*****LEAKS WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE WEEKEND*****
Post anything worthwhile and make sure you link to the e-mail. Start Logging the good stuff for processing. Use jsfiddle.net/n4nvdys5/ for easy browsing w/ back and forward buttons.
>DNC Sup Forums ROULETTE
>Not sure what to search for? Take your last 4 digits and use them to access emails. Example, post number 82241488 will read the following emails:
>Andy Tobias reached out to me last night worried that some of our LGBT donors were still emailing Julia’s DNC account. He forwarded one such instance where a donor’s request to process a $16,000 contribution went unanswered. Is there a way for me to get access to her account to tie up any remaining loose ends?
>let me just fucking log into the account to obtain shekels
FUCKING
Jose Perry
I'm sure am glad you moronic Trump supporters are falling for Putin cyber warefare. Both parties are friendly to the Media. This is all literally nothing.
Ethan Anderson
General threads really are useless shit.
Cameron Lopez
I always love these email leaks, funny to see what behind the scenes stuff is, rarely get the big "top secret career breaking" stuff in them though
>The GOP establishment has more than double the number of Hispanics we do proportionally and more than that in real numbers. He tends to hang out with Hispanics when he’s made the rounds this cycle. Ergo he hangs out with them and not us. What do they talk about? Us supposedly being full of shit when it comes to Hispanics.
Benjamin Ortiz
Is there anything that is talked about more?
Cooper Martinez
They got rid of Bernie and it was awesome
Blake Gutierrez
You've got mail - roll
Connor Wood
Do we have any info on when the next set of leaks will be released?
Or how many parts in total will be in this leak?
I've heard 4 and I've heard 6 parts.
The leak from yesterday was out 4 hours earlier than now (7am EST)
Don't think anything good in this one but has anyone noticed these people use a LOT of Trumpisms?
Connor Adams
ROLLING MOTHERFUCKERS (wish me well)
Julian Bell
DNC doesnt have the authorization to hold top secret info so highly unlikely.
Ayden Rogers
roll for more ammo
Angel Lee
Guys. We're probably the most dedicated amateur dataminers working on this right now, and we're gathering quite a bit of information. We need to compile this into something easily understandable. We're now at 15 threads and thousands of posts.
The DNC wants to stay opaque really, really badly. Lets not let them. I've begun writing up a document gather all the contact information, all the connections, trying to figure out who is talking to whom on a broader scale and to what extent the DNC has been colluding with the Clinton campaign, and specifically who has been in charge of these contacts. Together with the mindmap bubbl.us/mindmap?h=353c6c/6a7172/34fHeANPDpMfI I'm goign to try to put some names and faces to these people, which would help tons with background and understanding the material, aswell as figuring out who is complicit if any crimes have been committed.
Please reply to this message with whatever information you can that fits the bill I described.
'Also, reporters seem to be thrilled to be at the Convention lmfaooooo'
what was this in reply to
Justin Perry
rollin for leaks
Liam Perez
yes, especially "yuge"
Robert Williams
Rollllllling
Gavin Fisher
Should have phrased better, I mean like party secrets that if uncovered would kill their chances at the election
Hunter Howard
Okay so what scandalous emails have been found so far? I found an article on one:
>businessinsider.com/leaked-dnc-emails-wikileaks-2016-7 >An influential reporter at Politico made an apparent "agreement" with the Democratic National Committee to let it review a story about Hillary Clinton's fundraising machine before it was submitted to his editors, leaked emails published by WikiLeaks on Friday revealed.
Connor James
>so desperate for the hispanic vote that they're on a fucking hispanic news mailing list
Do you count email logins, social security numbers and house addresses/phone numbers as secret?
'cuz they're in there.
Charles Torres
Rolling. Praise kek!
Julian Moore
Any journalist that was disrespected in an email, has been contacted by me and made aware of said disrespect from the DNC.
The trick is to make all these rich/connected/famous people realize that working with the DNC was the biggest mistake of their careers. Make them aware that their personal info is wide open due to terrible security by the DNC, etc. Make them despise the DNC.
Thomas Adams
>they Don't you mean 'we'?
Carson Murphy
Confirmed that the Trump campaign fabricated all these emails
''Vogel gave me his story ahead of time/before it goes to his editors as long as I didn't share it. Let me know if you see anything that's missing and I'll push back.
Mark Paustenbach''
Wyatt Hernandez
Lets coordinate. I'm especially curious about the emails between the campaign and DNC.
