Why is homophobia so common?

Is there some kind of evolutionary reason for it? Shouldn't homophobia be selected against since more gays means less competition over females, since gays typically don't reproduce? Or is it mostly because of Christianity and Islam?

Other urls found in this thread:

nseuropa.wordpress.com/2013/04/11/heinrich-himmler-speech-about-homosexuality-to-the-ss-group-leaders/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292426/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because the Abrahamic religions hate fags and they spread themselves everywhere by the sword.

it is a symptom of weakness
societies that did not eliminate weakness did not live to see another day

>since more gays means less competition over females
Did you forget that women can be homosexual too? Lesbians are much more common than faggots.

It's a natural instinct. Homosexuals are sexual deviants.

Did you mean homophobia is a weakness, or being gay is a weakness?

Your arguments is either very right or very wrong depending.

Yeah but there is still a finite amount of resources, and fewer people reproducing means that your offspring will have access to more resources. Even taking lesbians into account, wouldn't it make sense for men to hate lesbians but be fine with gay men?

Considering that the Muslim, African and Asian countries don't give a shit about this secular homo acceptance bullshit and are breeding like rabbits, population control is the last thing we have to worry about.

>Shouldn't homophobia be selected against since more gays means less competition over females

So, genetics doesn't quite that way. There's no "homophobia" gene, the human brain and its behaviors is too complex for that. Aside from societal factors homophobia is going to be an expression of a ton of different traits that'll probably work out different in males and females.

Given that it's unlikely that genetic traits that would tend to make males express homophobia are the same that make women express homophobia, it becomes almost impossible to use traditional mendelian genetic theory.

> and it doesn't matter anyway

the vast majority of our behaviors correspond to societal norms. IMO it's way too soon in human history to start applying selection theories to societal constructs, but homophobia at the group level should equate to decreased expression of homosexuality and a corresponding increase of birth rate - thus it'd be more advantageous for an early society to be more homophobic, and for a later society less so.

the latter

Homophobia is learned behavior.

My niece never said anything negative about gays and she went to Catholic school. You have to teach those thought patterns. Children pantomime for a long period of life. They don't really have their own personality until they are teenagers.

I used to have chickens, and sometimes young male ones would hump other male ones, perhaps to show dominance.

But immediately the rapier chicken would get pecked by adult chickens or by the rooster as they broke up the raping.

I think it's a natural instinct. We should be more like chickens.

Moldovans cannot talk even the romanian language in a proper way.
They have some kind of a neurological problem.

fucking retard

fucking fruity faggot bum bandit
kill yourself

What's that image supposed to invoke? That kid has a kick ass costume. I wish I had gay parents damn.

If homosexuality is a 'weakness' then how exactly does it cause societies to collapse?

But why is it a natural instinct? What is the evolutionary benefit to it?

>watching a moldovan who throws tantrums.

>Homophobia is learned behavior.
Nah. Being the perma-virgin I am, I know i could instantly get laid if I decided to be gay but it doesnt work that way.

>Greeks build a strong civilization
>became degenerates who allowed faggotry
>collapsed

>Romans build a strong civilization
>became degenerates who allowed faggotry
>collapsed

>Christian civilization ruled the world for centuries
>became degenerates who started allowing faggotry
>collapsing

it's a symptom of weakness
a symptom of decaying family values and a lack of interest in investment in the future, which is having children
a symptom of men becoming women and women getting involved in politics, furthering marxist ideals
a useful tool to push for Big Brother, who will defend the rights of the fags from these evil christians who won't sell you gay cakes, while reducing the genetic pool to a breed of dumb mutts of niggers, spics and middle eastern goat fuckers

Causation=/=correlation

>commit violence on gays because they're annoying, obnoxious degenerates
>"phobia"

>watching a bucharest faggot speak in his cock sucking accent

>claims homophobic societies are more advanced
>rages like a baby
>is moldovan

Not looking too good pal

Then it's either correlation, or causation. And either of those can support the argument.

>is responded with an insult to an insult
>huh tough luck pal I win

By this you just show us how pathetic you are with your shitty comebacks.

Why is Sup Forums so leniant on fags lately?

>Have sex with the same sex in the orifice meant to expel waste
>W-WHY DO PEOPLE THINK THIS IS WEIRD???????????/

I love it when you call me a fag daddy.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'll blame you for that.

