Soon

Your days are numbered, muslim invaders.
U P F

Other urls found in this thread:

wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Constitution_of_the_Black_Hand
discord.gg/XNdgt
discord.gg/9MXqP
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Dont think jesus is gonna put up with your shit if youre just signing up to kill muslim invaders

I personally would like this to happen as peacefully as possible. Not a single bullet has to be fired, we want mass deportations.

WORKING DRAFT
A CHARTER FOR AN UNNAMED ORGANIZATION

Recognizing that Islam, as a phenomena, is not monolithic and includes many traditions some of which are in contradiction with one another we [UNNAMED] define the following terms:

(1) Koranist Islam: the set of sentences contained in the Koran

(2) Hadithist Islam: Koranist Islam plus a set of sentences contained in a Hadith collection

(3) Islamic law (Sharia): this set of the Shariah which would be considered as a body of law if it was applied in a western nation

(4) Political Islam: Koranist Islam plus Hadithist Islam plus Islamic law

(5) Muslim: an individual having sincerely pronounced the Shahada

(6) Islamic supremacism, Islam: synonymous with Political Islam

(7) Islamic community (Ummah): the set of Muslims (as per (5))

(8) Islamic sect: a particular doctrine or philosophy inspired by Islam

(9) Mass of an Islamic sect: its number of adherent

(10) Dhimmis: non-muslims apologists to Islam

(11) Mushrikun: westernized Muslims

Since it is our sincere belief that "Islam", as understood by a majority of Muslims and Islamic authorities (Sheik, Mufti, Ayatollah, Imam, etc.), is an inherently political phenomena, we will consider "Islam", "Islamic supremacism"' and "political Islam" to be synonymous. Some use the term "Islamism".

Furthermore, we recognize that the terms defined above are at best approximations. We do not claim the list to be an exhaustive representation of all relevant terms.

We furthermore define:

(12) Islamophobe: a non Muslim who believes that either Islam or part of Islam to be either deleterious or inferior to a competing ideological system

(13) Xenophobia: the rejection or dislike of that which is perceived to be foreign

(14) Xenophilia: the adoption or appreciation of that which is perceived to be foreign

As stated, we need a Guard unit.

Strictly for protection of Christians against those who seek to harm them.

The Order of St. Michael has a nice ring to it.

>The Order of St. Michael
Noice name

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE]

2. FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM

We [UNNAMED] recognize the following state of affair to be our "raison d'être":

(1) There exists a body of law called the Sharia. The Sharia is the divine law of Islam. The existence of such a body of law cannot be disputed.

(2) Laws are destined to be employed by a government.

(3) Therefore, Islam, as a doctrine, presupposes the existence of a government designed to apply its laws.

(4) A government applying laws believed to be of divine origins is a theocracy.

(5) Therefore, Islam is a theocracy.

(6) If an individual believe in the validity of the concept of Islamic law, then he must necessarily believe these to be, in principle, preferable to any alternative system of governance on earth, no matter the kind. Indeed, if Islamic law is to be considered the expression of the divine will here on earth, then one cannot place any other system of law above it, for then he would have committed an act of blasphemy or, in Islam, "shirk", by placing himself above God in judgement.

(7) Therefore every person who believe in Islamic law in a state which does not apply it is a seditious traitor.

This later point is [UNNAMED]'s "raison d'être". The fundamental problem of Islam is its inclusion of a body of law as a part of its religion.

No mention is here made of either terrorism or of religious violence. This omission is deliberate. This phenomena are, all things considered, somewhat marginal and must be interpreted in the context of political Islam. The use of force is only one of its component.

I think it's bad to make anything overtly Christian.

For one, I'm not Christian and many others aren't. Second: don't under estimate the potential for an internationalization effect of an anti-Islam movement. Muslims are everywhere and everywhere they are a burden.

Despite fitting a range of desirable criteria; St. Michael is protector of the Jewish people.

There is an organisation dedicated to St Michael that is preparing for conflict. These men are training in Sydney. Most of them are bikers who happen to be Christians, they're taking new recruits out to the bush and teaching them how to use rifles and pistols along with hand to hand combat in their boxing/kick boxing gym. They've vowed to support law enforcement and protect the innocent when the time comes.

Our emblem is a cross and shield. I don't think we can get more overtly Christian than that.

I am getting ahead of myself though, you're right.

First, we must identify what our group stands for and what type of message we want to send to others.

