I'm an Anarchist

I'm an Anarchist.

Ask me anything.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/ecHO1RwEdyQ?t=6m50s
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

no

How old are you? What does 'I'm an anarchist' entail? What's your educational level and your goals in life?

Be more specific.

An-cap?

Anarcho-Commie?

Or just complete anarchy.

Souldn't Anarcho-communism be an oxymoron?

Check these digits. OP is an edgelord faggot.

congrats, you are one phase away from becoming natsoc. Enjoy your temporary delusions.

You'd think so.

How old were you when you were diagnosed with a mental illness?

I'm 26, and I went to a tech school. There is a two party system that is incapable of making correct decisions. Nobody should be ruling over anybody. No hierarchy.

I don't know what Anarcho-Commie means.
It's like said.

Trump's one step away from being natsoc.

Trump wants to lend interest free money and set the nation's debt at 1 billion American notes?

>There is a two party system
There is a two party system in America, indeed. Is that a moral judgement? Would a three-party system be better? We have 7 parties in parliament.

>that is incapable of making correct decisions
What are the objectively correct decisions you want it to make?

>Nobody should be ruling over anybody.
Who is ruling over whom now?

...

What exactly are your political beliefs?
You're anarchist, but there are many different flavors.
Also posting the 2edgy4u symbol as the OP image isn't really helping your case.

Sup Forums is an 18+ board. You are violating the rules

When are you going to start a revolution?

...

7 is not enough, there needs to be a voice from every person, which is called general assembly.

Nobody should be making decisions for anyone else. If I want to fucking do something, I shouldn't have to go to somebody to do it.

The system in place is what's ruling us right now.

The problem with that pic is that the other person would have a gun.

People would just build roads by themselves.

You have to do it in your everyday life, create anarchy.

proof it fagit

Barter system is a start, you can have a money system as long as its agreed upon.

The anarchy symbol was posted by my friend. I would prefer the fist instead.

What are your specific anarchist beliefs? Post-left? Ontological anarchism?

How do you respond to criticisms of lifestylism

The things is, that in reality, people want to be left alone. We aren't really interested in going to general assemblies with every random person of various economic, political, ethnic background.
It work nice in theory though.
And also don't think that someone wouldn't try to take over the general assembly too.

>People would just build roads by themselves.
>just build roads
I will take "not knowing what public goods are" by 500, Alex.

Primitive Anarchy is what I am leaning towards.

People can do whatever the fuck they want, as long as they don't make one person part of it who doesn't want to be a part of it.

Checked. Can you give an example of who is oppressing you and makes you do things you don't want to do?

Can I have all your stuff?
Maybe use your shower, shit in your bed.

Property is theft after all, what's yours is mine.

This website is 18+

MODS

So when we're you diagnosed?

You don't need to have a fuckin' government for roads. If two communities wanted to build a road between each other, what's stopping them if they have enough resources?

Its not things making you do things you don't want to do, its things preventing you from doing things you want to do.

Who will stop them?

>implying I care about what you have to say

So a primmie?

How exactly do you reconcile that with this statement:

>People can do whatever the fuck they want, as long as they don't make one person part of it who doesn't want to be a part of it.

How exactly is capitalism to be abolished as a mode of production and a material regression to primitive-communism feasible with your atomistic understanding of individual rights

Private property =/= personal property

fagit, do you play minecraft?

Are you Jewish?

youtu.be/ecHO1RwEdyQ?t=6m50s

You clearly don't understand how public goods work, burger. You also don't understand what's required to build your average modern road.

You'd have to get it through me, and my community, first.

The community of people that knows of such actions.

what's it like to still be an edgy teen
also are you a member of antifa

>also are you a member of antifa

i am :3

Have you ever heard the word "ought"?

Do you understand the concept self sacrifice?

The right deals in authority, it's that which you give yourself to willingly. You do your duty for your nation because you are personally compelled to.

The left deals in control, it is that which bends you too its will. You do what is told of you because you will be punished if not.

The only difference between which system is needed is the demeanour and beliefs of the nation.

You see yourself as an individual, with individual rights, so you must be forced to sacrifice for the greater good.

We see ourselves as part of a greater machine so we feel it is our duty to sacrifice ourselves for the greater good.

listen here australia

What do you think about Capitalism and An-cap?
What do you think about National Socialism?

Bullshit

What's your problem with Fascism? How have Fascists hurt you in your life so that you're eager to seek physical confrontation with them?

>tl;dr you're brainwashed

for real tho

im just over from /leftypol/ famillia

Where is your handler and why have they allowed you to use the computer unsupervised?

No.

>also are you a member of antifa
No.

We probably wouldn't have nice roads, they'd probably be dirt.

Yeah it does

My problem with fascism?

Aside from the entire philosophy; they are competition.

reported!

>Aside from the entire philosophy; they are competition.
Do you think Nazi Germany was fasict state?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.

How was fourth grade?

>We probably wouldn't have nice roads, they'd probably be dirt.
If only there were some system in which people were motivated to produce quality services to meet the demand of those in need of said services.

Who gets to control the nuclear weapons and manage infectious disease control in your ideal world?

How's 8th grade?

Examples of personal property: Your personal items, your house, your car, your computer, things you use for work

Examples of private property: Property you lend out to others, Stocks, Investments, Copyrights, Intellectual property, Ownership of natural resources etc

Do you understand that hierarchies are natural, equality doesn't exist and that some people are inherently selfish and evil?

whats it like being mentally retarded?

