NEW BLADE RUNNER 2049 TRAILER

FUCKING KINO

youtube.com/watch?v=gJtZYCv7AxA

CAPESHIT FLICKS BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=F9L4q-0Pi4E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>implying I'm going to ruin my good memories of blade runner with a shitty sequal

IT'S A SOFT REBOOT

more like KINO 2049

>the meme method actor jared leto
dropped this sob so hard

>all these caps
too much sugar today, kiddo?

what if deckard is confirmed to be a replicant

Disgusting reddit pandering shit

Is this movie going to start a new wave of big budget philosophical kino?

more like

>literal garbage for manchildren who will consume any schlock as long as it's vaguely sci-fi or dystopian

Remakes are never good. With Nolan 2.0 in the director's chair, there's literally 0 chance this one will be either, although a much better director still wouldn't make it good.

If you want "Sequel/Remake/Reboot of Classic Film" you belong on reddit or in a noose.

please explain how this is pandering to reddit

I fingered Ana de Armas in front of a club in Budapest when they were filming this in Hungary last summer

It looks like someone turned down all the graphic settings on a pc.
Ghost in the shell looked better than this.
Where did they film this? A parking lot?

hopefully. it's a $200 million R-rated kino

everything panders to reddit

He always was pleb

This looks so crap compared to ghost in the shell.

Like something a film student would shit out.

lol fag I assbanged her and came on her leg behind a dumpster of a club in London last fall.

This will be shit. Like the rest of these reboots. Is Hollywood really unable to come up with anything remotely new and interesting?

yeah sure

BladeRunner: The Fury Road looks great. Cannot wait to watch!

>tfw didnt really care for the first

i wanna fuck that hologram

No, really.
It's literally a hooker with a bad wig superimposed over a low detail cgi background.
This is worse than prequel tier.

Why do scifi movie look so artificial nowadays? This looks so plastic and fake when compared to the original film

>it's a french director casts some no talent cumdumpster he picked up in a seminar at film school for an iconic role
S T O P

Looks too generic, and CGI. The original Blade Runner had amazing sets.

because it's based on some Chinese manga shit

*No talent cumdumpster that he fell in love with but doesn't give a shit about him

k i n o
c o n f i r m e d

>generic
no, it looks aesthetic as fuck

building a wall metaphores,black people slavery metaphores.
OMG is soo deep and progresive XD

Because apparently building miniature sets is too much work, even though they are VASTLY cheaper than all that excess cg.
If directors would want quality they'd film all practical and do some slight touching up with cg.
Constructing your entire movie in CG is expensive and looks like shit

go cry somewhere else, nigg**

I wonder how china will be tied in to help boost sales in that country? Cant wait to see ;3

Based Johann Johannsson capturing the magic of Vangelis.

He say you brade runnah.

>no, it looks aesthetic as fuck
Literally not.
It looks cheap and tacky like something you'd find on a graphics card box in the 90s

How do you know it is more expensive or cheaper?

>giant atari logo

what did they mean by that?

>sequal

what happened to his hand

Atari is the "future" company from an 80s perspective.

>sequel or reboot diminishes the original in any way

How ?

>Roger Deakins cinematography
>cheap and tacky
Try harder

I was into ADA before it was cool.

Good for you, faggot.

Looks like face sitting porn will be world changing in 2049

Roger Deakins cinematography is upvote groupthink approved meme tier shit

that's a basic pleasure model, created for entertainment

i like jared leto, but something about him just makes his acting shit, cant put my finger on it

Fuck off, George Lucas. No one cares about it being "so dense" because "there's so much going on in a single frame".

>post the definition of cheap and tacky
Nothing in the trailer had any weight to it.
The backgrounds are obvious flat cg or cheap props. Nothing looks lived in like the original.