I noticed your Charter, nice work mate.

>For one, I'm not Christian and many others aren't.
Even if you're an Atheist you must realize that Christianity, like old times, is just what the world needs right now.

Sadly that will never happen because the Pope is a cuck.

St. Michael is Prince of the Heavenly Host, second in command to Himself.

I don't see other options. "Archangels" sounds really edgy like we're in middle school.

Home Guard, is sweet and simple.

Even just The Order.

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE]

3. VALUES
3.1 NON VIOLENCE

[ORGANIZATION] preemptively condemns any and all acts of violence carried out in its name or in relation to it.

We formally reject all forms of violence as a mode of action and dedicate ourselves to the fulfillment of our objectives through pacific means.

3.2 Individualism

[ORGANIZATION] believe each individual to be the legitimate owner of its body and, as such, to have rights inherent to said ownership, namely:

(1) freedom of conscience

(2) freedom of speech

(3) freedom to peaceful assembly

(4) the equality of rights between all individuals belonging to the same polity

These are all logical consequences of the fact that people have a right to dispose of their own property as they see fit in so far as they do not affect the property of others without their consent.

We do not considers feelings or beliefs to be property.

KJV
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

I would value an umbrella organization where everyone non muslim (kufr) could be included with the possibility of forming sub-group with special emphasis on choosing particular identities.

Christians are welcome to use a cross and a shield if they wish, but it would have to be subservient to the larger organization.

High quality version.

Thanks to our German friend who made it in the last thread.

Atheist, can I join?

Perhaps one of our best options is decentralization. That is, to have multiple movements working in unison that can accomodate all differences among the greater community of people fighting against islam.

For one, we should have at least 1 movement that is strictly Christian, and it can organise itself accordingly.

For everyone else, there can be various movements based on secularism, and/or a plethora of different political ideologies.

My reasoning here is that it is better to have 10 united men on hand, than to have 100 dis-united folks. These movements can then work freely within their own principles, and work together as allies.

This makes sense.

I spoke earlier about chapters of UFP, but perhaps we can multiple heads instead of one. Sub-groups with different goals, but all fall under the umbrella of the main goals of UFP.

Why "progressive"?

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE AS OF 26-07-2016]

3.3 ISLAMOPHOBIA

[TODO: but as per definition (12). We need to appropriate the term. Term appropriation and inversion of values are always good strategy.]

[3.4 APOLITICISM]

[[ORGANIZATION] does not officially support any particular policy, be it foreign or domestic, nor any political organizations, though its member may.]

4. OBJECTIVES

4.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

A ideological movement is only socially significant in so far as it has a certain mass (def. 9). [ORGANIZATION] thus considers its prime objective to be, through pacific means, the elimination of any supremacist Islamic sect's mass.

This objective is considered valid and operative regardless of the place or the extend of the territory under consideration. [ie. The objective is valid no matter how you cut up any territory. It's valid for the US as a whole and for any state in particular or even for a town or the whole of the earth.]

4.2 SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

The reduction of the rate of growth of Islamic supremacist sects is a necessary condition to the fulfillment of the primary objective. This is the secondary objective, from which it follow that all acts of conversion to Islam is a defeat, all act of apostasy a victory.

Note: There is, in the objectives mentioned above, a deliberate conflation between the abandonment of Islamic supremacism and the renunciation of the Shahada proper. This is because Koranist Islam is a necessary condition to Hadithist Islam which is a necessary condition for Islamic law. Therefore, the destruction of Koranist Islam entails the destruction of Islamic law, even though the converse is not true. There is therefore no reason for us to limit our action to an attack on Islamic law as a concept. Since the Koran serves as a foundation for the Islamic supremacist enterprise, its loss of credibility would necessarily entail the fulfillment of the primary objective. There is thus no reason to limit our attack.

Atheist also, I'd really enjoy beheading a mudslime and taking a shit down it's neck

You're right but in order to have decentralization you have to have a kind of framework where different sub organization can pledge allegiance to a fairly broad declaration of principles and then work, in their own way, toward the fulfillment of our objectives.

That was unclear to me as well.

Progressive is because we need to establish public support, and we can't do that if our name is "Race War Now"

highlighted it very well.

Aside from mission statements and charters. What are the organisational intentions of this group? How will it be structured? How will it be funded? I guess it's transnational?