The problem with capitalism is that there is no ceiling. An-cap is alright.

As for NatSoc, no one nation is better than another so what's so great about it?

>I'm an Anarchist
> Nobody should be ruling over anybody. No hierarchy.

More like socialist amirite guys

/thread

What happens to nuclear weapons once anarchy takes over?

What happens to international relations?

Where does the guarantee of rule of law come from?

Are you retarded?

I believe fascism is more broad than the specific conception present in Italy if thats what your asking.

There would be. It's not motivated, people will do what they're skilled at. So you go get the person and they'll do it.

Nukes would be in the control of the general assembly.

To be frank, there is no guarantee of rule of law now either. You are relying on the State to enforce it, and you're giving up a whole lot of rights for this to happen.

Is Folk Punk your favorite music genre? If so, Pat the Bunny stopped being an anarchist years ago, so you can stop pretending now.

>Nukes would be in the control of the general assembly.
That's a hierarchy you retard.

Yes. Natural hierarchies would be acceptable, but created hierarchies would be unacceptable, unless it is agreed upon.

Do you understand the entomology of the word anarchy? an- without archy- hierarchy.

>hierarchies would be unacceptable, unless it is agreed upon.
You just explained Democracy dumbass

There will be no law.
The world would become a melting pot where people could be free to travel anywhere.

Never heard of it.

Anarcho-primitivism is a nice idea and all, but it's completely unrealistic. You need force to realise it. You can't just expect people to rewild of their own freewill, so you at first need force (an act of terrorism or an apocalyptic scenario or governmental force) and then what happens after? You will need to continue applying force if you want to maintain such a society or else tech/industrial progress will only happen again. Which is somehow destructive.

Anarcho-capitalism gets laughed at by the majority of people who call themselves "anarchists" (why I call myself a voluntarist most of the time), but despite not being what is traditionally thought of as anarchism, it's the only form of anarchism that you could conceivably arrive at without the use of force and the only one that could be maintained without an organising force (which would essentially just become government).

Everything else is a pipe dream. But, to be honest, you don't sound like someone who's given it much thought.

>A community
>Anarchism
Pick one.
Also, which believes liberatarians have do you distance yourself from? I understand liberatarians, but i believe we need at least some Basic form of government, or everybody would fuck everybody up.
For example: you said everybody should be able to do things as long as they dont make people who dont want it a part of it. What if that is what I want to do? What if for example want to drink and drive? Then people would say that i'm making them a part of my dangerous behavoir, but since there is no government and therefor no police force who is going to stop me?

...

If you think capitalism has no ceiling than how is An-cap alright. Its worse.

>no one nation is better than another so what's so great about it?

That is just not true.
And do you what Hitler did was wrong or he was protecting hes people?

How do you stay regular?
Do you have a stable income?
Are you content with your current situation?

If you aren't a drug addict, murderer, rapist, radical, self destructive, mentally unstable psycho,

NEWS FLASH

You're not an anarchist

>entomology
What's the study of insects have to do with this retard

How much of the system have you smashed?

>hierarchies would be unacceptable, unless it is agreed upon.
You just explained Democracy dumbass

Learn to speak actual English before opening your aussie mouth.

So lets re-cap.

You want to be able to own property and have a community of people to protect it forcibly for you.

You also want that community to be able to stop people from doing things you disagree with.

You understand the concepts of authority and duty, you understand that the needs of a nation take priority over the needs of the individual.

You accept that hierarchies are natural.

Stop playing yourself faggot.

One person leading another person is considered a natural hierarchy and leading happens.

Does it bother you that antifa are basically just thugs who only "accomplish" anything by breaking other people's property and abusing innocent bystanders to their demonstrations?

Very simple. Someone who lives in one of the communities says he doesn't care about a road, and therefore claims he shouldn't have to contribute any work or resources to it. He says he will use the road if it's there, but otherwise he's fine walking through the field or whatever. He is indifferent.

Of course, you don't actually know if he's telling the truth. Maybe he really doesn't care about the road. Or maybe he does want the road and is just lying so he doesn't have to contribute.

What do you do?

>Being this stupid

don't talk to me or my spellcheck ever again

No. Anarchism is the end goal of communism. Most an-coms hate the "socialist states" of the 20th century.

How long have you been on welfare?

By that point, though, the left had already stole Liberal from the right. Classical Liberals are essentially just minarchist Libertarians. And they'd have continued calling themselves Liberals if it hadn't been sullied.

You can't make private ownership illegal without a state

This is bait or retardation

Neato. I bet "general assembly" also takes care of heart transplants, civil disputes, meat and poultry inspections, scientific innovation, waste disposal. Wow! Why didn't we think to "general assembly" before? #iamnowageneralassemblymissile

Not particularly.

"Innocent bystander" is also a funny name for fascist ideologues.

So what if out of the 1.000.000 people in the G.A. 1 person disagrees? Does it have to be a unanimous agreement? If not, explain how this is any different than a direct democracy.

You can have capital without capitalism.

If somebody didn't like the fact that you did it, you'd have to fight for the right to keep doing it e.g. him harassing you everyday. If you're drinking and driving, presumably you'd die if you killed the harasser.

No law? So what prevents you from getting robbed or killed by random other people who don't have to adhere to civil law?

What prevents your group of people from getting slaughtered by a rival paramilitary group which doesn't have to respect international law / human rights?

>You can have capital without capitalism.
Nice citations dude

What do you do when someone who has a bigger gang than you wants to rob your house and rape your girlfriend in front of you?