/brit/

Loyalist militia edition

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pjXN_xPQd0M
youtube.com/watch?v=swEWvX74rDA
youtube.com/watch?v=C8S2WTii-7w
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bruce just did a sex wee on me

Terrible edition
Kys

>The paper whose headlines have included ‘500,000 migrants headed to Britain’ (April 2015), ‘Porn star: truth about my night with Ukip Nigel’ (April 2017) and the disgraceful and discredited ‘‘Top Tory killed’ girl, 15’ (January 2015)?

anime

The winners and losers of the world were determined during the closing days of WW2. These were unofficial after WW1, but finally set in stone after WW2. For simplicity's sake, I'll just use the terms first, second, and third world. There are first world countries, and then there are your permanent first worlders: UK, France, Japan, Germany, most of Western Europe. The current global economy is designed to make sure these stay on top. Then you have your second and third worlders. Third worlders mean nothing. Seconder worlders were designed to be hosts. For example, a new Mecedes factory opens in some second world nation; this eliminates second world competition and the first world reaps most of the benefits.

"Beggar thy neighbour" is a real policy, and when European Empire are the only neighbors in a world full of third worlders, it becomes harder to acquire assets.

Paradoxically, It's actually a lot harder for Second World countries to prosper than it is for Third World countries to prosper. Thus the second world is the neighbor which keeps on giving.

China has designed a system where all businesses must be owned 51% by a Chinese national. If Mercedes wants to open a factory in China, 51% of it must be owned by a Chinese partner.

There's also one more category: America. After the Treaty of Versailles, it became clear that First Worlders couldn't just keep lending to each other. The answer was to sell to America to invest in American surplus

South Korea is a purchaser of American surplus, i.e., we create a surplus of war equipment which you buy. We create it knowing you'll need to buy it. Not because you need to go to war, but because you need to get rid of your surplus.

me bowing to my queen

This one man, Arnon Milchan was a secret Israeli spy in the 60s. He was part of the plot to steal nuclear triggers from the United States in order to further their ILLEGAL nuclear program. JFK found out about this and wanted to shut it down. He got assassinated by Mossad because of that. This man also made movies with predictive programming before 9/11 happened. On the right side of my image you can see the movie poster for The Medusa Touch. This is a movie about a remote controlled airplane flying into a building. He also produced Fight Club which has the famous final scene of all the buildings exploding. With the 2 buildings in the middle falling last and together. His other movies include High Crimes, The Devil's Advocate, Gone Girl, The Big Short and a Time to Kill. Arnon was also producing the upcoming Bryan Singer biopic before Bryan had to quit because he's a fucking pedophile. He's made movies with Ben Affleck, De Niro, and Kevin Spacey among others. They've all had sexual misconduct allegations thrown against them.

Basically this guy is one of the kingpins. He makes the predictive programming in Hollywood. From trying to make pedophilia more acceptable to laying the groundwork in our subconscious for impending planned (((Events))) like 9/11.

Remember Madeleine McCann? This is her now.
Feel old yet?

Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the "American Federation for Peace." The first edition of this slim volume was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman's fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman's plan a "sensational idea."

Germany's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. "This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy," Goebbels privately commented. "If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn't have done a better job."

At his direction the German press played up Kaufman's call for genocide. A front page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a "Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People" and a work of "Old Testament Hatred." Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

about to start playing fate lads
shan't be hearing much from me in the coming days I'm afraid

hmmmmm

youtube.com/watch?v=pjXN_xPQd0M

Cirno is a shit touhou and smells of rotten salmon

anyone got a ROM?

A plan similar to Kaufman's was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined "Breed War Strain Out of Germans" in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an "outbreeding" plan that would "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities." (See also: Benjamin Colby, Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

The Harvard University professor's proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. "The objects of this measure," wrote Dr. Hooton, "include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals."

British men are my kryptonites. Even those rude cute chavs. No homo.

based jewboy

>microscopic brain
american
>miniscule brain
australian
>tiny brain
canadian
>small brain
british
>ginormous fucking brain with lights shooting out of it and shit
Welsh

i agree marisa is much better

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. "During this period," he went on, "encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males."

