Gary Johnson

This guy is gaining traction. Why? Is he based?

Other urls found in this thread:

realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html
youtube.com/watch?v=kNw8FuAVUv0
realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson-5949.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Ioq_iE4nVqI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

he's being pushed by the NeverTrump people
basically the neocons coopting the Libertarian Party.

Not to worry fampai
Bernouts are splitting the Dem party because of shit like this
Gary's a smuck who doesn't stand a chance. Except as our tool. Praise Kek (pbuh)

>Is he based?

Nah. He's basically just a Democrat.

I'm ready to #FeelTheJohnson

He is anti-based

>Neocon

lol the neocons are pilling behind hillary you smuck

Not even a little bit. He's got all the worst parts of Libertarianism that makes intelligent people vote Conservative combined with some just plain Liberal views to alienate any actual Libertarians who might like him.

his time as governor says otherwise cuck

He's objectively the best candidate, but Sup Forums is full of edgy authoritarian autists that sperg out at the idea of civil liberties.

kek, no it doesn't, you fucking libshit. Spending went up 41% under Johnson. That's just what we need, more spending.

Not that it matters, that little liberal cuck will never be President.

>pro-choice
Dropped. I really might have voted for him otherwise.

He's Hillary with a dick.

2 garybux have been deposited into your account

> Open Borders Cuck
> Based

HAHAHHAH

>that little liberal cuck will never be President.

No, but he could secure Cunton the presidency, which is what he's being payed for anyhow.

Johnson is a plant. The polls will be rigged to guarantee he makes it in the debates so both he and Shillary can gang up to attack Trump.

Daily reminder that libertarians are just liberals who aren't ignorant about guns.

he's secretly related to Boris Johnson

Looking at what he's said it basically seems to me that he doesn't give a shit about immigration and is fine with illegals. If the conservatives actually gave a damn about immigration they wouldn't be backing him.

only in polls hes included in he pulls evening from both trump and clinton, so better luck next time spewing that falsehood

He's a goofy bumbling pothead but I like him

>2012
>WE CAN'T VOTE LIBERTARIAN THEY'RE ISOLATIONISTS
>2016
>WE CAN'T VOTE LIBERTARIAN THEY'RE GLOBALISTS

>Johnson is a plant. The polls will be rigged to guarantee he makes it in the debates so both he and Shillary can gang up to attack Trump.

>has no sources to prove these claims
>pretends the polls are rigged for his favor when he gets excluded from them all the time

has it occurred to you hes approaching 15% because the other two candidates are vile and off putting, not because the polls are rigged?

>Daily reminder that libertarians are just liberals who aren't ignorant about guns.

do you honestly believe this?

shills need a buffer between trump and the hillbeast. no one with 1/4 of a brain would even give him a thought. he's pro open borders and wants strict gun control. he should kill himself and so should OP.

>2016
>not voting for Gary "Motherfucking Oak" Johnson

I honestly don't mind Gary "dude weed lmao" Johnson from getting into the debate.

He'd end up siphoning away votes from hillary more than Trump. All the bernouts who might've fallen in line with hillary would instead vote for Johnson. And nobody that would've voted for Trump is honestly going to vote for Johnson, seeing as their positions on everything are pretty much polar opposite except guns.

About 15 percent prefers a meteor hitting earth over Trump and Clinton, which is more than Johnson and Stein combined, so that's not saying much. His only voters are weed addicts and omegle fappers.

>people that support strong immigration wont support the guy whos more relaxed on immigration

wow thats really insightful, please tell us more

1
>OPEN BORDERS
2
>OPEN BORDERS
3
>OPEN BORDERS
4
>OPEN BORDERS

1
>DUDE WEED LMFAO
2
>DUDE WEED LMFAO
3
>DUDE WEED LMFAO

LET THE BORDERS OPEN UP
LET THE BORDERS OPEN UP
LET THE BORDERS OPEN UP
LET THE BORDERS OPEN UP

johnson is hardly a lib you faggot. kill youself

he's a buffer for cunton. they don't want trump 1v1ing hitlery into the fucking ground.