>>Romans build a strong civilization
>>became degenerates who allowed faggotry
>>collapsed
top kek, they banned it when they became christian, then collapsed a few centuries later

Homosexuality shortens lifespans and is a vector for numerous diseases.

Being repulsed by it is natural.

Also a phobia implies an irrational fear. Gays have successfully subverted society into accepting their sickness as normal. Along the way, anyone who pointed out their strategies, techniques and endgame and provided facts and evidence, was labeled a "homophobe".

"Homophobia" encapsulated:

>"Gays don't want to full social acceptance, they just want not be outlawed. You homophobe."
>"Gays aren't trying to change the culture by appearing on tv lighten up, homophobe."
>"Sure there are numerous gay characters appearing in ads and on TV , well out of proportion to their population, but don't be ridiculous. Gays don't want to marry they just want to be left alone, you homophobe."
>"Even if gays want to marry, the won't force any church or person to accept it. It won't affect anyone else's marriage. They just want equal rights. Besides they can't have kids, so it's not like they're going to "spread the gay". don't be so homophobic."
>"Sure gays want to adopt now, but that's okay because our pride parades have turned into diversity festivals at public schools . Our kids will be accepted. Don't be such a homophobe."
>"Sure we bash religion and (wrongfully) blame them for the oppression of gays, but we're just exercising our freedom speech, homophobe."
>"Yup that's right, churches can no longer speak against us and our movements in some countries or it will be labeled hate speech. Their freedom of speech should not be used for abuse. Maybe now they'll stop being so homophobic."
>"Now bake me a gay wedding cake celebrating my right to put a dick in a man's ass, and let this mentally ill tranny take a piss in the girls washroom with your daughter or I will have your business and or church shut down. And if you say anything against it, I will have you charged with a hate crime you disgusting homophobe."
>"Why are people so put off by 'I Am Jazz?" It's 2016.

Why do most straight people enjoy anal sex with women? I support gay rights but I think anal sex is disgusting for men and women.

Because creative sex is indicative of higher intelligence.

I don't expect a homophobe to heed anything to do with science however.

Or a lurking variable.

I agree anal sex is absolutely disgusting, I tried it once and got a piece of shit on my dick. Awful, awful :'(((

as I told you before, moldovans have communication problems.

>Why do most straight people enjoy anal sex with women?

>most

Naw f'am.

i dont think people mind fags putting cocks in each others asses, i think people mind them trying to treat it like its perfectly normal and something everyone should accept, and shoving their faggotry in everyone's faces

being a fag is a weakness

It's because 50% of the population have IQs under 100. No normal person cares about which hole a stranger inserts their cock into.

Faggots are at the very core of an advanced society's slide into irrelevance. Fags promote:
=Marxism & Communism
=Race Blind Ideology, i.e., more money fo dem programs, and a torrent of nigger babies will make up for the ones they forgot to breed
=Drug & alcohol abuse/dealing, major $$$ drain
=Sexual diseases, major $$$ drain
=The mindless validation of any type social degeneracy that springs up in a metropolitan area, whether that be cross-dressing, piercings, tattoos, etc.

Fags belong in the closet. They are going back in sooner or later.

A shame really. Had he a little more English we could have witnessed his argument implode in real time.

Let's see. Where to begin. The early Church was completely different on this. What happened was a big number used to go and give everything they had up for Christ and go live barefoot in a mountain. They came down when people started believing Plato bullshit. Plato said that man was created as three separate hermaphrodites and that when you marry and fuck a woman you do that because you want to go back to being a hermaphrodite. Rather than a rin and dust, these "complementarians" believe God split Adam down the middle, creating Eve. Did anybody have kids before Eve sinned? No. But she needed to sin in order for Christ to come. Who came immaculately. Then what you do is you rape people and angels and goats and be a big pagan and then call this sodomy and think this is a big sin and obsession worthy of 2000 years of pure bullshit. Sodom was a city. Sodomy was not its sin. Being a rapist asshole was the sin. You cannot tell believers not to marry anybody but especially not anybody to wed Christ. Everybody shouldn't forget Him. Guess what? Read up about the 144,000 in the book of the Unveiling (Revelations). It says these Jewish men will all be male virgins. Of women. Those who haven't "defiled themselves with women". Christ and the people of his time knew about faggotry in Rome. Blessed them. Knew about "faggotry" in Sodom and SAID this wasn't the case but we mistranslate a lot of shit and ADD much more. Knew of David and Jonathan who were just merely total broskies and nothing more. Lol even though David said he loved him more than he's ever loved any woman. Yeah. Basically you grow up playing with boys and then spit on me because im not changing diapers. Xq28 gene. Surrogates. All Biblical. Ahh. Release

You're disgusted with shit and insects for the same reason: They spread disease.

