ITT we post common sense that enrages the American mind

ITT we post common sense that enrages the American mind

but muskets were one of the highest tech weapons of the era

guns with high fire rates like that are already illegal

Metric is more logic than imperial units.

We were right in 2003.

USSR and the UK contributed more in WW2 than america.

dd/mm/yyyy not mm/dd/yyyy

I'm not even sure you can own the bottom weapon, and even if you could you need a serious background check

That's like saying we shudn't use 18th century laws to regulate 21st century people

not letting you post this

machine guns got banned in the 80s and cost a fuck ton of money, as well as background checks and registration

you shouldn’t microwave your water to heat it up

...

it just doesn't make sense to americans
if it says armed it means armed

it is about pov if you are going to argue why owning x now is the same as owning y back when you are obviously going to argue x is y

and ignore the fact that y does not behave the same way as x
why would anyone introduce inconvenient fact into their own argument anyway

>G36 optic on a 249

amerishots BTFO

Ah ok.

I'm all for replacing the constitution, Jefferson didn't believe it was permaneant. a 300 year old document from a time when black people weren't considered people? count me out

this one always cracks me up

>i've never even touched the gun or been in a physical fight of any sort but i'm sure of all these things

guaranteed replies

>when you have to worry about gun battles in your coffee shop, and miss the good old days of only worrying about knife attacks, getting hit by a maniac in a car, and getting burned by acid
I admit thats a really shitty way to holster your gun though

he looks like a security guard tho or even a cop

>partially weapons trained

Your reading comprehension also seems to be partially trained.

fuck u

>modern rifles should be banned because they shoot more bullets than old rifles
modern rifles should be banned because modern people is too stupid to use them responsibly

Agree. The founding fathers couldn't possibly foresee the existence of radio, television or the internet, thus free speech should be limited to quill and ink, manual press and spoken word only.

Also, freedom of religion should be limited to beliefs that existed in the 18th century only, so Mormonism and the Baha'i faith should be outlawed and their believers persecuted.

Freedom of movements should be limited to foot travel and animal propulsion only.

Probably means she knows how to use a kitchen knife though
roasties love to exaggerate

You have all those things happening in America too. Just less frequent because the mentally ill can get firearms and cause much more damage than these other things.

He's either a cop or works in a fairly high-risk security job, regular people aren't allowed to carry guns in Manhattan

>I COULD HAVE BRUTALLY SLAUGHTERED EVERYBODY IN THIS COFFEE SHOP AND MORE IF I HAD STOLEN THIS THING FROM THIS GUY I THINK ABOUT THIS A LOT BY THE WAY
>AMERICA YOU HAVE A PROBLEM

chill out Texas

firearm attacks are more frequent here in places with the strictest firearm laws.

>believing her statement to be true

i guarantee you that woman is not "weapons trained"

that only makes it more pathetic and hilarious 2bh

It's an MG4, ironically a weapon americans will never be able to own (import ban)

That's all speculation though. She could be law enforcement in trainning or take trainning course in her free time.

probably armored car/bank guard

>firearm attacks are more frequent here
that's all
you could have saved yourself the effort of writing more than that

>she could be law enforcement in training
>has Tumblr freakouts about security guards carrying in a Starbucks
how about no

if you are going that way then no

the 2nd isn't about owning guns, it's about the power of a state raising a defensive force against a foreign threat

not matter what kind of noun replacement you make you cannot ignore first clause in the statement and the purpose

Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon?

We're not given any evidence to the contrary.

Bullshit I see yanks firing these guns all over youtube

Explain how

well if you poison the musket bullets with say wolfbane extract they are guaranteed 100% deadly while using only technology from antiquity (Scythians used to poison their arrows).

SHALL

'Muh freedomz' muh tyranical guberment'

Why do you feel the *need* to post this bait in every thread and then report your results back to /brit/?

apply this logic to freedom of speech too then?

Obviously, people shouldn't have freedom of speech on the internet, since you can reach so many more people with your "dangerous ideas" than you could with a pamphlet in the 1800s.

Don't really blame Americans for not taking advice on civil rights from a German. Your track record is not really the best.

>'Muh freedomz' muh tyranical guberment'
>Obama and Trump still alive
the main issue with unitedstatians is their hypocrysy

try not to cut yourself on that edge

girls with boobs are cute

It isn't about how deadly it is, it's about how many casualties may occur within such a short space of time.

A fork is 100% deadly if I use it to stab your throat 100 times.

So "freedom" extends to the freedom to put their fellow citizens in danger by owning lethal assault weapons equipped with armour-piercing rounds?

