Where does the theory that diversity is strength come from?

Is there any real evidence to support this?

youtube.com/watch?v=tceWlIkbTfo

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
youtube.com/watch?v=WsCSAEdxXMc
americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Unfortunately the answer is that it comes from a handful of Jewish scholars

Polish,Germans,French,American etc = Diverse and functioning add brown or black to the mix and it fails. Multiculturalism is fine until you put subhumans in it.

Every continent is already, by definition, multicultural, so this shit seriously doesn't have a leg to stand on.

/thread

From jews like Ludwik Zamenhof (guy who invented Esperanto language), basically people with no national identity wanting to create a global empire aka jews

>muh sickle cell anemia

Imagine a football team with only strikers or only goalies.
Imagine an economy with only carpenters and no other trades.
Imagine a couple with only men or only women.
Imagine a family only ever breeding with close relatives.
It doesn't work.

With that said, interpreting "diversity" on a "racial" level, therefore constituting that there's significant inherent differences between people primarily due to different racial traits is for all intensive purposes the definition of racism.

It comes from academics paid to shill for big business and mass immigration.

Incest is bad.
What's the opposite of incest?
Well if it's the opposite of bad then that thing must be good then!


I guess there is also the thing of national pride, "A" race is good at x but bad at y
"B" race is good at y but bad at x
put the two together and you get good at x & y

Diversity is only useful for corporate and decision making environments but people extrapolate that to entire societies.

In actuality, diversity is terrible. Putnam shows that racially diverse communities result in complete withdrawls by its members from civic life and interpersonal relationships even amongst their own race.

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/

>real evidence

Yeah, America in the 19th and early 20th century. But they didn't import folks for the sake of importing folks. You had to get your ass over here and make it happen on your own.

Well the most advanced societies all were homogeneous European nation states. Now multiculturalism is only destroying Europe and causing Europe problems so ethnic diversity is only a weakness

Jews.

...

/thread.

Imagine adding children to adults' football team for the sake of diversity.

Read History book

After Alexander died - Macedonia empire fall apart - because nobody want different culture

Mongol Empire collapse because rebellion of Han(chinese) Race

Ottoman Empire go to be disunited because Egyptian start rebellion

Austria-Hungary empire is fall apart- because Austrians build something and Slav gypsy ruin it consistently

Eastern Europe refuse Moscow regime and that disorganize Soviet Union

2016 ,black in Compton , Latino in East LA , Asians in West Covina

They hate each other

Latino and black don't bring technological innovation , they make america like Brazil 2.0

They were all assimilated into one single identity in the 19th century because the diversity was an issue.

Diversity is literally SHIT.

>Asians are literally yellow

racist much?

Imagine making blind people surgeons for the sake of diversity and integration.
Imagine a black person playing a storm trooper.
Imagina making a woman President of the United States of America for the sole reason of her being a women, despite her being otherwise completely unfit for the job.

From the fact that big cities such as NY, London, Berlin are powerhouses while a lot of cuckservative villages/states utterly useless.

Any other questions?

> Multiculturalism has been official policy in several Western nations since the 1970s, for reasons that varied from country to country, including the fact that many of the great cities of the Western world are increasingly made of a mosaic of cultures.

Diversity as a strength is a meme propagated by academics and intellectuals to justify the mass immigration tht happened during the 60s and 70s after the fact.

The left embraced it as a potential pool of captive voters that could be easily bought with a few gibsmedats.

There is no inherent value in diversity, immigration is not even cheap labor as much as it is subsidized labor. It only benefited a few businesses at the expense of everyone else. To this day, we're still paying for the consequence of allowing shit-tier unskilled laborers and their families to settle down here with no end in sight.

Diversity is like paint, too much into the mix and it turns into a useless, shit color.

The only problem I have with infographs like this is that they highlight the Jewish owned companies. I know they are majority, but surely there are ones owned by white Christians or atheists as well, right?
Showing only one side of your argument in infograph devalues it among normal people. Unless them viewing this wasn't the intention at all, and this was just meant for Sup Forums. But it'd be way more effective to have sample of companies, then explain that while Jews are only small percent of American population, they own most of the companies.

...

Diversity is like ice cream, if you add 1 bucket of shit to 100 buckets of ice cream, you get 101 buckets of shit.