(Dw, open-ended questions, so expecting non-specific answers)

that simbol is the same for everyone or it can be customize per nation
>I did Hungary

What if we had a sub-organization per country? Like a UPF France or UPF Germany?

(IIRC Al Qaeda do that but it's not a bad idea)

Look at the logo. It's a Christian cross. So no.

Plus, this is partially your fault. Liberal laicism and religious ambiguity got Europe into this shit. Kebab would've never happened in a Christian Europe.

So convert or GTFO.

how do you join this LARP

Yes, as long as it is workable and doesn't tie any 1 group to principle it doesn't follow.

The main goal of all organizations being 'the neutralization of islam', and the framework being the strategic co-operation of the organisations, through regular meetings, war-councils, sharing of intel, etc.

In the end, I don't think it matters if 1 group is conservative catholic, and 1 is secular anarcho-socialist, as long as they have a mutual respect for the role of the other in the greater fight, and a willingness to cooperate where necessary.

Damn, that's beautiful

The flames are burning out of control. Let them consume the filth and purge the planet. May the left rot like carrion on a hot road.

If we try to step into any sort of political arena with our main goal being the neutralization of muslims, we will be demonized immediately and this won't ever have a chance of taking off.

Subtlety is our advantage right now. Violence isn't what we need right now. That comes later.

We must first establish as a movement that seeks to protect the individuals who have been targeted by these vicious attacks and to provide a safe haven for Western culture and society and its people.

Nah mate, it's actually catholic cucks. I get that 70% of atheists are cucks but so are catholics.

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE AS OF 26-07-2016]

(cont. of the note) This is what distinguishes [ORGANIZATION] from reformist movements. The later seek to increase the mass of the Koranist sect of Islam, while we do not care to protect any variation on the

5. METHODOLOGY

5.1 DESCRIPTIVISM [as opposed to "essentialism"]

Recognizing that the Islamic community is not monolithic, [ORGANIZATION] rejects the notion of an "authentic" Islam and any approach based off such a concept. What "authentic Islam" truly is is completely irrelevant to us.

Rather, we adopt what we call a descriptivist approach, which seeks to recognize the various forms Islam can take.

When considering a particular instance of Islam -- what has been termed an Islamic sect -- the question of its "authenticity" will never be considered. We will only care to correctly characterize it (describe it) as its followers characterize it and, if possible, quantify its mass.

5.2 TRANSPARENCY

Truth need not darkness to thrive, but it is the natural habitat of falsehood. Furthermore time and rational discourse favors truth and tends to eliminate error. Therefore, any individual or groups of individuals who believe to possess some truth ought to favor transparency over secrecy, since they do not need the later while the former is their natural ally.

Similarly, those who believe to do good do not need to hide behind closed doors, as the goodness of what they do ought not to be ground for shame.

Thus any organization which purport to do good and rely on truth yet insist on secrecy has already admitted, through actions if not words, that there is something defective about what they preach.

*triple cross on shield

Nah, I will use this one...

I am interested in joining. I'm ready for subversion, how can we more effectively communicate?

Discord, or an IRC channel is the only thing I can think of desu.

MY BROTHER!

Cara al sol con la camisa nueva!

That's the problem...

Brethren, for us to achieve perfect victory we must have knowledge. Knowledge of ourselves, knowledge of our purpose, knowledge of our enemy, and knowledge of the realities of warfare and power.

For this reason, I propose the following reading list:

The Bible
>This is entirely up to you, whether you are taking the holy fight or not.

The Qu'ran and the Hadiths
>Know thy enemy. This book will lay bare all the ground that the enemy stands on.

The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli
>One cannot ignore the reality of what it takes to gain and keep power.

The Art of War, by Sun Tsu
>THE book of warfare

The 48 Laws of Power, by Robert Greene
>The ultimate collection of principles by which true power can be obtained.

The 33 strategies of War, by Robert Greene
>As above, but more focused on warfare. Not just physical, but also personal and political.

The Art of Seduction, by Robert Greene
>The great manual of obtaining mental and emotional control of others.
>Not just personal seduction, but also of the seduction of nations and peoples.

>Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky
>The manual for anyone who wishes to challenge the status quo.
>Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton regard this book as their manual.

I should take The Constitution of the Ujedinjenje ili Smrt - Unification or Death, serbian terror group from early xxth century and modified it.

>wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Constitution_of_the_Black_Hand

The 5 rings by Musashi Miyamoto is a good read too.