Plebbit showed up to "change our minds" about things because we are out meme-ing them in the US elections. Too bad they don't have facts or studies that support anything they believe.

If they could argue their points logically and factually, I might actually turn.

Damn shame.

>Because creative sex is indicative of higher intelligence.
If we lived in a proper culture a horny man with a high IQ would at most knock up his wife and five other women to satisfy his "creative" sexual needs. Instead what we have instead is bug chasing bdsm or whatever.

fuck off you degenerate

And I believe that Variable to be that Liberals and their kin ruin society and the breeding of actual men

>Being repulsed by it is natural.
This. Theoretically there is nothing wrong with them, but it's no coincidence that homosexuals are overrepresented amongst those with mental illnesses. They're defective, and a healthy person can pick up on that.
Nu/pol/

That's it. Dudes have been fucking each other in the ass forever and generally speaking no one gave a fuck. It's the fact that they insist on rubbing ours noses in it today and forcing us to pretend it's normal and not degenerate.

Do whatever the fuck you want but don't expect me to approve and fir fucks sake don't do it in public.

But has this always been the case throughout history?

No pussy around,so test level get high,and they can choose to kill,or fuck each other(in animals world).For humans don't know the reasons.

Show your support for gayz during the DNC

>No normal person cares about which hole a stranger inserts their cock into.

If they're doing it in private and not flaunting it all over the media and streets, then who the hell cares?

However, this is not the case.

No normal person thinks that what gay influence has done to western culture and freedoms is in any way positive.

We have managed to control most of our faggot population by sending them to macau and thailand, but there are still too many of them around. No one cares when 2 men sleep together, but when they normalize it and claim to be healthy, thats wrong

It's disgusting to see a man that behaves like a women and enjoys being dominated.

Fags are riddle with STDs.

>What is the evolutionary benefit to it?

just like a computer will erase corrupted data, we like to keep the odd ones away just because something feels wrong about them.

Many speculate that its evolutionary since many gays carry STDs/STIs.

in a culture that devalues men and wants to shape us into either leaders or disposable drones those who set on a different path to happiness are hated out of envy because they are free from societal expectations. However Masculinity is by definition what is expected of men from other men. Even within gay culture there is division amongst the butch manly men and the effeminate types.
I think hatred towards gayness is derived from the fact that gays have an influence on masculinity. Part of gay acceptance is the idea that men should be free to express themselves in whatever way they see fit which may put extra pressure on straight men due to increased expectations to be well groomed fit and have material displays of worth since gays tend to physically flaunt themselves as the definition of what is attractive for men they are at the forefront of what is defined as the ideal attractive man for women and society.
You often find the most attractive men are gay
the best actors and fashion models are gay
women will say its too bad you are gay or you should be like so and so who was in this oscar winning movie.

I think homophobia is a part of society due to the envy of staight men who are losers and cant get laid so they try to redefine what masculinity is to make themselves feel better. In reality homophobes and those guys mocking haha thats totally gay are in reality the same as Tumblr land whales who hate skinny chicks because thats what men want just like all women want to fuck fags because fags are always the best men due to our inherant competitive nature when you have a culture of extreme masculinity attracted by masculine features you get natural selection producing gay men who are the Zenith of not only physical but mental desirabilty amongst both sexes.

>Implying the gay is genetic
Seriously it's a fucking fetish that they're embracing into their lives instead of keeping it inside of the bedroom.

As if the science behind that statement holds up under the slightest scrutiny.

I'm judging my generalization purely from the type of porn i see. Roughly 50% of it is or includes anal sex.

No matter how hot the chick is in that type of porn, I just can't fap to it unless her front is also being penetrated.

In the tribal sense, gays are weak, effeminate and woman-like.

In a survival situation or a tribal one, allowing fags in your midst means you tolerate weakness.

Evolutionarily it makes sense that as tribal beings we innately want to drive fags out to look and be stronger.

>more gays means less competition over females
More gays could also mean your species is more likely to die.