The theory is that Diversity of ideas strengthens the whole, which is true

The theory is NOT that putting Europeans, Indians, Arabs, Africans and Asians all in the same society means the society will be stronger for it.

People have traded ideas and goods for thousands of years before "globalisation" and "multiculturalism" demanded we all live under the same roof (the white persons roof)

This pretty much

You can mix lots of different soft drinks together and the end product will still end up tasting good, likely better (Mix Lemonade, Fanta and Creaming Soda together, it tastes great).

Add some coffee into the mix and It'll be shit no matter what combination of soft drink and coffee you make.

It comes from the fact that diversity is important to robustness and fitness.

If a virus spreads that kills only people with a certain genetic makeup, and we've all encouraged that genetic makeup for a generation, that group of people is at extreme risk of being killed off. So in order for humanity to survive, it has to be diverse.

Obviously there are caveats but if you consider everything in terms of market forces, having options is preferable to having none.

In social circumstances, a genuine argument is that diversity allows people of a similar belief to gain support and deflect attacks based on specifics.

We need muslims to whistle blow other muslims in order to have any progress. So we need muslims that believe in American ideals and recognize there's a fire in their kitchen.

It's easier for a message to carry if the person sending it is similar to the person recieving it.

Its because they are powerhouses that they became diverse, not the other way around.

>Is there any real evidence to support this?

Because Irish or Italians were concidered subhuman but integrated into America just fine in the long run, people now think that the difference between an English and an Irish is as negligeable as the one between a Japanese and an Australian Abo

>The theory is that Diversity of ideas strengthens the whole, which is true

You could argue the diversity of ideas helps with creative thinking. A team of people with the exact same background and trainign is less likely to come up with new ideas than a diverse one, but too much diversity hinders communication. It can be useful in some situation but isn't a strength by any means.

Multiculturalism doesn't provide diversity, people fucked up when they ended up equating the two.

It's that success that attracts immigrants. If diversity=strength we would be a powerhouse.

diversity in skills is a strenght in the market
that truth is perverted as if everyone is valuable no matter what are their personal values nor their market value
it's a modern faith

Empirial diversity is good, in that you have differing groups of people working towards a common goal. But importing ten million illerate disease ridden shits is not that

Debunked.

See

...

...

...

Doesn't really matter who owns them.
All these companies produce mostly cancer

...

>Doesn't really matter who owns them.

It does for the correcting stormfag disinfo.

Fucking black cunts

>It does for the correcting stormfag disinfo.
Who gives a fuck about stormfags, dude?
They can produce data all they want, does it matter? Your typical blue pilled faggot will never wrap up his head around the idea that he's being fucked by a juden anyway

biology
the more diverse the gene pool the higher are the chances that some individuals carry variants of gene which could be useful under certain circumstances

If you like somebody by his/her smell, it means you are different concerning the genes of your immune system. if you combine, you child will be in advantage. if you do not like somebody, you shouldn't mate, because you are to similar.

race is still not a thing in human studies (except in the USA). You do not determine a species or race based on his appearance, but on it genes. If you do that, you would find lots of African races, while Asians, Europeans, Americans and Australians (except natives) would make one or two "races", because they have the same origin and a small gene pool.

>Who gives a fuck about stormfags, dude?

Sup Forums, as you can see by posters who post disinfo and posters who agree with this disinfo.

it comes from the fact that breeding with different members of the same species makes the offspring stronger, due to a mix of both parents passing down positive traits and eventually weeding out bad or useless traits over generations. jews misconstrued this and thought it meant that mixing races was a good thing.

so what's your argument? that women should be excluded from the workforce? bringing them in increased gdp and productivity tremendously

Based Sean Last

There are almost ten times as many single mothers as there are single fathers, yet we are to believe that single mothers are responsible when 39% of inmates grew up with single mothers and 4% with single fathers. Weak attempt.

This is why praise for diversity is ALWAYS vague and full of meaningless buzzwords
"Opportunities"
"Perspectives"
"Horizons"

as in all things, there is a balance.

>This scenario seems to fit perfectly with a now not-so-secret plan of the New World Order known as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan for the most anti-human and anti-Christian elite schemes in history: The ‘painless’ but systematic genocide of the native peoples of Europe.

