Race mixing

Race mixing is honestly the best route the human race can go.

Why would you marry someone who looks identical to you? Not race mixing promotes incest.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hTF_XVspfDM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

This is a reddit raid thread do not reply

>why should I knowingly produce children dumber than I am

Get out.

That would imply intelligence is genetic.

The evidence for which is inconclusive. We don't even have a rigorous definition of intelligence and all our methods of "intelligence" testing are dubious at best.

>denies that IQ is 60-80% genetic

wew, just like the colony you are you parrot after your master.

It is inconclusive.

There is so much we don't know about neuroscience or human physiology. Unlike you, I'll wait until the evidence can concretely show that intelligence is genetic.

>Race mixing is honestly the best route the human race can go.
The best route to anihilation maybe.

>Why would you marry someone who looks identical to you?
Race mixing ensure that veryone will become the same at some point. You're diluting differences until mankind become a uniform slave race for the jews, which is why they're pushing race mixing in the first place.

As far as IQ is concerned, it's mostly genetic, the studies on this are based on adopted children.

Also, watch this if you have the time youtube.com/watch?v=hTF_XVspfDM

I gave you the racial bell curve by IQ graph.

What else do you want?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

Evolution is inconclusive to creationists. Heritability of IQ is inconclusive to you.

>The general figure for the heritability of IQ, according to an authoritative American Psychological Association report, is 0.45 for children, and rises to around 0.75 for late teens and adults.

But the available evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of a genetic basis. You saying you'll wait for more evidence is just passing the buck, because you KNOW no further evidence will come out because this is heavily suppressed stuff.

With everything we know so far, it's easy to draw the conclusion that (even if there isn't 100% concrete proof) it's still best to play it safe and not race mix with dindus.

Its genetic you fucking cuck.

It is inconclusive.

I'm not denying that there are many studies that may show the intelligence is genetic but a single study is not sufficient enough to say something is true.

We don't know a lot about the human brain and there is still a lot more to learn before we can say anything for certainty.

Like I said, all our definitions are faulty and non-rigorous.

The methods of testing intelligence are also questionable.

You're fucking retarded. And that's conclusive.

???

How do you know that?

>Like I said, all our definitions are faulty and non-rigorous.

Fine, then let's use empirical observations and quickly find out that the race with the highest capability of producing intellectual wealth is (and this cannot be disputed) European Whites.

A picture doesn't prove anything in science you dunce.


>because I know
Stop putting words in my mouth. I am being conservative in my opinion. Truth is it is inconclusive. That is the cold hard truth. There has not been a consensus on the matter.

You cannot come up with a conclusion on a topic for which there are faulty definitions and dubious testing methods.

This is not science.

I want a rigorous definition of intelligence and a testing method of intelligence that reflects this definition that is unbiased towards people of various socioeconomic backgrounds.

>one study

There are a multitude of studies. All which corroborate the same conclusion: that intelligence is largely genetically inherited

If you want to breed with Europeans go ahead.

Why are you so threatened by what I am saying? I'm not going to stop you from having kids with Europeans.

All I want are rigorous definitions on intelligence and a better testing method.

Why are you so threatened by this?

3rd cousin marriages produce the healthiest offspring

Do you really think, in 2016, that there aren't hundreds of female scholars trying to prove that black people are as intelligent as Asians?

There's a reason you haven't heard about it.

You voted remain didn't you?

It was posted yesterday this has been happening all summer

Operation normalise wont work btw faggot fucks

Studies based on lofty definitions and dubious testing methods.

ergo;

It is inconclusive.

You can go ahead and believe whatever you want. All I'm saying is that we have bad definitions and dubious testing methods.

It is not enough to satiate a claim that intelligence is genetic as a scientific truth.

t. Jewish Shill

>that reflects this definition that is unbiased towards people of various socioeconomic backgrounds.

Socioeconomics is a retarded memes.

Whites too were once poor.

Being poor doesn't mean you are literally incapable elevating yourself out of poverty and into wealth, just as Whites and capitalism has proven.

You're a niggerlover racemixing shill trying to dilute the White race and reduce it's rightful genetic superiority.

As fMRI increases in its usefulness and the suppression of this information decreases we will soon discover why Whites are better.

Except not.
Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics will change as a its population adapts to the environment.
i.e take the niggest nig. Like a pitch black 12 a.m type of nigger from fucking congo and leave him in,say germany.
Even if he breeds only with nigs as time goes by there are chances that its descendants will mutate, and in this case a beneficial mutation would be lighter skin.

Shut the fuck up. You're a traitor to the Anglosphere, traitor.

Ahh they're not very good at it, it seems.

What?

Why are you bringing in female scholars?

I just want a rigorous definition of intelligence and a method of testing intelligence that is unbiased towards a person's socioeconomic background.

What is so wrong with this?


You can't claim that intelligence is genetic as a scientific truth if you have shitty definitions and biased testing methods. It's not a fair experiment.