This.

oh yes, forgot to add that one.

This is a line of dialogue from a parable (moral story), the speaker is an un-named king. It is also about something that happens after the second advent, not in between advents. Nice try, Molech

>still apologizing
>j-just another chance
Just forget about it right now.

Muslims in northern Colorado here threatening military families. I need a resistance cell over here too.

Okay, on the question of communication. Discord, it seems, is OK for now. I don't use it so I will put my username, others that are serious about this and want to talk more in depth please join me. This is how we make it real outside of Sup Forums. Also open to any communication suggestions other than Discord. I made a user just for you guys: caleamabob

>UFP
Atheism is cuckoldry itself.

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE AS OF 26-07-2016]

(cont.) [ORGANIZATION] is firmly committed to the idea that it seeks both truth and goodness, and therefore pledge to be as transparent as is humanly possible, and if truth and goodness be not enough to secure victory, if it is ever felt that lies and deceptions are necessary evils in the furtherance of our goals, then let us lose for we will have deserved it.

5.2.1 TRANSPARENCY IN CONTENT

"Never regard something as doing you good if it makes you betray a trust or lose your sense of shame or makes you show hatred, suspicion, ill-will or hypocrisy or a desire for things best done behind closed doors." Marcus-Aurelius

No document, no official communication, no plan, no point of doctrine, must be kept hidden from the public at large. We firmly believe that secrecy can only serve error and falsehood, and that openness and transparency are the best guarantors of the veracity and morality of our opinions and actions.

From this it follows that anything which may make us feel inclined to secrecy is to be regarded with suspicion, brought out before all members, analyzed and possibly rejected.

What causes doubt in ourselves must either be weakly understood by us, because we do not have good ground to believe in it, in which case we ought not to pretend to believe in it, or must be weak in and of itself, in which case it must be rejected.

Doubt is thus indicative of a problem relating to a certain position. We consider transparency to be the best remedy against the incorporation of weak positions within our organization.

Finally, there is no doubt that an organization such as ours would be under a great deal of scrutiny and that, therefore, there would be no hope of keeping a secret for very long and that any attempt to do so would only invite scandals.

Of course. I was speaking of the hypothetical organisation of our ranks.

We could always start a forum.

What is Discord?

The Rich man, in hell, lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

"And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

"But Abraham said, Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and you are tormented.

"And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed and you are on the wrong side," said Abraham

"Well at least I'm on the right side of HISTORY" said the rich man, and everyone in hell retweeted him.

I like the sound of this. We also need a way to communicate aside from posting somewhere, to organize and to discuss the more minute details

>an individual having sincerely pronounced the Shahada
Remove the "sincerely" part, since all Muslims are liars and will just cuck you and say "I didn't mean it, it wasn't sincere, look I eat pork kuf--".

What are you gonna do, shower them with love and tolerance until they stop?

It's only about the religion and culture, brother.

...

the more blood the better

Yes! What else? If you kill them, they win, don't you know?!

>Sadly that will never happen because the Pope is a cuck.
>What is the Orthodox Church?

bitch and complain about dead europeans on Sup Forums until they realize christianity was a joke all this time and proceeds to converting to islam.

Don't forget about the traitors, niggers and kikes..

They will all feel the wrath of the Aryan race

The Catholic Church has a dogma regarding proper retaliation and war for the sake of the safety and interests of the Church. In the case of Muslims, whom the Catholic Church has a long history against, finding precedent for these kinds of actions is the likely route. Given that the death of a priest and soon to be martyr has occurred at the hands of a Muslim organization, there is much that can be done, but that may be willfully ignored for the sake of other, more subversive plans. The Church is never "cucked" in the sense used today. Christ is the final redeemer, and from Him does Peter receive his authority.

Just go on a Mass Conversion spree. That's how you win.

It's an app, that also has a desktop version that allows you to communicate with other in a private channel.

discord.gg/XNdgt
discord.gg/XNdgt

I made a server for us.

...

shhh niggers don't know

>discord.gg/XNdgt

Thank you

Underrated

What is the meaning behind this, and why would you ever call yourselves "progressive"?

As some people mentioned in the other thread, for this to take off we need legitimacy. Some kind of foundation that draws other who are tired of these daily happenings.

