I consider myself to be a progressive and to be pro-gay rights...

I consider myself to be a progressive and to be pro-gay rights. I have no problems with more homosexual characters on tv and film. But holy shit that scene was probably one of the most disgusting things I've seen right next to the gay sex and orgy from Sense8. I've seen rape scenes, characters gets heavily mutilated, children getting killed on screen but none of that bugged me as much as that gay scene in American Gods. I legit understand what causes homophobia now. I know it's wrong to be disgusted by this but I can't stop myself from being grossed out.

You had a boner, didn't you OP?

>I legit understand what causes homophobia now. I know it's wrong to be disgusted by this but I can't stop myself from being grossed out.

You finding the way someone has sex to be gross doesn't exactly justify treating them like shit.

No, did you?

>spotted the fag

I know, gay sex isn't inherently immoral and nobody should be punished for it but now I understand where older and more conservative people are coming from when they say that it's unnatural.
That user's not wrong about not treating people like shit because of their sexual orientation though.

>gay sex isn't inherently immoral
based on what standard?

I don't know, maybe by the fact that there's nothing harmful about two consenting adults choosing to have sex with each other regardless of their gender.

You realize that conservatives don't hate gays because they watched gay porn, right?

so incest is not immoral?

I watched this scene because Sup Forums kept bitching about it and it was honestly just kinda silly. Not to mention that it's a really poor representation of gay sex. What the fuck was the bottom even doing? That ain't how it works

Honestly, incest isn't really a problem unless the incestuous couple starts reproducing.

and even then, only close family ties. Cousins are usually fine, and second cousins might as well be not family at all in the sense of reproducing.

>But holy shit that scene was probably one of the most disgusting things I've seen right next to the gay sex and orgy from Sense8. I've seen rape scenes, characters gets heavily mutilated, children getting killed on screen but none of that bugged me as much as that gay scene in American Gods.
I didn't particularly care for it but what about it did you find particularly more disgusting than literal rape/character mutilation/child death?

very well, I take note that for you there is nothing wrong in mom/son dad/daughter incest as long as they use condoms
I have nothing to add, be proud of yourself
bye

Homosexuality is an immutable orientation, whereas incest is not.

kek and liberals are surprised when conservatives consider them degenerate beasts

>I consider myself to be a progressive and to be pro-gay rights
>Honestly, incest isn't really a problem unless the incestuous couple starts reproducing.
2017 ladies and gentlemen

>muh moral panic

Nigga, why do you care? Do you suck cock yourself so you're afraid it misrepresented you or something? People can do whatever the fuck they want as long as they don't harm anyone else.

>thinking progressive means you should be pro-gay

the slippery slope is real

especially when they're volunteering to remove themselves from the gene-pool, they should be considered heroes.

Lel who would have thought the slippery slope argument wasnt a crock of shit

>Honestly, incest isn't really a problem unless the incestuous couple starts reproducing.
you mom must be proud of you, so progressive!

Can you explain why incest is wrong outside of obvious stuff like rape and sexual grooming?

I have nothing against gays and fully support gay rights and all that. But its just sort of an intrinsic reaction for me when seeing explicit gay shit, it just grosses me out. I just don't want to see it, they can buttfuck each other as much as they like in private.

Dude chill, I doubt incest will ever be accepted, plus it's rare. The average joe or jane isn't attracted to their sibling. Plus if you ever met an incestuous couple. What are you going to do? Are you going to interrupt them during sex.

>one explicit hetero sex scene
>one explicit fag sex scene
Now I wonder if we will get explicit lesbian sex scene, or they are only progressive when they should bandering landwhales who masturbate for BL shit.

>Honestly, incest isn't really a problem unless the incestuous couple starts reproducing.
Liberals. This is what they consider progress.

>What the fuck was the bottom even doing? That ain't how it works
How it works?

>liberal progress

That's BS made up by the gay lobby. It's a spectrum that is reinforced by choices people make. Every gay guy I know has had sex with at least one woman.

How gross is it? I'm only up to episode 2, and I was already shocked to see an erect penis.

So if gay is a choice then they're not a protected class and nobody is born gay.

