What is exactly wrong with Women's liberation?

I thought Sup Forums was Libertarian?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/jEUXxLlVKLw
youtube.com/watch?v=VTBPPc-IexI
instagram.com/iamiskra/?hl=en
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Women are stupid and unfit to make their own decisions by any objective measure. Only the craziest anclaps would consider letting children run feral, and women are still mentally children.

Consider the categorical imperative.

Does "women's liberation" make for a stronger family unit?

>just a few
we are nationalists, not lolbertarians

sage

They vote for Nanny state.

hmmm

not to mention the warts between your legs, honey

Do women want to be looked at like sluts for the rest of their lives??

Sup Forums likes freedom but the hivemind has slowly come to realize that people are not equal. Some are not fit to handle the responsibility of freedom or of the vote. This includes nearly all women - and most men, too, so don't get your panties in a twist.

It's not 2007 anymore, nobody cares about lolbergtarianism anymore.

Isn't the point of Libertarianism that people have to deal with the consequences of their actions? If so, then what is the issue with Women's liberation IF they are held accountable?

It's not enough they have to ruin their own lives.
They seek to ruin everyone elses as well.

...

Lol, that's pretty pathetic fãm

>that guy who responds to the entire thread to get (You)s

well it worked, congrats

>Sup Forums gives non-whites shit for treating their women badly
>yet they personally see women as objects rather than people and want them to have curtailed rights compared to men

Why do women need liberation from in current year?

Womens liberation is payed by men's taxes, if not nothing is wrong with it and I'm sure many people would cheer them and want to see them as responsible people.

Degeneracy.

It didn't.

We posted credible info to the contrary. The thread is gonna slide in 5 minutes and the faggot is gonna leave.

I don't know if Sup Forums is libertarian, but libertarianism is not libertinism.

A libertarian would say "people should have the right to use drugs without being arrested". This doesn't mean that he believes people should use drugs.

The same is true for promiscuity.

Libertarianism doesn't mean moral nihilism or that "as long as it doesn't harms others it is OK to do it".

Fuck off with your garbage slide thread.
Sup Forums is the board of peace.
We aren't one person.
We are rebels. Communists, anarchists, nationalists, socialist.
Dystopian truth seekers.
One thing for sure, we don't agree on anything.

Quit trying to put us in a box OP. We will never fit.
Sage all slide threads

It's not about seeing women as objects, it's about seeing them for what they generally are; self centred and shallow people, unable to think truly objectively. Women want to fit in more than they want to do what serves the greater good.

The only power women have historically had over men is; sex and the knowledge that if they whine and moan enough, men will say 'fine, fuck it just do what you want'. Women's Liberation is just the latter taken to the extreme.

kill yourself, this board largely believes in social Liberty

the problem is they dont. have you ever heard of a woman in real life actually going out to fix a problem they had that didnt put someone else on the streets [read: alimony, divorce settlements, getting people fired for nothing, false rape accusations the list goes on forever]. no, instead they shift the blame on to other people, expect them to take all the responsoblity, and let the woman cry because doing nothing was 'such a burden/really scary/"i feared for my life (over spilt milk)/didnt feel loved'.

if the last 9 years has shown me anything, its that women do not want a libertarian society, they do not WANT freedom. they want to be protected, coddled, and lied to because their feelings will get hurt.

youtu.be/jEUXxLlVKLw
watch this video with an objective mindset and you'll see why.

As long as women have the right to vote, libertarians will never get close to presidency or be in a position of political power and influence.

Too much ass.

Thanks, Mr Berlosconi.

i just
I could care less. I am sorry to be the baron of bad news, but you seem buttered, so allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false mortality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-madonnas, but you seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. so I ask you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything but the kids Nysnc, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back to into reality, because it's now like the pot calling the kettle cracked. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.

Irregardless, make my words, when you get down you brass stacks it doesn't take a rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts, instead of baking a half bread effort. You might have to come to this conclusion though denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it's a peach of cake. Except the fax. Irregardlessly, I guess it was inevadible....

fuck off Guido

very good point actually

>wrong

lol
subjective hon

WEW

No seriously why you guys are into fat women.

Listen to the wise man speak:
youtube.com/watch?v=VTBPPc-IexI

OP is a shill?! WHAT
I NEVER EXPECTED THIS
REEEEEEEEEE

im not into fat women
i wouldnt want to be seen out in public with one
but that bitch gets my dick so fucking hard
its so visually stimulating to see curves like that
and that belly is just so... hnnng, i just want to blow raspberries on it and then unleash my evil seed all over it.

how can i keep a fat fuck toy in my basement?

In America women can have jobs and pay taxes. You could va r googled that you mentally deficient shit stain

>Sup Forums is a board of infantile rage
FTFY

This user gets it

Whats up with these thick waist band mans brief style of fucking panties? What the fuck is this shit. Some faggots must have bought into the mens ladies panty genderblender meme.

