I'm just on my way to the beach

I'm just on my way to the beach

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/S718f6v6F2Q
youtube.com/watch?v=cEAOabj963I
youtube.com/watch?v=pnMuN8NaKHE
youtube.com/watch?v=cstEn_Phvi8
youtube.com/watch?v=pWawqTfa3vU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

did they ever release the fedora guy footage from the new season?

Still gets me to this day. Press F to pay respects to an innocent man.

>So you met this girl online?
>Yes, is that a crime? Lots of people meet each other online.
>How old did she says she was?
>18
>She said she was 13.
>What, no way.
>I have the transcripts. "Wow, you are only 13? We need to keep this a secret, a young girl like you doesn't come around often"
>I was just going to the beach!


dude, was framed. Would hate if that would happen to me desu

not even the beach is safe

Kino

>I was just going to the beach!
How did this strike him as a good excuse? Did he think the beach was in that girl's house?

True.

Michael: "Hello."
Jolanda (off screen): "I baked some cookies, they're on the table."
Chris (voice over): "He's Michael Willis, screenname 'genericwhitemale.' He's almost 50 years old, and he's been chatting online with a girl who calls herself, 'Jolanda,' and who says she's 15."
Chris: "Hungry?"
Michael (while eating cookie): *nods*
Chris: "How's it taste?"
Michael: "Great! Wow, these are home baked?"
Chris: "Do you want time to finish your cookie, or..."
Michael: "Umm. Not really."
Chris: "Okay, so you're good if I ask you a couple questions?"
Michael: "I'm just on my way to the beach."
Chris (voiceover): "Then I remind 'genericwhitemale' that Jolanda told him she was 15."
Chris: "You didn't know?"
Michael: "What!? No way."
Chris: "You know, I have the transcript of your conversation with Jolanda."
Chris (voiceover, as Michael): "We'd have to keep us a secret because of the age difference. Younger girls like you don't come along often. I'd want you again and again."
Chris (voiceover): "Then he sends an online picture of his penis."
Michael (flashback): "No way."
Michael: "You know what, I don't want this cookie. I just want to get to the beach."
Chris: "Come here. Sir!"
Chris (voiceover): "But 'genericwhitemale' won't be going to the beach today."
Police: "Get on the ground!"
Chris (voiceover): "The police quickly take him down to the ground."

...

I think we're all just trying to get to the beach, but sometimes life has other plans for us.

someone post the webm of him tripping on the steps

Whatre you so pumped about?

Better version:

Michael: "Hello."
Jolanda (off screen): "I baked some cookies, they're on the table."
Michael: *comes into the kitchen, sits down, and starts eating a cookie*
Chris: "Hungry?"
Michael (while eating cookie): *nods*
Chris: "How's it taste?"
Michael: "Great! Wow, these are home baked?"
Chris: "Do you want time to finish your cookie, or..."
Michael: "Umm. Not really."
Chris: "Okay, so you're good if I ask you a couple questions?"
Chris: "What are you doing here today?"
Michael: "Is this some kind of set up or something? I'm just on my way to the beach."
Chris (voice over): "He's Michael Willis, screenname 'genericwhitemale.' He's almost 50 years old, and he's been chatting online with a girl who calls herself, 'Jolanda,' and who says she's 15. He lies to her about his age, typing, 'I'm 30. You probably don't want me around you. I'm cute though. Built good.' Then he says, 'We'd have to keep us a secret because of the age difference. Younger girls like you don't come along often. I'd want you again and again.' Then he sends an online picture of his penis to the girl who told him she was 15."
Chris: "And how did you meet her?"
Michael: "Well, of course online."
Chris: "You act like I should know that."
Michael: "Well, yeah. I mean, it's a common thing now."
Chris: "Just to meet young girls online?"
Michael: "Well, meet any women online."
Chris (voiceover): "Then I remind 'genericwhitemale' that Jolanda told him she was 15."
Chris: "You didn't know?"
Michael: "What!? No way."
Chris: "You know, I have the transcript of your conversation with Jolanda."
Michael: "You know what, I don't want this cookie. I just want to get to the beach."
Chris: "Come here. One second. Sir!"
Chris (voiceover): "But 'genericwhitemale' won't be going to the beach today. As he heads out the back, he stumbles off the porch, right into the arms of the Ft. Myers police department."