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany's population and immigration policies. Since the nation's defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

what is this 2009

Karen is a shit kiniro and smells of rotten salmon

...

...

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the earth, of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportionment of her lands.

To all those men and women who would rather die fighting for freedom, than remain alive as slaves;

To all those men and women who, unafraid, speak out the truth as they conceive it to be the truth;

To all those men and women who, inspired by the efforts, hopes and aspirations of mankind place its needs before their own;

This book is humbly dedicated.
Special Note to Reader

Germany Must Perish presents a plan for the structure of a permanent and lasting peace among civilized nations. It bases its thesis on the eventual defeat of Germany by the British Empire and its Allies, without the assistance of the United States.

However, should circumstances decree that the American public cast its ballot in favor of war as a measure of self-defense (and it is the fervent prayer of the author that this may never happen) it would become paramount that the lives of our native sons not be sacrificed in vain as were their fathers' lives a generation ago.

If our soldiers must go forth to kill or die in battle, at least let them be given not alone a Slogan but a Solemn Purpose and a Sacred Promise.

Let that Purpose be an Enduring Peace!

And, this time, that Promise must be kept!

any sled man in

...

Today's war is not a war against Adolf Hitler.

Nor is it a war against the Nazis.

It is a war of peoples against peoples; of civilized peoples envisioning Light, against uncivilized barbarians who cherish Darkness.

Of the peoples of those nations who would surge forward hopefully into a new and better phase of life, pitted against the peoples of a nation who would travel backward enthusiastically into the dark ages. It is a struggle between the German nation and humanity.

Hitler is no more to be blamed for this German war than was the Kaiser for the last one. Nor Bismarck before the Kaiser. These men did not originate or wage Germany's wars against the world. They were merely the mirrors reflecting centuries-old inbred lust of the German nation for conquest and mass murder.

This war is being waged by the German People. It is they who are responsible. It is they who must be made to pay for the war. otherwise, there will always be a German war against the world. And with such a sword forever hanging overhead the civilized nations of the world, no matter how great their hopes, how strenuous their efforts, will never succeed in creating that firm and solid foun- dation of permanent peace which they must first establish if ever they intend to start the building of a better world.

For not only must their be no more German wars in fact; there must not even remain the slightest possibility of one ever again occurring. A final halt to German aggression, not a temporary cessation, must be the goal of the present struggle.

Rude
Have a bit of decorum lad

hmm karen is from the UK yes sounds accurate

youtube.com/watch?v=swEWvX74rDA

Why do lefties oppose the UK selling arms/materiel to Saudi Arabia because of their involvement in Yemen, yet have no problem with Saudi Arabia essentially funding Hamas to kill Jews and Christians in Israel?

imagining how ignorant of monetary policy the person who created this image was makes my brain hurt

This does not mean an armed mastery over Germany, or a peace with political or territorial adjustments, or a hope based on a defeated and repentant nation. Such settlements are not sufficiently conclusive guarantees of no more German aggressions.

This time Germany has forced a TOTAL WAR upon the world.

As a result, she must be prepared to pay a TOTAL PENALTY.

And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty: Germany must perish forever!

In fact -- not in fancy!

Daily the truth is being impressed upon us by observation, and upon others less fortunate, by bombs, that the German doctrine of force is not one based upon either political expediency or economic necessity. The personal war-lust of those who lead the German people is but a component part of the war-lust which exists as a whole in the German masses. German leaders are not isolated from the will of the German people because apart from this will they could not come into being or exist at all. Their personal inspiration, the motivation, even the acquiescence to their deeds are one and all drawn by German leaders from the very depths of the German national soul.

