So when are we colonizing space?

so when are we colonizing space?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RMBi-UrZJyM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

We can't with niggers still existing.

When we put women in their place.

Aka making them have lots of children when they're still in the best pregnancy years and haven't filled their body to the brim with alcohol and 30 men's semen

Also when we've killed all people with American Indian blood fuck you stupid spic bastards

Never. we aren't allowed to leave, they'll reset us with a ""natural"" disaster before we can even get close to it.

Bring back apartheid you faggot. I wanted to visit South Africa but there is no way I'm going there now that apartheid has ended.

why would they make the sides of the torus ring sloped? wouldn't everything crumble into the canal?

once we dig the green skin's our of the earth control the sea's, but deals have been made.. the enemy is quite entrenched now.

S P E S S
M A G I K

At the current rate South Africa will be visiting you.

Never, we will all die within the next 20 years

When we have the technology to do so.

Bump.

Good point. I guess if the buildings are still perpendicular to the centripetal force it's no different then building on a hill. Still pointless though.

If we removed all the brown and chinese people we'd have plenty of Earth left for the rest of us. Still, I guess we need to get working on that eventually.

>Still pointless though.

It's not pointless, it's the most efficient distribution of the forces applied to the structure.

Well yes structurally it's useful but the ground itself could be leveled but the metal structure could still be arched on the outside.

This is impossible to have such body of water in these kind of "space rings".
>centrifuge

What? Why?

>but the ground itself could be leveled but the metal structure could still be arched on the outside.

What about the forces from pressurization? There's a reason vessels that experience pressure differentials (e.g., submarines, aircraft, spacecraft) are all cylindrical.

For what reason? Earth is perfect. It needs to be fixed so we can use it to its full potential first.

>when the 3d modelling skills are too shit

Never. Colonizing anything beyond our solar system is pure fiction. Colonizing Mars in more than a tiny scientific post scale is just as unlikely. Even if we somehow survive for billions of years, we will never survive the expansion and death of the sun.

That's why the structure itself would be arched, but the ground leveled. Yes of course round structures are useful when dealing with high pressures outside/inside. The edges of rectangular structures tend to be failure points.

how do you stop meteorites and space lightning from fucking your shit up

Not until a drastic reduction in the cost of space flight and a significant economic incentive is found.

>I don't understand centrifugal forces

Nuke everything in south america except Chile and Argentina.

we would need technology that's beyond out grasp to be able to live on other planets with sustainable populations that won't have birth defects

When it becomes lucrative to do so. Otherwise space colonists will just go crazy and kill each other to no purpose.

You can fix earth AND colonise space.

>the answer to this question rests in the hands of talulah riley

bravo humanity

>tfw it might actually be never

If the water surface is a t 1G, everything under the surface is above 1G. The deeper you go, the higher is the gravity. Everything will tend to sink, and the "weight" of the water itself would be a serious problem.
Same goes with high structures, the higher you go the lighter you'll be.

Everything should be less or more at the same "altitude".

>That's why the structure itself would be arched, but the ground leveled.

That doesn't make any sense. Either you're pressurizing unusable space or you're unnecessarily introducing a failure point into the structure with wider consequences than the precipitating event (similar to the cabin floor in aircraft, which generally catastrophically fails in the event of a depressurization).

The solution to this would be to introduce living/working space under the "ground level" of the structure but following that design logic it doesn't make any sense to take up any daylighted space with functions that don't require insolation.

Yes that is true, but having a body of water a few meters deep wont be a big issue, at lease for a torus the size of the one in OP's picture where gravity would change fairly slowly.

Soon.

Yes you could build a subway, or just extra living space, like you have in a normal city anyways.

sooner.

>Everything should be less or more at the same "altitude".

Tidal effects only occur where there is a large gradient in gravitational force or its surrogates, e.g., in small-diameter structures. It's apparent from this visualization that would not be a problem; this structure's diameter is on the order of miles.

You're also assuming that the structure has to produce centripetal forces of 1g; while the effects of low gravity on human health and development are not well-known it's reasonable to assume 0.7-0.9g would not be significantly harmful.

Real colonization will never happen unless some shit destroys the planet
Tell me one good reason to colonize a planet that can't even grow potatoes without help

Can you imagine space terrorism?

when taiwan stops being number one

0/10

wat

You? Never. The next species that develops a society and advances science beyond being able to nuke people on their home planet will probably colonise space. Humanity is not the one.

youtube.com/watch?v=RMBi-UrZJyM

Post your face when it's too late

...

WHEN IT BECOMES PROFITABLE YOU DULT

The shape's all wrong people on the "sides" will get fucked up either way the torus/cylinder spins.

The would NOT let us leave, we will be stopped by any means, EARTH is our CAGE