IQ is only part of it. You can take a lower IQ individual and make an intelligent person with good parenting and hard work, or you could marry an Asian woman and there goes your argument for IQ

>1 post by this user
Why are you sliding?

tell me what picture related is used for.

this test is universal across all languages and cultures.

it tests logical reasoning.

>believing that you can nurture and school IQ points into someone

kek

How are socio-economics retarded memes.

Why are so threatened by me?

I want to see good science. Not retarded half truths that are based on terrible definitions.

If you were so confident on the superiority of whites, you'd support this too so you can concretely say that whites are better - if indeed they are.

There is still a long ways to go for neuroscience. If you don't know this, I have no business in talking to you because we are just wasting each others time.

You can claim all that you want to but everyone in biology, neuroscience and other fields knows that we aren't able to produce a conclusive scientific truth with the current standards of intelligence that we have.

desu, the only time I would see a problem with race mixing is when two different cultures intermingle (i.e. nigger "culture" and white, upper middle class "culture.")

Because nigger parents don't care about their children's educations? My parents were both poor and not very intelligent, but they told me to work hard, and I'm on my way to med school

Logical reasoning is not the only type of intelligence.

The relationship between IQ and Intelligence is questionable. Also there are many criticisms to these kinds of tests. Pattern recognition may not even be what is being tested here.

>neuroscience and other fields knows that we aren't able to produce a conclusive scientific truth with the current standards of intelligence that we have.

This is a total fabrication and lie.

They aren't publishing the data because of the current political climate surrounding this issue.

As Charles Murray as said, all we have to do is wait another decade and we will know all the answers, and he knows that genetic heredity of IQ is by 60-80%.

Niglets get stuffed into public school whether they want it or not.

>Pattern recognition may not even be what is being tested here.

What is being tested then I want to hear that.

The easiest form of proof I need to say Whites are superior is empirical evidence (a philosophical concept invented by a White):

the intellectual and physical wealth the White peoples of Europe have created.

I'm already mixed, well Hispanic mostly

my family wont give two shits if I date a black girl, i'll just say she is dominican

Facts, my friend. Sure, IQ may not be a perfect tool, if you don't like it then you can simply observe cultures around the world.

>Even if he breeds only with nigs as time goes by there are chances that its descendants will mutate, and in this case a beneficial mutation would be lighter skin.
Over how many thousands of years exactly? Explain to me how this is relevant. If it all happened in the span of a few hundred years, then I'd understand, but it's not the case at all. Which makes this fact irrelevant. The human race may very well die before the descendants of your dindu specimen turn white, and maybe get a few more IQ points than their ancestor.

Okay? That still doesn't dispute the fact that intelligence is both genetic and environmental

>The relationship between IQ and Intelligence is questionable
That's complete bullshit. IQ correlates with every metric of achievement imaginable. You're just trying to weasel out of the blatant fact that having frizzy-haired mulatto children is fucking shit-tier.

>That still doesn't dispute the fact that intelligence is both genetic and environmental

What is important to understand is that IQ is largely genetic instead of environmental.

This socialist/communist meme of "give everyone equal resources and they will turn out to be equal" (100% nurture) doesn't work and the proof is in the pudding.

Niggers in America have been showered in welfare and given all these (intrinsically racist) "equal opportunities" and they aren't performing better, as a matter of fact they are performing even worse than 50 years ago.

Take a good look at that image. Both adults look alright but that fucking kid instantly makes me want to vomit. It looks like it shouldn't exist and just makes me want to hit its head against the wall until it's dead. Fucking raceless kids creep me out

>total lie

Well, the only "evidence" you have is that scientists are being suppressed from saying what they want to say because of politics. But you are forgetting you can submit studies anonymously and there are many free scientists that do submit their studies. Its just that they are faulty and are repudiated by other scientists. This is called peer review. Maybe if you tried writing something in academia you'd know what that is.

I don't know who Charles Murray is and his fields are
Political science, Social Science, History of Science

Tell me why I should trust someone who does not have a PhD in a science related field, much less so in Biology or neuroscience.

Is it because he wrote a single book that has been repudiated by many scientists in Academia?


I have no idea what is being tested in that.

I also have no idea what the tests correlation to intelligence is.

You know why? Because there is no definition for intelligence and we do not know if this testing method is truly "universal" as you claim to be.


Intellectual and physical wealth

Well if that satisfies you then good. I'm not stopping you. Why are you so troubled by this?

Go ahead and believe that but I'm just saying. No one in academia will believe you on the basis of your "empirical evidence"

Actually genetically its best for the kid. Far less chance of physical and mental defects. Have you ever seen a retarded mixed race kid? Me either.

>This is called peer review. Maybe if you tried writing something in academia you'd know what that is.

Locate 100 indoctrinated people into the important positions for this "peer reviewing" and you can effectively put a cap on information. It is proven that this is taking place. Science is totally corrupt from within.

>Is it because he wrote a single book that has been repudiated by many scientists in Academia?

He wrote multiple books and you will have to be more specific about which one was supposedly repudiated.