>This plan was devised – or at lleast set in motion – by an Austrian diplomat and Freemason named Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894- 1972). The Kalergi family roots can be traced back to Byzantine royalty via Venetian aristocracy. Coudenhove-Kalergi was actually the first proponent of a unified Europe back in the 1920s and for this reason Coudenhove-Kalergi is recognised as the founder of the hugely influential movement for a United Europe.

>The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan becomes evident in 1925 when he writes approvingly in Practical Idealism (Praktischer Idealismus): “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

>Coudenhove-Kalergi’s plan for the total destruction of Christian Europe had two pincers. The first – the destruction of the nation-state through the creation of a single European central government – has been pushed forward quite openly, and is well-known and -understood by opponents. The second – the destruction through mass immigration and the promotion of integration and interbreeding – has clearly been promoted just as vigorously by the same elite groups, but as it fits within the United Nations definition of genocide (and is therefore a crime under international law) it is has done under cover.

but that can only be believed by a stupid fuck with no understanding of biology.

do you know when they say "there is no race", what they mean by it?

the reason they say that is the fact that the % of genetic variation is bigger between you and you white neighbor than between you and some African. That's why they say there is no race.

So, essentially no.

Asian people don`t even look anywhere near yellow.

Japs and Koreans are whiter than white people.

Thats not "debunking" anything. Like the user pointed out Your talking about a sliver of the population. It also doesn't go into the makeup of those hired under these companies. "Owner" isn't the whole story. They can't physically do everything in these companies and you don't think it's odd that they just happened to employ from the tiny pool of their own ethnic group. Rupert Murdoch, for which you attribute much of the green, is questionable and moves in those circles anyway. Its about cliques and control.
Its you that are bending the facts to fit what you want to see.
It is evident from mere observation the "Jewish" influence in American Media.

it comes from your ass

>The two pincers are complimentary: It’s one thing to destroy the nation-states of Europe and replace them with a European super-state, but as long as the peoples who created them remain, there is always the possibility of popular revolt and the overthrow of the new imperium. Once the peoples themselves, however, have been destroyed through a mixture of mass immigration, birth control and abortion, and artificially promoted miscegenation, then the ‘danger’ of a nationalist and traditionalist counter-revolution is gone forever. The mixed and rootless herd of human cattle thus produced can them be ruled over forever by the elite identified by Coudenhove-Kalergi as the proper masters.

>It was Coudenhove-Kalergi who suggested Beethoven’s hymn as the EU’s national anthem and he was very active in connection with the design of the EU logo which seems to show the influences of both freemasonry and Catholicism. He was initiated in Freemasonry in the Humanitas Lodge in Vienna in the early 1920s but left in 1926 to avoid the heavy criticism which occurred as a result of the relationship between the Pan-European movement and Freemasonry. Some say later, in 1947, he founded the powerful Ur-Lodge Pan-Europa, that is still active to this day and draws members from the political and economic elite.

>Coudenhove-Kalergi’s ground work prepared the EU for what many Christian’s familiar with the prophecies of “The Book of Revelation” perceive as “The New Holy Roman Empire.”
The socialist elite of Europe born out of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s plan have created a United Europe under a centralised government, a system that actually will be the prototype for the US and the rest of the world when the New World Order is finalised.

the math that matters is only thus: one white person plus one other person(not white) does not a white person make. What have ye made, and where does it fit.

This is deep...

Pandering
That's all it is, straight up pandering
The sad part is minorities are actually quite oppressed but not by the people they think they're oppressed by, it's the exploitative left that grooms them from an early age to be in a cycle of fear and demise just so they can vote for candidates who essentially extort them with promises of improvements against a for they don't have

>that there's significant inherent differences between people primarily due to different racial traits is for all intensive purposes the definition of racism
that's absolutely true though
there's nothing wrong with admitting that

There needs to be similarities in values and/or a similar cause to stand for. Otherwise there is no strength, only weakness.

that is the point, this particular infograph accurately highlights all the major media companies in America

This.

Basically, Jews want to destroy all cultures and ethnicities (other than their own) to defeat the human tribal instinct and end all conflict and unify the world (and their shekels). It's not even a secret, George Soros actually explicitly states that is his goal.