>This guy is gaining traction
he's not, people don't even know who he is.

only he is, and has been for awhile now, and is on track to get into the debates, you just dont realize that because you havent be paying attention

All of these LP topics as soon as Trump seals the nom, surely it's just a (((coincidence)))

can you actually give an argument other than "muh borders" and "muh controlled opposition"?

because you sound like a high schooler and should be in Sup Forums, where the shitposters belong

>on track to get into the debates

Maybe in one Clinton News Network poll.

realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html

A hopeless effort to steal votes from Trump thats all.

fuck you man, I ain't no neocon.

Trump and Shillary are pro-choice dumb fuck.

WEW LAD

whats your argument here? Hes doing well in that and many others, regularly being within 4% of 15%

do you have an issue with him doing well in polls?

>waaa stop doing good otherwise ill call him controlled opposition

...

I know that, but Trump is less pro-choice than Hillary or Johnson.

just like bernie gained traction and had this huge following, and it worked out so great for him right?

...

He's 7% short on average. He won't make it, but I'm ready for the cringe if he does. He mainly takes votes away from Clinton so he's not really a threat. I just dislike his autistic supporters.

youtube.com/watch?v=kNw8FuAVUv0

>forcing you to bake gay cakes
>libertarian

...

DUDE WEED LMAO
DUDE OPEN BOARDERS LMAO

Some of the neocons are behind Hillary and some are behind Johnson. That should tell you they're both on the same side as the globalists (and so is Stein).

Voting for Gary is the same thing doofus.

He's not a libertarian at all. He doesn't follow the NAP. He thinks that equality should be enforced through force. He wants christians to have to submit to the dildo degeneracy. He's also gun grabber and when Peterson gifted him a replica of George Washington's musket, he threw it in the garbage.

And the best part? Opening our borders to mexicans that vote socialist 75% of the time means that any libertarian policies he could've possibly enacted would just get overturned by the time the next election comes around and the demographic shifts ensure that no small-government politician ever gets elected again.

For fucks sake, look at what he did to New Mexico. They might as well just remain it Mexico after his policies allowed hispanics to increase by 25% from 2000 to 2010.

>> OP (((YOU)))

Haha so true, these shills have no power here.

>For fucks sake, look at what he did to New Mexico. They might as well just remain it Mexico after his policies allowed hispanics to increase by 25% from 2000 to 2010.
What actually happened? I've heard this claim tossed around a lot, but I have no idea.

One guy on pol is promoting him constantly.

average dont matter in this honestly, he only has to get 15% in a few polls to get in, and hes still got a fair bit of time till the debates and has some very big success with fundraising lately

why do you even care? you're from Belgium, you're fucking the discussion for people who this actually matters for

>gaining traction
more like hillary is gaining funding to shill for him

Jill Stein and Gary Johnson the last hope of saving the Divided States of America.

...

you do realize that spewing the word globalist isnt an argument?

and neocons are NOT following Johnson, hes against foreign intervention and blames previous policy for the current situation in the middle east, just like trump does

the libertarian party was co-opted as soon as the Koch brothers said they supported the party

Cant Parry The Gary

Good point, the libertarian party is indeed irrelevant, but it's not like this kind of faggotry doesn't exist in Belgium. I'm no Nate Silver, but I can tell you that it won't happen.

>voting for a literal meme

From what I've seen he's a libertarian without the "I'm just here because small government will let me be racist" vibe that the party used to have. I'll be honest, the dipshit portion of the libertarian party being so against him just makes me like him more, those faggots were the big reason I didn't give the party much of a chance before.

In what universe is he gaining traction? Lmao, he won't even get on the debate stage.

the universe where you actually pay attention to polls

I bet you think trump would win right now if the election was today, he would get blown out

Clinton will crush him like a bug

Get fucked lolbertarian

Clinton will win.