Cripes you're all hermaphroditic trannies and men put it in ALL holes. In my view a vagina is way more gross and dark in a spiritual way than a man. All fallen angels take male form but they only rape women. Why you'd risk that to sleep with that is beyond me. Temple hookers are what you need to worry about. Marry Christ or have nothing

~4% of the population is trying to tell the rest that its normal
~4% of the population are now infiltrating the school systems, changing curriculum to convince children its normal timmy has two dads who shove dicks in each others asses
fags can do what they want. but leave the kids out of it and dont pretend youre not a freak

what the fuck are you talking about.

> Canadians, not even once

51% but ok we all have aids yes. White fags have aids. My sides

>gook
>doesnt know Bible
Yep

nseuropa.wordpress.com/2013/04/11/heinrich-himmler-speech-about-homosexuality-to-the-ss-group-leaders/

The answer to your question is in this speech.

is this the autism faggots really believe?

It makes sense why normal people should be disgusted with it, but why institutionalize discrimination against gays? Is it just a by-product of this?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2292426/

>I'm judging my generalization purely from the type of porn i see. Roughly 50% of it is or includes anal sex.

Roughly 95% of it is produced by jews. (((coincidence)))?

Welcome to Sup Forums. You must be new here.

>Femdom isn't a thing
>All fags like to be dominated

> canadian
> thinks everyone is christian

buddhism hasn't ever had the problems with faggotry the west does. and we've been around longer than your religion. but by all means, continue to enjoy the symbolic nature of your religion. "eating the flesh of christ," pretty fucking fag-tier

>Christianity and Islam

Conveniently leaving off Judaism

You know what to do boys

take a biology class

You're criticizing Moldovans for linguistic incompetence when you can't even type in English properly. Your syntax is awkward.

>>Femdom isn't a thing

Homosexuals in disguise

>>All fags like to be dominated

Yeah, they all do. That's why they are fags.

Slowly decaying by the muslim tideway...

>but why institutionalize discrimination against gays?

This my friends is the product of cultural marxism.

What you really should be asking, is "Why have a society based on moral precepts rather than leftist ideology?"

Why prevent anyone from promoting and spreading, and normalizing disease, really? This should be enshrined in law.

Faggots destroy civilization.
Civilization is built, maintained and defended by men working together.
When homosexuality is omnipresent and accepted, even normal man to man interactions become difficult, because they might be interpreted as sexual interest.
This makes trust and cooperation among men fragile, which makes the whole society weak.

Yeah muh getting high under a tree muh 57 lives muh terrorism muh peace muh things need to feel a certain way in order to get me shit. Who's im charge of all this. The tree force I guess

If gays are born gay, then they are genetic aberrations, and we would instinctually shun and detest them, because they weaken the tribe

If gays are not born gay, then they are mentally ill, and again, we would instinctually shun and detest them, because they weaken the tribe.

I don't hate gays... I hate faggots.

>Greeks build a strong civilization
>became degenerates who allowed faggotry
>collapsed
Homosexuality in Greece was common for hundreds of years, their collapses happed because they grew too big and too fast without founding any rulling and social structure to sustain it. After the death of Alexander the Greek empire was split and fighting began between the new kingdoms, which caused them to weaken greatly and be conquered by the Romans

>Romans build a strong civilization
>became degenerates who allowed faggotry
>collapsed
The Roman Empire , same as with Greece, had homosexuality for hundreds of years. What causes their collapse is unstable governing body, corruption and integrating barbarians in to the legions which backfired when they used their own tactics against them.

>Christian civilization ruled the world for centuries
>became degenerates who started allowing faggotry
>collapsing

Christian civilization isn't collapsing but it is getting weaker, the roots of hat goes back to the French revolution when the people decided to abolish the cleric estate and become a secular country, after this event other nations followed suit.

>t. History student

better than pedo fag priests

>Because creative sex is indicative of higher intelligence.
>Sticking your dick in arse
>Creative

Top Kek you mentally defective peice of human garbage, faggots are a cancer on society and should be purged

coward

Yep. I don't go to an organised Church
Eugenicist
Yeah had nothing to do with tribalistic idolatry and usury
I hate clamdiggers

>Why prevent anyone from promoting and spreading, and normalizing disease, really?
Because homosexuality becoming more accepted doesn't mean that more people are becoming gay, and even if it did, it would mean that other people were catching the disease, not you. Genes are selfish.

Do you know what a top is?

It would make sense that parents would stop providing for gay children, since they would not be propagating their genes.

You people really love eachother

>something harmfull
>let other people contact it
>it wouldn't effect me anyway
wew lad,no wonder are going down...