Carter Lewis
FOR FUTA FOR KEK
Nolan Carter
rolling
Jose Jackson
I mean like hilary's lizard medication, her talking crap about an entire demographic not voting for her in a state, extremely illegal 'donations'
Henry Bailey
how are we working on spreading that picture around, the Hispanics will go ballistic when they see how much the DNC refers to them as such petty simpletons
>people at DNC ask for clips of responses from a certain Akshai during a RNC vs DNC questions and answers session >they have a discussion: will it be better to organize the clip and make a DNC "effort story" out of it (e.g. how much we fight, how hard working we are). >somebody suggests just to cherry pick something Trump said in the Q&A and make it look like it is offensive (by framing the clip) >idea is discarded because now they are focussing on DNC's effort stories >nevertheless, it is implied they often do that gimmick with Trump's speeches to damage him. Just not this time.
TL;DR: (my summary) >hey, do you have footage of that dude so I can make a video to make him look nice? >why don't we just do what we usually do, that is, to frame something random Trump said in a way that it will sound offensive even if it's not? >yeah man. I am aware we usually do that... but just not this time
4634233765566423301127 97675172 $66,800.00 5/16/2016 2:29 PM Pending Approval DC377 - POTUS DC Roundtable William Eacho 2404816100 [email protected]
Ryder Sanders
We need a release vector.
We need some hard-hitting stuff made very digestible and readable - no cluttered infographics with shitty grammar, get someone to proofread it.
Then piggyback on trending hashtags, maybe?
Use the DNC watchathon to spam the fuck out of everything we find? Pray that celebs retweet?
That's an excellent idea, fuck
Julian Miller
fucking Pablo kek
Dylan Brown
This is a REALLY JUICY email sent to Wasserman Schultz informing her that she got an "off the record" meeting with Phil Griffin, president of MSNBC, to discuss Mika of the Morning Joe specifically
If some interested user could check MSNBC's coverage the week before and after this meeting, and find a direct shift on some topic, this could be huge
Brandon Hughes
I don't have the infrastructure to spread it.
My local demographics for my entire county are nearly 99% while with no diversity. I didn't meet a different race until I went to college. Someone more connected with other races can try and spread that with the hispanics.
Lucas Mitchell
Bzzt. Kek gimme a good one.
Cameron Brown
K this is good.
***************************************** ANY INDIVIDUALS CAUGHT DONATING ANYTHING *EXCEEDING* $30,000 REPLY WITH THE EMAIL URL TO THIS POST ************************************************
Is anyone combining the good info? >Where are these being saved? Is anyone combining the good info? >Post a link Make sure you back up your computer >don't want a barbell to fall on your neck resulting in two bullet holes in your head
This is fucking disgusting. Just because they say Trump's rhetoric is hateful doesn't mean it is. They're treating it like a fact, and trying to censor him because of it.
Lincoln Ortiz
...
Nolan Moore
i wouldn't be posting cc info, which is in that post
Zachary Clark
you can donate up to like 100k i thought because it can go 33,400 to 3 different parts of the DNC
William Barnes
SOmeone needs to compile all these findings... it's 15 threads long so far... and the archieve will be gone soon if it isnt stored elsewhere
>Eric drafted this last night > SL: Is Thin-Skinned Trump's Prez Run an Attempt at Payback for 2011 White House Correspondents' Dinner? >Body: From the New York Times:
$33,400 per calendar year to a national party committee. This limit applies separately to a party's national committee, House campaign committee and Senate campaign committee.
Jason Jackson
oh fuck
I honestly thought that popup was from all of YOUR guy's computer from being on wikileaks.
Some bong posted just the picture a few threads ago before it archived, and I remember thinking to myself
>no memetabs
kek
Wyatt Ortiz
R A R E A R E
Benjamin Cook
Should I post Twitter reaction from normies here? It could help with the direction we take this stuff.
I'd like to know who the (((Goldbergs))) are and what the rest of the emails are about. Apparently they backed out of a 350k donation over 20 minutes of something
Jacob Jenkins
>Paul Manafort isnt a GOD
KEK
Kevin Stewart
Can I help without visiting wikileaks? I'll be fired if I go there.
>The thesis: we hand out thumb drives at events, which could infect the reporters/attendees' computers. So that means that we're bad at cybersecurity. Okay. >Buzzfeed: These Experts Think The DNC And RNC Are Both Horrible At Cybersecurity
BAHAHAH
Carter Hill
His twitter is really fun right now.
Anthony Bennett
They are worried about Sanders people starting violence at the DNC
Do it on a mobile device? Copy/paste the link and just put minimal commentary.
Or get on twitter and start spamming the fuck out of it, a bunch of sites are scrubbing it right now.
Levi Cox
DNC has been hacked before! Foreign powers has had access to the DNC since way before. Is it a coincidence that the journalists were from Ukraine? Maybe ruskies infiltrated?
A husband and wife each have separate contribution limits, even if only one spouse has an income. For example, a couple may contribute a $5,400 check to a candidate's primary campaign as long as both sign the check (or an attached statement), as explained above.