>and we do not know if this testing method is truly "universal" as you claim to be.

You will need a [citation] to back this claim.

>No one in academia will believe you on the basis of your "empirical evidence"

No of course not, in academia just like politics we all deny reality and act like its rainbows and sunshine right?

I hope a mudslime self-detonates in your immediate vicinity.

I'm simply not satisfied with the current testing methods.

We don't have a proper definition for intelligence and our methods of testing are dubious.

Well please explain to me how we are able to illustrate the relationship between IQ and intelligence when we don't even know what intelligence even is. We have nothing to concrete relate to.

>Every metric of achievement imaginable.
Like?

What measurement are we using? What are the units? How are we measuring such "achievement". What are the uncertainties of our measurements.

If you don't a frizzy-haired mulatto child then don't have a child with a black woman? You aren't the only person in the world. I really don't care what kind of baby you want, I just want a rigorous definition to intelligence and a testing method that reflects this definition and is unbiased towards a person's socioeconomic background.

That's why you mix with Asians and Jews.

>
Locate 100 indoctrinated people into the important positions for this "peer reviewing" and you can effectively put a cap on information. It is proven that this is taking place. Science is totally corrupt from within.

Nice opinion. If you don't like science then don't do it. If you don't like the scientific community then stay away from it. How is this so hard to understand? No one is forcing you to do anything. Academia wants to do its very own thing.

All of them are repudiated. He has no background in biology, neuroscience. Anything he writes cannot be taken seriously because of it.

>asking a skeptic to disprove something
Lol.

Yes no one will believe you on the basis of your "empirical evidence". Like I said, if you don't like it then go away from academia.

I want a rigorous definition of intelligence and a method of testing intelligence that reflects such a definition and is unbiased towards a persons socioeconomic background.


One cannot draw a conclusive statement on intelligence if we do not even know what intelligence is.

>Mudslimes self-detonotes
Hmm...

This is a non-argument I believe.

>
I want a rigorous definition of intelligence and a method of testing intelligence that reflects such a definition and is unbiased towards a persons socioeconomic background.

And you're not capable of coming with this yourself? Describe what you imagine under this concept.

>Academia wants to do its very own thing.

"Academia" is controlled and being intellectually dishonest on purpose to prevent a civil war since it is socially unacceptable to say that niggers and leeches and belong deported from White nations.

Your semantic horseshit will find its end soon enough.

No I am not. I am just a humble man trying to understand the world around me.

You say all these things but you have no proof. For what purpose? Are you trying to persuade me to believe that there is a dark conspiracy or are you just saying things for the sake of saying things?

I don't care if you don't like academia. Maybe you are a bitter undergrad who wasn't accepted to graduate school. Maybe you are just a white supremacist. I don't really care what your background is. I've told you from the very beginning what it is I want. I've typed it out many times to you and I've given you the reasons why we can't draw a conclusive statement on the heritability of intelligence because of this. It is very difficult to say anything about intelligence because we do not even have a proper definition of it.

You don't have to live your life based on what I am saying but you are so threatened by these simple truths it sounds so silly. You sound like you have paranoia or a mental illness.

I'm not even trying to be mean.

>I want a rigorous definition of intelligence and a method of testing intelligence that reflects such a definition and is unbiased towards a persons socioeconomic background.

I asked you to share your imagination of this, how come in that half-assed speech of yours about all the assumptions you've made concerning my educational background I saw no traces of the core of this conversation?

>I'm not even trying to be mean.
>implying words can hurt men

I am not obligated to share what I think about intelligence with you.


You seem pretty hurt.

Huh, first post on Sup Forums

Dude, there will be gene therapy methods in like 20-30 years that will boost IQ. It honestly doesn't matter anymore.

>I am not obligated to share what I think about intelligence with you.

Top kek shit gets serious and you've got nothing but your convoluted ad homs.

Typical leaf.

wtf I like Dominicans now

I can already tell you are at the bottom of the Hispanic Caste, next to Full blooded Amerindians

You have no idea what the word maybe means.

I made no claim on your background.

I doubt you even know what ad homs means.

My mother is one. That whole island is africa 3.0, africa 2.0 is neighboring Haiti, where they decided to kill off all the whites.

Because black people are gross.

Is this why Anglo is the most drunk basterd with most mental diseases and cheating relationships around? Oh praise Jesus. You really showed us the light with those 1 year lasting marriages, we were doing it so wrong with lifelong marriages, simply not enough money for church to earn if no divorce and not enough money for shrinks since it was too perfect. This new democracy model has it all: apartment chaos, cheating, mental diseases, drunks, children from other relationships, money loss, being fat. So many problems capitalism can invent cures for. Lets hold on tight and maybe we roll a nice genetic disease too.

gr8 b8 m8

I have a problem....I'm a nationalist but I'm about to fall in love with this woman (pic related). My mind tells me it's wrong, but I feel my white soul shivering

HA! Gross

it's upbringing

"i know im gonna fall in love with her". you sound like you're 16, but since your a swedish manchild you're probably 30