TODAY ON VERSUS

North Korea vs. South Korea

Which would win?

Rules:

1. No foreign aid on either side to include military

2. No nuclear weapons

3. Law of War is not an issue

South Korea.

>North Korean Military

Fact: The more north you go the better the country actually is.

See Japan, China, Russia, Germany, USA, England (Scotland not included), Argentinia, Australia and New Zealand.

>north Australia
>good

if you like Abos and petrol sniffing

NK would win. Their military is HUEG, they seriously have more active personnel than the US

I spend half a year in Townsville and half a year in Melbourne.

And I would gladly sniff petrol all day until I forget those 6 months of Melbourne.

>No foreign aid
Does this include assets other than soldiers? If so, easy win for SK. Fatty might be able to march his army on an empty stomach by distributing Methamphetamine to his soldiers but it is no miracle drug. What goes up must come down. Millions would die no matter what given NK would probably fire artillery into civilian populations of SK as their first move. SK "loses" long term because adapting and retraining NK civilians would be expensive.

North Korea would win, they basicly invest every bit of the little money that they have into the military.

logistics win wars
nk can't even feed their population without a war

yeah, and they've got about 10 fifty year old rifles between them

They have over 5000 Tanks and Armored vehicles compared to SK's around 3500.

Seoul would be burning rubble in like 45 minutes.
North would win with that single act alone.

Unless SK relocates their entire population out of range of NK artillery.

You've never been to New Zealand, were you?

North -> brown scum and chinks
South -> based kiwi bros

South Korea basically has no army, they just assume 'Murica would bail them out if the commies cross the DMZ.
So the "No foreign aid" rule basically hands it to the Cheesemaster

South Korea.

North Korea (and their military) is forever stuck in the 1950s. It's actually pretty fascinating.

Either way, SK could destroy NK with little to no effort.

>TOWNSVILLE
fuck it that's good enough cunt, I'M going to the pub

Norty korea best korea ezpz

North Korea

With no support, the DPRK. They are actually well armed. People who say they arnt are just making shit up. If they were so shit, the US would have gotten rid of them years ago. Thats why SK goes into panic training mode whenever they piss them off and come crying to the US to run drills.

Better then fucking
>Waggawagga

/thread

North koreans have more manpower (?) but they use russian cold war equippment.

No air power and you can effectively half the numbers of available assets due to poor maintenance and training.

>Fact: The more north you go the better the country actually is.

Do not see: Scotland. Ireland, Vietnam, China, Mexico, countless other shitholes

South Korean kpop boipucci will distract the Norks long enough for a planned counter attack.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

The US cannot get rid of them because doing so would mean war with China. Since you are too fucking dumb to actually learn about global politics, how about you take a look at the 1961 treaty between China and North Korea wherein both nations are required to come to the aid of one another in the event of a military attack.

But that does NOT EVEN FUCKING MATTER YOU GOD DAMN MORON. Because China would never allow the US or any force friendly to it to occupy North Korea. North Korea is a buffer region between China and the US.

A contributor (but not cause) of the divide between NK and SK is that China will never allow union unless NK is in charge because it needs a buffer zone. US will never allow union unless SK is in charge because it wants basing rights and power projection.

You guys are so dumb. It's like going to a board called /math/ where no one knows basic addition or subtraction but tries to write proofs.

>China
>better in the north

What son?

The South Korean population is not as rugged and determined as the Norks.

It will be a time based war, if Norks dont get Seoul lit on fire fast enough the South will win.

Long term battle favors the south. Short intense conflict favors the North

this burger is right

South Korea would win the battle, North Korea would win the war.

How? North Korea would have 35 million "refugees" on the South tit, overwhelming it.

The South doesn't want reunification for a reason.

underfunded, tiny shitholes don't automatically win because they are small and the underdog.

One day, for example, there won't be an Israel.

> 1. No foreign aid
NK would win. SK has been on welfare for decades.

Nort Korea will win

sk wouldnt get btfo

>SK, the worlds 11th military power will lose to the north, an impoverished country with antiquated equipment, who just barely makes it into the top 25
Really now

I never heard about SK army. Aren't they an American protectorate or something?

They are yes, but they also have their own military, they arent banned from army shit like the Japanese.
Plus mandatory military service for all males.

Mongolia you mongoloid

Topkek

>Mongolia
>nice
Fuck off Finnig

North Korea would get fucking massacred

90% of their stuff is from no later than the late 50's to mid 60's with maybe some 70's "high tech" sprinkled in there, nothing newer than the mid 80s

they have no modern armor at all, no air force worth a damn, they still use things literally from WW2. literally they have going for them is huge amounts of artillery and dumbfire rockets

it would be fucking amazing to see that shit desu, they'd get BTFO'd SO HARD it'd be a great sacrifice to Kek

Don't underestimate south koreans. In vietnam some of the units the viet-cong/NV army feared most were the koreans that came over to help us out. They've got much better tech nowadays from us than WW2 junk Kim Jong's got.

Wouldn't whoever attack first win?

NK can zerg rush to Seoul, SK has better everything.

Japan would never stay quiet anyways, they don't want an Unified Korea, right?

>japan

>militarily relevant

4th largest army in the world, despite their constitution

Aren't they thinking about changing that non-army article? And they got an extremely strong navy IIRC.

>what are Busan, incheon, dague

Without foreign interference, North Korea would win.

>B-but South Korea have more nice things, future battle tanks and what not

So the Saudis and they are losing their M1 Abrahms against barefoot yemeni soldiers armed with AKs, RPGs and Kornets.

>B-but the north can even feed themselves
Yeah no, it is not the 90s anymore
Also, again, look at Saudi Arabia, they are well feed and armed and yet they are losing to one of the poorest nation in the world.
South Koreans are pretty much westernized kids who sit in their asses and play videogames all day while the North Koreans train and train and train and dream about a war with the south.
The entire nation of North Korea is teached since kids to handle weapons and to hate the south meanwhile south koreans are more interested in build fancy things and play LoL/Starcraft.

The only reason the South still exists is the US.

Who ever strikes first. A first strike by the South would dismantle the North's Air and artillery capabilities, while a North first strike would shell the shit out of Seoul and demoralized the South.

>Northern Canada
>Frozen wasteland for 8 months of the year

Thats complete bullshit

>North Korea, Best Korea
Let's meme it to real

This "intervention" lead by the saudi's is going to be just like the vietnam war and the Soviet-Afghan war. The foreign aid will back out when they lose to many planes and shit then saudi's won't have the will to fight.