What does Sup Forums has to say about this?

What does Sup Forums has to say about this?

Other urls found in this thread:

skyview.vansd.org/lschmidt/Projects/The Nine Types of Intelligence.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Crashing this plane..

It's really long and I have no desire to read it. I like the first sentence though.

This only makes sense when you go back a few hundred years (or further) when our modern technology wasn't so prevalent in society. Survival was only an issue then due to lack of medicine and comforts of modern science. Intelligence and IQ is valued more today because we don't need to struggle to survive.

Blacks live in the same world we do, they don't have an excuse.

>Intelligence and IQ is valued more today because we don't need to struggle to survive.

used to be like this, but right now people sub 90 IQ are better adjusted to the environment because people above that tend to produce less children, which is what it really comes down to, evolution wise.

>the geek gets the girl in Korea

Even black people are loser weebs now.

Unfortunately, white people vastly outclass everyone in surviving in any of those situations, and even the far hashed environment of space, due to the technology we made with our higher IQ. Looks like whites are just better...

Second paragraph is completely wrong. There is, in fact, a correlation between IQ and high achievement. To say "not all high IQ people are high achievers" is like saying "not all Asians are shorter than whites". Exceptions don't disprove averages.

The third and last paragraphs are correct. IQ measures intelligence in a western, agricultural/modernized setting. Other types of intelligence are more suited to primitive ooga booga rope swinging and spear chucking.

Harsher*

>hurr the warlords of africa tamed the land that makes them the geniuses of africa
except if Race is a Social Construct™ then they could have made the same shit as white people
they wouldn't have to "survive" and have "not being eaten by some animals" as a metric of their intelligence

good job proving your own argument wrong you brainless fuck

I agree, we're good at civilization, they're good at running around.

>Back
>To
>The
>Jungle

I say the smart man builds a fucking building in the Arctic with a heater. Or builds a fucking building in the jungle with an air conditioner and a dehumidifier and a fence to keep out the ocelots.

It makes sense until you read the last couple of lines. 'Street smarts' don't make you a genius. Crime, drugs and gangs don't make you a genius. Being able to navigate around these problems is survival, you could say, but the fact most don't makes them idiots. This also doesn't make sense when you look at the average 'come leech off the system' blacks we'd have around here. If survival is creating a safe space for their unemployed selves and four or more kids, then well done. The real genius lives away from the prying eyes of society, it seems.

>Thinking we haven't risen above evolution
It's like you don't even know the direction humanity is going

We're going to have a retarded dependent underclass majority and an intelligent ruling class

An IQ test is literally just fucking puzzles
That's it
There's nothing particularly developed about it
It's testing you on the most basic human trait
The trait that separates humans from most other animals
Pattern recognition

It's not modernization it's about sapience

Sounds good.
So when are we shipping niggers back to Africa since you agree that they are unfit for success among whites and chinks?

>jungle tribes are the adept ones in the rainforest
>not whites
If you forced whites to colonize the rainforest today, we'd have it razed and industrialized in half a year, with resort theme parks, world class hotels, and 10,000 acres of concrete modern living space with air conditioning and supermarkets. What did he actually mean by this?

The final paragraph basically admits that blacks are bad at math.

His point applies to why the races are different - survival in ancient Africa diff than ancient nordic areas.

But this IQ conversation always regards the ability to function in modern society, so his point is relevant and just Jewish word games to make you think he drew a conclusion that wasn't drawn

It's not a matter of survival in the traditional sense, but in a watered down social sense. Blacks 'survive' in black neighbourhoods if they're more aggressive, more athletic, etc.

Did you read the entire thing or not?

Basically, what he's saying is that blacks are still adapted for the hunter gatherer lifestyle, and not for civilisation. For blacks to be in their element, and operate at their peak, they have to go back to the jungles of central and west Africa. I'm inclined to agree with him.

Some people surive in the harshest of conditions.
Others flew in space, made cities with green parks and air conditioned homes in the middle of deserts, and warm research bases on the south pole.

But evolution isn't survival of the fittest, it's survival of the 'fit enough'.

Reproducing doesn't make one more intelligent, and using that as a standard is even worse than the imperfect IQ test.

>In the North Pole the Inuit tribes are the geniuses. In the dark jungles of Brazil, the jungle tribes are the adept ones. In the Sahara, the nomadic tribes are the intelligent ones

All of the people listed were conquered by whites.