>nigg**
so you are a shill and a SJW?
your mom must be proud of you.
NIGGER

BASED BATISTA

Looks like cheap shit and way too 'clean' also >sony

>50% of the original movie that made it impactful was Vangelis
>instead we get BRRRRRRRRRRRT BRRRT BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP Nolanesque dubstep
>mfw

Batista finally redeeming himself after Gardeners of galaxy shit

Except thats what this movie does poorly.

The original blade runner had much more going on than cheap cgi.

>this upset
typical nig lel

The synths in the beginning of the trailer are good though

True but he's still talented

brrrrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap
>giant woman enters the screen
WHAT DID THEY MEAN BY THIS?

No vangelis?

It's a visual metaphor for how The Goose has a million dollars and can fuck two chicks at the same time.

>muh precious original

You were't financialy or creatively involved in the original film in any way, you probably were't born, if you were you never saw it in the cinema and if you were you are the fucking man child for still posting on here so... whats your point ?

Apparently he wasn't interested

fucking REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>mfw you say "Blade Runner 2" when saying its full name

This is some advanced tier stuff

I'm more concerned about how crap those statues look.

This is going to be the Fury Road of Blade Runner.

They look about the same. Grandiose sets stopped being awe inspiring the moment everything became CGI

so you mean it'll be shit?

>not directed by the original director
>not something that was put on the shelf for more than a decade
Explain, imdb drone

>tfw oil is no longer the most valuable resource anymore
>tfw canada's economy will fall further

But Fury Road was written and directed by George Miller who made the originals.

>Film takes place 30 years later.
>Deckard supposed to be a Replicant.
>Still alive.

What happened to all that Roy Batty shit about needing more time to live?

This will revitalize A E S T H E T I C S

youtube.com/watch?v=F9L4q-0Pi4E

you need to be less agresive if your boss wants those manchildren sheekels, you shill.

>>Deckard supposed to be a Replicant.

Ridley outright says his version of BR has Deckard as a Replicant. Is the sequel suddenly going to follow the book then?

This. It kinda ruins that whole interpretation.

He knows it's a nostalgia cash grab desu

Its not even aesthetic

stop

Good for him.

>This will revitalize A E S T H E T I C S
I think I saw vaporwave die and it was this post that killed it.

He was lol

Who ever said Deckard was a type of Replicant with a built in lifespan?

I didn't understand the first one. I hope this is easier to swallow.

What happened to Rachel..?

muh dicc

Built in lifespan? Unless I'm misremembering all of them die relatively quick and Roy Batty offers several futile alternatives in the hope that they can avoid it. Tyrell just laments that Roy is the best they can do. Even Rachel, Tyrell's newest and most eager project is implied to die as well right?

Seems fishy to just have Deckard, a random cop assigned as a Blade Runner and knowingly disposable to arbitrarily have a long lifespan for plot reasons in a sequel. But you could be right.

She went crazy after a memory implant malfunctioned, convinced herself she was Catwomen and died when she jumped off a ledge testing her nine lives.

Who ever said there was a a type of Replicant without one?

"it looks like gits" is something i expect from normies who have no clue what gits or blade runner are

yet its all over this thread

>The force awakens
Kylo Ren shown to be the most powerful force user in the saga by stopping a blaster shot in mid air despite being an autistic tween ruins Darth Vader by making him look a like a pussy with weak force powers. Rey shown to be a proficient force user with no training ruins Luke's force training by making him look like a retard super slow learner.
>Rouge one
The death Star weakness being designed completely ruins Luke's achievement at the end of a new hope and makes it way less impressive

Just a couple of specific examples

We Deus Ex: Invisible War now.

>"it looks like gits" is something i expect from normies who have no clue what gits or blade runner are
Well it cant even compete with gits.

Blade runner looked better because it was practical, gits was digital.

They have the synths and the rain scenes. I'm sold.

>Showing Harrison Ford is not a replicant
>Not completely ruining the ambiguous ending of the original movie
That is how reboots and sequels ruin the original. The only way to avoid this is to not only never watch the sequel but to also pretend it doesn't exist