Fuck johnson


I despise 3rd parties

The idea that literal nobodies can run. No you should be forced to win the primary's to win.


It's why I oppose independent mps and recently created parties like UKIP

Only The old established parties should be allowed.


Clinton or Trump should win. Not Johnson.

You need to earn the right to run for president.


Loved watching that senile old bastard Ron Paul crash and burn.

what are you talking about? polls biased against repubs/trump are showing him up still

he would clobber her today

He supports the TPP and BLM. He agrees with Hillary on loads of issues. He's courting socialists. His VP pick is a gun-grabbing, patriot act, Iraq-war loving globalist. He's literally a business democrat or neolib shill.

He increased the size of government when he was governor.

>This guy is gaining traction. Why? Is he based?

He's gaining traction in the same way Bernie had more votes than Hillary and was going to win california...

He supports TPP and BLM. His VP pick calls Trump a "neo-isolationist". He is definitely a globalist.

Give me one coherent argument for or against him.

He supports BLM and the TPP.

>people should be left alone and be allowed to do what they want!
>unless they don't like trannies and poopdick and drug users! They must be forced to associate with such things

""""libertarian""""

I'm really glad most Gary Johnson supporters aren't old enough to vote.

Gary Johnson is for open borders. In an interview he said he believed in no border control, period. He is more for open borders than Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. He's a far-left faggot masquerading as a libertarian...

realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson-5949.html

maybe not blownout but he is not winning

He is a little anti gun for me.

>unless they don't like trannies and poopdick and drug users! They must be forced to associate with such things

right because keeping the government out of those issues = forcing people to associate with them?

only a idiot would think that

"Associating" is a broad term, jojoposter
Are you talking about working with? Or simply encountering in the street?
Freedom is bound to make people uncomfortable, this is obvious, but people wouldn't be "forced" to associate with people under social/cultural libertarianism. If anything, they'd be able to talk more shit about them, because of uncensored speech.
Or are you implying that you want safe spaces for conservative straight white people?
Horseshoe theory in action.

Reminder that Trump shills are from Reddit

Sup Forums never would have supported a retard like trump a few years ago

> it's a Gary Johnson thread
> it's one autist making up +30% of the discussion trying despareretly to defend Johnson
> he will reply to this post

Every fucking time

speak for yourself faggot

>No borders
>Legalize all drugs
>No federal laws
>Abortions are A-Okay and no one should say anything
>We need to defund the military

He's a crack pot

Americans .. you dun goofed

Mc Afee would have been perfect if he could just lose the Mc

McAfee murdered his neighbor while in Belize. He is psycho

The Koch brothers were involved in the founding of the Libertarian Party in the 70s and one of them was their VP candidate in 1980. They were Libertarians before they were Republicans.

2 reasons:

1. NeverTrump in the Republican party
2. Democrats, particularly Bernouts, who hate Hillary just as much as they hate Trump and can't vote for Hillary especially after her VP choice and the Wikileaks. Many of those are also voting green party but for me the thing is.. which third party candidate is most likely to get the threshold needed to get federal funds for their party next election. It'll feel like less of a waste of a vote if I at least get a 3rd party more funding and more chance to be in the debates and such.

But I hate Trump and Hillary so bad I want them both to be killed. I could not vote for either, you couldn't pay me to.

This is a good one

You fucking sheep lol

yeah, no
fuck this guy

youtube.com/watch?v=Ioq_iE4nVqI

Why don't we meme on gary johnson

Spread the rumour that he's a pedo

why are you so keen to have an authoritarian dictator rule over your life?

because hes a child

This is one of the most disgusting things I've ever seen on this site in the years I've been here
I hope you die in a gutter like the filthy rat that you are

Seriously. George Washington tried to warn us about the decadence and destruction of democracy that political parties bring. Did we listen to him? No.

He is to this election what John Anderson was in 1980.

>libertarians
>being anti guns

what the fuck

why didn't ron paul run for the libertarian party?

how are literally the worst candidates out of all of them the nominees?