Far too often the claim has been made that the present German drive toward world-dominion is only street gangsterism practiced on an organized national scale, deriving principally from the lowest classes, the dregs of Germany. Such a claim is not sustained by facts, for the same lust, the same brute force which the Germans display today under the rule of the so-called "low class Nazis," they also displayed in 1914, at a time when the "highest classes" and the "noblest specimens" capable of being produced by the German nation, the Junkers, ruled that land. And a vast number of Germany's intellectuals, another German "high-class," sat as members in the German Reichstag!

what are you some redneck northern ontarian. ya hackin darts eh there bud?

seriously though if you sled that's neat

Es ist nicht wahr, daß Deutschland diesen Krieg verschuldet hat. Weder das Volk hat ihn gewollt noch die Regierung noch der Kaiser. Von deutscher Seite ist das Äußerste geschehen, ihn abzuwenden. Dafür liegen der Welt die urkundlichen Beweise vor. Oft genug hat Wilhelm II. in den 26 Jahren seiner Regierung sich als Schirmherr des Weltfriedens erwiesen; oft genug haben selbst unsere Gegner dies anerkannt. Ja, dieser nämliche Kaiser, den sie jetzt einen Attila zu nennen wagen, ist jahrzehntelang wegen seiner unerschütterlichen Friedensliebe von ihnen verspottet worden. Erst als eine schon lange an den Grenzen lauernde Übermacht von drei Seiten über unser Volk herfiel, hat es sich erhoben wie ein Mann.

disprove it then big brain

anime is bent

No! The problem of Germanism must not again be passed along to the next generation. The world must never again be stretched and tortured on the German rack. Ours is the problem; ours the solution. The world has learned, with a knowledge born of tragedies too numerous, too horrible to record, that regardless of what leader or class rules Germany, war will be waged against it by that country, because the force which compels it to action is an in- separable part of the mass-soul of that nation. True, that soul, at one time, might have been otherwise fashioned.

But that time was in the civilizing cycle of a thousand years ago. Now it is too late.

We know that. Our men of 1917 did not. They had no precedent on which to base their experience. We have not that excuse today. Their futile sacrifices and their empty efforts must today dictate our own actions and decisions. We are paying today for the lack of experience of the last generation in dealing with the peoples of the German nation. When and if the time comes for us to take similar decision and action we must not repeat their mistake. The cost is far too great; not alone for us, but for all future generations.

We must bring ourselves to realize that no leader can govern Germany at all unless, in some manner, he embodies the spirit and expresses the war-soul existent in the majority of her peoples. "Majority" is used advisedly for in speaking of the masses which compose a nation it must be impartially conceded that some fraction of the mass must perforce vary from it. Consequently no unfair contention is here being made that everyone in Germany is guilty of its heinous offenses against the world. In fact we shall, in pursuing our point, favor Germany by allowing that as much as 20% of her population is entirely guiltless of complicity in her crimes, as well as being foreign to any share of her war-soul. We therefore grant, for argument's sake, that some 15,000,000 Germans are absolutely innocent.

A typical example of one of Beijing’s propaganda schemes in the UK is the ‘China Watch’ supplement, produced by state-owned newspaper China Daily, which is found once a month in The Daily Telegraph. The supplement purports to bring readers “informative and diverse stories about contemporary China’s dynamic development”. Typical articles include a report on a video (released by China’s State Archives Administration) showing sex slaves suffering at the hands of Japanese soldiers, and a deeply reassuring piece on Tibetan families moving into new houses as part of a settlement project. “Chairman Mao gave us the pastures that were once controlled by the nobility, and now his successors have given us houses”, one of them was quoted as saying. The Telegraph is paid £750,000 (over US$1 million) per year to run this supplement, the content of which is also available online.

really makes you think....................................................................

too fast!

enjoy visiting Loyalist cemeteries.

brave women and men they were. and contrary to what you might think, not all of them were ethnically british. Some were dutch and german and other europeans

Don't even keep up with news these days
Africa could by starving of aids and U wouldn't be aware of the wiser

BUT -- shall Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Austrians, Norwegians, Dutch, Belgians, Frenchmen, Greeks, Englishmen, Irishmen, Scotsmen, Canadians, Australians and Americans -- for we too may ultimately feel the spike of the German boot -- shall all these peoples, numbering some 300,000,000 of the most civilized, most enlightened on earth suffer constantly and face unnatural death every generation so that some small part of Germany's populace may continue to exist? Are those 15,000,000 Germans so valuable, so indispensable to mankind that 300,000,000 guiltless men, women and children shall fight a war with Germany every time she so decrees? Shall perpetual struggle against the German be the only future facing civilized peoples? Why breed children while Germany breeds war?

