep

Won his CLs with the golden generation of Spanish player + the greatest player of his generation
(a team that had previously won the CL in 2006)

At Bayern he took at team that won EVERYTHING and underachieved compared to Heynckess

At City he broke the transfer record and will probably win a lot of domestic trophies, but has won nothing in Europe yet.

(He also had an embarassing elimination against Monaco)

Mou:

Won a CL with Porto, a team that did nothing before in the years before he came
Won a CL with Inter, a team that did nothing in the years before he came to train them
Took a chronically underachieving Real Madrid, and got decent results
At Chelsea and Man Utd you could say he underachived
His teams play a less attractive football that Pep's


Pretty close I think

>Debate

>a team that had previously won the CL in 2006
Pep had like 3 of those guys. Barcelona went out in the CL RO16 in 2007 and finished 3rd in the Liga in 2008

Attached: 1.png (500x403, 19K)

There was no debate. It was over when Mouyes lost 5-0. Montella is just an Italian Poop with worse players which makes it extra painful.

>Mourinho
won CL without Messi

>Pep
?

but I thought penaldo was the goat?
checkmate faggots who claim penaldo is goat when it's about Messi and claim Messi is goat when the discussion is about Pep

Mourinho should work as a bus driver, would save everyone time

The new debate is Allegri x Zidane

If he wins it this season (essentially being the only manager to win the treble twice) will you rate him?
Where will he rank with the greats?

Attached: Champions-League-Managers.jpg (623x751, 170K)

it didn't even began.

Attached: pep mou.png (529x534, 390K)

the really shocking part of that list is that only 2 managers have won more than 2. Goes to show that managers are fairly interchangeable on the biggest stage and the individual players matter much more

Debating over bronze and silver when gold is unexposed/able

Attached: DE0B0487-0DE9-4386-BEE6-B38EC544DD72.jpg (634x591, 70K)

yep. paolo maldini won the EC/CL five times as a player over the course of three different decades.

City will get exposed in the next round.

why allegri my fellow monkey lad?

This

At least they made it to the next round so your point is?

He won the monkey mouse league a few times and the "we beat Tottenham Hotspur through experience" trophy