>pantyjew

Jheeze, sauce on this semen demon op
thanks

instagram.com/iamiskra/?hl=en

you're welcome

Bought into thw pantyjew meme... faggot. Why dont you start putting all your imaginary ladies in mens briefs

jesus christ your post was the most autistic thing ive ever seen, kill yourself edgelord

FPBP

I dont hate the idea that women should vote or be allowed to be financially independant.

I hate the childish cosmo-magazine brand of commercialized selfishness that it was perverted into.

It quit being about equality decades ago, now its just a petty demand for extra privledges and special treatment.

What I hate about women's lib is that it was replaced by feminism, which is basically just commercialized womens lib.

L O W T E S T
O
W

T
E
S
T

>Sup Forums follows a single ideology

Rights without responsibility is not liberation.

Being on Sup Forums doesnt mean anything special and we arent anything except a bunch of mostly white males who got bored and posess an internet connection.

>In America women can have jobs and pay taxes.
Now google who pays the most taxes and who benefits most from those paid taxes.

It is a fake "liberation" because they are being "liberated" from things which keep them secure, safe and healthy. If I liberated you from the use of your legs, it would not be a good sort of liberation. The same is true of feminism. It is a simple linguistic trick in order to convince people that a very bad thing is a very good thing.

Themselves and the tyranny of responsibility.

They vote first and foremost to absolve themselves of accountability

Because they are big children.

You faggot, I am prime example of high test, its not low test to not want your woman to wear these unsexy mens breifs style the pantyjew is pushing. This is miley cyrus/tier style.

Sure, once we destroy the welfare state and get the government out of marriage you can be as liberated as you want, until then you'll be seen as the leech you are if you aren't fighting for those things

I don't care about the clothes, I focus on the body because i am not a faggot

As a woman, not all women are degenerate, but most are. They made themselves into whores and want to accept everyone despite their religion or race, even if that person is raping them and their country.

Womens lib was never a legitimate movement in the first place.

Its purpose was so (((they))) could tax women and so the family unit would be destroyed allowing the education system more time to indoctrinate the young minds compounded with the fact that a diminished family unit destabilizes society. It was 100% subversion start to finish. Not 1 second of its existence was for female rights.

The data doesn't necessarily imply that sexual intercourse is the cause of unhappiness and depression, just that promiscuous women are riskier to marry because of the possibility of mental or behavioral instability.

I think it's probably more intuitive to present the relationship in the opposite way- that the mental instability that causes unhappiness and breakdown of relationships is the same behavior which leads to promiscuity. The idea that individuals who are prone to depression or would have a tendency to act poorly in a relationship or choose poor partners would seem much more likely to those being products of sexual activity.

Bottom line is that hoes were probably damaged goods to begin with.

We also like to laugh at black people chimping out

no woman for the bottom 80% so they don't reproduce or even try to achieve
turns out that bottom 80% holds up society

Women always vote for more government. They are the antithesis to libertarianism.

it doesn't really matter in which way the causal relationship goes - if one intends to find a long-term partner as a man it is best to aim for a virgin

Another thing to consider is religion being the cause of both virginity and marriage success.

Women desire polygamy which says fuck you to the monogamous family unit as a result they destroy the family unit in favor of primal sexual pleasure. Women are also terrible judgers of reproductive potential(in this century) as their instincts tell them to still breed with stupid savages(bad boys) to have strong offspring, they find gentleness and kindness completely unnerving an disgusting in men in otherwords the only way to please them is the treat them like complete shit and dont give the ability to do anything. Dont allow them to choose their mates force them to become your mate thats actually what they really want a savage that rapes them then leaves them to raise his spawn and die.

To too many, liberation of one group (the "oppressed") means turning against the "oppressors".

This is a great argument for women's equality, it would be fucking terrible if each family still had like 5 children.

>it is best to aim for a virgin
The problem being that once you arrive at your mid-twenties this is virtually impossible, especially among the non-religious, especially if you've participated in sexual activity yourself.

I'm in a long term relationship with a Catholic girl now, but I know better than to inquire about her sexual history. There's simply no good that can come of that conversation. I'm by no means a virgin myself, either, though I would presume that my number of partners is probably lower than hers.

It's really tough.

They stopped sucking dick. Next question.

I have this idea... That when I am ready to find a marriage partner, I will inquire and find out 1. if she is a virgin. 2. how high her IQ is 3. religious/etc. Before I do that I will have no intention of fucking her.
So the good that will come out of me finding out her history is I can get rid of her and move on.

or marry and have childrens

The only thing it liberated was their dignity.

So we're based paleolibertarians right?

No. Women want to be sluts but ban society (i.e. Chad) from judging them as such.

>/robot/
REEEEEEEEEEEE

Naw, I'm a bengali who hates kebabs because I was raised by kebabs. Muslims are cancer.