1:35 in:
youtu.be/S718f6v6F2Q

He saw an open door, called out hello to check that everything was okay, and heard an invitation to come eat some cookies. He decided to grab one on the way to the beach. It just so happened that he had previously interacted with the girl online.

I would be okay if these guys were strung up and killed, yet every time I watch this show I find my self rooting for them to find some sort of lie/excuse that will get them out of it. Like it's a game show.

The transcript ruins it every time.

What charges could they reasonably be convicted of? Their intent doesn't matter because they didn't actually break the law. They were chatting with adults the whole time. And it's usually supposed to be a 15 year old. Most of the world allows marriage at 15. The whole show smells fishy.

Is he the only one who got away with it? How did he do it?

>You know what, I don't want this cookie

Because he did nothing wrong

...

kekaroo

Only him and three other people ever beat the charges

youtube.com/watch?v=cEAOabj963I

Depending on the state statute, they could be charged with attempt offenses, given they were trying to commit a crime. The only reason they didn't succeed was because of the decoys, which the perps were not originally aware of.

Dateline did get some heat from certain media outlets claiming that the perps were entrapped, but I think entrapment is too heavy-handed for what was occurring here.

is this guy at the end Sup Forums incarnate?

Thought crime

>tfw Lorne's internet access got taken away
>tfw he won't do any more cooking videos

On one hand, most of these people are absolute scumbags who would happily fuck children. On the other, some of them are just attracted to girls who are legal in most of the world. The show doesn't really differentiate between the two, and some of their tactics do border on entrapment.

Why do so many talk to police without a lawyer present???

this was one of the photos used to lure predators

Where are these chat rooms that these guys use? Do they still exist? I want to meet some friends

There is no crime in going to the beach

This. Especially considering how receptive the decoys are. If a 15 year old were really this eager to meet up with people for sex, she'd propably be mature enough for it.

...

how has chris hanson not been shot dead on the set? it's gotta be all fake

...

tfw I'm getting a little too pushy

That one Rabbi tried to attack him. They have security with them.

he always comes out alone though with his clipboard... it would be so easy to take him out

Still, if they know they are going for life (like that guy that did 10 years for molesting before), it is suspicious that none of them decided to waste Hansseeen just for the fun the of it. Doesn't make sense. I thought America was all about guns.

kek that last one

lmao the kike
>YOU HAVE NO RIGHT GOY

Pedophiles probably aren't the most courageous people in the world

...

4 words

who /cleanest-best-pleasure/ here?

...

How the hell did those guys avoid a guilty verdict?

Most prosecution uses mens rea ,the mentality to commit a crime, and actus rea, the act of commiting a crime, to prosecute people. This show makes it hard to convince a court that the actus rea has taken place since no actual sex was had. That is why they tend to have lighter sentences because the most they tend to get them for is solicitation of a minor for sex versus the act of rape of a minor.

I JUST WHACKED MY TOE ON THE BANISTER AND I'M GOING TO GET SHOT IF I BLEED ON THE RUG

>what was your plan here
>"NO PLAN WHATSOEVER"

>t. booty warrior

youtube.com/watch?v=pnMuN8NaKHE
youtube.com/watch?v=pnMuN8NaKHE

Literally entrapment.

>all getting 5-12 years
>that one guy gets SEVENTY FIVE YEARS

>wins appeal
>gets sentence reduced
>to FIFTY years

kek that thomas moffitt guy is pretty smart all things considered

I think that was Jean-Pierre right? As far as I know it's because it was his third strike.

i almost feel bad for some of these shlubs

>44 years old
>dead end marriage
>no one has shown attraction to you in decades
>don't understand technology at all
>all of a sudden some girl online is going out of her way to flirt with you
>want to believe someone might actually be interested in you

The funny thing is that 90%+ of men from the past centuries up to prehistory would get caught if they time traveled to today and chatted online with the teenage (not little kids) decoys.

>entrapping some guy who probably goes to sex.com for porn

bravo dateline for getting these scum off the streets

Underrated.

youtube.com/watch?v=cstEn_Phvi8

what did they mean by this

You can see the life draining out of his eyes once Chris starts reading the chat. All cause that 22-year old bitch Adrianna set him up

>what's your name
>"22"

someone tell George Costanza

Entrapment requires more than deception, though. The government agent has to induce the crime and the perpetrator must not have been predisposed to commit the crime.

Those men were already in the chat rooms, and from what I could tell, the decoys made their "age" known early on, after which point the perps chose to keep talking to the decoys. It's questionable, but I think arguing inducement under those circumstances is a tough sell to any judge.