Are not the Dutch a sober and thrifty people? Are not the French cultured? Are not the Czechs industrious? Are not the Poles deeply attached to land, family and God? Are not the Scandinavians a decent people? Are not the Greeks brave and fearless? Are not the English, Irish, Scotch and American freedom-loving and progressive people? And in very simple arithmetic are not these 300,000,000 more than 15,000,000 Germans?

If Democracy as Americans know it is majority rule in a national sense, it must be so in an international sense as well. The greatest good for the greatest number is Democracy's rule of thumb; to fight for world Democracy is to secure the rights of the majority of democratic peoples against the incursions made upon them by any autocratic minority.

If this is not so, why conscript a vast army for Democracy's defense? Why train American soldiers to murder a hypothetical enemy of Democracy, when the Will which spawned this enemy waxes and grows with each successive blood-bath?

In 1917 American soldiers, as those of every other major nation, were forced to murder by the millions. What for?

...

I don't mind age gaps per se, just sexual exploitation. The issue with letting a 14-15 year old girl date a 25 year old man is the vast disparity in their life experience, and the former's vulnerability towards the older person. I don't see anything wrong with letting a fairly mature 18 year old girl date a 30 year old man.

people already get free money through welfare
basic income is mostly an attempt to simplify the system

I'm from Bancroft. People from north of French River would consider me to be southern but to everyone else I'm just a hick.

That's not mine though I do have a 1979 Yamaha SRX 440.

etc, etc.

point is lads, 'kikes pulling the strings behind everything' isn't just a fucking meme. Actually happened and happens and all you have to do is look out your fucking window to see it.

The USA has the largest stock of received foreign direct investment ($2,815,000,000,000) and the largest stock of foreign direct investment abroad ($4,854,000,000,000.00)

A good measure of a healthy country is received FDI. The UK comes after America (2,069,000 million). Hong Kong follows the UK. The come China and Germany, followed by Belgium, Switzerland, France, and Canada.

On the flip side, Sudan as received 0 foreign investment. Micronesia received 15 million dollars worth.

Ashcamm
More like
Hashcam

Amarite

this 2bh. Also welfare in its current state creates a trap which essentially incentivises laziness whereas UBI wouldn't

the woman I'm fucking regularly now is 12 years my senior

is this the most fully-brained thread we have ever seen?

central banks in most countries - certainly the UK, US and Eurozone have an inflation target of around 2%. If inflation goes above that, in normal circumstances they increase interest rates to discourage borrowing meaning that private banks create less money in the form of loans.

if fiscal policy (i.e. UBI spending) lead to an increase in inflation, central banks (which are mostly independent now) would immediately respond with measures to keep inflation within the target band. Some of these measures, like higher interest rates, would have a distributive effect (i.e. the people who wanted to borrow would lose out, assuming the borrowing was actually a good idea.) but not an aggregate one.

no i think it is ashcammm

would honestly fuck a 16 year old the minute i had the option (legally of course)

exactly la
welfare is a colossal waste of money and hugely bureaucratic
imagine how much simpler it would be if everyone just got a cheque in the mail monthly

believe so. have another:


The Rothschilds are certainly NOT the #1 family.
You know how I know this???
BECAUSE YOU KNOW ABOUT THEM!

They are the "Court Bankers" for the clans of Black Nobility and the liason between the known nobility (England, Spain, etc), the black nobility (remnants of the Hapsburgs, Mediccis, etc... they ARE still around and have INSANE WEALTH in the form of priceless artifacts, art, holy relics...) and the Vatican's Swiss banks.

They are basically just jewish middle-men as per usual, only they are the TOP-TIER jewish middle-man operation on Earth for centuries.

not an argument

>if it causes inflation then they'll just shut it down and forget about it and we go back to toiling

Some of my loyalist ancestors were Scottish Catholics whose parents/grandparents were Jacobites. Family legend is they were hoping for a Stuart restoration.

...

also

I don't support the concept of "welfare" because our society already promotes government reliance and socially maladaptive behaviour enough. Capitalism is great (in concept) because its supposed to align selfish impulse with socially-productive behaviour. Welfare and basic income does the opposite by encouraging parasitism and sloth.

