Why the fuck did this get a better score than Ratchet and Clank?!!

Why the fuck did this get a better score than Ratchet and Clank?!!

is this going to be a thread about how we should always listen to Rotten Tomatoes or a thread about how we should never listen to Rotten Tomatoes?

Because Angry Birds is redpilled as fuck.

>50%
ugh are you kidding me? it's so problematic it should be at least 8%

Political propaganda

Probably because it's a better movie.

Going by the trailers, R&C looks worse.

There's only a few reviews out for it now quit being a tard

more paid reviews budget. RC had no money.

There's only 10 reviews out brah

It's going to be a thread where retards don't look at the average rating.

The sad part of all this is that it's probably still one of the best movies based on a video game.

What a sad thread

This feels more like a straight forward simple animted property.

That other shit was furr baiting and dorky shit, I saw the Death Battle episode and that made me dislike the concept

The hard and fast rule is if the score is good then the reviewers were paid off, and if the score is bad then the reviewers were paid off.

It's also a lot like watching a video game to the point where you might as well play the movie's much better received video game adaptation.

Uncharted 4 proves Sony is perfectly happy to pay off reviewers, so I doubt that's the case.

>problematic
>>>/tumblr/

Well now I want to watch it.

just wanna post this

POSITIVE REVIEWS
>Guardian
>Variety
>The List
>Hollywood Reporter
>IGN
>Cinopsis (soon on RT)
>Spielfilm.de (soon)
>Damon Smith (soon)
>FilmRezensionen (soon)
>Flickering Myth (probably)
>MovieJones.de (probably)
>Luke Ryan Baldock (probably)
>Atomix.vg (probably)
>Director's Cut Movies (probably)

NEGATIVE REVIEWS
>TheWrap
>Screen International (mixed on MC)
>Urban Cinefile (x2)
>Impulse Gamer (had wrong allegory--9/11)
this guy's review: impulsegamer.com/the-angry-birds-movie-film-review/
>Indiewire (soon)
>Empire (soon)
>Flickreel (soon)
>Flavourmag (probably)
>FilmFeeder (probably)
>Entertainment Fuse (prob.)
>Live Love Cinema (prob.)


To put the tomatometer in perspective, the highest rated VGM (FF: The Spirits Within) is at 44% by 144 reviews

>Implying Sony gave a crap about the R&C movie

They have an animation studio of their own yet they chose to give it to a small shit production. They really wanted to have their hands as clean as possible in the chance it'd fail, ending up setting it for failure.

>IGN
>for movies

>IGN
>for anything

It's placed in RT, so it counts.

Its topical.

Only one critic so far said that the movie has some propaganda in it. But he doesn't refer to the correct one.

impulsegamer.com/the-angry-birds-movie-film-review/

>To put the tomatometer in perspective, the highest rated VGM (FF: The Spirits Within) is at 44% by 144 reviews
God damn, that is an interesting fact to learn. I guess studios only make them because they know they'll usually get a good ROI.

It probably was a better film?