>to fight the kebab you must know the kebab, be raised by the kebab, become the kebab

THICC
H
I
C
C

I think you'll be sorely disappointed. A happy relationship is based to some degree upon emotion and personal chemistry that can't be quantified with statistics. I think mutual trust and believing that the other person wants to be with you alone and will work for the good of your relationship are the keys to staying together long term, especially in an environment where people get into marriages for selfish reasons and get out of them for even more selfish reasons.

Finding a woman who doesn't have illusions about what she wants is very rare (the same can be said for men).

REDPILL ME ON X
>REDPILL ME ON X
REDPILL ME ON X
>REDPILL ME ON X
REDPILL ME ON X
>REDPILL ME ON X
REDPILL ME ON X
>REDPILL ME ON X
REDPILL ME ON X
>REDPILL ME ON X

read the fucking sticky, this is fucking cancer, you cretin

"Chemistry" and "attraction", etc, I don't put on a list because they ought to be pretty obvious.

why do you assume I dont take those things in to account?

I just supposed you don't because you didn't mention them, my mistake.

Good luck to you in your romantic ventures. You'll need it.

Get off TRP. What's a "bad boy" to you just a guy that does what he wants. "Nice guys" on the other hand aren't doing what they want, they're doing what they think women want. Nobody likes a fake person. This is why people in general are disgusted by so called nice guys, they aren't being real to what they want.

>"Nice guys" on the other hand aren't doing what they want
There's nothing about following social norms that that implies a lack of agency, especially among adolescents. The illusion of agency is created when someone goes against social norms in adolescents because the only decisions that can possibly be made are 1) participation 2) non-participation.

The irony that adolescent non-patricipation has a tendency to cause a lack of agency in later life among both genders is one of the biggest indicators that instinctual preference for mates in women no longer causes them to make beneficial choices in civil society and ought to be suppressed by societal behavior.

>adolescents
adolescence* fuck me

user plz stop confusing guys pulling on a front for nice guys, also nice guys dont act nice for the pussy THEY JUST ARE NICE GUYS. Women are the most two faced pieces of this planet and they can talk shit about fake people they casually talk shit out their own friends like they are accessories.

Women want a big tough bad boy who fucks her like a slut but then they also want this over-muscled anti social reject to transform into a touchy feely listener who is the paragon of empathy and treats her like a chivalrous knight would a princess.

In other words they want every disney and rom-com they have ever watched to be condensed into one guy.

They expect unrealistic demands to be met and when they all arent they flake out and begin moaning and wailing that the relationship is a failure and that you can only prove you care about her by changing to be all these impossible things.

I had one girl leave me literally because I didnt magically know what she wanted and provide it without being asked.

Being provided what she wanted wasnt even good enough for that bitch, she literally thought having to ask was beneath her and thought that if a man really actually cared he would magically just make whatever it was happen with zero prompting.

Women dont want a man they want a pet.

This might be true for the majority of women, but what about the minority who are able to think rationally? Shouldn't there be avenues to allow those women to become successful while leaving the sheepish women behind?

There is nothing wrong with women's liberation. Insofar as feminism has become shit (and it has) it is because it has ceased to be an emancipatory movement, instead acting in practice as an authoritarian one.

Women have been liberated in the US for several decades now.

The only movements trying to roll it back are pro-islam liberals who support gender-based suppression and 3rd wave feminists who support gender-based affirmative action.

>Sup Forums still falls for this shit
it's just canuck and american shitposting

Ok buddy

Its kinda like the gay rights or black rights thing.

They made so much money for so many years off of activism, and then they get granted the rights they want.

So what, those civil rights lawyers and multi-million "non-profit" organizations are going to just pack up and go home satisfied that they got what they want?

Fuck no! Theyd be out of a job, so the gays are suddenly butthurt because they dont have thier own bathrooms, the blacks are pissed that crime is still a dangerous profession, and the feminazis are cooter-blasted that people still use masuline oriented language. Because it keeps the donations flowing, and their lobbyists and high powered lawyers still have jobs that pay great while requiring no real work.

They just gotta stir social media every now and then with some bait, wait for an uproar from the oversensitive millinials, and release a press conference that is basically just more bait.

Theyve created a self sustaining cash cow and they aint letting go any time soon. When gays get thier own bathrooms its gonna be just an absolute TRAVESTY that they dont get special parking places like the disabled......


You get my point. America has created an industry out of victimhood, being a minority is very lucrative if you know the right people and can say the right things.

Contrary to woman hating pol, this is more how I view women. Most women are idiots, but there are outliers. I think we should let them live with their stupidity, and deal with the consequences of their actions. I also think society should be more accepting of women who want to be housewifes, because most women would be happiest if they were.

i must tell r9k about this

>Women's liberation?
What do you mean? Are you talking about equal rights for women? Are you talking about reducing the rights of men to accomplish this? Are you talking about widespread acceptance of promiscuity?

>that's fat

yes, embrace puberty, low test aussie, yes.