>it isn't about how deadly it is, it's about how deadly it is
okay

Try not to kill yourself with those guns

no but really, when was the last time you """people"""" actually did an armed revolt?
you prefer to complain instead of acting

No they're not faggot. They are just very expensive.

if she was any of those things she wouldn't have made such a retarded statement

bet you wouldn't have so many terrorist attacks and knife attacks if people could actually defend themselves
we don't have those sorts of things in places with lax gun laws

my fists are deadly, wanna ban them yeah?
you can drown in water, wanna ban water yeah?

you can CHOKE on BREAD, wanna ban BREAD yeah?


SHALL NOT INFRINGE (my right to be retarded)

t. American on vacation

>having the right to do something means you have to overthrow the government x amount of times every ten years
literal monkey logic

So ban trucks then?

Or fertilizer?

Or matches?

All of these can incur extreme casualties within a short space of time. But none of them can be effectively used for resistance against a tyrannical government.

I actually don't agree with a lot of the american view of how things work, or should work. But the gun thing, they've got figured out, unlike the rest of the world.

as someone who actually does have weapons training and experience, it's clear she does not

I used his context of deadly. As in the lethality in a signle shot. I should have made it more clear.

you sound really upset about something, would you like to talk about it?

...

...

I know "don't judge book by the cover" but if picrelated claimed that he can beat marine would you trust him too?

I know you're being facetious but it's a good point. Cars kill way more people than guns why not ban cars?

i'm not the supremacist with a nigger ex-president or the commie pinko with an alt-right currernt prez, mate


>didn't add goblino heads
apply yourself more

don't give them ideas, the euros will actually do it and ban them

There are people in this country too poor to afford health insurance who will vote against providing themselves with healthcare because doing so would require billionaires to pay more taxes.

>i'm not the supremacist with a nigger ex-president or the commie pinko with an alt-right currernt prez, mate
What are you even trying to say? Is your brain malfunctioning?

>i'm not the supremacist with a nigger ex-president or the commie pinko with an alt-right currernt prez, mate

as opposed to guns which were designed with the explicit intent of being used as a means to kill, cars are but a means of transport

i agree completely

hopefully you let those pussy germans know who's boss

Freedom ain't free

The USSR could've single-handedly won the European theater, and largely did. The US could've single-handedly won the Pacific theatre, and largely did. The UK didn't do shit except bully the shitty Kriegsmarine that would've kicked their asses had Hitler deployed all his U-boats. Monty was pretty good in North Africa but all his major victories were against the resource-starved Afrika Corps.

everyone would need to pay more taxes. a lot more. bernies admitted this when he debated ted cruz

>having the right to overthrow tyranny means you can horde all the guns you want and never EVER use them
seriously mate you goblins all talk and no action

>individual beings do not change populations do
WRONG for orther to population gain new traits at least one indiviual from group needs to get specific genetic mutation and then by reproduction give that to rest of group.
>Humans are not special
While i agree on just a species we are special, which is why we become dominant species in much lesser time then it took for dinasours.

Guns have basically no other purpose than to kill. They're just murder tools.

the difference is people actually have an argument to want to keep their earnings, while you have absolutely none to make the case for why I should be paying for your asscancer pills.

their purpose is defence

...

>>having the right to overthrow tyranny means you can horde all the guns you want and never EVER use them
2bh whats wrong with this? I don't collect guns but I don't see why it bothers you how other people spend their money. why are euros so intrusive

addmitting the truth is deadly in politics
poor bernie, he's too much of a honest man for US presidency

well a gun is a hole-making machine

b-but muh second amendment

yes, in America you are allowed to own things
it's literally Nazi Germany

nobody wants to pay higher taxes for someone elses bills retard. if someone cant afford their cancer treatments then there are charities specifically for that purpose

ACA aka Romneycare doesn't require everyone to pay way more taxes.

>we become dominant species in much lesser time then it took for dinasours

that was thanks to the Ayyliens

Founding fathers also allowed privately owned merchant vessels with cannons.

Really, the test of a bad custom is how many other cultures choose to adopt it, much in the way that the evolutionary filter weeds out poor-quality mutations. If American gun laws were remotely sane then you would see at least *one* developed state mimick them. You don't and you never will because they aren't sane.

>feels guy
fuck off newcancer

oops forgot the pic i was quoting

everybody loves free shit though
my point was that bernie would never win if he continued his policy of truth, though

>Guns have basically no other purpose than to kill. They're just murder tools.
They are fun to shoot and you can compete with them in marksmanship tournaments. Also, they allow you to hunt your own food.

its not free if all of our taxes are raised

No its just becouse of European man
HEIL EUROPA!

Same reason you pay for the sidewalks I walk on fagmaster. And don't forget I'm paying for you too.

A gun is an equalizer.

...