...

The level of interest the decoys usually show in them is also unbelievably low

...

>If a 15 year old were really this eager to meet up with people for sex, she'd propably be mature enough for it.

Yeah...that's not how it works m8, they're still a minor.

>why don't you have a seat right on that stool there?

Why did Chris go with such a bad catchphrase?

Yeah... to secure a conviction for criminal sexual conduct/related offenses involving minors, the state need not demonstrate that the minor was in fact "too immature" to handle sexual activity/communication. As soon as the victim's age is admitted into court, nothing else about the victim need be proven up.

How did he not see the camera?

Does the church of cawd still phone him up to laugh at him?

Liberals are the ones pushing pedophilia right now.

Hansen vs Predator was fucking garbage

>their intent doesn't matter
that's where you're legally wrong, which is the best kind of wrong.

entrapment specifically involves law enforcement. dateline is a private enterprise.

why don't they do To Catch A Predator but with the hollywood casting couch?

Every time I see that creep, for a second I swear it's Jello Biafra

what bothers me the most is he doesn't say 'my mommy, daddy, and I'

nah dog, you just stepped in some legal shit.

the crimes the contestants trip is committed before they're invited to the house. There is no "intent" to said crimes.

Dateline often coordinated with law enforcement officers to execute their operations. I don't know what the case law says about who specifically must make contact with the defendant for an entrapment defense to apply (it probably differs by jurisdiction), but it isn't a stretch to argue that law enforcement was involved, as they were on the scene to coordinate and make arrests.

Some legal practitioners and experts have argued that Dateline entrapped the perps, and to make that argument the threshold question of "was law enforcement involved?" has to be answered in the affirmative.

>"On second thought I don't really want this cookie"

Cute tho. Built good.

>Rabbi gets 6 and a half years

GET OWNED KIKE

their crime has multiple components, the solicitation, and then the attempt to go to the minors house to 'see what happens'. both components involve intent.

they were involved legally the same way law enforcement is involved when i find my car is stolen and call the cops. how the situation is planned out doesn't matter as long as perverted justice is the ones pulling the strings.

...

i have never seen this show but i love that guys expression. also i love the bebe version.

They dodge entrapment by ensuring the contestants have already committed a crime before putting them on camera. Getting to the house is irrelevant to all criminal charges beyond gathering evidence.

You're wrong. There is only one component to the crimes they'll actually charge people with. The chat logs. They aren't being charged for going to the house, entering the house, or anything that's actually on camera.

post the edited reaction of the guy with the seinfield music

I think what he meant was going to the house shows intent, and they were not being charged of going into the house.

youtube.com/watch?v=pWawqTfa3vU

This retarded cripple literally talks himself into 8 years of prison with the officer. Kino interview.

I read that he showed up in a wheel chair the day of his court date, probably to try and get some sympathy from the judge. This dude had mounds of CP at his house and admitted to it and gave the A-OK to the cops to confiscate it. He thought "being honest" would help him get out of it. What a faggot.

If they did not I think we may have been scammed or even worse, trolled

DMAC

again, the crimes they're charging people with have nothing to do with intent and don't require any proof or indication of intent.

I don't think that's quite accurate: the police aren't arranging for your vehicle to get stolen by a perpetrator to whom they've told that the door is unlocked and the keys are in the ignition. Police were in on the sting operation, in my opinion, to a degree that it is feasible to argue that the Perverted Justice agents were "agent provocateurs."

Going to the house following the incriminating chat is usually evidence of intent (barring some freak coincidence), even if it isn't needed to meet the statutory elements of the crime.

...

This Lionel guy is a fucking moron

>again, the crimes they're charging people with have nothing to do with intent and don't require any proof or indication of intent.
I did not read every single conviction but I'm pretty sure some required intent.
If the statute they were charged of violating does not require intent, making them show up is most likely just there (aside for TV lulz) to help build a case against the defendant, specifically identity. That's why they ask them (at least on the new show) to bring specific things to tie them to the chats.

I can't fucking believe the extremely creepy guy with the gelled blonde hair who asks "Mmmmm are you the only child?" got off with nothing.

Pretty sure Church of Cawd dissolved a few months ago.

Temple of TCAP is still up and really active though.

why are you always in these threads with this? none of us are lawmakers, who are you trying to convince? we just want to laugh at people who stupidly show up to a house of a girl they met online