Is forced diversity in film a recent phenomenon?
Is forced diversity in film a recent phenomenon?
no, it's only now that people are realizing that it's forced
literally who cares
Probably not but it is less fun now.
why is everyone chimping out about a black guy being in star wars now?
i have a feeling that if they did that 30 years ago no one would give a shit.
No, it's only now that people are realizing that it's forced because of meme.
Yes, mostly. Last 10-15 years.
>forced
Not really, it makes sense from commercial point of view.
they use to be feel natural the characters
That would make sense if nigs actually had money
no it's just less skilfully done now so you notice it more.
No, it does not make sense from commercial point of view.
Hmmmmmmm
Most of those posting under the US flag on Sup Forums, are self-hating whites and millennial progressives of the following type:
youtube.com
They desire the transformation of the United States, which they consider the most racist country to ever exist, into a non-white country, and are actively leading the charge to turn it more diverse and multicultural, while marginalizing the white males and reducing their social and economic power. Many of them are members of Antifa, and all of them fully support the protests taking place on college campuses, where they receive their liberal arts degrees. They consider it important to include PoC in all forms of media because it helps people especially in Western countries to make the psychological adjustments that are necessary for the transformation of their countries into multicultural societies.
They despise white America more than the most anti-Americans on Sup Forums are capable of, and are the most eager proponents of its destruction. The leading figures of the anti-American and anti-white intellectual movement in the US, are almost entirely composed of white males. They are united in their belief in and support for the extermination of the white working class demographic in the US. They consider it, just like the extermination of the bourgeoise in Marxist ideology, to be an inevitable step in the creation of a post-racial, multicultural United States, where the power is no longer dominated by white men, but distributed among women, ethnic and sexual minorities.
They are known by many names - bugmen, soyboy, numale, yoga shrimp, incel - in their desire to be recognized as allies to People of Color, women, transsexuals, and homosexuals.
Lando Calrissian was one of the most popular side characters in the original trilogy, the badass voice of Darth Vader was black and everybody liked that, and while people complained about the pandering aspect George Lucas was attempting with casting no one actually cared about Samuel L Jackson as a Jedi council master second only to Yoda in the prequels.
>pointless add minority hires on some film
>watch idiotic liberals and alt-righters give me free promotion on social media with their squabbling
Excellent way to make anything relevant today
who excited here?
What the hell is this?
We wuz jedis
May the force be with you
lgbt propaganda is forced
>that flag
>this post
It doesn't really add to a story just because it makes capitalistic sense. Nobody wants to see the "ideal" film that panders to all minority groups. Probably the same thing with modern architecture. Commieblocks are very efficient as well.
yes. remember the lord of the rings trilogy? that shit was huge but had no forced diversity and that was 15 years ago. now, every major blockbuster has a plethora of people cast into roles for the sake of diversity. before the 90s even diversity quotas and affirmative action weren't things.
i'm not against black people and women having integral parts in films, television and even books these days but forced diversity kills artistic integrity
not really
there is no way this is real, just a shitty meme
its Sup Forums suggested cast for the new amazon lord of the rings series that just got announced
that is not forced diversity dumbass, just diversity. the difference is with one you cast based on a fucking quota and to appeal to the modern political sensibilities of the people, and with the other you cast based on preference and who you think would fit best into the film
Sup Forums is cancer
>white...check
>black...check
>hispanic...check
it's funny that only now they decide to cast hispanics, and specifically that one hispanic dude on the right in every film
...
>Sup Forums is cancer
>t. Sup Forumsvilight fan
aren't there a lot of minorities in you armed forces?
when did Sup Forums become Sup Forums?
lotr wasn't that well cast to begin with
Nearly pissed myself laughing (still voting SVP)
Yes, but from what I've heard, not so many in the CIA paramilitary/Special Forces groups
>new amazon lord of the rings series
pls be joking
yes and so is forced LGBT shit. There were movies about black people and ghettos in the past but it was not even nearly as bad as it is right now, and you can just feel how HARD they're trying to not offend the blacks by making their characters the antagonist or be wrong at all, it's always either a protagonist or a token sidekick who usually has zero negative traits
>pic related, the last good movie which was full of blacks and where diversity wasn't forced but rather the plot itself
Piss off mongrel.
it's way more ironic than Sup Forums
there are very many
this
I don't give a fuck, really. If I think a movie is stupid because the characters are fucked up just to shove in diversity bullshit then I won't watch it. I don't buy into any propaganda. The reason whybI skipped certain games as well.
>Waaa! Waaa! How come always white?!
>That's racist! Make blacks as heroes and add more asian!
Pathetic, really. If I wanted to see niggers in movie, I could try something from south africa and if I wanted to see plastic gook or asian, I could just punish myself by watching those korean trash.
I am being realistic, I don't need any special treatment from society.