>Berlin
>powerhouse

dude
berlin leeches BILLIONS of federal aid from germany, paid for by the actual economic powerhouses (bavaria, baden-württemberg)

berlin is literally a welfare leech city that can't stand on its own, and without federal aid it would collapse overnight.

Yup, so what. Job scarcity will be a huge thing. Cutting that pressure by half would be a positive in many ways. PURELY on the GDP issue. GDP means nothing when you have to pay twice as much for housing etc. Shame it has gone this far.

#10 didn't the Ethiopians invent a written language?

The English thought that because they were able to live in a Union with the French and Italians, so obviously they can live with Muslims from the East.

The problem is when "multiculturalism" and "diversity" turned into "the whites take care of and provide everything for free for the non-whites" and assimilation became "racist".

> to defeat the human tribal instinct
Nah, As a minority they want to play divide and conquer against their host, to avoid backlash like in WW2. This is why the talk big about that utopia but push for a concept like "multiculturalism" with its community demagogues wanting more power under them and lobbying for their tribe. Its conflict not peace they want.
Close proximity. Separate people.

NYC + London only generate money by being their country's respective financial centers.
In Germany you'll need to compare it to Frankfurt.

There's absolutely no connection to diversity though, at least as long as you don't take diversity of stocks into account obvs.

>bringing them in increased gdp and productivity tremendously

No, it didn't. Men and men's inventions increased productivity.

gotta get this out of the way first. im mostly being facetious here.
> genetic variation is bigger between you and you white neighbor than between you and some African

a source on that? i have a sneaking suspicion that the genetic difference between blacks and whites are somehow more substantial than between 2 whites.

>Rupert Murdoch, for which you attribute much of the green, is questionable

No, he isn't.

>It is evident from mere observation

No, it isn't.

Diversity - noun - the practice of importing hostile brown people who want to destroy your own first world culture and replace it with their 7th century death cult.

I think this is more of a "mind=blown" phrase stemming from the possibility that the genetic variation among two whites CAN be larger than between one white and one black.

It's highly doubtful there is any research done to the mean difference since racist research, especially at scale, is pretty much banned throughout the western world.
You do not need to explain away what nobody knows for sure.

why not exclude men from the workforce and let women do everything then? in fact, why not cull 99% of men and just keep the smartest, strongest, most attractive to populate the human race? it would be the definition of a male centered utopia, and an ecological one as well since population would be cut in half instantly

By "there is no race" they only compare genes, and not allelic frequencies, which are the basis of race.

Essentially SJWs use a very outdated definition.

the % of genetic variation. Go to the American Anthropology website and read about studies involved, but that's the whole reason behind "race not real" is what I'm saying

just biology
thats what happens when you draw social conclusions from nature

both the left and right should know this, since we had had big sucsess in the past

no, I think they just look at overall variation rather than ascribing meaning where there is none.

It also killed our birth rates to the point where we have to import third worlders just to keep our population numbers constant

total utter bullshit don't repeat it again you idiot. for so many reasons on top of existence of the female Mitochondrial DNA you are an idiot

>so what's your argument? that women should be excluded from the workforce?

That would be a very good start.

Wow she got fake tits

Dropped

This.

Allowing women to participate means the death of a society. Women are sex objects and house subjects and not much more.

youtube.com/watch?v=WsCSAEdxXMc

>overpopulation is a problem

>lets have more kids because the brown people are doing it too!

classic

Dude, fuck off with your Putin shilling.

Putin is a Jew. He is literally a Jew.

uneducated goober...

>americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583

your argument rests on the assumption that all of the progress of the last half century, all the growth would have happened anyway if all women stayed home rather than joined the workforce. your evidence is a skeleton with a sickle.

it's dubious chummer, it's dubious

Diversity is strength, yet we must have a mixture of the same quality. I would hate to eat the same thing every day, but that doesn't mean I want to have shit as part of my diet.

Now that I think about it, the only things that are diverse are our pets.

>youtube.com/watch?v=WsCSAEdxXMc

So you say the reason why diversity is strength is that diversity is strength?

Sound reasoning..

It seems like all jews are under the same ideology. Where are they taught this? Is it passed down through the Jewish gene pool or something?

>Feel the strength

Which is why Singapore runs so well.