The countries that apply death penalty: what do they have in common other than death penalty?

The countries that apply death penalty: what do they have in common other than death penalty?

How is USA not orange?

The only way to get death penalty in USA is; Treason or aggravated murder

Ordinary crimes probably means outside of wartime

But it's so fucking stupid to put us in the same category as Saudi Arabia where they put you to death for being Gay, China where they put you to death for petty shit, or North Korea where they put you to death for calling your mum in Russia.

Also Japan has a law where it's only if you use hostile force against another nation, pretty much start a war, to get the death penalty.
Why they are not orange?

Tbqh, the only argument against the death penalty is a quasi-religious one

>any country of other than green color is a non-country

There's no death penalty here at all.
this map is bullshit

>what is the universal declaration of human rights

Orange means wartime executions

This t b h. Every western country is green EXCEPT le 56% country...

Afaik your country still has it retained for wars.

Yes Brazil technically applies death penalty during wartime. The last execution however was carried in the early 19th century, with a fork iirc.

The map doesn't care about your fee-fees.

Article 5
XLVII – there shall be no punishment:
a) of death, save in case of declared war, under the terms of article 84, XIX

Dont really get this map.
There is no death penalty in Russia. Only life sentence

>czech think he lives in country but Saudi Arabia, India, China, Iran, Indonesia and the USA are non-countries
cute

They're all 3rd world.

We're orange and it's been over a century since the last guy was sentenced to death.

not officially )))))))

Technically it is still there. It only isn't practiced in recent years. You can be sentenced to death, but its de-facto a life sentence. Same with South Korea for example.

They're shitholes and uncultured.

>You can be sentenced to death, but its de-facto a life sentence
Yeah that's it. I was confused by what they meant by "abolitionist in practice"

>The map doesn't care about your fee-fees.

>murder
>not ordinary

>be a good boy
>recruted to go to some war you dont give a shit
>refuse
>die

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Then you realize in Brazil ONLY men can get a death penalty

>being this wrong
Just stop posting. A guy was put to death in japan this year for a single murder.

I'm with you murica

>Then you realize in Brazil ONLY men can get a death penalty
Promoting third-way feminism has it's pros, you know? :^)

>Saudi Arabia
>country
>not just Brit puppet state to overthrow the Ottomans
And yes I know you are going to >Canada >country

...

>The death penalty is inhumane!
>It's much better to just imprison someone for the rest of his life like some kind of beast, with zero chance of ever seeing the outside world again and force him to take all kinds of calming drugs that won't help his chances of ever being free again anyway
>Because all humans can be redeemed, except the ones who can't but we just lock them up and don't talk about them
>Human life is sacred, so much so that we'll stop an inmate trying to kill himself because he has LITERALLY NOTHING to look forward to in the coming decades until his death

the dealth penalty here is not in every state. plus it take a long time to get into effect anyways. usually inmates will sit on death row for years before anything happens. ain't comparable to saudi arabia which beheads people infront of everyone every maybe like 1 trial lol

quintessentially American post
>that ego
>that American education

Peaceful countries?
The rest of SEA is relaxing watching tv forgetting about the 4-5 actually hanged every year while Pinoys are gunned down by their own police in the tens of thousands.

Japan is the only civilized country with death penalty. Interesting.

Theyre not fags.

Japs at least have the excuse of not being of European descent.

US* however are the ONLY western country that still kills its criminals like we did in the 1600 really makes you think

Ok Justin, if Mudslimes come into your house and rape your wife and slit her throat, would you still oppose the death penalty?

It sounds like the solution is to give inmates with life sentences the option of assisted suicide.

>B-But how can you be sure they actually did that? It's not like we have a thing called burden of proof which we can make heavier in capital cases
>B-But how is the executing of those who torture, maim, mutilate and kill proportionate?
>B-But human life is a human right! Which is why it's not just to execute those who violate these human rights!
>B-But the criminally insane can be rehabilitated! That's why we have life imprisonments!

Or just give them the death penalty, mate. Cut out the middle man of forcing the taxpayer to provide for their stay in a correctional facility when it has already been acknowledged that their stay in said correctional facility DOESN'T. FUCKING. HELP. The only "life imprisonment" that's acceptable is permanent house arrest, and even that only happens in highly exceptional circumstances usually involving high profile figures like Kaiser Wilhelm (who despite unleashing WW1 on Europe technically wasn't even a criminal!).

Not him and that's not the point. It would take a lot to keep me from killing the man myself, and I would almost certainly try, the point is that the state and people as a whole should rise above the individual's need for revenge and excercise an effective system of rehabilitation not capital punishment. We can't let the state be a vehicle for our emotions or the emotions of victims, it needs to be a vehicle for the improvement of society as a whole.

>rehabilitation
Explain the rehabilitating effects of life imprisonment, or even multiple life sentences (they're a thing in America). Go on, I'll wait. By your logic life imprisonment shouldn't even be a thing and those who wantonly kill and torture without any kind of remorse should simply be treated by a psychiatrist, who can then decide when his patient is 'ready' to return to society. Fixed sentences, especially fixed life sentences, go against that ideal of rehabilitation.

We don't lock criminals up for life because we expect that we can 'fix' them, we lock them up for life because they're a danger to society and to give some sense of retribution to the victim and their loved ones (you're right in that the justice system overrides and to a certain degree replaces blood vengeance). In that instance the step to the death penalty is a small one and a more human one that advantages everyone, even the culprit himself.

Rehabilitation does not always mean release. Even as a prisoner an inmate may have value to society, through work (many things like licsence plates are manufactured in prisons) or outreach programs, prison education programs, etc.
Killing serious criminals serves absolutely no beneficial purpose other than saving money (which it often doesn't) but even that comes with the price of creating a society in which money is more valuable than human life. Statistically it doesn't even work as a deterrent.

>Rehabilitation does not always mean release
What does it mean then? The very word implies that those who are supposed to rehabilitate are restored to a 'normal' state, which the very fact that these individuals are deemed to dangerous to ever set free again contradicts. You need a very strange definition of rehabilitation to justify life imprisonments.

>Even as a prisoner an inmate may have value to society, through work (many things like licsence plates are manufactured in prisons)
Of course, because America's for profit prison system works so well...

>Killing serious criminals serves absolutely no beneficial purpose other than saving money
Other than offering greater retribution/closure to the victim and their loved ones?
Other than being more moral than perpetually caging a man like an animal and robbing him of even the ability to take his own life when he can no longer stand it?
Other than sending a more powerful signal of what a state and its people believe is an intolerable abomination and a violation of their most sacred rights?
Yeah, other than that it's an entirely monetary argument. Very much unlike for profit prisons, where prisoners are milked in a labor mill, or life imprisonment in general, which elevates human life by... not executing those who infringe upon the right to human life. If anything, being too squeamish about the death penalty in the most severe cases is a disrespect for human life.