America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. How is this hard to get?
i think it started long before gaming but im not sure because its been a long while since i dropped cinema as a whole
but 10 or so years ago there was no forced diversity whatsoever
every other word of this was a curse, even i dont curse this much
>forced diversity
It's not forced, it's more real than ever
because before it just feel natural and happened less.
now it's completely forced for no fucking reason.
What's the difference between forced diversity and non-forced diversity in film?
all diversity is forced in a way.
i kind of respect the SJW types more because at least they're honest about it
>Star Wars
>creator married to Black woman
>forced
1) it's always a filthy nigger.
Why not any Asian or Latino.
2) it's forced as fuck.
It's funny but the other day I had access to HBO and their shows and their cast choices are so jarring. You have tv shows that in theory would appeal to men but the casts are full of women in all sorts of positions of power and the only men are usually black, maybe one or another typically white antagonist/rival. I remember reading some pasta about how the big bang theory was actually marketed at women because marketers came to the conclusion that if they get the female audience the male audience will soon follow. I wonder if it's really that widespread or if I'm just having too much fun imagining Sup Forums getting triggered.
>wh*Tes are minority of population in US
>non-wh*Te gets a role
>WOAH FUCKING FORCED DIVERSITY
I unironically can't wait for wh*Te genocide to be finished
>Implying Lando Calrissian wasn't forced diversity in 1980
>Insert Black man into film in the year 2015
>Whites chimp out
Fucking seriously?
>1) it's always a filthy nigger.
>Why not any Asian or Latino.
>2) it's forced as fuck.
Creator of Star Wars is married to a BLACK woman. It's not forced.
Identitarian politics forced some young conservatives into white preservation
kek
kys
>implying white cucks who literally worship blacks are not the target audience
The era of the wh*toid will soon be over. By 2100 wh*toids will make less than 1% of newborns, I could bet on that.
yeah this
except it doesn't
Yes, and it's partly why theaters are doing so poorly (at least in America).
trips of truth
>thinking hollywood gives a hot squirt of piss about the domestic market
Yeah, I remember how the new Red Dawn movie changed the villain from China to North Korea for commercial reasons lol. It turned an implausible story into a fucking retarded one.
>America, as a country, is totally illegitimate - America was built on occupied land appropriated from its rightful owners, the American Indians.
...
Btw if you think Hollywood is going shit, just look at new music videos.
youtube.com
youtube.com
Theaters are doing so poorly because there's on-demand TV and netflix which are being outrageously successful. That's like claiming the drive-in theater died because monster movies were casting too many giant moths.
Theaters are a dying medium.
>America was built on occupied land
So was every country in the world.
On-demand TV and Netflix weren't even things in 2002 when the trend started. While I will agree that those have hurt theater sales recently, they can't explain the start of the trend.
i hate those really dark black people that obvisouly arnet' americans, look so ugly, ruining my film
>kikes think being White is bad
what else is new?
From that perspective we can claim diversity quotas only became blatantly obvious starting at 2007 at the earliest, long after attendance numbers began crashing.
Only racists care
Exploitation of someones features has always been a thing.
Because it's so obviously forced. It has to make sense within the confines of the universe in which the story takes place.
stick to the novels if you want lore-friendly content
movies only intention is to hit the widest available market they can, if that means changing aspects about the universe and story (as in EVERY goddamn adaptation ever) an the inclusion of some homosexual or some minority here and there so be it.
Adaptations had always been and will always be a lower product than the original one, people had been complaining about this since fucking Shakespeare and it's not a new phenomenon that started with the new trend of diversification to reach a bigger audience
The white+black coo movies from 80s and 90s were actually cute.
...
no.
shakespeare did that shit with othello 400 years ago
it just feel more forced nowadays
or it's just millenial buzzfeed humor
even blaxploitation feels like a masterpiece compared to now
There's a gigantic fucking difference with someone challenging the norm for the sake of challenging the norm versus people doing it basically to virtue signal.
It's only a coincidence, Jewood loves movies with black man and white girls:
no there's not
>this is your mind on sweden
is forced faggotry a recent phenomenon?
Othello wasn't diverse
it comes and goes to be honest
Holy shit, are you betafucks STILL bitching about diversity? Just dont watch the fucking films, you manchildren.
We'll make sure absolutely no wh*Tes are allowed in films as soon as brown Latinos are the majority.
It's not forced if its new characters, American demographics aside movies now cater to a global audience. Movie studios were a for profit venture last I heard.
Also, diverse casts fucking kicks ass
neither was Merchant of Venice to be honest desu
the foreign characters were fishes out of water
...
what is this?
How exactly is it forced when America is 56%? It's just reflective of American reality at that point.
>look mom I posted it again!
it's typecasting but inverted, the worst fitting actor for what audience expects of that role
You mean to say Samuel L Jackson and Morgan Freeman are not what audiences expect from their roles?