I'll tell you what she really is proud of ;)

The way the bottom was arching his back in that scene would make it incredibly difficult for the top to penetrate him not to mention be very painful for the bottom. It's not really an accurate portrayal of gay sex. Not to mention the terrible blowjob the bottom gives.

It's mostly gross because there's a hairy guy in it. You see their dicks a bit (but nothing stimulating the dicks during the shot).

The most graphic bit is you see CGI fire that's supposed to represent the jinns cum going inside the Twinks body. But the that entire bit is cgi anyways. Don't watch it with your family and you'll be fine unless you're super uncomfortable with homosexuality. Personally I just had it playing on one monitor while browsing Sup Forums on my second monitor.

p.s. it's about a 1-2 minute long scene.

AY YO, YA'LL NIGGA GOTTA KEEL DEM WHITE BOYS!
*Bryan Fuller jerks himself off over what a profound statement he's making*

>Honestly, incest isn't really a problem unless the incestuous couple starts reproducing.
why liberals want to destroy our civilization so much?

At least it was in the books. Unlike extended and meaningless Bilquis scenes and fucking homicidal Anansi.

That's what i thought too. you can't lift your ass and not clench at the same time.

There is no valid moral argument against incest between two consenting adults, assuming that no one else is harmed as a result, e.g. mutant offspring.

That said, it's a little harder to swallow, because as implies, if a gay person isn't allowed to be gay because someone else isn't cool with it, then they're denied any love/sex life at all. If a guy isn't allowed to fuck his sister because someone isn't cool with it, well he's got literally billions of other women out there he could fuck instead. So it's a little harder to argue in favor of incest.

But as a liberal, I don't think anyone, especially the government should be able to tell two consenting adults they can't do what they want, whether they're related or the same sex or whatever. You would think conservatives in favor of small government would think the same, but alas, they're hypocrites.

Can they fucking hurry up then.

People are not supposed to feel sexual attraction to their close relatives. Incest is always a result of something being very fucked up in family, like physical or emotional abuse.

I was considering watching this show.

Not anymore.

In the end it was just a ruse to the stupid niggers so he can eat their souls.

If it was legal there'd be scores of mutant offspring.

ARE YOU A FUCKING BIGOT? IT'S 2017

It would look pretty weird even if it was a heterosexual couple. I really don't know why they filmed it that way.

So would you argue those "pray the gay away" camps should theoretically work? Because it's been shown over and over that they don't.

the sexual revolution went so wrong

>because there's a hairy guy in it
oh no, not hairy guy in it. someone write a angry letter.

Not the guy you're responding to but there's a difference between understanding that there's no moral argument against consensual incest among adults that makes sure a pregnancy never occurs and saying that it should be legal. One is a matter of ethics the other is a matter of pragmatism.

Any sexual relationship that involves abuse is wrong. Remove that from the equation and there is nothing morally wrong with incest.

Someone link the scene I want to see how bad it is

Seriously, they can't show me any explicit gay sex which would make me more mad than the Anansi scene did.
He was the best character in the book, and here they just transformed him into a psycho who orders his followers to do jihad in the name of BLM.

Genuine champions such as Germaine Greer fought for what eventually became this

...

I mean that's pretty much my reaction to this whole thing. The scene has a couple of dicks. I've seen more dicks on Sup Forums in the past hour than I did in the show for that hour.

I liked the scene by itself for precisely that reason. A jive-talkin' nigga getting slaves to an hero in the name of #BLM. But then in the behind the scenes clip at the end, Bryan Fuller starts going on about "It's such a powerful scene. We're talking about things that need to be talked out." I need to stop watching those.

I've read both American gods and Anansi Boys recently, and boy did they butcher his character all right. He's not cruel or angry. He doesn't need bloody sacrifices.

>there is nothing morally wrong with incest.
>liberals will become parents one day
>this is what they are going to teach to their sons

Anansi did nothing. There's nothing wrong about slaves killing their masters. Get over it. It's like complaining about a jew killing a Nazi.

The moral argument would be that the two people are wasting their time and should get to making actual children with healthy partners.

please report any post against incest
keep Sup Forums in fucking Sup Forums

>Point out that sexually grooming children is morally wrong
>LIBERAL PARENTS ARE GOING TO FUCK THEIR KIDS!!!

