What are your thoughts on this youtube cartoon reviewer

what are your thoughts on this youtube cartoon reviewer

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s9o6krTi5rA
youtube.com/watch?v=D2Ejb0iohP8
youtube.com/watch?v=nXJjCg9Pt04
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

He's autistic

Literally who?

i don't like him

I feel like because of his autism he calls out a lot of dumb stuff that doesn't need criticism. He wants a lot more logic than needed in cartoons.

I still watch'em if he's on recommended videos.

>brony
>takes nostalgia critic clips when he doesn't feel like making content
>when he does feel like making content it's even worse than that
>fanbase is headquartered on tv tropes

>this thread has been autodeleted or pruned

...

...

...

He's good if you just ignore the autism

...

>this cartoon is bad because its mean spiritied
nah

...

...

uh oh

...

he's a fucking snob

...

He's good if you just ignore the autism

Where did you find this?

-----0

I like him. Make interresting videos and even when I don't agree with him he explain his opinion.

I also like that he clearly say when his opinion is due to personal taste.

though I tend to prefer his Admirable Animations to his Animated Atrocities.

>>brony
Didn't he stop being a Brony?

He makes some good points but it's hard to hear through the autistic white noise.

I used to think he was okay, but he's really fucking obnoxious. And his editing is shit, compared to RebelTaxi who's editing is fucking amazing.

>spends five minutes complaining that it doesn't make sense that a cartoon oil rig has a fire on it
>doesn't know that gas flares exist

If you ignore the autism, he is good

>>>this thread has been autodeleted or pruned
You really think that plan will work? All you manage to do is get your posts deleted and get banned.

oh
quote me
quote me!

youtube.com/watch?v=s9o6krTi5rA

eceleb threads get deleted anyway, this guy's just shitposting because the thread will get deleted before a mod sees his posts

He's pretty much a soccer mom in the body of a 30-year-old autistic man.
But though I rarely see eye-to-eye with him on most of his critiques, I do appreciate that he at least logically explains why he doesn't like certain shows.
Plus, in his "Homer Badman" review he managed to provide a convincing argument for defendant rights in rape cases without sounding like an edgy 13-year-old.

whay do this tho? wath are you getting out of it user?

Not always.

though MR Enter indeed tend to get deleted faster. But as long as it pertain to cartoon it can keep existing as long as things keep being civil.


Which is actually the case here, if you ignore the porn post.

are you the one who goes on tv tropes and downvotes negative reviews

It's hard to believe this guy was in the Marines.

I don't know about him, but I'm getting porn out of it.

Some people are so cripplingly autistic, they spam threads with illegal content to get it deleted instead of just ignoring it.

What is this thread?

You are confusing him with Fiery Joker.

Someone was wrong?

>anything illegal was posted

Looks like no, his shitposting actually got his shit kicked in before this thread bit the dust.

Illegal against the global rules.

Literally who

Illegal as in it break the rules of a blue board.

Learn to context.

Nah, he just deleted his own posts because he's a memer

>Fiery Joker
that's guy is also a huge mega snob

>calls out stuff that doesn't need to be called out
>blocks people who disagree with him
>borderline contrarian
>egotistical bellend

Rule violation? Illegal? It doesn't matter. You're being a retard. Stop it.

>Nothing actually illegal is ever posted on Sup Forums
Learn to context

Mr. Enter LEAVE!

there's a difference between disagreeing and harassment. He blocks harassers

No context can make sense of what you just posted there.

I have posted disagreeing comments several times and I was never deleted.

>snob
I don't think you know what this word actually means.

around the time of the trolls video. he openly stated he deleted comments which said trolling wasnt cyberbullying

I don't like it when he tells people how comedy works.

He's asexual, so he shouldn't even bother critiquing romance or sex,since it bothers him so much

I don't want to be "that guy" but he's a complete sperglord. He's also a scam artist considering he gets paid $200 per review but still decides to pirate everything.

yeah. he claims that sex is repulsive and then reviews a family guy episode based on sexual harrasment

In later video he has actually acknoledged the opinionof people saying it's not the same.

For someone complaining he get butthurt too easily, You get butthurt way too easily.

He's an interesting guy, and I like his AA videos. Sometimes he gets way too emotional over cartoons or criticises some very trivial things, but overall I tend do more agree with him than disagree. The technical quality of his videos has been going down lately, though. Too bad.

>e gets paid $200 per review
How do you know his addreveneue?
>but still decides to pirate everything.
Source?