A lot of "crusade" threads in the past have just been a bunch of anons saying they will pick up a gun and start shooting muslims. Absolutely nobody outside this board would take it seriously if that we say similar things. This idea might be a bit far fetched, but as these attacks get more common people will start to have enough.

beautiful

Sorry, link regenerated.

discord.gg/9MXqP
discord.gg/9MXqP
discord.gg/9MXqP

I don't remember Jesus being particularly veangeful.

DEUS VULT

You christcucks can act all militant and shit but we all know that you have played a major part in this mess.

If you actually take up arms against the scourge you have helped created we might spare you when it is over.

But be prepared to renounce your kike on a stick or face his same fate at the end of it.

Abrahamic religions must die

GTK
RWN

The purpose of this cross is to unite the three branches of Christianity. Assuming you're Christian, the centre one is the branch you identify with, while the smaller ones are the other two branches. For example, I'm Protestant, so the centre one for me represents Protestantism, and the left and right ones represent Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.

t. the guy who made it

Batman told me that if you kill your enemies they win

If you read what he's typing, he mentions non-muslim supporters in his list for identifying forms of Islam. Dhimmis he calls them, presumably that would include liberals/SJWs that cry #notallmuslims and subversives.

>Progressive is because we need to establish public support

2nd Law of Politics
Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.

See: Gamergate


Fair enough.

...

discord.gg/9MXqP

discord.gg/9MXqP

discord.gg/9MXqP

Get in here lads

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE AS OF 26-07-2016]

5.2.2 TRANSPARENCY OF LANGUAGE

Any individual or organization project in the world a certain perception which it is not a leisure to control. It is futile, through artful language or the use of euphemism, to attempt to counter them with what may be called "perception management". Any such attempt is immediately recognized for what it is: a manifestation of fear and the implicit recognition on the part of the person using such tactics that he should not be saying what he is saying. It is therefore better not to use them.

For instance, it is clear that an activist such as Ayan Irsi Ali, one of the so called reformist, does not in fact desire anything other than the complete elimination of Islam, which she would realize were she able to do it. Her reformists pretensions are thus perceived for what they probably are: an attempt to bring Islam to an intermediate stage the finality of which is the development of a type of hollow religiosity, of a purely symbolic character. No one is duped by her reformist label.

[ORGANIZATIONS] pledges to never have recourse to such tactics. Our language must always accurately reflect our true goals and intentions, and must not be used in order to manage the perception of others. We believe that the only way to truly change someone else's perception of ourselves is to first change who we are.

...

A gajillon hours in mspaint

Strayan version

It was (cultural) marxism that created this mess, which is a founded in atheist thinking.

Strayan version v2/shitpost version

Translation:
"Fuck off, We're full"

>fuck off we're full in Latin
Never change, Australia, never change.

[WORKING DRAFT: NOT DEFINITIVE AS OF 26-07-2016]

6. MEMBERSHIP AND SYMPATHIZERS

6.1 CONDITIONS

Is considered a member or a sympathizer any individual who adhere to the declaration of principles as presented in this charter and believing in its objectives.

6.2 DUTIES

The firsts duty of any member is to be educated in regard to Islam, on the arts of polemic and propaganda. The member must seek to be an agent of influence.

The second duty of any member is participation in the internal activity of the movement as defined by it. The member is involved vis-à-vis all other members.

The third duty of the member is to be active in his own community, to exercise his or her influence in furtherance of the [ORGANIZATION]'s goals.

7. STRUCTURE OF THE ORGANIZATION

[TODO. decentralized, regional, autonomous, robust, loosely coupled, open source]

8. PHASES

Phase 0

The current phase, which include the definition of the organization through the elaboration of its charter and structure. This phase consists in defining the movement's core, establish a curriculum for the formation of its members, the positing of its organizational principles, its fundamental values, etc.

Phase 1

From what as been established in phase 0, begin the acquisition of member and sympathizer among the demographic most likely to agree with our goals and principles. (ie. Little convincing work required.) Encourage participation in the organization itself, activate, mobilize, educate. Build the infrastructure necessary to the education of new members as well as their inclusions in the network.

Phase 2

After a local branch of the network has been established, after a sufficient mass has been acquired, begin influence operations. [Influence operation: to be defined]

italy

Oh the irony, refugees aern't invaders you idiot, your army on the other hand is. (invaded 9 countries since 2001)

You're next nigger, we're going to reclaim Rhodesia

...

Immigration is a deeper form of invasion than is a standing army. An army destroys the government. Immigration destroys the people.