He seems to be completely right about the nature of IQ. That doesn't mean IQ is not applicable though, since the western market requires skills such as spatial and verbal intelligence, and not 'catch-mosqitoes'-intelligence (where africans are vastly better than europeans) or 'story-telling-intelligence' (where native americans outperform everyone). IQ might be a white man's concept, but it works because it is a white man's world.

Yeah but he's trying to imply that there's no objective good survival, so the false conclusion is IQ should never matter. The places IQ is brought up is regarding eg university and job placement. Which is abstract thinking only.

So what is he actually saying that means anything?

Basically IQ is bullshit and niggers are secretly geniuses, they just don't have a need to learn math but could if they wanted to.

>Blacks score lower than Koko the Gorilla on IQ tests
>b-but in Africa, the blacks are highly adapted to survive!

So is Koko the fucking Gorilla you fucking libshit

your distinction is meaningless here. 100 IQ (avg white) was the "fit enough" floor in ancient Northern Europe. 85 was the floor for "fit enough" in ancient Africa.

Now that we have modern society, 100 is the "fit enough" floor to get the same long-term-planning and abstractual ability jobs that are """kept from""" blacks

Sup Forums requires a citation or for the author of this piece of tripe to gtfo. Whether or not this is true, and it may very well might be, there needs to be a legitimate citation to an actual peer reviewed study on the matter or else he is just typing out of his ass.

"That which is presented without evidence may be dismissed in the same manner."

Hitchens' razor.

Aside from chimping out and running fast, what IQ test DOES black people score well on?

If IQ tests are culture dependant, and the current ones favor white people, but everyone is supposed to score equally, then there must also be IQ tests favoring black people. Where are they?

It's fucking bullshit is what it is. "niggas don't give a fuck bout dat IQ, we out dere husslin'"

Niggers are fucking stupid, it's not that they are more adapted to survival and secretly genius. Take a look at the Irish and Italian Americans that first came over. They lived in really shitty neighborhoods and rose out of it. Niggers for some reason can't.

Pseudo science from some faggot who has no clue what he's talking about.

Blacks are inherently stupid and unintelligent. They have no intellectual capacity whatsoever.

If, suddenly, it was demanded of the black race that if they wanted to surtive they must make some scientific or mathematical discovery or achievement, they would go extinct, because such a thing is simply just impossible.

>a legitimate citation to an actual peer reviewed study

Jesus, hearing a chorus of pseudo-intellectuals repeating this crap is like tinitus.

Even among the red pills, where you should know certain research is either banned or filtered, you still repeat this dogma over and over again.

In fact, I'm sure you have tons of peer reviewed studies out there that prove that Jamal is a Mensa member who didn't do nothing. Does that make it true?

Why in God's holy fuck do you people assume that the science milieu is somehow a pure meadow of pure unfiltered information?

This guy is a software developer and has no clue.

He is not able to make a distinction between physical advantages that help in extreme environments and intelligence.

He's just pulling shit out of his ass, and it sounds half-right because he can spell. That's it. No evidence, no understanding of his subject.

>Strongest reason is cultural
>not biological

Come on now

>Ignores massive link between IQ and test scores, the massive link between test score and future wealth generation

He's literally just trying to redefine the IQ test so that it doesn't mean anything.

Peer reviewed research and studies are the most succinct form of knowledge we have available to us. If we don't draw our knowledge from the best source available, we hamstring ourselves and end up sounding like the guy in OP's picture, talking out of our asses and making up """data""".

If aboriginals are the geniuses of their own habitats, how come Whitey got shit done when he got there and not them?

skyview.vansd.org/lschmidt/Projects/The Nine Types of Intelligence.htm

>Bodily kinesthetic intelligence is the capacity to manipulate objects and use a variety of physical skills. This intelligence also involves a sense of timing and the perfection of skills through mind–body union. Athletes, dancers, surgeons, and craftspeople exhibit well-developed bodily kinesthetic intelligence.

>Musical intelligence is the capacity to discern pitch, rhythm, timbre, and tone. This intelligence enables us to recognize, create, reproduce, and reflect on music, as demonstrated by composers, conductors, musicians, vocalist, and sensitive listeners. Interestingly, there is often an affective connection between music and the emotions; and mathematical and musical intelligences may share common thinking processes. Young adults with this kind of intelligence are usually singing or drumming to themselves. They are usually quite aware of sounds others may miss.

By this logic the whitest of the white (Swedes, Dans, and Fins in the upper north) are still the master race. and sub-Saharan dindus living in abundance are still just dindus.