Fucking read my posts my man.

Nothing wrong with the scene until you realize that Bryan Fuller thinks the "message" of it somehow applies to real life today.

With that logic any sexually active couple who aren't trying to procreate are morally in the wrong

>something is moral as long it doesn't hurt anyone
of course fetuses are not "anyone", they are just pieces of shit, not beings

>LIBERAL PARENTS ARE GOING TO FUCK THEIR KIDS!!!
where did I say that, my cuck?
I wrote that you are going to teach to your children that incest is not wrong

>The moral argument would be that the two people are wasting their time

Is there a moral argument against me shitposting on Sup Forums at 3:30 in the morning?

There is two problem with it.
1. in the book he saved two children instead of sending his men to death
2. he is a trickster god whose legends are pass as bedtime stories for children, not a psycho who murders people
The creators of the show raped both his book and irl counterpart just to pass a forced BLM bullshit.

why haven't you just saved the webm by this point literal faggot?

If anything it's morally righteous since it means you aren't out spreading your obviously inferior genes.

liberals are a cancer for society

Yep. That's why we shame bachelors and women that never marry.

Yes. You will die eventually and let down everyone before you that did bother to reproduce. jerk, they sacrificed for you.

So what's the moral problem if a Sup Forums lurker banged their 4/10 shut in sister if they're both adults?

Watch Querelle bro

>Rich White guy alters an authentic african god to force his sjw message
>there is nothing wrong with it
Well except showing a widely liked african god beloved by both blacks and whites for his cautionary tales as a white-hating jihadist.

What if they're part of an open relationship while married to other people and they have kids with other people?

Then what's the problem?

>tfw I don't care about social rights and this shit
>tfw I pretend to be super progressive and liberal just because women like that and I hope I can taste some pussy for once in my life
this thread gave me new ideas, I'll start defending incest to prove how progressive I am

I know you're kidding, but the idea that liberals are a-ok with incest is Sup Forums being irrational. Most people are instinctually grossed out by it.

The whole incest thing is more of a matter of lacking a good philosophical argument against incest. Nobody is saying it'd be desirable to make it legal.

>You finding the way someone has sex to be gross doesn't exactly justify treating them like shit.

Yeah but fuck necrophilia and zoophilia right?

>I know you're kidding
I'm not
here (germany) 99% of women are ultra liberal, and the 1% sane in mind is already taken
pic related
I hate this country

Zoophilia is obviously harmful to the animal though.

Thanks for the warning OP, was gonna try this out. Fuck this garbage, isnt it written by a chick? Why the fuck would have have a gay sex scene like that. Not even six feet under did that shit .

necrophilia doesn't harm anyone
nor does zoophilia unless there is human male/female animal penetration

>Zoophilia is obviously harmful to the animal though.

The book it's based on is written by a dude, Neil Gaimen.

lol no?
how would oral sex harm an animal?
or letting a dog or hose fuck you

Wait incest is illegal in US? What the fuck kind of regressive country is that? You shouldn't have children, sure, but you can adopt. What's the problem here?

That's awesome but a full on gay sex scene is seriously unneccesary. Even normal ones break the flow of the show, but gay sex ones would be seriously disgusting to watch.

unfortunately America is hostage of christian bigots my dude

If the current legal definition of rape is sex without consent then yes, zoophilia is rape and thus morally wrong.

not that guy, but this is the first thread I've seen about this

Prove an animal can't consent to sex.
Because when a dog mounts and bangs a chick it seems like he's consenting

>Zoophilia is obviously harmful to the animal though.

You cant use that shit, we cut open their throats and bleed them out and then eat their muscles and brains. We also sometimes eat animals while they are still alive.

Also dogs hump people all the time, that's basically them saying "yes" right?

Also animals never get pleasure from sex, except dolphins. So they will always seem to be harmed, but that doesn't stop from breeding animals.

I just skipped around till the end of that unnecessary gay stuff. Why would I subject myself to watch this when I'm not attracted to it at all.

Because a dog lacks the IQ to understand the concept of consent and thus can't. That's like saying if a child said yes to sex that counts as consent when we know they lack the mental wherewithal to properly process what is going in.