It's ironic how he's such a logicfag but in his shitty cartoon that makes no sense he explained it by saying it was "cartoon logic idk".

maybe i'm wrong. i only watched his videos actively until mid last year. if there is a video later proving me wrong then fair enough

dude, i once saw a to 10 his where he actually said his taste is Superior to everyone else.
that's fucking snobbery

What happened here?

Autism.

I am 90% sure it was meant to be a joke.

>source
doesn't he not review things because he 'can't find a good enough copy online'enter got to them

Underage cartoon character getting porked (some literally).

I was pointing out that the original statement "Some people are so cripplingly autistic, they spam threads with illegal content to get it deleted instead of just ignoring it." could easily be interpreted as posting content that breaks the law, on a website where child pornography is often posted to get threads delted. Within this context, you should have instead made the statement "Some people are so cripplingly autistic, they spam threads with rule breaking content to get it deleted instead of just ignoring it." if you did not want to be misinterpreted in this way.

Is that clear enough?

Mean spirited
Mean spirited
Mean spirited

>enter got to them
Enter would be the last person to post this kind of content, let alone visit Sup Forums.

this thread
youtube.com/watch?v=D2Ejb0iohP8

>doesn't he not review things because he 'can't find a good enough copy online'
I do not remember well, but I thik he once mentionned he pirated stuff that was impossible to find on the market.

Even if that is true, this is i in no way "everything".

>people get this butthurt about an ameture cartoon reviewer on youtube

Ah, should have expected it. These Mr. Enter threads brings out the worst of people.
that's why I come and read these threads

>could easily be interpreted as posting content that breaks the law, on a website where child pornography is often posted to get threads delted.
Not really. People who acknoledge context actually know that "illegal" actually refer to the rules of the Sup Forums board.
> Within this context, you should have instead made the statement "Some people are so cripplingly autistic, they spam threads with rule breaking content to get it deleted instead of just ignoring it."
1. I didn't made that original post and I find ludicrous some would belive Enter would actually do those kind of stuff.
2. No, "illegal" is an apt word to use to describe something that break the rules of the board.

>Is that clear enough?
It didn't help that the opinon you tried to express was wrong, but now it's clear, thanks.

This is pretty accurate.

The fact that people on Sup Forums will actually defend this autist just speaks loads about the kind of people who browse this board.

You can see watermarks used in torrent/rip sites. His most recent review says "episode premier" in the corner implying someone recorded and put it on the internet to be used by him a few years later. I don't know his ad revenue but it wouldn't be hard to look up analytics and estimate his earnings. I'm referring to his Paetron where he gets $200.

>MrEnter in Seconds
>last more than 30 seconds
You had one job.

this thread
youtube.com/watch?v=nXJjCg9Pt04

>This is pretty accurate.
Not really.

At least he explain why he dislike something and when it's due to personal tastes.

It doesn't cover either his Admirable Animations who are basically the reason to pay attention to him.

>His most recent review says "episode premier" in the corner implying someone recorded and put it on the internet to be used by him a few years later
Uh? By this point, you can find way better quality videos. If anything, that would indicate he recorded it himself, which make the would stuff legal.

MEAN SPIRITED! MEAN SPIRITED!

I WANT MORE BUTTERFLIES AND RAINBOWS!!!

If people complain about Mr. enter for his poor editing, making those kind of counter-argument isn't really helping.

He would have a recording of an episode he doesn't like for over half a decade?

Why take a poor torrent rip then?

He's a huge sperg. I'd tell him to kill himself, but I guess that would be too mean-spirited.

>there are people in this thread that think childrens cartoons should be mean spirited

Do people who complain about his complain of "mean spirited" actually watch his videos? I don't read his DA posts, but I actually don't see him make that complain that often.

This guy is a fucking faggot.

Well that's definitely not the only one he pirated. I'll go make a collection of watermarks in his videos if you need me to.

I have never cared to try to figure out this rating system (don't care much about rating in the first place). Only check his videos to get his opinion.

I'm pretty sure he's made well over 50 charts like that.

That is some Chris-chan-tier autism.

He's a complete baby and complains about anything non-conventional. That being said, some of his videos are still somewhat entertaining.

Doesn't Première actually indicate that it's an advertisment video, which is perfectly legit to take to review.

Also, what the rule about show you review, when you make a living out of it? Is it just tax-deductible?

They aren't hard to make

Pretty interesting from time to time even if he's extremely sensitive. Though I can't really get over how he seems to view MLP as almost perfect.

I honestly don't get how one can get mad over a chart like that. I mean, if it was insulting a beloved episode, I would get, but there, it's just someone making a complicated rating chart to evalute McDonald food.

It's pointless, sure, but certainly not infuriating.