The marxists love the idea of a "basic income" because it means people will depend on the government to provide their basic goods and services, and with that dependence on big government comes a state that can exercise its will upon the masses without fear of dissidence.

not remotely noncery

Why legally

Where did all these leafs come from? Is it because I linked reddit in the last thread?

thanks to you, the average IQ of the thread has increased like 30 points

...

what province are you from, other leaf?

number of jfs especially leafs is getting out of control

we need an Australian style points system and we need it NOW

I'm a pickle riick!

that's actually one of the interesting things here with welfare
Universal Credit for all the shit parts actually had a good idea in altering how welfare tapers off when you're in work so that you're always better off working, but the treasury constantly wanted larger budget cuts than could be delivered while actually keeping that incentive, so what was originally a carrot-and-stick system just started beating claimants to death with the stick, at which point they were found fit for work by an ESA assessor.

central banks can't shut it down, it's a fiscal policy measure controlled directly by governments.
if a government has already decided to introduce it, they can hardly go back on it politically. it would be a u-turn on the scale of re-armament preparing for WW2.

don't quite fancy american prisons myself and every state has a randomly set AoC from 16-18 in this cunt

what did she mean by this

...

...

rick and morty became so major so it is not intelligent anymore

how the fuck can a wall, which keeps ILLEGALS out, be illegal?

was this done on purpose? surely people aren't this stupid.

welfare doesn't encourage parasitism unless society itself encourages it.
social attitudes towards work and full employment as a key element of monetary policy were far more effective than brutal distrust in keeping people off the dole. people worked shit poverty tier jobs that were worse than just living on the dole in the 1960s and 1970s because that was just what you did, even if by any economic analysis this was completely irrational behaviour.

the fear of "big government" merely transforms government, it doesn't alter its size - instead of a big government that intervenes to keep people in work, you get a big government that intervenes to fuck with people on welfare without actually getting them off it.

tempted to go out and get some beers but its frigid outside (47F) so

>47F

youtube.com/watch?v=C8S2WTii-7w

love me some chris gay gun haha

absolute brainlets in this thread complaining that universal income would cause inflation and inflation is Le bad
most western economies are struggling with record low inflation and income rates at the moment, Australia especially. corporate bankers would love for those rates to go up to encourage investment in the economy

I enjoy watching local tv broadcasts because the presenters all come across as deranged sociopaths. their enthusiasm and friendliness and whatnot is all so fake. you know that as soon as the cameras are off they hate eachother

In early 2011, the Chinese government launched a million dollar advertising campaign, which was aimed to improve the "incomplete understandings" the American public has about China. A 60-second ad was shown at New York's Times Square, which featured Chinese personalities such as scientist Sun Jiadong, singer Liu Huan and news anchor Jing Yidan, ending with the message of "Chinese Friendship". Newsweek noted that the ad's great production values, but criticized it as confusing and explaining little about the featured Chinese identities.[64]

>universal income

i told you this

does he try on purpose to be like idubz? or does idubz act like him?

need china to undergo an economic crisis so i can gain an understanding of whether their present economic approach is post keynesian or not.

...

I think the way to find a stable and prosperous society is to keep corporations and government in a balance of power, as a check and balance. It's pretty clear that average people, even rallied together, rarely amass the power to contest the will of a government gone awry. Give corporations enough power and capital and they can overwhelm government and subject people to their own interests. But somewhere between those two extremes lies an accountable government and corporations which are fairly regulated to promote innovation and the dispersion of benefits across all tiers of society.

In short, centrism.

youtube's become just as obnoxious as tv with all these idubbz clones being all chipper and unfunny

Envy those Norwegian/Danish, they've got pretty strong nonce game, prisons there are like a 5star holiday retreat experience
Hell, they're basically incentivizing noncery

because the UN said it was illegal like 20 times?

Where is this located
I'll piss on their fucking grave

Does anyone need any legal advice?

universal basic noncery when

motherfuck the UN

>the UN said it was illegal

>become

>the (((((((((((UN)))))))))))))